PONE-D-24-04543Research on the evolution of the structure and influencing factors of the export competitiveness
network of Chinese provincial agricultural products
——Based on a two-mode network perspectivePLOS ONE
Dear Dr. Chen,
Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration,
we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria
as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the
manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.
Please submit your revised manuscript by May 16 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more
time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact
the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.
Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s).
You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.
A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version.
You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.
An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload
this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.
If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your
updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files
are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.
We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.
Kind regards,
Tinggui Chen
Academic Editor
PLOS ONE
Journal Requirements:
When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.
1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including
those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at
2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:
"Social Science Planning Project of Sichuan Province: Research on the Comparative
Advantage Structure Evolution and Development Strategies of Sichuan Province's Agricultural
Products Export under the Belt and Road Initiative (SC22C012)."
Please state what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role,
please state: ""The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis,
decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.""
If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed.
Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will
change the online submission form on your behalf.
3. We note that your Data Availability Statement is currently as follows: All relevant
data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Please confirm at this time whether or not your submission contains all raw data required
to replicate the results of your study. Authors must share the “minimal data set”
for their submission. PLOS defines the minimal data set to consist of the data required
to replicate all study findings reported in the article, as well as related metadata
and methods (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-minimal-data-set-definition).
For example, authors should submit the following data:
- The values behind the means, standard deviations and other measures reported;
- The values used to build graphs;
- The points extracted from images for analysis.
Authors do not need to submit their entire data set if only a portion of the data
was used in the reported study.
If your submission does not contain these data, please either upload them as Supporting
Information files or deposit them to a stable, public repository and provide us with
the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of recommended repositories,
please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories.
If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please
explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data
are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an
ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee,
ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.
If data are owned by a third party, please indicate how others may request data access.
4. When completing the data availability statement of the submission form, you indicated
that you will make your data available on acceptance. We strongly recommend all authors
decide on a data sharing plan before acceptance, as the process can be lengthy and
hold up publication timelines. Please note that, though access restrictions are acceptable
now, your entire data will need to be made freely accessible if your manuscript is
accepted for publication. This policy applies to all data except where public deposition
would breach compliance with the protocol approved by your research ethics board.
If you are unable to adhere to our open data policy, please kindly revise your statement
to explain your reasoning and we will seek the editor's input on an exemption. Please
be assured that, once you have provided your new statement, the assessment of your
exemption will not hold up the peer review process.
Additional Editor Comments:
Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE.
I have completed my evaluation of your manuscript. The reviewers recommend reconsideration
of your manuscript following major revision. I invite you to resubmit your manuscript
after addressing the comments below.
[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]
Reviewers' comments:
Reviewer's Responses to Questions
Comments to the Author
1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?
The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with
data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously,
with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be
drawn appropriately based on the data presented.
Reviewer #1: Yes
Reviewer #2: Yes
Reviewer #3: Yes
Reviewer #4: Yes
**********
2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?
Reviewer #1: Yes
Reviewer #2: Yes
Reviewer #3: Yes
Reviewer #4: Yes
**********
3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully
available?
The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript
fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data
Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as
part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository.
For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians
and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing
data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.
Reviewer #1: Yes
Reviewer #2: No
Reviewer #3: No
Reviewer #4: No
**********
4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard
English?
PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles
must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should
be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.
Reviewer #1: Yes
Reviewer #2: Yes
Reviewer #3: No
Reviewer #4: No
**********
5. Review Comments to the Author
Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You
may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual
publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as
an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)
Reviewer #1: Greetings! This manuscript reveals the foreign trade network of agricultural
products at the provincial level, which is an important guide for sustainable regional
agricultural development. However, this article needs more in-depth analysis. I suggest
the following three aspects for improvement:
(1)Some of the content of the article lacks support from the literature, especially
in the introduction. In the introduction, the authors only cite a large number of
policy documents to highlight the practical significance of this study, but the scientific
significance is largely not mentioned.
(2)The authors should discuss the key findings obtained from the study.
(3)Authors should enhance the condensation of the conclusion and abstract sections
rather than simply repeating important findings.
Reviewer #2: The manuscript, titled "Research on the evolution of the structure and
influencing factors of the export competitiveness network of Chinese provincial agricultural
products – Based on a two-mode network perspective," has examined the changes in agricultural
exports and the factors that impact their export competitiveness.
