Figures
Abstract
Background
Megalin is a large endocytic receptor with relevant functions during development and adult life. It is expressed at the apical surface of several epithelial cell types, including proximal tubule cells (PTCs) in the kidney, where it internalizes apolipoproteins, vitamins and hormones with their corresponding carrier proteins and signaling molecules. Despite the important physiological roles of megalin little is known about the regulation of its expression. By analyzing the human megalin promoter, we found three response elements for the peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR). The objective of this study was to test whether megalin expression is regulated by the PPARs.
Methodology/Principal Findings
Treatment of epithelial cell lines with PPARα or PPARγ ligands increased megalin mRNA and protein expression. The stimulation of megalin mRNA expression was blocked by the addition of specific PPARα or PPARγ antagonists. Furthermore, PPAR bound to three PPAR response elements located in the megalin promoter, as shown by EMSA, and PPARα and its agonist activated a luciferase construct containing a portion of the megalin promoter and the first response element. Accordingly, the activation of PPARα and PPARγ enhanced megalin expression in mouse kidney. As previously observed, high concentrations of bovine serum albumin (BSA) decreased megalin in PTCs in vitro; however, PTCs pretreated with PPARα and PPARγ agonists avoided this BSA-mediated reduction of megalin expression. Finally, we found that megalin expression was significantly inhibited in the PTCs of rats that were injected with BSA to induce tubulointerstitial damage and proteinuria. Treatment of these rats with PPARγ agonists counteracted the reduction in megalin expression and the proteinuria induced by BSA.
Conclusions
PPARα/γ and their agonists positively control megalin expression. This regulation could have an important impact on several megalin-mediated physiological processes and on pathophysiologies such as chronic kidney disease associated with diabetes and hypertension, in which megalin expression is impaired.
Citation: Cabezas F, Lagos J, Céspedes C, Vio CP, Bronfman M, Marzolo M-P (2011) Megalin/LRP2 Expression Is Induced by Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor -Alpha and -Gamma: Implications for PPARs' Roles in Renal Function. PLoS ONE 6(2): e16794. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016794
Editor: Ben Ko, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Received: July 27, 2010; Accepted: January 12, 2011; Published: February 2, 2011
Copyright: © 2011 Cabezas et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work was supported by Grants: Fondecyt (Fondo Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica, CHILE) Grants 1070373 and Proyecto Nucleo Milenio P07/011-F, Fondos del Programa Iniciativa Científica Milenio (ICM) (www.iniciativamilenio.cl) to MPM and 1080590 to CPV (www.fondecyt.cl). PFB 12-2007 to CPV and MB (www.fondecyt.cl). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Megalin/LRP2 is a large membrane glycoprotein that belongs to the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) family, which includes LDLR, LRP8 (apolipoprotein E receptor 2) very low-density lipoprotein receptor, LDLR-related protein 1 (LRP1) and LRP1B [1]. This multiligand endocytic receptor is expressed on the apical membrane of several epithelial cells, including those of the kidney proximal tubule cells (PTCs), lung, thyroid [2], gallbladder [3] and neuroepithelium [4], [5]. The ectodomain of megalin/LRP2 is very large and is responsible for ligand binding. In contrast, the cytoplasmic domain of the receptor is relatively small and contains three NPXY motifs, which have been suggested to regulate its endocytic activities [6]. In addition, the megalin cytoplasmic domain determines the apical localization of the receptor [7] and can be phosphorylated by glycogen synthase kinase 3(GSK3), an event that regulates megalin recycling and cell surface availability [8].
Megalin's functions cover a broad spectrum and include processes that are critical during development [4], [5], [9], [10], [11] and adult life and are impaired in several pathologic conditions that compromise the kidney and the central nervous system [12], [13], [14]. In addition, it has been recently suggested that megalin could have roles in regeneration processes in both peripheral and central nervous systems as well as in kidney [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. One of the best studied systems of megalin function is the proximal tubule, where the receptor is able to recover and internalize several molecules, including complexes of vitamin A, B12 and D, along with their corresponding transporter proteins [21], leptin [22], angiotensin II (and I-VII) [23], [24], insulin [25] and albumin [12].
Megalin expression is compromised in kidney disease associated with diabetes [26], [27] and other conditions, such as aging [28]. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying downregulation of this receptor remain obscure. Additionally, little is known about the transcriptional mechanisms regulating the physiological expression of the megalin gene. Previous studies have indicated a positive regulatory role of cyclic AMP, retinoic acid and vitamins A and D in the expression of megalin in cell culture [29], [30]. Angiotensin II and insulin have also been reported to be involved in the regulation of megalin expression in opossum proximal tubule cells (OK) [31]. Finally, although the mechanism is unclear, high concentrations of albumin significantly reduced the expression of megalin in PTCs in vitro [32].
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are transcription factors belonging to the nuclear receptor superfamily, for which three isoforms (α, β/δ and γ) that are encoded by separate genes have been described [33]. PPARs form active heterodimers with the 9-cis-retinoid X receptor (RXR) and bind to characteristic DNA sequences, the PPAR-responsive elements (PPREs) that are located in the promoters of their target genes [34]. Fatty acids and their oxidized metabolites have been proposed to be natural PPAR ligands [35], [36], [37]. Moreover, synthetic ligands for PPARα and PPARγ such as fibric acid and thiazolidinediones, have positive effects in human diseases, including type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, obesity and insulin resistance [38]. It is also known that PPARs regulate the expression of some LDLR family receptors, with LRP1 expression induced by PPARγ [39] and VLDL-R expression regulated by PPARα [40].
Megalin is highly expressed in a pattern similar to the three PPAR subtypes in the kidney [41], [42] and in PTC lines [43]. In addition, both PPARα and PPARγ agonists have renoprotective actions that are independent of their systemic roles related to metabolic control [38]. A long-term study of human patients with type 2 diabetes showed that treatment with the PPARα agonist fenofibrate significantly reduced albuminuria [44], which could be potentially related to megalin function in the kidney, including its function as an albumin receptor. In addition, the PPARα agonists gemfibrozil and fenofibrate were able to reduce kidney hypertrophy and fibrosis associated with diabetic nephropathy in two different diabetic animal models [45], [46]. Furthermore, the beneficial effect of gemfibrozil on the kidney was shown to be independent of the lipid-lowering effect of the drug [45]. The dual PPARα/γ agonists, JTT-501 [47] and compound 3q [45], are also renoprotective agents in both mouse and rat diabetic models. Moreover, in diabetic patients and diabetic animal models, which exhibit reduced megalin expression [26], [27], it has been shown that several PPARγ agonists decreased albuminuria [45], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52]. It has also been reported that the treatment with the PPARγ agonist pioglitazone increased tubular cell albumin uptake in vitro [43]. However, in these studies, the mechanisms by which the synthetic PPAR agonists reduced the albuminuria and promoted albumin uptake in PTCs were not completely clear and likely involved glomerular as well as tubular effects.
In this study, we tested the hypothesis that megalin expression is regulated by PPARs. We found three consensus PPREs in the human megalin promoter. In addition, we show evidence that PPARα, PPARγ and their corresponding ligands induce megalin expression at the mRNA and/or protein level in cell lines and in the kidney in vivo. Using in vitro PTC models of BSA-induced downregulation of megalin expression, we demonstrate that treatment with either PPARα or PPARγ agonist ameliorates the reduction in megalin expression. This protective effect was also observed when PPARγ agonists were used in vivo. Overall, our findings suggest that PPARs and their agonists could be critical regulators of megalin expression in various pathophysiological conditions, including chronic renal disease.
Results
The presence of PPREs in the megalin promoter and the participation of PPARα and PPARγ, but not PPARβ/δagonists in megalin expression
The analysis of the human megalin promoter sequence (NC_000002.11) using MatInspector revealed the presence of three putative PPREs, located at −696 bp (AGGTCACAGATCTC), −2150 bp (GCTGCTACAGTGAAAGGGCACAC) and −2800 bp (TGGCTTCTGGGGCAATGGT) relative to the transcriptional start site (Fig. 1). This finding prompted us to determine whether megalin expression responds to distinct PPAR agonists in in vivo and in vitro models.
Nucleotide numbering is labeled relative to the transcription start site (nt +1, arrow). Putative PPAR responsive-elements (PPREs) were located by MatInspector (www.genomatix.de).
