Figures
In the last paragraph of the Results section under the heading 'Differences in the binding site may explain the lower affinity of 8−11 in 5-HT2A and higher affinity of 10−11 in 5-HT2B', the second sentence is incorrect. The correct sentence is: This position is occupied by a methionine in 5-HT2B, but an valine in 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C (Fig. 7a-c). In the second paragraph of the Methods section under the heading 'Ligand docking into the 5-HT2B crystal structure', the second to last sentence is incorrect. The correct sentence is: The binding sites of the 5-HT2 receptor subtypes deviate only in two residue positions: 5.46 (5-HT2A: S, 5-HT2B: A and 5-HT2C: A) and 5.39 (5-HT2A: V, 5-HT2B: M and 5-HT2C: V). In the final paragraph of the Methods section, under the heading "Conformational penalties for strained ligand poses", the following sentence should be added as the last sentence of that paragraph: Marvin was used for drawing 2D structures (Marvin 5.12.3, 2013, ChemAxon, www.chemaxon.com) and 3D structures were illustrated using Pymol (PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.5.0.4 Schrödinger, LLC). Figure 7 is incorrect. The correct version of Figure 7 can be viewed here:
Citation: Isberg V, Paine J, Leth-Petersen S, Kristensen JL, Gloriam DE (2014) Correction: Structure-Activity Relationships of Constrained Phenylethylamine Ligands for the Serotonin 5-HT2 Receptors. PLoS ONE 9(1): 10.1371/annotation/c0047d59-f3e8-4923-8883-dcc991c0e61e. https://doi.org/10.1371/annotation/c0047d59-f3e8-4923-8883-dcc991c0e61e
Published: January 17, 2014
Copyright: © 2014 . This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Competing interests: No competing interests declared.