This is an excellent paper, and it deals with an important and timely issue using
quantitative analytical tools. They have rightly used network analysis. However, the
authors must address the following issues to enhance the paper's quality, readability,
and communication.
•Title of the paper: The title of the manuscript is very long. The title of an article
is very important to enhance its searchability, reach the audience, engage readers,
influence their thoughts, and increase the probability of citations. The title is
expected to be understandable to people, even those who are not experts in the field.
Therefore, to reflect the content and make it easily understandable, the title may
be revised as "Export competitiveness network of Chinese provincial agricultural products:
Evolution, performance, and influencing factors."
•Strengthen the discussion section: The authors cited other studies, mainly in the
introduction and methodology section, to highlight the importance of examining an
issue. They have not compared the results of the present study with other studies
dealing with similar topics, such as the export competitiveness of agricultural products
(for example, Long, 2020) and the influence of Belt and Road on competitive advantage
(for example, Feng et al., 2020). They can also cite the results of studies on trade
competitiveness and international sister cities. For example, the manuscript has cited
the study by Ramasamy and Cremer (1998), who analyzed the economic role of international
sister-city relationships between New Zealand and Asia. Readers and policymakers will
appreciate it if the authors cite the results of such studies. Thoughtful comparison
always enhances the quality and impact of our research.
References
Feng, L., Xu, H., Wu, G., Zhao, Y., & Xu, J. (2020). Exploring the structure and influence
factors of trade competitive advantage network along the Belt and Road. Physica A:
Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 559, 125057.
Long, Y. (2021). Export competitiveness of agricultural products and agricultural
sustainability in China. Regional Sustainability, 2(3), 203-210.
Ramasamy, B., & Cremer, R. D. (1998). Cities, commerce and culture: The economic role
of international sister‐city relationships between New Zealand and Asia. Journal of
the Asia Pacific Economy, 3(3), 446-461.
Reviewer #3: The paper has assessed the competitive advantage position of provincial
agricultural product exports in the international market and investigated the influencing
factors of the competitiveness network of provincial agricultural product exports.
1. Does the citation format of the literature meet the requirements of the journal?
The author needs to confirm it again.
2. In introduction, the main research problems and research contributions of this
study should be clearly defined.
3. It is suggest the authors to add a discussion on the application research of the
dual mode network.
4. The figures from this manuscript are not clear. Please ask the authors to resolve
this issue.
5. Does Guangxi produce coconut? Please ask the authors to confirm it.
6. The models required for this study should be placed in one section
7. The robust analysis should be added.
8. More robust analysis should be provided.
9. Finally, this manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical
English editing.
Reviewer #4: Dear Authors,
Your research on the evolution of the export competitiveness network of Chinese provincial
agricultural products and its influencing factors offers valuable insights into a
critical area of agricultural economics and international trade. After a thorough
review, I would like to provide some constructive feedback to enhance the clarity,
depth, and impact of your work.
1. Originality and Significance:
Your study makes a significant contribution by using export customs data from 2015
to 2022 to analyze the competitive network of agricultural exports across various
Chinese provinces. The focus on the dynamic evolution of this network and the systematic
analysis of influencing factors is commendable. However, it would be beneficial to
more explicitly state how this work builds upon and diverges from existing literature
in the field. Highlighting the novel aspects of your research will underscore its
contribution to academic and practical knowledge.
2. Theoretical Framework:
The paper could benefit from a clearer articulation of the theoretical framework guiding
the analysis. While the empirical approach is robust, integrating a theoretical perspective
on networks in international trade or theories of competitive advantage could provide
a stronger foundation for interpreting the results. This addition would also help
in situating your work within broader academic discussions.
3. Methodology:
The methodology section is well-developed, leveraging export customs data to construct
a network analysis of provincial agricultural product competitiveness. However, details
on the specific network analysis techniques and statistical methods used would enhance
the reader's understanding and the reproducibility of the study. Additionally, discussing
any limitations of your methodological approach would lend credibility to your findings.