First, we determined baseline megalin expression levels in LLC-PK1 cells, an epithelial cell line derived from kidney proximal tubule, and in BN cells, a cell line derived from rat yolk sac. The expression of the three PPAR subtypes has previously been documented in kidney [41], [42] and proximal tubule cell lines, including LLC-PK1 cells [53], [54], [55]. Additionally, we confirmed the expression of PPARα, β and γ in BN cells by RT-PCR (Fig. S1). Next, cells were treated with varying concentrations of either WY 14643 (a potent PPARα agonist), GW 610742 (a PPARβ/δ agonist), telmisartan (an angiotensin II type-1 receptor (AT1) blocker that is also a PPARγ modulator [56], [57]) and rosiglitazone (a synthetic agonist for PPARγ). After treatment for 24 h, cells were lysed, and megalin and β-tubulin protein levels were determined by western blot. Treatment with WY 14643 led to a dose-dependent increase in the expression of megalin, which was significant starting at concentrations of 50 µM in both cell lines, and a reduction in expression towards control levels at higher doses of 200 µM (Fig. 2A). In contrast to the effect of the PPARα agonist WY 14643, agonists for PPARβ/δ did not affect megalin expression in either cell line (Fig. 2B). The effect of PPARγ agonists was evaluated using rosiglitazone (Fig. 2C) and telmisartan (Fig. 2D). Both agonists were able to significantly induce the expression of megalin in BN and in LLC-PK1 cells.
(a) BN cells (600,000 cells/well) and LLC-PK1 cells (500,000 cells/well) were treated with different concentrations of the PPARα agonist WY 14643, (b) the PPARβ agonist GW 610742, and the PPARγ agonists (c) rosiglitazone and (d) telmisartan for 24 h in 0.5% FBS in DMEM. Cells were lysed and the expression of megalin and the loading control, β-tubulin, was determined by western blot. The bands in the blots were quantified by densitometry, and the results were plotted as the ratio of megalin/β-tubulin for each condition. Statistically significant differences compared to the control (DMSO) are indicated as *P<0.05, **P<0.01.
Endogenous megalin mRNA expression responses to PPARα and PPARγ agonists and antagonists
We determined if PPARα, PPARγ and their ligands could induce megalin expression at a transcriptional level by qRT-PCR. When LLC-PK1 cells were treated with agonists (100 µM WY 14643 or 1 µM rosiglitazone) for 24 h, megalin mRNA levels were significantly induced. In contrast, when cells were only incubated with an antagonist for either PPARα (GW 6471) or PPARγ (GW 9662), the expression of megalin was significantly reduced compared to the control condition, indicating that an important aspect of the regulation of basal megalin transcription may be mediated by PPARα/γ ligands, such as fatty acids, present in the serum. Interestingly, when cells were pre-incubated with the PPARα and PPARγ antagonists, the effects of the agonists WY 14643 and rosiglitazone were inhibited (Fig. 3A, C). As known PPAR target genes, we determined the expression of Acox and caveolin 1 after stimulation of PPARα and PPARγ, respectively (Fig. 3B, D).The expression of both genes was altered as expected after treatment with the appropriate agonists/antagonists. These results suggest that both PPARα and PPARγ nuclear receptors are involved in the activation of megalin gene transcription.
(a, b) LLC-PK1 cells were treated with 100 µM WY 14643 (PPARα agonist), 10 µM GW 6471 (PPARα antagonist) or both drugs for 24 h. Megalin and Acox mRNA levels were determined by qPCR, and values were normalized to the housekeeping gene actin (n = 4). (c, d) LLC-PK1 cells were exposed to 1 µM rosiglitazone (PPARγ agonist), 10 µM GW 9662 (PPARγ antagonist) or both drugs for 24 h. Megalin and caveolin 1 mRNA levels were detected by qPCR, and values were normalized to the signal from the housekeeping gene actin (n = 4). Results are expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD). Statistically significant differences compared to the control (DMSO, vehicle) are indicated by *P<0.02, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001. Statistically significant differences to the agonist alone are indicated by #P<0.001.
Megalin expression is increased in vivo by treatment with PPARα and PPARγ activators
Because PPARs agonists induced the expression of megalin in cell culture, we evaluated whether these compounds were also able to increase megalin expression in vivo in mice. BALB/c mice were treated with the PPARα ligands ciprofibrate and WY 14643 or the PPARγ ligands rosiglitazone and telmisartan (for details, see Table S3). Activation of PPARα with ciprofibrate significantly induced the expression of megalin in the mouse kidney at the protein level, as measured both by western blot (Fig. 4A, B) and by immunohistochemistry (Fig. 4C, D). In contrast, this treatment did not modify the expression of megalin at the mRNA level (Fig. 4E) although the PPARα activator treatment did effectively alter expression of the target gene Acox (Fig. S2A). Treatment with WY 14643 also upregulated the expression of Acox mRNA (Fig. S2A), but similar to ciprofibrate treatment, was unable to induce megalin expression at the mRNA level (Fig. S2B). However, the expression of megalin protein, as determined by western blot, was significantly increased by WY 14643 (Fig. S2C, D). In contrast, treatment with the PPARγ activator rosiglitazone significantly increased the expression of megalin at both the protein and mRNA levels (Fig. 5A–E). Similar to rosiglitazone, treatment with Telmisartan, a partial PPARγ agonist, resulted in the induction of megalin at protein level in mice (Fig. S3A, B) and in the kidney of rats, as determined by both IHQ (Fig. S3C, D) and qPCR (Fig. 9A).
BALB/c mice (n = 3–5/per group) received ciprofibrate (200 mg/kg/day) or vehicle for 1 week. (a) Kidney extracts were used to determine megalin protein levels by western blot, with β-tubulin used as loading control. (b) The bands in the blots were quantified by densitometry, and the results were plotted as the ratio of megalin/β-tubulin for each condition. (c) Immunohistochemical staining for the megalin cytoplasmic domain in kidney sections (cortex) showed increased staining for megalin in ciprofibrate–treated mice compared to control mice. Bar = 100 µm. (d) The megalin-immunostained area was significantly increased in the ciprofibrate group compared to the control group as measured by morphometric analysis. The quantification of the megalin-stained area is shown as µm2. (e) Megalin mRNA expression was determined from kidney RNA by qPCR. Data are expressed as means ± SD. *P<0.05 vs. control, **P<0.0001 vs. control.
BALB/c mice (n = 4–6/per group) received rosiglitazone (20 mg/kg/day) or vehicle for 10 days. (a) Kidney extracts were used to determine megalin protein levels. β-tubulin was used as loading control. (b) The bands in the blots were quantified by densitometry, and the results were plotted as the ratio of megalin/β-tubulin for each condition. (c) Immunohistochemical staining of megalin in kidney sections (cortex) showing increased immunostaining for megalin in rosiglitazone-treated mice compared to control mice. Renal tissue was immunostained using an antibody that detects the megalin cytoplasmic domain. Bar = 100 µm. (d) The megalin-immunostained area was significantly increased in the rosiglitazone group compared to the control group as measured by morphometric analysis. The graph shows the quantification of the megalin-stained area in µm2. (e) Megalin mRNA levels were determined by qPCR. Data are expressed as means ± SD. *P<0.05 vs. control, **P<0.0001 vs. control.
Activation of a megalin promoter construct containing the putative PPRE, located at -696 bp relative to the transcription initiation, by PPARα and its agonist in a Luciferase/β-galactosidase Reporter Assay
We next investigated whether a luciferase reporter gene construct containing an 800-bp region of the human megalin promoter sequence and the first PPRE was able to respond to PPAR transcription factors and their ligands (Fig. 6A). BN cells expressing the megalin promoter construct were able to induce luciferase expression by 30-fold when coexpressing exogenous PPARα and by nearly 50-fold when they were also incubated with the PPARα agonist, WY 14643 (Fig. 6B). In contrast, overexpression of PPARγ with or without its ligands (rosiglitazone or telmisartan) was unable to induce luciferase expression (Fig. 6C). Similar results were obtained when LLC-PK1 cells were used (data not shown). These results suggest that the first PPRE of the human megalin promoter is targeted by PPARα, but not PPARγ.
(a) Schematic of the construct used to analyze megalin promoter activity. (b) BN cells (6×104 cells) were seeded in 24-well plates in triplicate. The cells were transfected 24 h later with the megalin promoter construct (−800 meg-Luc) and a β-galactosidase vector (pCMVβ). Cotransfections were performed by adding either PPARα or PPARγ cDNAs. After 24 h, the transfected cells were treated with specific agonists for the PPARs and incubated for an additional 24 h prior to assaying the luciferase activity. Cells expressing the megalin promoter construct were able to increase luciferase activity 30-fold when PPARα was overexpressed and nearly 50-fold when in addition to PPARα, cells were treated with 100 µM WY 14643. (c) In contrast, overexpression of PPARγ with or without the corresponding ligands and treatment with rosiglitazone or telmisartan was unable to induce luciferase expression. Data are expressed as means ± SD. *P<0.05 vs. the −800 meg-Luc control.
