Peer Review History
| Original SubmissionSeptember 1, 2025 |
|---|
|
PONE-D-25-47590-->-->First of a Line or Last of a Dynasty? Parabos tigneresi and the Evolution of Eurasian Bovinae in the Early Pliocene-->-->PLOS ONE?> Dear Dr. Sorbelli, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. The submitted manuscript represents a high-quality and valuable contribution to the understanding of Early Pliocene Bovinae in Europe, based on the remarkable material from Camp dels Ninots. It is a well-structured, rigorous, and clearly written study that significantly enriches current knowledge of the paleobiodiversity of this period and region. The editorial process took longer than usual, mainly due to the difficulty in finding suitable and available reviewers with expertise in this specific field. Nevertheless, the received evaluation confirms the scientific merit of the work and highlights the strength of the analyses, the precision of the illustrations, and the clarity of the descriptions. The reviewer emphasized the overall consistency and scientific rigor of the manuscript, as well as the up-to-date bibliography and the coherence between results and conclusions. Only minor adjustments and clarifications were suggested, as indicated in the annotated PDF. These mainly concern certain paleoenvironmental and biogeographical interpretations, which could be presented in a slightly more cautious manner—preferably framed as working hypotheses for future research rather than as definitive statements. Recommendations: 1- Revise the discussion and conclusions to express the paleoenvironmental and biogeographical interpretations in a more tentative or exploratory tone. 2- Address the specific corrections and comments noted in the annotated PDF. 3- Perform a final language and consistency check to ensure clarity and uniform terminology throughout the manuscript. Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 12 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.
If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols . We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Kind regards, Wesley D. Colombo Academic Editor PLOS ONE Journal Requirements: When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements. 1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 2. In your manuscript, please provide additional information regarding the specimens used in your study. Ensure that you have reported human remain specimen numbers and complete repository information, including museum name and geographic location. If permits were required, please ensure that you have provided details for all permits that were obtained, including the full name of the issuing authority, and add the following statement: 'All necessary permits were obtained for the described study, which complied with all relevant regulations.' If no permits were required, please include the following statement: 'No permits were required for the described study, which complied with all relevant regulations.' For more information on PLOS One's requirements for paleontology and archeology research, see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-paleontology-and-archaeology-research . 3. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: “This research has received funding from the Catalan Government (Generalitat de Catalunya) through the Departament de Cultura (project CLT009/22/000043) and the research group 2021 SGR 01238 (AGAUR), as well as from the Universitat Rovira i Virgili (grant 2023-URV-01238). Additional funding is provided by the Ministry of Science and Innovation of the Spanish Government through project PID2021-123092NB-C21. L.S. was supported by a Humboldt Research Fellowship provided by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation and by the CERCA Programme of the Generalitat de Catalunya. The research conducted by F.G., E.M., G.C., and B.G.S. is funded by the CERCA Programme of the Generalitat de Catalunya.” Please state what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf. 4. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript: “The CN project is supported by the Caldes de Malavella Town Hall. This research has received funding from the Catalan Government (Generalitat de Catalunya) through the Departament de Cultura (project CLT009/22/000043) and the research group 2021 SGR 01238 (AGAUR), as well as from the Universitat Rovira i Virgili (grant 2023-URV-01238). Additional funding is provided by the Ministry of Science and Innovation of the Spanish Government through project PID2021-123092NB-C21. L.S. was supported by a Humboldt Research Fellowship provided by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation and by the CERCA Programme of the Generalitat de Catalunya. The research conducted by F.G., E.M., G.C., and B.G.S. is funded by the CERCA Programme of the Generalitat de Catalunya.” We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form. Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows: “This research has received funding from the Catalan Government (Generalitat de Catalunya) through the Departament de Cultura (project CLT009/22/000043) and the research group 2021 SGR 01238 (AGAUR), as well as from the Universitat Rovira i Virgili (grant 2023-URV-01238). Additional funding is provided by the Ministry of Science and Innovation of the Spanish Government through project PID2021-123092NB-C21. L.S. was supported by a Humboldt Research Fellowship provided by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation and by the CERCA Programme of the Generalitat de Catalunya. The research conducted by F.G., E.M., G.C., and B.G.S. is funded by the CERCA Programme of the Generalitat de Catalunya.” Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf. 5. We note that Figure 1 and 2 in your submission contain [map/satellite] images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright. We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission: 1. You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figure 1 and 2 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license. We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text: “I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.” Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an ""Other"" file with your submission. In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].” 2. If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only. The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful: USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/ The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/ Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/ Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/ USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/# Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/ 6. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information. 7. If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise. 8. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice. [Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.] Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? Reviewer #1: Yes ********** 2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?> Reviewer #1: Yes ********** 3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??> The PLOS Data policy Reviewer #1: Yes ********** 4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??> Reviewer #1: Yes ********** Reviewer #1: A truly excellent and important piece of work that provides valuable information about the relatively unknown Bovinae of the Early Pliocene in Europe based on the impressive material from Camp dels Ninots. The descriptions are detailed and accurate, the comparisons comprehensive and thorough, the diagrams and visual material impeccable, as usual in works signed by the first author, the bibliography is fully up to date, and the conclusions are interesting and in complete harmony with the results. I have very few comments/corrections and suggestions to make (see annotated pdf). Some of the environmental/biozoogeographical interpretations may be somewhat exaggerated (see comments in pdf) and would be better formulated as working hypotheses for future studies. ********** what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy Reviewer #1: Yes: Dimitris S Kostopoulos ********** [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.] To ensure your figures meet our technical requirements, please review our figure guidelines: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures You may also use PLOS’s free figure tool, NAAS, to help you prepare publication quality figures: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-tools-for-figure-preparation. NAAS will assess whether your figures meet our technical requirements by comparing each figure against our figure specifications.
|
| Revision 1 |
|
First of a Line or Last of a Dynasty? Parabos tigneresi and the Evolution of Eurasian Bovinae in the Early Pliocene PONE-D-25-47590R1 Dear Dr. Sorbelli, We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements. Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication. An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. For questions related to billing, please contact billing support . If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org. Kind regards, Wesley D. Colombo Academic Editor PLOS One Additional Editor Comments (optional): Reviewers' comments: |
| Formally Accepted |
|
PONE-D-25-47590R1 PLOS One Dear Dr. Sorbelli, I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS One. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team. At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following: * All references, tables, and figures are properly cited * All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission, * There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset You will receive further instructions from the production team, including instructions on how to review your proof when it is ready. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few days to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps. Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org. You will receive an invoice from PLOS for your publication fee after your manuscript has reached the completed accept phase. If you receive an email requesting payment before acceptance or for any other service, this may be a phishing scheme. Learn how to identify phishing emails and protect your accounts at https://explore.plos.org/phishing. If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org. Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access. Kind regards, PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff on behalf of Dr. Wesley D. Colombo Academic Editor PLOS One |
Open letter on the publication of peer review reports
PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose to reveal their names.
We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions, to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research system.
Learn more at ASAPbio .