4. Results and Discussion:
Your findings regarding the increasing competitiveness of provincial agricultural
exports, the need for enhanced competitive advantages, the role of international sister
city relationships, and the influence of agricultural output, exports, and trade freedom
indexes are intriguing. It would be valuable to deepen the discussion on how these
factors interplay and their implications for policy and practice. Exploring the heterogeneity
in the effects of node attributes across different provincial regions and export destinations
in more detail could provide nuanced insights into strategic planning for export competitiveness.
5. Policy Implications and Recommendations:
The policy recommendations provided are a strong point of the paper, particularly
the emphasis on cultivating distinctive and globally competitive agricultural products
and leveraging the Belt and Road initiative. Expanding on how these strategies can
be implemented at both the provincial and national levels, considering the varied
economic and agricultural contexts across China, would make the recommendations more
actionable.
6. Writing Quality and Organization:
Overall, the manuscript is well-organized and clearly written. Ensuring consistency
in terminology and further proofreading to catch any grammatical or typographical
errors would polish the final manuscript. It may also be helpful to include more visual
aids, such as charts or graphs, to illustrate key findings and trends.
In conclusion, your manuscript provides a valuable contribution to the field of agricultural
economics and international trade. With the suggested revisions, I believe the paper
will offer stronger insights and clearer guidance for researchers, policymakers, and
practitioners interested in enhancing the export competitiveness of Chinese provincial
agricultural products. I look forward to seeing the revised manuscript and believe
it has the potential to make a significant impact.
**********
6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article
(what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.
If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still
be made public.
Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.
Reviewer #1: No
Reviewer #2: Yes: Uttam Deb
Reviewer #3: No
Reviewer #4: No
**********
[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached
to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account,
locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If
this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]
While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis
and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first
register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab,
where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter
any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.
We wish to thank the reviewer 1 for her/his detailed comments and suggestions that
helped to tremendously improve the manuscript.
Reviewer #1: Greetings! This manuscript reveals the foreign trade network of agricultural
products at the provincial level, which is an important guide for sustainable regional
agricultural development. However, this article needs more in-depth analysis. I suggest
the following three aspects for improvement:
(1) Some of the content of the article lacks support from the literature, especially
in the introduction. In the introduction, the authors only cite a large number of
policy documents to highlight the practical significance of this study, but the scientific
significance is largely not mentioned.
We noticed that there is a lengthy discussion about policy documents. Thus, we made
deletions and added explanations of scientific significance.
In the Introduction section, the policy documents paragraph was rephrased as followed:
In 2022, China’s Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs rolled out the “14th Five
Year Plan for International Cooperation in Agriculture and Rural Affairs”, emphasising
the enhancement of international collaboration in agriculture and the development
of competitive advantages in agricultural trade. This focus on competitive advantage
has now become a significant influencing factor in China’s agricultural cooperation
endeavours [1].
The explanation of scientific significance was added in the Introduction:
Despite this progress, Chinese agriculture contends with challenges such as limited
resources, land fragmentation, and high production costs [2]. These issues have impacted
the competitiveness of China’s agricultural exports, which have revealed a comparative
disadvantage [3,4], hindering the export growth and sustainable development of the
sector [5]. In light of these circumstances, it is imperative to assess the current
situation, identify the reasons, and understand the factors influencing the competitiveness
of China’s agricultural product exports. This will aid in shaping a high-quality development
model for China’s agricultural trade within the existing development framework.
(2) The authors should discuss the key findings obtained from the study.
We thank the reviewer for raising this important point. We have made some additions
and deletions to the discussion on the research conclusions.
1)In the 5.Network structure characteristics and evolution analysis section, the following
phrase was added:
It is clear that provinces selectively opt for specific export markets for their agricultural
products to cultivate a competitive advantage. However, this advantage in competitiveness
falls under 4% across the 174 countries (regions) analysed in this paper. Thus, the
competitiveness of Chinese provincial agricultural exports is essentially minimal.
The following phrase was deleted:
The process of choosing export markets for agricultural products can create a degree
of exclusivity, establishing a competitive advantage and potentially reducing or avoiding
competition among different agricultural products in the same international market.
As a result, it will facilitate the establishment of a competitive edge in global
markets and serve as a demonstration base for agricultural exports from the province.
So, the first conclusion is:
Firstly, there are significant opportunities to improve the competitive edge of agricultural
product exports across various Chinese provinces.