Binding of PPARα-RXRα and PPARγ-RXRα heterodimers to PPREs identified in the megalin promoter region
We tested the binding ability of the three PPRE consensus sites in the human megalin promoter using electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) reactions (Fig. 1). For the first PPRE, located at −696 to −683, we observed specific binding of a PPARα-RXRα heterodimer. In contrast, we did not find any specific binding for PPARγ because an excess of either the wild-type or the mutant unlabeled oligomers were able to displace the 32P-end-labeled DNA from its binding to the heterodimer (Fig. 7A). These results are in agreement with the promoter activation assays, which indicated that PPARα, but not γ, was able to activate the PPRE present in this promoter region. PPARγ agonists activated megalin expression both in vivo and in vitro; thus, we hypothesized that the other two PPREs at positions – 2800 and -2150 might be able to bind the PPAR-RXRα protein complexes. In accordance with this hypothesis, both PPARα and PPARγ specifically bound to the labeled oligomer that corresponded to the -2150 promoter region (Fig. 7B, C). This binding could be competed away by a 20- to 50-fold increase of the wild-type, but not the mutant, PPRE oligomer. PPARα binding to the -2800 PPRE region was somewhat weak in our experimental conditions but still could be displaced by an excess of the appropriate unlabeled oligomer. However, the binding of PPARγ to this region was clear and specific. We did not detect binding of PPARβ/δ-RXRα heterodimers to any of the sequences analyzed (data not shown), which is in agreement with our data demonstrating that treatment with PPARβ agonist did not increase megalin expression (Fig. 2). Overall, these results indicate that PPARα and PPARγ bind to multiple PPREs in the megalin promoter, which supports our observations of activated megalin expression in the various model systems treated with PPAR agonists.
EMSAs were performed with in vitro translated RXRα plus PPARα or PPARγ using probes for the wild-type (wt) PPREs of the human megalin promoter. The competition analyses were performed with a 20- or 50-fold excess of the wt or mutated probes. (a) −700 bp, (b) −2150 bp and (c) −2800 bp. PPARα bound to all the sites, whereas PPARγ bound specifically to the −2150 and −2800 bp sites.
Megalin expression is reduced by high concentration of albumin: the role of PPARα and PPARγ agonist treatments
Reduced megalin immunoreactivity has been previously described in diabetic rats with albuminuria [26]. In addition, high doses of BSA were associated with a decrease in megalin expression in PTCs in vitro, but the mechanism for this observation was not determined [32]. Based on these studies, we reasoned that the treatment of LLC-PK1 cells with high concentrations of BSA combined with the effect of PPARα and PPARγ agonists on megalin expression would be a good model to initially test for a protective role of these nuclear receptors on megalin expression. We found that megalin expression was significantly reduced in cells that were exposed to BSA concentrations over 10 mg/ml (Fig. 8A), similar to previously published data [32]. When cells were exposed to agonists for PPARα (WY 14643) or PPARγ (rosiglitazone), megalin mRNA levels significantly increased (Fig. 3, Fig. 8B–C). Interestingly, when the cells were treated with PPAR agonists and BSA (10 mg/ml) simultaneously, both agonists were able to significantly counteract the inhibitory effect of BSA on megalin expression.
LLC-PK1 cells were seeded and used 2 days after confluence was reached. Before use in experiments, cells were cultured in medium depleted of serum for 16 h. Each condition was assayed in triplicate. (a) Cells were incubated with different concentrations of BSA for 24 h. Megalin mRNA expression was determined by qPCR. At concentrations of 10 mg/ml, BSA induced a significant reduction in megalin mRNA expression (n = 3). (b, c) LLC-PK1 cells were pretreated with 100 µM WY 14643 (PPARα agonist), 1 µM rosiglitazone (PPARγ agonist) or vehicle for 1 h prior to 20 mg/mL BSA exposure, which was maintained for 24 h. Megalin mRNA levels were determined from cellular RNA extracts by qPCR. Values were normalized to the expression of the housekeeping gene of actin (n = 3–4). Results are expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD). Statistically significant differences are indicated as *P<0.05, **P<0.01.
We next moved to an in vivo model; we induced proteinuria in healthy rats by daily administration of 2 g BSA for one week, which resulted in downregulation of megalin expression, similar to the in vitro observations. To test whether activation of PPARγ was able to prevent the reduction of megalin in kidney, three groups of four animals received vehicle, telmisartan or rosiglitazone for four days. During this “pretreatment” condition, the expression of megalin was determined by qPCR and found to be significantly increased in the kidneys of the animals receiving telmisartan or rosiglitazone compared to the controls (Fig. 9A). In parallel, four other groups of animals, including two controls pretreated with vehicle, started receiving daily injections of BSA (or saline as control) for 7 days to induce tubulointerstitial damage as previously described [58], [59], [60]. Before and after the BSA administration, renal function parameters were determined. Creatinine clearance was similar in all experimental conditions (Table 1), but rats in the BSA-treated group developed significant proteinuria (Fig. 9B, Table 1) that was significantly lower in the animals treated with rosiglitazone, indicating a protective role for PPARγ in this experimental condition (Fig. 9B). Megalin mRNA levels were also significantly lower in the BSA-treated animals receiving vehicle (Fig. 9C); however, in the rats receiving telmisartan the negative effect of BSA on megalin expression was avoided, and in the animals receiving rosiglitazone the effect of BSA was partially neutralized. In both cases megalin mRNA expression were maintained at levels similar to the control animals (saline) (P = 0.81, control + saline vs. Telmisartan + BSA; P = 0.38, control + saline vs. rosiglitazone +BSA). Moreover, in the Telmisartan + BSA group, megalin mRNA was significantly upregulated compared the control + BSA group; a similar, but not significant, tendency was observed in the rosiglitazone + BSA group (P = 0.1, vs. control + BSA). The effects of the BSA injections and PPARγ agonist treatments were also established by morphological examination. The BSA-treated animals exhibited marked tubular lesions within the proximal and distal tubules, including epithelial flattening, tubular dilatation, intraluminal proteinaceous casts and interstitial infiltration of mononuclear cells, without evidence of fibrosis. In addition, a clear reduction in immunoreactive renal megalin located at the luminal pole of proximal cells was evident in BSA-treated animals compared to control animals, especially in the tubules showing intraluminal proteinaceous casts (Fig. 9D). Consistent with the alterations in mRNA levels, megalin immunoreactivity was less decreased in the BSA-treated animals receiving PPARγ agonists compared to the BSA-treated animals receiving vehicle (Fig. 9D). Overall, these results indicate that the reduction in megalin expression observed in kidneys exposed to high doses of BSA is partially, but significantly, prevented by treatment with PPARγ agonists.
(a) The expression of megalin mRNA, determined by qPCR, in the kidneys of rats treated with telmisartan or rosiglitazone for 4 days was increased significantly compared to the control (vehicle); *P<0.05 vs. control. (n = 4 per group). (b) A separate group of rats continued with the treatments for one week and simultaneously received daily injections of 2 g BSA or saline. Before (Initial) and after (Final) the BSA injections, proteinuria (UV prot) was determined as explained in the Material and Methods. Pretreatment with agonists alone did not modify the UV prot levels (comparison of all groups at Initial conditions); however, rosiglitazone decreased the proteinuria induced by the BSA injections. #P<0.001 vs. final control + saline. *P<0.05 vs. final control + BSA. (c) At the end of the treatments, the expression of megalin was determined by qPCR. BSA induced a significant downregulation of megalin mRNA compared to the control and both PPARγ agonists maintained megalin mRNA levels close to the control condition without BSA. **P<0.01 vs. control + saline, *P<0.05 vs. control + BSA. (d) Immunohistochemical staining for megalin in kidney sections (cortex). In control animals, megalin protein is abundantly expressed in the apical pole of proximal tubule cells (PTCs), whereas the BSA-treated animals exhibited a decrease in megalin immunostaining of the apical pole of PTCs, especially in areas where tubular dilatation with intraluminal proteinaceous casts were evident (arrow). Kidneys from animals treated with BSA and PPARγ agonists show a partial recovery of megalin immunostaining along with the presence of less tubular damage. Representative figures from the different groups are shown. Bar = 100 µm.
Discussion
The fundamental role of megalin in kidney and in development is clearly demonstrated by the phenotype of megalin knockout mouse models [4], [5], [61], [62]. The absence of megalin expression in the kidney is associated with the urinary loss of ligands, including albumin and low molecular weight proteins such as vitamin D-binding protein and retinol-binding protein. Kidneys of megalin knockout animals showed a significant reduction in the endocytic compartments of PTCs, including clathrin-coated pits and apical recycling compartments [61]. In addition, it has recently been suggested that megalin expression is decreased in the kidneys of old rats [28], which could potentially affect the renal functions in which megalin is involved. Moreover, there are pathological conditions, such as Dent's Disease and Lowe Syndrome, in which megalin expression is functionally compromised [14], [63], [64]. However, despite the important roles of the megalin receptor, there are few studies that have investigated the mechanisms that control its expression.
