Peer Review History

Original SubmissionAugust 21, 2025
Decision Letter - James Crainey, Editor

Dear Dr. Mazzoni Zerbinato A Silva,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Nov 30 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.
  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.
  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

James Lee Crainey, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1.Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels.  

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions.

3. Thank you for uploading your study's underlying data set. Unfortunately, the repository you have noted in your Data Availability statement does not qualify as an acceptable data repository according to PLOS's standards.

At this time, please upload the minimal data set necessary to replicate your study's findings to a stable, public repository (such as figshare or Dryad) and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers that may be used to access these data. For a list of recommended repositories and additional information on PLOS standards for data deposition, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories .

4. If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise. 

5. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

Please attend to the very minor concerns raised by reviewer 1 and return your manuscript at the earliest opportunity.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: The authors demonstrated that the four B variants of three Psalidodon species contain retrotransposed copies of the sbno2 and simc1 genes. These gene copies were acquired in a common ancestor and have been maintained across speciation events. The findings are supported by bioinformatic analysis of gDNA and RNA reads, PCR, and FISH. The absence of introns in both genes suggests that retrotransposition caused the transfer of these gene fragments. Interestingly, it appears that both pseudogenes may influence the expression of their counterparts located on the A chromosomes. The quality of the results is high, and the findings are logically discussed in the context of current knowledge.

Line 45

Please consider clarifying that B chromosome drive mechanisms can occur pre-meiotically and post-meiotically, not just during meiosis, depending on the species.

Line 75 and others (e.g. line 201, )

Please avoid using the term “A genome” and instead use “A chromosomes.” The term “A genome” is typically reserved for distinguishing subgenomes in allopolyploid species, which could cause confusion.

Line 301

Please indicate where in the manuscript the quick protocol for identifying B-chromosome-bearing individuals is shown.

Figure 3.

Please add in the figure “A chromosome-derived retrotransposition of….”

Reviewer #2: Manuscript ID: PONE-D-25-45744

Title: B chromosome retrotransposed sequences persist through speciation, contributing to genomic and regulatory innovations in the fish genus Psalidodon (Characiformes, Acestrorhamphidae)

Authors: Lucas F. Lasmar, Mateus R. Vidal, Pamela C. F. Nadai, Rodrigo Zeni dos Santos, Raquel da Costa Machado, Ricardo Utsunomia, Francisco J. Ruiz-Ruano, Alexander Suh, Claudio Oliveira, Duilio M. Z. A. Silva, Fausto Foresti

The goal of the presente paper was to investigate the evolutionary history of two pseudogenes, sbno2-B and simc1-B, on the B chromosomes in Psalidodon species, as well as their potential effects on gene expression. The authors demonstrate that four B chromosome variants of three Psalidodon species have retrotransposed copies of the sbno2 and simc1 genes that were acquired in a common ancestor and maintained across speciation events.

B chromosomes and retrotransposons are distinct genetic elements that share a remarkable ability to selfishly take advantage of biological processes, thereby increasing their transmission to future generations through different molecular mechanisms. B chromosomes are supernumerary genetic elements that primarily cheat by preferentially being incorporated into generative cells during meiosis. In contrast, retrotransposons are genomic sequences that over-replicate during cell cycles.

The work is of great interest, primarily because it addresses two distinct and intriguing genetic elements. In this study, the authors demonstrated that retrotransposons have activity on B chromosomes, generating genomic diversity. Furthermore, Psalidodon spp. can be considered “model species” for the study of B chromosomes.

I recommend your publication.

One correction is pointed out:

Page 2, Line 58: “The genus Psalidodon Eigenmann, 1911 within the family Characiformes includes about 30 species,…”

within the Family Acestrorhamphidae or order Characiformes

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org

Revision 1

Dear James Lee Crainey,

Academic Editor

We sincerely appreciate the time and effort you and the reviewers have invested in evaluating our manuscript for PLOS ONE. We are pleased with the overall positive feedback and have carefully addressed the suggestions provided. We have used track changes to highlight the modifications made in response to the comments.

Thank you for considering our revised manuscript.

Cordially,

Duílio Mazzoni Zerbinato de Andrade Silva

Editor

1.Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

We conducted a thorough review of the entire manuscript to guarantee it meets PLOS ONE’S style requirements.

2. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels.

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions.

We reviewed all the manuscript figures to ensure they adhere fully to the PLOS ONE guidelines. Also, we provided all the original gel images as Supporting Information.

3. Thank you for uploading your study's underlying data set. Unfortunately, the repository you have noted in your Data Availability statement does not qualify as an acceptable data repository according to PLOS's standards.

At this time, please upload the minimal data set necessary to replicate your study's findings to a stable, public repository (such as figshare or Dryad) and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers that may be used to access these data. For a list of recommended repositories and additional information on PLOS standards for data deposition, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories.

We provided the GenBank accession codes for the deposited sequences.

4. If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise.

The reviewers’ suggestions did not include recommendations to cite specific previously published works. Thus, we addressed and followed all the reviewers’ suggestions to the manuscript.

5. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

We conducted a thorough review of the reference list to ensure it is complete and correct.

Reviewer #1

Line 45

Please consider clarifying that B chromosome drive mechanisms can occur pre-meiotically and post-meiotically, not just during meiosis, depending on the species.

We thank the reviewer for the suggestion. We clarified in lines 45-46 that B chromosome accumulation mechanisms can also occur at pre-meiotic and post-meiotic stages.

Line 75 and others (e.g. line 201, )

Please avoid using the term “A genome” and instead use “A chromosomes.” The term “A genome” is typically reserved for distinguishing subgenomes in allopolyploid species, which could cause confusion.

To avoid confusion with the terminology used for allopolyploid species, we have replaced all the occurrences of “A genome” with “A chromosomes” throughout the manuscript.

Line 301

Please indicate where in the manuscript the quick protocol for identifying B-chromosome-bearing individuals is shown.

We have now clarified in the text where the quick protocol is described.

Reviewer #2

Page 2, Line 58: “The genus Psalidodon Eigenmann, 1911 within the family Characiformes includes about 30 species,…” within the Family Acestrorhamphidae or order Characiformes

We thank the reviewer for the suggestion. We have corrected the sentence accordingly to refer to the order Characiformes.

Attachments
Attachment
Submitted filename: S8_raw_images.pdf
Decision Letter - James Crainey, Editor

B chromosome retrotransposed sequences persist through speciation, contributing to genomic and regulatory innovations in the fish genus Psalidodon (Characiformes, Acestrorhamphidae)

PONE-D-25-45744R1

Dear Dr. Mazzoni Zerbinato A Silva,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager®  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. For questions related to billing, please contact billing support .

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

James Lee Crainey, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Formally Accepted
Acceptance Letter - James Crainey, Editor

PONE-D-25-45744R1

PLOS One

Dear Dr. Mazzoni Zerbinato A Silva,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS One. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

You will receive further instructions from the production team, including instructions on how to review your proof when it is ready. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few days to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

You will receive an invoice from PLOS for your publication fee after your manuscript has reached the completed accept phase. If you receive an email requesting payment before acceptance or for any other service, this may be a phishing scheme. Learn how to identify phishing emails and protect your accounts at https://explore.plos.org/phishing.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. James Lee Crainey

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Open letter on the publication of peer review reports

PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose to reveal their names.

We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions, to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research system.

Learn more at ASAPbio .