2) In the 5.Network structure characteristics and evolution analysis section, the
following phrase was added:
However, the yearly rankings of the top 5 agricultural products show variability and
instability across provinces, with only Guangdong Province consistently showing a
competitive edge.
So, the second conclusion is:
Secondly, with the exception of Guangdong Province, the types of competitively robust
agricultural products exported by each province are inconsistent.
3)Based on the research findings of the paper, the third conclusion is:
Thirdly, international sister-city relationships can foster the development of an
export competitiveness network of Chinese provincial agricultural products, whereas
geographic distance may hinder this network.
4) the fourth conclusion is:
Lastly, the development of this competition-focused export network is also influenced
by province-level and national (or regional) characteristics, and there are unique
differences within these influences.
(3) Authors should enhance the condensation of the conclusion and abstract sections
rather than simply repeating important findings.
We apologize for the redundancy concerning the statements in the conclusion and abstract
sections of the paper. We have sorted out the article's conclusions and extracted
key conclusions.
In the conclusion and abstract section, the corresponding paragraph was rephrased
as followed:
Our analysis leads to several conclusions. Firstly, the competitive edge of agricultural
exports from various Chinese provinces needs bolstering. Secondly, aside from Guangdong
Province, the stability of competitively advantaged agricultural exports is uncertain
in other provinces. Thirdly, the international sister-city network aids the development
of Chinese provincial agricultural product export competitiveness, whereas distance
hinders the formation of competitive export trade relationships. Lastly, the creation
of this export competitiveness network is also influenced by provincial and national
(regional) characteristics, suggesting a degree of heterogeneity.
We are grateful for the constructive comments of reviewer 2 that helped to strengthen
the manuscript.
Reviewer #2: The manuscript, titled "Research on the evolution of the structure and
influencing factors of the export competitiveness network of Chinese provincial agricultural
products – Based on a two-mode network perspective," has examined the changes in agricultural
exports and the factors that impact their export competitiveness.
This is an excellent paper, and it deals with an important and timely issue using
quantitative analytical tools. They have rightly used network analysis. However, the
authors must address the following issues to enhance the paper's quality, readability,
and communication.
•Title of the paper: The title of the manuscript is very long. The title of an article
is very important to enhance its searchability, reach the audience, engage readers,
influence their thoughts, and increase the probability of citations. The title is
expected to be understandable to people, even those who are not experts in the field.
Therefore, to reflect the content and make it easily understandable, the title may
be revised as "Export competitiveness network of Chinese provincial agricultural products:
Evolution, performance, and influencing factors."
Research on the evolution of the structure and influencing factors of the export competitiveness
network of Chinese provincial agricultural products – Based on a two-mode network
perspective
As proposed by the reviewer, we adopted revised title as the title of our paper:
Export competitiveness network of Chinese provincial agricultural products: Evolution,
performance, and influencing factors.
•Strengthen the discussion section: The authors cited other studies, mainly in the
introduction and methodology section, to highlight the importance of examining an
issue. They have not compared the results of the present study with other studies
dealing with similar topics, such as the export competitiveness of agricultural products
(for example, Long, 2020) and the influence of Belt and Road on competitive advantage
(for example, Feng et al., 2020). They can also cite the results of studies on trade
competitiveness and international sister cities. For example, the manuscript has cited
the study by Ramasamy and Cremer (1998), who analyzed the economic role of international
sister-city relationships between New Zealand and Asia. Readers and policymakers will
appreciate it if the authors cite the results of such studies. Thoughtful comparison
always enhances the quality and impact of our research.
We apologize for not having compared the results of the present study with other studies
dealing with similar topics. As suggested, we added literature comparison and rephrased
the respective sentences in the corresponding section.
In the 2. Literature review section, the paragraph was rephrased as followed:
In summary, while current literature provides extensive theoretical and empirical
research on the competitive advantage of agricultural trade and trade networks, it
lacks a focused, detailed look at the export competitiveness of agricultural products
from individual Chinese provinces. Some studies have examined the export competitiveness
of Chinese agricultural products [5], but none have assessed the influencing factors
and evolutionary patterns of such competitiveness via a network perspective. This
gap leaves us without a comprehensive understanding of provincial agricultural product
export networks.