In this study, we have shown for the first time, using both in vitro and in vivo models, that megalin expression is induced by PPARα and PPARγ agonists at the mRNA and/or protein levels. We found that specific antagonists for PPARα and PPARγ disrupted the activation effect of WY 14643 and rosiglitazone, respectively, which strongly suggests a direct role of PPARα/γ in the regulation of megalin expression. In addition, several lines of evidence support the role of both nuclear receptors in the activation of megalin expression. First, overexpression of PPARα activates expression of a luciferase gene under the control of a portion of the human megalin promoter containing one PPRE. Second, the effect of telmisartan, which binds directly to PPARγ [65]. Moreover, we showed that PPARα and PPARγ heterodimers containing RXR bind to at least two of the three PPREs present in the human promoter of megalin, which is a potential mechanism for the activation of megalin expression observed at the transcriptional level in our animal and cellular models.
We tested the hypothesis that megalin is a novel PPARα and PPARγ target gene in order to determine whether these nuclear receptors and their agonists could have a protective role in conditions in which there is reduced megalin expression using in vitro and in vivo methodologies. Our strategy was based on the data previously published by Caruso-Neves et al. [32], which showed that LLC-PK1 cells incubated with high concentrations of BSA have a significant reduction in megalin at both the mRNA and protein levels. Although the mechanisms involved in the BSA-mediated reduction of megalin were not completely clear, this study proposed that megalin normally has a protective role in PTCs based on its direct association to PKB/AKT in conditions that are associated with high concentrations of albumin and because the severely reduced megalin expression levels were correlated with the induction of PTC apoptosis [32]. A similar situation could occur in vivo if the barrier function of the glomerulus was disrupted, resulting in excess filtration of albumin and induction of renal damage. Interestingly, we found that the pretreatment of LLC-PK1 cells with either PPARα or PPARγ agonists prevented the drastic reduction of megalin using similar methods to the described in vitro experimental conditions [32]. We next tested whether megalin expression in PTCs in vivo could also be downregulated by an excess of filtered albumin and whether expression could be recovered by PPARγ agonists. Our results demonstrated that treatment with PPARγ agonists circumvented the significant reduction of megalin in PTCs from BSA-injected rats and also reduced the proteinuria that had developed in these animals. These observations may provide a mechanistic context to the known protective roles of PPARα/γ in kidney diseases, such as diabetic nephropathy, which is associated with proteinuria and compromised expression of megalin. In addition, recent studies indicate that megalin expression is reduced in conditions associated with proteinuria. For example, megalin expression was reduced in the Ren2 rat, a model used for studying hypertension and metabolic syndrome [66]. Treatment of Ren2 rats with a β1-antagonist blocker to reduce the secretion of renin improved the reabsorption of albumin and LMW proteins by the PTCs and restored megalin expression levels. Our data suggest that treatment with the PPARγ partial agonist/AT1 antagonist telmisartan would also have a beneficial effect in this model, inducing megalin expression that could otherwise be decreased by angiotensin II with hypertensive conditions [31].
Similar to PPARγ agonists, treatment with PPARα agonists has been linked to a reduction in proteinuria [46] and to the regulation of the renin-angiotensin system, with a reduction of AT1 and the induction of AT2 expression in the kidney [67]. Furthermore, it has been shown that renal disease, including albuminuria, is more severe in diabetic mice that are genetically deficient for PPARα than in wild-type mice [68]. Although we did not test PPARα agonists in our protein overload model in rats in vivo, we did demonstrate the protective role of PPARα agonists in an in vitro model of PTCs that were incubated with high doses of albumin and showed that PPARα agonists regulate megalin expression in vivo in mice. Interestingly, in mice, the hypolipidemic drugs ciprofibrate and WY 14643 exerted their effects at the level of megalin protein expression and did not increase megalin mRNA, in contrast to the upregulation of megalin mRNA that was induced in our cell culture model after a similar treatment. These somewhat contradictory results are not necessarily unexpected because differential activity of PPARα and its ligands on the expression of various genes has been reported, and it depends on the species of the analyzed gene [69], [70] and of the PPARα itself [70]. For example, in human, but not in rodent cells, the expression of the gene encoding for hydroxysteroid sulfotransferase (sult2a1) is induced in a PPARα dependent manner by ciprofibrate and WY 14643 [69]. In mice, the expression of the same enzyme is induced by WY 14643 in transgenic animals expressing human PPARα, but not in wild-type mice, indicating that only the human PPARα is able to activate the PPREs of the sult2a1 gene. In our study, however, it is unlikely that the differential response of megalin mRNA expression observed in the mice is due to the PPARα species. Our experiments that tested the activation of the human megalin promoter by luciferase reporter assay and the EMSAs, which used human megalin probes, were performed with mouse PPARα. Moreover, the DNA-binding domains of human and mouse PPARα are completely homologous [70], suggesting that they should bind with similar affinities to the megalin PPREs. Another potential difference to consider is related to the numbers and sequences of PPREs in the megalin promoters of different species. Using Matinspector software (www.genomatix.de), we found that human, mouse and rat megalin promoters have different numbers and sequences of PPREs (data not shown). This difference could contribute to the absence of an induction of megalin mRNA expression by PPARα agonists in the mouse kidney in vivo and should be further explored in future studies.
Nevertheless, although megalin mRNA expression was not modified by the PPARα agonists ciprofibrate and WY 14643 in vivo, megalin protein levels were increased. Both agonists have been implicated in the regulation of the expression of several genes encoding inflammatory molecules, proteins related to lipid metabolism and transcription factors [71], [72]; several of these molecules could directly or indirectly affect megalin expression in the whole animal. It is also possible that turnover of the megalin protein is modified by PPARα agonists, leading to decreased degradation. For example, ciprofibrate, via a PPARα -dependent mechanism, has distinct roles in the expression of the HDL receptor, SR-BI; ciprofibrate increases SR-BI protein levels expression in murine and human macrophages [73] but reduces it in mouse liver [74]. On the other hand, it has been shown that fibrates activate different signaling pathways depending on ERK phosphorylation status, activation of PKC and activation of PI3K/AKT with inhibition of GSK3β [75], [76], [77], [78]. Accordingly, megalin expression is also regulated by signaling pathways depending on ERK and PI3K in PTCs [31], its proteolytic processing can be induced by PKC activation [79] and its cell surface expression is upregulated upon GSK3β inhibition [8]. Taken together, these data could indicate that multiple mechanisms may be operating to upregulate megalin expression in PPARα agonist-treated mice. Whatever the mechanism, similar to PPARγ agonists, PPARα agonists could be used as protective agents to reduce proteinuria and induce megalin expression.
PTC dysfunction with microalbuminuria is associated with early states of diabetes [26] and precedes glomerular damage [26]. These observations reinforce that maintenance of megalin expression, apical localization and trafficking in PTCs is critical for avoiding albuminuria and the subsequent renal damage, including inflammations and fibrosis. Furthermore, due to its role in signaling molecule degradation, megalin expression is required to negatively regulate the signaling of molecules involved in the early and late stages of renal disease, including angiotensin II [23] and leptin [22]; in addition to their other functions, these signaling molecules are involved in the regulation of renal inflammation and fibrosis and, for example, can induce the expression of TGFβ and Smad 2/3 activation [80], [81], [82], [83]. Other physiologically relevant roles of megalin include the tubular recovery of proteins such as vitamin D binding protein and liver fatty acid binding protein FABP1 [84]. Diabetic patients show an alteration in vitamin D metabolism, with lower levels of 1,25-OH vitamin D [85], due to an impairment in the activation of 25-OH vitamin D that occurs in the PTC after megalin-mediated endocytosis of the DBP-vitamin D complex. Moreover, treatment with PPARγ agonist pioglitazone reduced the urinary excretion of FABP1 in diabetic patients [86], which again reinforces the role of the PPAR system in the improvement of renal function through the activation of megalin expression.
In addition to the kidney, there are many other systems in which megalin function and expression are critical. During brain development, megalin expression is essential because it controls the sonic hedgehog and bone morphogenetic protein 4 signaling pathways by regulating their availability [5]. In the adult, megalin participates as an endocytic receptor in the gallbladder [3], blood-brain barrier [87] and nervous system, where it is associated with protection against neurodegeneration and with regenerative processes [16], [88]. Moreover, in all of these physiological systems, PPARs function as protective agents [89], [90], [91], [92], [93]. Thus, the significance of megalin/LRP2 expression in many organs is evident, and, therefore, it is important to understand the molecular and physiological regulation that controls expression of this the receptor. With our study, we added an important contribution to this field, showing that PPARα/γ are involved in the control of megalin expression. Our data indicate that, in addition to the previously proposed functions and target genes of PPARα/γ, the regulation of megalin expression and availability should also be considered an important role of the PPAR nuclear receptors.