In the 4.1 Network construction section, the second paragraph was rephrased as followed:
Feng et al. [52] primarily researched RCA networks along the Belt and Road without
categorising the products. These fall under one-mode networks. We examine the export
competitiveness network of different agricultural products from a more granular, provincial
viewpoint, which is classified as a two-mode network. This micro two-mode network
is particularly suitable for analysing the export competitiveness of Chinese provinces’
agricultural products.
We are thankful to reviewer 3 for his valuable comments that helped to profoundly
improve the manuscript.
Reviewer #3: The paper has assessed the competitive advantage position of provincial
agricultural product exports in the international market and investigated the influencing
factors of the competitiveness network of provincial agricultural product exports.
1. Does the citation format of the literature meet the requirements of the journal?
The author needs to confirm it again.
We thank the reviewer for raising this important point. Based on the requirements
and specifications of the journals regarding formatting, we used endnote software
to fully adjust the formatting of references.
2. In introduction, the main research problems and research contributions of this
study should be clearly defined.
As suggested, we rephrased the research problems and research contributions of this
study in the Introduction section.
The innovations in this study are primarily seen in several aspects. First, using
provincial agricultural product export data, we categorise agricultural product types
based on the 4-digit Harmonized System (HS). This allows for a detailed exploration
of the current status and issues concerning the global reach of Chinese provincial
agricultural products. Second, applying a two-mode network perspective and an enhanced
revealed comparative advantage index, we innovatively construct an export competitiveness
network of provincial agricultural products. This provides insight into the network’s
evolution, growth, and the current state of provincial export competitiveness for
agricultural products in China. Third, by using the Exponential Random Graph Model
(ERGM), we investigate the factors influencing the development of the export competitiveness
network of provincial agricultural product and offer sound policy suggestions for
nurturing competitive advantages in provincial agricultural products.
3. It is suggest the authors to add a discussion on the application research of the
dual mode network.
We thank the reviewer for raising this important point. As suggested, we added a discussion
on the application research of the two-mode network.
Research on the two-mode network
Initial research into two-mode networks emphasised clustering, density, and centrality
metrics [23]. Since then, indicators of structural features and empirical econometric
models have been developed [24,25]. By adopting dynamic thinking, researchers have
evolved the study of two-mode networks from a static to a dynamic perspective [26].
Various practical applications of two-mode networks such as firm-city networks [27,28],
debt-bonding networks between non-financial and financial listed companies [29], networks
mapping Southern women’s activity participation [30], stakeholder and cost management
networks [8], and fund-stock networks [31], have been thoroughly explored. Such studies
typically encompass the conversion of a two-mode network into a one-mode network,
the structural assessment of a two-mode network, and the analysis of factors influencing
a two-mode network.
4. The figures from this manuscript are not clear. Please ask the authors to resolve
this issue.
We apologize that the graphs are blurry in the paper. The figures in the paper are
as follows:
Fig. 1. A schematic diagram of the construction of a two-mode network for provincial
agricultural exports.
(a)
(b)
Fig 2. The export competitiveness networks of the top five provincial agricultural
products in 2015 (a) and 2022 (b). (data source: Chinese customs data). Note: The
red nodes represent provincial agricultural products, and their size is proportional
to the degree; the purple nodes represent countries or regions. The edges represent
TCA values, and their widths are positively correlated with the TCA values.
(a)
(b)
Fig 3. The number of agricultural products with competitive advantages that Chinese
provinces exported in 2015 (a) and 2022 (b). (data source: Chinese customs data).
5. Does Guangxi produce coconut? Please ask the authors to confirm it.
As suggested, we went further and checked the data. In a report on the development
of the coconut industry, it is noted that coconuts are mainly distributed in Hainan,
Yunnan, Guangdong, Guangxi, Fujian, Taiwan and other provinces and regions of China.
Among them, Hainan is the main production area. We looked further into Chinese customs
data. In 2022, a total of 11 provinces in China exported coconuts, and only Guangxi
province exported coconuts to the United States. Therefore, Guangxi produces coconut.
6. The models required for this study should be placed in one section
We thank the reviewers for this suggestion. Two parts of this paper include formulas.