Materials and Methods
Reagents
Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM), Minimum Essential Medium Alpha Modification (αMem), glutamine, PMSF, antipain, aprotinin, leupeptin, pepstatin, poly (dI-dC), BSA, DMSO and Triton X-100 were purchased from the Sigma Chemical Company (St. Louis, MO, USA). Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) was from Hyclone (South Logan, UT, USA). Trypsin and Penicillin-Streptomycin were from Invitrogen/Gibco (Burlington, ON, USA). Lipofectamine 2000, random primers and RNAseOUT were from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). The Luciferase Reporter Assay and the TNT-coupled reticulocyte lysate system were from Promega (Madison, WI, USA). WY 14643 (PPARα agonist), GW 6471 (PPARα antagonist) and GW 9662 (PPARγ antagonist) were from Sigma. GW 610742 (PPARβ/δ agonist) was a gift from GlaxoSmithKline (Research Triangle Park, NC, USA), and rosiglitazone (PPARγ agonist) was from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI, USA). BCA Protein Assay Reagent was from Pierce (Rockford, IL, USA). RNA-Solv reagent was from Omega Bio-Tek (Norcross, GA, USA). DNAseI, RevertAid M-MuLV Reverse Transcriptase, BamHI and XhoI were from Fermentas (Glen Burnie, MD, USA). Brilliant Sybr Green was from Stratagene (La Jolla, CA, USA). Oligonucleotide primers were obtained from Gene Link (Hawthorne, NY, USA). Telmisartan (SAMERTAN) was from BAGO (Santiago, Chile). Rosiglitazone (AVANDIA) and ciprofibrate (Estaprol) used for animal treatments were from GlaxoSmithKline (Mississauga, ON, Canada) and Sanofi Aventis (Amberes, France), respectively. Mouse monoclonal antibody to β-tubulin was purchased from Chemicon (Temecula, CA, USA). The polyclonal antiserum to recombinant human megalin cytoplasmic domain (anti-MegT) was previously described [7].The secondary antibodies for immunostaining and PAP complex were purchased from ICN Biomedicals, Inc. (Aurora, OH).
Plasmids and constructs
(PPRE)x3TK-Luc, pCMX-mPPARα, pCMX-mPPARβ and pCMXm PPARγ were provided by Dr. R. M. Evans. pCMX·mRXRα was provided by Dr. M.Ananthanarayanan, and the -1500 pGL3-enhancer megalin promoter (−1500 meg prom) [94] was a gift from Dr. F. Lammert. TK-luc and pCMV-βvectors were from Clontech (Palo Alto, CA, USA). The pGL3 enhancer vector was from Promega. The -800 luciferase megalin promoter (−800 meg prom) was constructed as follows: −1500 meg prom was digested with BamHI and XhoI, and the resulting 930-bp fragment containing −830 to +100 (with +1 considered to be the transcriptional start site) of the megalin promoter was subcloned into a TK-Luc plasmid previously digested with BamHI and XhoI, which, therefore, lacked the TK promoter.
Cell lines and treatments
LLC-PK1 and BN cells (both of which express endogenous megalin) were cultured essentially as described [3] and maintained at 37°C in 5% CO2. For testing PPAR agonists, BN and LLC-PK1 cells were cultured overnight in medium containing 0.5% FBS and then treated with agonists or vehicle (DMSO) for 24 h. For the experiments in which the PPAR antagonists were used, the cells were preincubated for 30 min before the addition of the respective agonists. BSA treatment in LLC-PK1 was performed in cells cultured overnight in medium depleted of serum. Then, various concentrations of BSA were added to the cells for 24 h. The treatments with PPAR agonists or the corresponding vehicle were performed 1 h before adding albumin at 20 mg/ml and were maintained for 24 h. At the end of the treatments, the cells were used for detection of protein by western blot or for RNA isolation. For western blots, the experiments were performed at least three times (n = 3), and for mRNA determination, each experimental condition was performed in triplicate with n = 3–4 independent experiments.
Western blotting
Cells were lysed in PBS containing 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM PMSF, 1 mM pepstatin, antipain, 1 µM leupeptin and 0.3 µM aprotinin. Kidney extracts were obtained as indicated below. Equal amounts of protein from each extract were subjected to SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions. The immunodetection of megalin, tubulin or actin was determined as described [3], [7]. Densitometric analysis was performed using the Gel Doc 2000 Gel Documentation System and Quantity One version 4 software (Bio-Rad, CA, USA). The signal generated by β-tubulin immunolabeling was used for normalization.
Megalin mRNA quantification by real-time PCR (qPCR)
Total RNA was isolated using RNA-Solv and following the manufacturer's instructions. Total RNA (1 µg) was first digested by DNAse I and then subjected to reverse transcription in a 20 µl reaction mixture using random primers and RevertAid™ M-MuLV Reverse Transcriptase in the presence of RNAseOUT. PCR reactions were performed using a 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA). TaqMan gene expression assay primers were used for mouse megalin, Acox and GADPH (Applied Biosystems). For the other mRNAs, Brilliant SybrGreen I (Stratagene) was used (see Table S1 for primers). All primers were used at a final concentration of 300 nM. Analyses of results were performed with the 7500 System Software.
Promoter and reporter assays
BN and LLC-PK1 cells were cotransfected with 300 ng of −800 meg-Luc and 300 ng each of either PPARα or PPARγ cDNA. Control wells were supplemented with the same amount of vector DNA such that the total amount of DNA added to each well remained constant. All cells were also transfected with a β-galactosidase vector (pCMVβ) as an internal control for transfection efficiency. On the second day, cells were treated with the appropriate PPAR agonist for 24 h in their respective medium with 0.5% FBS. Luciferase activity was assayed in a luminometer using the Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Luciferase activity was normalized for transfection efficiency using the expression of β-galactosidase. Results are expressed as the fold increase of activity over the control vector.
Electrophorectic mobility shift assays
Using the TNT-coupled reticulocyte lysate system (Promega), cDNAs encoding mouse RXRα, PPARα, PPARβ and PPARγ were transcribed and translated according to the manufacturer's instructions. Aliquots of the transcribed/translated extracts were used for EMSAs. Reactions (2 µl) containing PPARα, PPARβ or PPARγ alone or together with RXRα were added to 9 µl total volume of binding buffer (10 mM Tris HCl, 50 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM EDTA, 1 mM MgCl2, 4% glycerol, 0.5 mg/ml poly (dI-dC) at 25°C for 15 min followed by another 20 min incubation with 10 µCi of [γ-32P]ATP-labeled oligonucleotide containing the putative human PPRE binding sites. For competition assays, unlabeled wild-type or mutant oligonucleotides were added to the reaction 15 min before the addition of the probe. For probe details, see Table S2. The DNA-protein binding complex was run on a 4% non-denatured polyacrylamide gel in 0.25× TBE at 220 V for 1.5 h. Gels were autoradiographed using Kodak Biomax film.
Animals and experimental procedures
Animal protocols were carried out with approval from the Review Board for animal studies at the Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas and the Ethical Committee of the Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (Approval Certificate CE #020106) and according to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of CONICYT. Animals were maintained at constant room temperature with a 12-h light/dark cycle.
Ciprofibrate, WY 14643, rosiglitazone and Telmisartan treatment in mice (see Table S3 for more details).
The kidneys were harvested and washed in PBS 24 h after finishing the treatment protocols. One kidney was processed for immunohistochemistry (as described below), and the other was used for western blot and qPCR analyses. For western blots, one kidney half was homogenized on ice in homogenization buffer (PBS, 0.5% (v/v) Triton X-100, 2 mM PMSF, 1 mM pepstatin, antipain, 1 µM leupeptin and 0.3 µM aprotinin) using a dounce homogenizer; nuclear debris was removed by centrifugation at 3,000× g for 10 min at 4°C, and the supernatants were saved. For qPCR assays, total RNA was isolated from the remaining kidney half using RNA-Solv reagent (Omega-BioTek) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Induction of tubulointerstitial damage and proteinuria in Sprague-Dawley rats (see Table S4 for more details).
After treatments were finished, kidneys were removed for morphologic and qPCR analyses from the rats while they were under anesthesia (ketamine/xylazine). To determine the renal function levels, animals were subjected to urine and blood collections. Urine collections were performed in individual metabolic cages for 16 h, during which time food was withheld to avoid fecal contamination, but water was offered ad libitum. Functional damage was assessed by the determination of serum creatinine levels and creatinine clearance. Urine and plasma creatinine were assayed in a Beckman Creatinine analyzer (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA). Creatinine clearance over 16 h was calculated according to the standard formula C = UxV/P, where C is creatinine clearance, U is creatinine urinary concentration, V is the urine flow rate per minute and P is creatinine plasmatic concentration [95].