One, in Chapter 4, analyses the network by constructing the network and the network
metrics. This part of the formulas aims to perform a network structure analysis to
describe the development process of constructing the network. Secondly, the formulas
are involved in the model construction part of Chapter Five. This part is based on
Chapter 4. They are differentiated. Generally speaking, the research paradigm using
network analysis methodology includes network structure analysis and empirical regression
analysis, with different research contents and perspectives. After much deliberation,
placing the two parts of the formula in the same section is inappropriate.
7. The robust analysis should be added.
We thank the reviewer for pointing to this important methodological aspect of our
paper. We have now added robust analysis in the Analysis of regression results section.
Robustness analysis
This paper employs lagged data and replacement regression methods for robustness testing.
The corresponding regression results can be found in Table 6.
PONE-D-24-04543R1Export competitiveness network of Chinese provincial agricultural products: Evolution,
performance, and influencing factorsPLOS ONE
Dear Dr. Chen,
Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration,
we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria
as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the
manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.
Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 15 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more
time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact
the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.
Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s).
You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.
A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version.
You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.
An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload
this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.
If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your
updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files
are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.
We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.
Kind regards,
Tinggui Chen
Academic Editor
PLOS ONE
Journal Requirements:
Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you
have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing
so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant
current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal
letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article,
indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a
citation and full reference for the retraction notice.
[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]
Reviewers' comments:
Reviewer's Responses to Questions
Comments to the Author
1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round
of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you
may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your
conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit
your "Accept" recommendation.
Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed
Reviewer #3: All comments have been addressed
Reviewer #4: All comments have been addressed
**********
2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?
The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with
data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously,
with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be
drawn appropriately based on the data presented.
Reviewer #2: Yes
Reviewer #3: Yes
Reviewer #4: Yes
**********
3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?
Reviewer #2: Yes
Reviewer #3: Yes
Reviewer #4: Yes
**********
4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully
available?
The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript
fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data
Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as
part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository.
For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians
and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing
data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.
Reviewer #2: Yes
Reviewer #3: Yes
Reviewer #4: Yes
**********
5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard
English?
PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles
must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should
be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.
Reviewer #2: Yes
Reviewer #3: Yes
Reviewer #4: No
**********
6. Review Comments to the Author
Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You
may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual
publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as
an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)
Reviewer #2: Thank you for addressing the comments and suggestions in the revised
version of the manuscript. Now, it is an excellent paper with potential impacts for
enhancing export competitiveness.
Reviewer #3: The revision has been well improved based on the comments of the reviewers.
But, the manuscript still needs some minor improvements based on following comments.
1. The understanding of the research innovations from the authors is biased. The three
research innovations mentioned in this paper seem to be the main focus of this study.
2. The current literature lacks a focused, detailed look at the export competitiveness
of agricultural products from individual Chinese provinces. But, the authors did not
mention the necessity of this research in the introduction,
3. In Empirical analysis section, there are still relatively little comparative analysis
with other methods and literature.
4. The main conclusions and policy implications do not seem to correspond one-to-one.
Meantime, the policy implications should have specific implementation entities.
Reviewer #4: The authors have largely addressed the suggestions made by the reviewers,
but there are still the following details that need attention:
1. Pay attention to formatting, such as aligning the ends of the text and keeping
the charts and graphs on the same page.
2. Simplify the content, such as the findings need to be further refined and summarised
to make them more logical and organised.
3. describe in detail the construction process of the agricultural export competitiveness
network, including the definition of network nodes and edges, data processing methods
and other content.
4. carefully proofread and revise the language of the paper to ensure smooth and accurate
language expression and avoid grammatical errors and spelling mistakes.
**********
7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article
(what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.
If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still
be made public.
Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.
Reviewer #2: Yes: Uttam Deb
Reviewer #3: No
Reviewer #4: No
**********
[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached
to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account,
locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If
this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]
While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis
and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first
register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab,
where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter
any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.
We are thankful to reviewer 3 and reviewer 4 for their valuable comments that helped
to improve the manuscript once again.
Reviewer #3: The revision has been well improved based on the comments of the reviewers.
But, the manuscript still needs some minor improvements based on following comments.
1. The understanding of the research innovations from the authors is biased. The three
research innovations mentioned in this paper seem to be the main focus of this study.