Tissue processing and immunohistochemical analysis
Renal tissue samples from the different groups (3 mm thick) were fixed by immersion in Bouin's solution for 24 h at room temperature. The tissue was then dehydrated, embedded in Paraplast Plus (Monoject Scientific, St. Louis, MO), serially sectioned at 5-um thickness with a rotatory microtome, mounted on glass slides and used for immunostaining. Immunostaining was performed using an indirect immunoperoxidase technique [96], [97] to localize megalin in rat or mouse kidneys. Briefly, tissue sections were dewaxed, rehydrated, rinsed in 0.05 M Tris-phosphate-saline (TPS) buffer pH 7.6 and incubated with the primary antiserum raised against megalin 1:120,000 overnight at 22°C. The secondary antibody and the corresponding antiperoxidase (PAP) complex were applied for 30 min each at 22°C. The immunoperoxidase reaction was visualized by incubating sections in 0.1% (wt/vol) 3,3′-diaminobenzidine and 0.03% hydrogen peroxide. The antisera and PAP complex were diluted in TPS buffer containing 0.25% Triton X-100 and 0.7% (wt/vol) λ-carrageenan. Controls for the immunostaining procedure were prepared by omission of the first antibody or by the replacement with the preimmune serum. The sections were rinsed with TPS buffer between incubations, counterstained with hematoxylin, dehydrated and cleared with xylene and then coverslipped. The tissue samples from all of the groups were coded and studied independently by 2 observers (C.P.V and C.C.) in a blinded fashion; sections selected at random were used for each animal, and 3–4 fields per section were studied. Images were acquired using a Nikon Eclipse E600 microscope and Nikon DXM1200 digital camera. The megalin-stained area in each image was determined utilizing computer-assisted image analysis software, Simple PCI (Hamamatsu Co, PA USA). The values corresponding to total immunostained (brown) cells were averaged and expressed as the mean absolute values and expressed as squared microns as described [98]. To evaluate the tubulointerstitial damage in rats, focus was placed on tubular shape, the presence of protein casts within the lumens of tubules, cell infiltration in the interstitium and immunostaining as previously described [98].
Supporting Information
Figure S1.
Detection of PPARα, PPARβ/δ and PPARγ in BN cells by RT-PCR. Expression of the PPAR (α, β and γ) nuclear receptors in the rat yolk sac cell line BN was analyzed by RT-PCR using different numbers of cycles. The presence of the PPAR mRNAs in the cell extracts is evident. These expression levels were compared to those observed in the rat liver (right panels). In the liver samples, the bands shown correspond to 26 cycles for PPARα, 29 cycles for PPARβ and 25 cycles for PPARγ.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016794.s001
(TIF)
Figure S2.
Mice receiving ciprofibrate and WY 14643 respond to the activation of PPARα but only augment the expression of megalin at the protein level. BALB/c mice (n = 3-5/per group) received ciprofibrate (200 mg/kg/day) or vehicle for 1 week or W Y14643 (50 mg/kg/day) or vehicle for 10 days. (a) The effectiveness of the PPARα agonists was confirmed by quantification of the mRNA levels of the PPARα target gene Acox by qPCR. (b) WY 14643 did not affect the expression of megalin mRNA. (c) Kidney extracts from the animals treated with WY 14634 were used to determine megalin protein levels by western blot, with β-tubulin used as loading control. (d) The bands in the blots were quantified by densitometry, and the results were plotted as the ratio of megalin/β-tubulin for each condition. Results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistically significant differences are indicated by *P < 0.05 vs. control, **P < 0.01 vs. control.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016794.s002
(TIF)
Figure S3.
The expression of megalin is induced by telmisartan in mouse and rat kidney. BALB/c mice (n = 4-6/group) and Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 4/group) were treated for 7 or 4 days, respectively, with telmisartan (3 mg/kg/day) or vehicle. (a) Kidney extracts were used to determine megalin protein levels in mice, with β-tubulin used as loading control. (b) The bands in the blots were quantified by densitometry, and the results were plotted as the ratio of megalin/β-tubulin for each condition. (c,d) Immunohistochemical detection of megalin protein in rat kidney sections (cortex) was performed and quantified. The plots show the megalin staining area (µm2), which was significantly increased in the telmisartan group compared to the control group. Results are expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD). Statistically significant differences are indicated as *P<0.05.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016794.s003
(TIF)
Table S3.
PPARα and PPARγ agonist treatment in mice
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016794.s006
(DOCX)
Table S4.
Protocol for inducing tubulointerstitial damage and proteinuria in rats; the role of PPARγ agonists in megalin expression
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016794.s007
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. R. M. Evans (Howard Hughes Medical Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA) for providing the plasmids (PPRE)x3TK-Luc, pCMX- mPPARα, pCMX-mPPARβ and pCMX-m PPARγ. We also thank Dr. Meena Ananthanarayanan (Mount Sinai School of Medicine, NY, USA) for giving us pCMX·mRXRα and Dr. Frank Lammert (Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, German) for the plasmid -1500 pGL3 enhancer megalin promoter (-1500 meg prom).
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: MPM FC CPV. Performed the experiments: FC CC JL. Analyzed the data: MPM FC MB CPV. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MPM CPV MB. Wrote the paper: MPM.
References
- 1. Herz J, Bock HH (2002) Lipoprotein receptors in the nervous system. Annu Rev Biochem 71: 405–434.
- 2. Marino M, Pinchera A, McCluskey RT, Chiovato L (2001) Megalin in thyroid physiology and pathology. Thyroid 11: 47–56.
- 3. Erranz B, Miquel JF, Argraves WS, Barth JL, Pimentel F, et al. (2004) Megalin and cubilin expression in gallbladder epithelium and regulation by bile acids. J Lipid Res 45: 2185–2198.
- 4. Willnow TE, Hilpert J, Armstrong SA, Rohlmann A, Hammer RE, et al. (1996) Defective forebrain development in mice lacking gp330/megalin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93: 8460–8464.
- 5. Spoelgen R, Hammes A, Anzenberger U, Zechner D, Andersen OM, et al. (2005) LRP2/megalin is required for patterning of the ventral telencephalon. Development 132: 405–414.
- 6. Li Y, Lu W, Marzolo MP, Bu G (2001) Differential functions of members of the low density lipoprotein receptor family suggested by their distinct endocytosis rates. J Biol Chem 276: 18000–18006.
- 7. Marzolo MP, Yuseff MI, Retamal C, Donoso M, Ezquer F, et al. (2003) Differential distribution of low-density lipoprotein-receptor-related protein (LRP) and megalin in polarized epithelial cells is determined by their cytoplasmic domains. Traffic 4: 273–288.
- 8. Yuseff MI, Farfan P, Bu G, Marzolo MP (2007) A cytoplasmic PPPSP motif determines megalin's phosphorylation and regulates receptor's recycling and surface expression. Traffic 8: 1215–1230.
- 9. Christensen EI, Verroust PJ (2002) Megalin and cubilin, role in proximal tubule function and during development. Pediatr Nephrol 17: 993–999.
- 10. McCarthy RA, Argraves WS (2003) Megalin and the neurodevelopmental biology of sonic hedgehog and retinol. J Cell Sci 116: 955–960.
- 11. Maurer ME, Cooper JA (2005) Endocytosis of megalin by visceral endoderm cells requires the Dab2 adaptor protein. J Cell Sci 118: 5345–5355.
- 12. Cui S, Verroust PJ, Moestrup SK, Christensen EI (1996) Megalin/gp330 mediates uptake of albumin in renal proximal tubule. Am J Physiol 271: F900–907.
- 13. Kantarci S, Al-Gazali L, Hill RS, Donnai D, Black GC, et al. (2007) Mutations in LRP2, which encodes the multiligand receptor megalin, cause Donnai-Barrow and facio-oculo-acoustico-renal syndromes. Nat Genet 39: 957–959.
- 14. Lee BH, Lee SH, Choi HJ, Kang HG, Oh SW, et al. (2009) Decreased renal uptake of (99m)Tc-DMSA in patients with tubular proteinuria. Pediatr Nephrol 24: 2211–2216.
- 15. Ambjorn M, Asmussen JW, Lindstam M, Gotfryd K, Jacobsen C, et al. (2008) Metallothionein and a peptide modeled after metallothionein, EmtinB, induce neuronal differentiation and survival through binding to receptors of the low-density lipoprotein receptor family. J Neurochem 104: 21–37.
- 16. Chung RS, Penkowa M, Dittmann J, King CE, Bartlett C, et al. (2008) Redefining the role of metallothionein within the injured brain: extracellular metallothioneins play an important role in the astrocyte-neuron response to injury. J Biol Chem 283: 15349–15358.
- 17. Vinuesa E, Sola A, Jung M, Alfaro V, Hotter G (2008) Lipocalin-2-induced renal regeneration depends on cytokines. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 295: F1554–1562.
- 18. Pedersen MO, Jensen R, Pedersen DS, Skjolding AD, Hempel C, et al. (2009) Metallothionein-I+II in neuroprotection. Biofactors 35: 315–325.
- 19. Fleming CE, Mar FM, Franquinho F, Saraiva MJ, Sousa MM (2009) Transthyretin internalization by sensory neurons is megalin mediated and necessary for its neuritogenic activity. J Neurosci 29: 3220–3232.
- 20. Fujigaki Y, Sakakima M, Sun Y, Fujikura T, Tsuji T, et al. (2009) Cell division and phenotypic regression of proximal tubular cells in response to uranyl acetate insult in rats. Nephrol Dial Transplant 24: 2686–2692.
- 21. Christensen EI, Birn H, Verroust P, Moestrup SK (1998) Megalin-mediated endocytosis in renal proximal tubule. Ren Fail 20: 191–199.
- 22. Hama H, Saito A, Takeda T, Tanuma A, Xie Y, et al. (2004) Evidence indicating that renal tubular metabolism of leptin is mediated by megalin but not by the leptin receptors. Endocrinology 145: 3935–3940.
- 23. Gonzalez-Villalobos R, Klassen RB, Allen PL, Navar LG, Hammond TG (2005) Megalin binds and internalizes angiotensin II. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 288: F420–427.
- 24. Gonzalez-Villalobos R, Klassen RB, Allen PL, Johanson K, Baker CB, et al. (2006) Megalin binds and internalizes angiotensin-(1-7). Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 290: F1270–1275.
- 25. Orlando RA, Rader K, Authier F, Yamazaki H, Posner BI, et al. (1998) Megalin is an endocytic receptor for insulin. J Am Soc Nephrol 9: 1759–1766.
- 26. Tojo A, Onozato ML, Ha H, Kurihara H, Sakai T, et al. (2001) Reduced albumin reabsorption in the proximal tubule of early-stage diabetic rats. Histochem Cell Biol 116: 269–276.
- 27. Tojo A, Onozato ML, Kurihara H, Sakai T, Goto A, et al. (2003) Angiotensin II blockade restores albumin reabsorption in the proximal tubules of diabetic rats. Hypertens Res 26: 413–419.
- 28. Odera K, Goto S, Takahashi R (2007) Age-related change of endocytic receptors megalin and cubilin in the kidney in rats. Biogerontology 8: 505–515.
- 29. Czekay RP, Orlando RA, Woodward L, Adamson ED, Farquhar MG (1995) The expression of megalin (gp330) and LRP diverges during F9 cell differentiation. J Cell Sci 108: 1433–1441.
- 30. Liu W, Yu WR, Carling T, Juhlin C, Rastad J, et al. (1998) Regulation of gp330/megalin expression by vitamins A and D. Eur J Clin Invest 28: 100–107.
- 31. Hosojima M, Sato H, Yamamoto K, Kaseda R, Soma T, et al. (2009) Regulation of megalin expression in cultured proximal tubule cells by angiotensin II type 1A receptor- and insulin-mediated signaling cross-talk. Endocrinology 150: 871–878.
- 32. Caruso-Neves C, Pinheiro AA, Cai H, Souza-Menezes J, Guggino WB (2006) PKB and megalin determine the survival or death of renal proximal tubule cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 18810–18815.
- 33. Braissant O, Foufelle F, Scotto C, Dauca M, Wahli W (1996) Differential expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs): tissue distribution of PPAR-alpha, -beta, and -gamma in the adult rat. Endocrinology 137: 354–366.
- 34. IJpenberg A, Jeannin E, Wahli W, Desvergne B (1997) Polarity and specific sequence requirements of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)/retinoid X receptor heterodimer binding to DNA. A functional analysis of the malic enzyme gene PPAR response element. J Biol Chem 272: 20108–20117.
- 35. Forman BM, Chen J, Evans RM (1997) Hypolipidemic drugs, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and eicosanoids are ligands for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors alpha and delta. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94: 4312–4317.
- 36. Kliewer SA, Sundseth SS, Jones SA, Brown PJ, Wisely GB, et al. (1997) Fatty acids and eicosanoids regulate gene expression through direct interactions with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors alpha and gamma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94: 4318–4323.
- 37. Itoh T, Fairall L, Amin K, Inaba Y, Szanto A, et al. (2008) Structural basis for the activation of PPARgamma by oxidized fatty acids. Nat Struct Mol Biol 15: 924–931.
- 38. Guan Y (2004) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor family and its relationship to renal complications of the metabolic syndrome. J Am Soc Nephrol 15: 2801–2815.
- 39. Gauthier A, Vassiliou G, Benoist F, McPherson R (2003) Adipocyte low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein gene expression and function is regulated by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ. J Biol Chem 278: 11945–11953.
- 40. Rakhshandehroo M, Hooiveld G, Muller M, Kersten S (2009) Comparative analysis of gene regulation by the transcription factor PPARalpha between mouse and human. PLoS One 4: e6796.
- 41. Guan Y, Zhang Y, Davis L, Breyer MD (1997) Expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in urinary tract of rabbits and humans. Am J Physiol 273: F1013–1022.
- 42. Yang T, Michele DE, Park J, Smart AM, Lin Z, et al. (1999) Expression of peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptors and retinoid X receptors in the kidney. Am J Physiol 277: F966–973.
- 43. Zafiriou S, Stanners SR, Polhill TS, Poronnik P, Pollock CA (2004) Pioglitazone increases renal tubular cell albumin uptake but limits proinflammatory and fibrotic responses. Kidney Int 65: 1647–1653.
- 44. Ansquer JC, Foucher C, Rattier S, Taskinen MR, Steiner G (2005) Fenofibrate reduces progression to microalbuminuria over 3 years in a placebo-controlled study in type 2 diabetes: results from the Diabetes Atherosclerosis Intervention Study (DAIS). Am J Kidney Dis 45: 485–493.
- 45. Calkin AC, Giunti S, Jandeleit-Dahm KA, Allen TJ, Cooper ME, et al. (2006) PPAR-{alpha} and {gamma} agonists attenuate diabetic kidney disease in the apolipoprotein E knockout mouse. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21: 2399–2405.
- 46. Park CW, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Wu J, Chen L, et al. (2006) PPARalpha agonist fenofibrate improves diabetic nephropathy in db/db mice. Kidney Int 69: 1511–1517.
- 47. Shibata T, Takeuchi S, Yokota S, Kakimoto K, Yonemori F, et al. (2000) Effects of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha and -gamma agonist, JTT-501, on diabetic complications in Zucker diabetic fatty rats. Br J Pharmacol 130: 495–504.
- 48. Nakamura T, Ushiyama C, Osada S, Hara M, Shimada N, et al. (2001) Pioglitazone reduces urinary podocyte excretion in type 2 diabetes patients with microalbuminuria. Metabolism 50: 1193–1196.
- 49. Nakamura T, Ushiyama C, Shimada N, Hayashi K, Ebihara I, et al. (2000) Comparative effects of pioglitazone, glibenclamide, and voglibose on urinary endothelin-1 and albumin excretion in diabetes patients. J Diabetes Complications 14: 250–254.
- 50. Toblli JE, Ferrini MG, Cao G, Vernet D, Angerosa M, et al. (2009) Antifibrotic effects of pioglitazone on the kidney in a rat model of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nephrol Dial Transplant 24: 2384–2391.
- 51. Miyazaki Y, Cersosimo E, Triplitt C, Defronzo RA (2007) Rosiglitazone decreases albuminuria in type 2 diabetic patients. Kidney Int 72: 1367–1373.
- 52. Imano E, Kanda T, Nakatani Y, Nishida T, Arai K, et al. (1998) Effect of troglitazone on microalbuminuria in patients with incipient diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes Care 21: 2135–2139.
- 53. Al-Rasheed NM, Chana RS, Baines RJ, Willars GB, Brunskill NJ (2004) Ligand-independent activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma by insulin and C-peptide in kidney proximal tubular cells: dependent on phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity. J Biol Chem 279: 49747–49754.
- 54. Letavernier E, Perez J, Joye E, Bellocq A, Fouqueray B, et al. (2005) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor beta/delta exerts a strong protection from ischemic acute renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol 16: 2395–2402.
- 55. Giral H, Villa-Bellosta R, Catalan J, Sorribas V (2007) Cytotoxicity of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha and gamma agonists in renal proximal tubular cell lines. Toxicol In Vitro 21: 1066–1076.
- 56. Benson SC, Pershadsingh HA, Ho CI, Chittiboyina A, Desai P, et al. (2004) Identification of telmisartan as a unique angiotensin II receptor antagonist with selective PPARgamma-modulating activity. Hypertension 43: 993–1002.
- 57. Schupp M, Janke J, Clasen R, Unger T, Kintscher U (2004) Angiotensin type 1 receptor blockers induce peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma activity. Circulation 109: 2054–2057.
- 58. Eddy AA (1989) Interstitial nephritis induced by protein-overload proteinuria. Am J Pathol 135: 719–733.
- 59. Thomas ME, Brunskill NJ, Harris KP, Bailey E, Pringle JH, et al. (1999) Proteinuria induces tubular cell turnover: A potential mechanism for tubular atrophy. Kidney Int 55: 890–898.
- 60. Ardiles LG, Loyola F, Ehrenfeld P, Burgos ME, Flores CA, et al. (2006) Modulation of renal kallikrein by a high potassium diet in rats with intense proteinuria. Kidney Int 69: 53–59.
- 61. Leheste JR, Rolinski B, Vorum H, Hilpert J, Nykjaer A, et al. (1999) Megalin knockout mice as an animal model of low molecular weight proteinuria. Am J Pathol 155: 1361–1370.
- 62. Nykjaer A, Dragun D, Walther D, Vorum H, Jacobsen C, et al. (1999) An endocytic pathway essential for renal uptake and activation of the steroid 25-(OH) vitamin D3. Cell 96: 507–515.
- 63. Watanabe T (2004) Megalin and proximal renal tubular dysfunction in Dent disease. Pediatr Nephrol 19: 1305; author reply 1306.
- 64. Guggino SE (2007) Mechanisms of disease: what can mouse models tell us about the molecular processes underlying Dent disease? Nat Clin Pract Nephrol 3: 449–455.
- 65. Schupp M, Clemenz M, Gineste R, Witt H, Janke J, et al. (2005) Molecular Characterization of New Selective Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma} Modulators With Angiotensin Receptor Blocking Activity. Diabetes 54: 3442–3452.
- 66. Hayden MR, Habibi J, Whaley-Connell A, Sowers D, Johnson M, et al. (2010) Nebivolol attenuates maladaptive proximal tubule remodeling in transgenic rats. Am J Nephrol 31: 262–272.
- 67. Banks T, Oyekan A (2008) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha activation attenuated angiotensin type 1-mediated but enhanced angiotensin type 2-mediated hemodynamic effects to angiotensin II in the rat. J Hypertens 26: 468–477.
- 68. Park CW, Kim HW, Ko SH, Chung HW, Lim SW, et al. (2006) Accelerated diabetic nephropathy in mice lacking the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha. Diabetes 55: 885–893.
- 69. Fang HL, Strom SC, Cai H, Falany CN, Kocarek TA, et al. (2005) Regulation of human hepatic hydroxysteroid sulfotransferase gene expression by the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha transcription factor. Mol Pharmacol 67: 1257–1267.
- 70. Yang Q, Nagano T, Shah Y, Cheung C, Ito S, et al. (2008) The PPAR alpha-humanized mouse: a model to investigate species differences in liver toxicity mediated by PPAR alpha. Toxicol Sci 101: 132–139.
- 71. Chinetti G, Fruchart JC, Staels B (2000) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs): nuclear receptors at the crossroads between lipid metabolism and inflammation. Inflamm Res 49: 497–505.
- 72. Chinetti-Gbaguidi G, Fruchart JC, Staels B (2005) Pleiotropic effects of fibrates. Curr Atheroscler Rep 7: 396–401.
- 73. Chinetti G, Gbaguidi FG, Griglio S, Mallat Z, Antonucci M, et al. (2000) CLA-1/SR-BI is expressed in atherosclerotic lesion macrophages and regulated by activators of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors. Circulation 101: 2411–2417.
- 74. Mardones P, Pilon A, Bouly M, Duran D, Nishimoto T, et al. (2003) Fibrates down-regulate hepatic scavenger receptor class B type I protein expression in mice. J Biol Chem 278: 7884–7890.
- 75. Rokos CL, Ledwith BJ (1997) Peroxisome proliferators activate extracellular signal-regulated kinases in immortalized mouse liver cells. J Biol Chem 272: 13452–13457.
- 76. Gardner OS, Dewar BJ, Graves LM (2005) Activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor ligands: an example of nongenomic signaling. Mol Pharmacol 68: 933–941.
- 77. Li R, Zheng W, Pi R, Gao J, Zhang H, et al. (2007) Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha prevents glycogen synthase 3beta phosphorylation and inhibits cardiac hypertrophy. FEBS Lett 581: 3311–3316.
- 78. Bulhak AA, Jung C, Ostenson CG, Lundberg JO, Sjoquist PO, et al. (2009) PPAR-alpha activation protects the type 2 diabetic myocardium against ischemia-reperfusion injury: involvement of the PI3-Kinase/Akt and NO pathway. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 296: H719–727.
- 79. Zou Z, Chung B, Nguyen T, Mentone S, Thomson B, et al. (2004) Linking receptor-mediated endocytosis and cell signaling: evidence for regulated intramembrane proteolysis of megalin in proximal tubule. J Biol Chem 279: 34302–34310.
- 80. Wolf G (2006) Renal injury due to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activation of the transforming growth factor-beta pathway. Kidney Int 70: 1914–1919.
- 81. Wolf G, Ziyadeh FN (2006) Leptin and renal fibrosis. Contrib Nephrol 151: 175–183.
- 82. Kumpers P, Gueler F, Rong S, Mengel M, Tossidou I, et al. (2007) Leptin is a coactivator of TGF-beta in unilateral ureteral obstructive kidney disease. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 293: F1355–1362.
- 83. Carvajal G, Rodriguez-Vita J, Rodrigues-Diez R, Sanchez-Lopez E, Ruperez M, et al. (2008) Angiotensin II activates the Smad pathway during epithelial mesenchymal transdifferentiation. Kidney Int 74: 585–595.
- 84. Oyama Y, Takeda T, Hama H, Tanuma A, Iino N, et al. (2005) Evidence for megalin-mediated proximal tubular uptake of L-FABP, a carrier of potentially nephrotoxic molecules. Lab Invest 85: 522–531.
- 85. Levin A, Bakris GL, Molitch M, Smulders M, Tian J, et al. (2007) Prevalence of abnormal serum vitamin D, PTH, calcium, and phosphorus in patients with chronic kidney disease: results of the study to evaluate early kidney disease. Kidney Int 71: 31–38.
- 86. Nakamura T, Sugaya T, Kawagoe Y, Ueda Y, Koide H (2006) Effect of pioglitazone on urinary liver-type fatty acid-binding protein concentrations in diabetes patients with microalbuminuria. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 22: 385–389.
- 87.
Dietrich MO, Spuch C, Antequera D, Rodal I, de Yebenes JG, et al. (2007) Megalin mediates the transport of leptin across the blood-CSF barrier. Neurobiol Aging.
- 88. Carro E, Spuch C, Trejo JL, Antequera D, Torres-Aleman I (2005) Choroid plexus megalin is involved in neuroprotection by serum insulin-like growth factor I. J Neurosci 25: 10884–10893.
- 89. Pan GD, Wu H, Liu JW, Cheng NS, Xiong XZ, et al. (2005) Effect of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma ligand on inflammation of human gallbladder epithelial cells. World J Gastroenterol 11: 6061–6065.
- 90. Mysiorek C, Culot M, Dehouck L, Derudas B, Staels B, et al. (2009) Peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor-alpha activation protects brain capillary endothelial cells from oxygen-glucose deprivation-induced hyperpermeability in the blood-brain barrier. Curr Neurovasc Res 6: 181–193.
- 91. Roberts TJ, Chapman AC, Cipolla MJ (2009) PPAR-gamma agonist rosiglitazone reverses increased cerebral venous hydraulic conductivity during hypertension. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 297: H1347–1353.
- 92. Inestrosa NC, Godoy JA, Quintanilla RA, Koenig CS, Bronfman M (2005) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma is expressed in hippocampal neurons and its activation prevents beta-amyloid neurodegeneration: role of Wnt signaling. Exp Cell Res 304: 91–104.
- 93. Cimini A, Benedetti E, Cristiano L, Sebastiani P, D'Amico MA, et al. (2005) Expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) and retinoic acid receptors (RXRs) in rat cortical neurons. Neuroscience 130: 325–337.
- 94. Knutson A, Hellman P, Akerstrom G, Westin G (1998) Characterization of the human Megalin/LRP-2 promoter in vitro and in primary parathyroid cells. DNA Cell Biol 17: 551–560.
- 95.
Stanton BA, Koeppen B (2004) The kidney;. In: Berne R, Levi M, Koeppen B, Stanton BA, editors. St. Louis,, MO.
- 96. Vio CP, An SJ, Cespedes C, McGiff JC, Ferreri NR (2001) Induction of cyclooxygenase-2 in thick ascending limb cells by adrenalectomy. J Am Soc Nephrol 12: 649–658.
- 97. Madeddu P, Vio CP, Straino S, Salis MB, Milia AF, et al. (2001) Renal phenotype of low kallikrein rats. Kidney Int 59: 2233–2242.
- 98. Salas SP, Giacaman A, Romero W, Downey P, Aranda E, et al. (2007) Pregnant rats treated with a serotonin precursor have reduced fetal weight and lower plasma volume and kallikrein levels. Hypertension 50: 773–779.