We thank the reviewer for raising this important point. We rephrased the research
innovations in the Introduction section.
(1) Most existing literature studies the export competitiveness of Chinese agricultural
products from a national perspective. This paper, however, connects Chinese provinces
with exported agricultural products and examines the international competitiveness
of Chinese provincial agricultural products from a more micro perspective.(2) By applying
a two-mode network perspective and an enhanced revealed comparative advantage index,
this paper innovatively constructs an export competitiveness network of provincial
agricultural products, which further enriches the research paradigm and methodology
on the trade relationship. (3) Using the Exponential Random Graph Model (ERGM), this
paper investigates the factors influencing the development of the export competitiveness
network of provincial agricultural products from a comprehensive perspective. Compared
to the traditional linear regression model, ERGM can better track the endogenous dependencies
in forming the export competitiveness network, a task the conventional regression
model cannot accomplish.
2. The current literature lacks a focused, detailed look at the export competitiveness
of agricultural products from individual Chinese provinces. But, the authors did not
mention the necessity of this research in the introduction.
We apologize for not mentioning the necessity of the export competitiveness of agricultural
products from individual Chinese provinces. As suggested, we added a paragraph in
the Introduction section.
The main objective of this study is to investigate the status and influence of Chinese
provincial export competitiveness for agricultural products from the perspective of
complex networks. The study aims to explore the evolution of the export competitiveness
network of Chinese provincial agricultural products and to identify the factors affecting
the competitive advantages of agricultural exports at the provincial level. The current
literature lacks a focused and detailed exploration of the export competitiveness
of agricultural products from Chinese provinces. This study fills this gap by conducting
a comprehensive analysis from micro and macro perspectives.
3. In Empirical analysis section, there are still relatively little comparative analysis
with other methods and literature.
We thank the reviewer for raising this important point. We have made some additions
to the comparative analysis with other methods and literature.
In contrast to traditional linear regression models, such as those in Zhou and Tong
[4] and Huyen and Bang [10], ERGM does not exclude the endogeneity problem. Additionally,
the model incorporates three different levels of explanatory variables and is capable
of identifying key influences as comprehensively as possible [39]. Therefore, ERGM
is widely used as a statistical analysis tool for both one-mode [58,59] and two-mode
networks [25,60,61].
4. The main conclusions and policy implications do not seem to correspond one-to-one.
Meantime, the policy implications should have specific implementation entities.
As proposed by the reviewer, we adjusted the policy recommendations based on our conclusions
one by one and indicated the implementing entity for each policy.
The first policy implication corresponds to the first conclusion.
(1) Enhancing and developing agricultural products with traditional advantages in
China's provinces, strengthening cooperation with research institutes and relevant
enterprises, and cultivating distinctive and high-quality varieties will help increase
their international competitiveness and influence. Specifically, the provincial government
can improve the quality of agricultural products through standardized, large-scale,
and modernized production models and create distinctive and competitive agricultural
products in each province based on economic and agricultural diversity.
The second policy implication corresponds to the second conclusion.
(2) Provincial governments should actively create agricultural brands and form a group
of competitive geographical indications for agricultural products to stabilize the
superior agricultural products in each province. On the one hand, provincial governments
should provide policy support and guidance to integrate modern agricultural industrial
parks and advantageous specialty industrial clusters and create agricultural product
brands with strong competitive advantages in the provinces. On the other hand, provincial
governments can facilitate better exports of advantageous agricultural products by
building stable and mature export routes.
The third policy implication corresponds to the third conclusion.
(3) Provincial governments must make the most of diplomatic relations at the local
level to build a platform for agricultural cooperation. Leverage international sister-city
relationships to create new possibilities for bilateral economic and trade cooperation
and to enhance the competitive advantage of provincial agricultural exports in friendly
countries. Encourage interactions and collaborations between provinces and global
partners to increase awareness and recognition of provincial agricultural products
through bilateral cultural and economic exchanges. At the same time, special attention
should be paid to exploring complementary spaces for agricultural products between
Chinese provinces and countries along the Belt and Road.
The fourth policy implication corresponds to the fourth conclusion.
(4) Different regions should carry out reasonable regional layouts and planning for
agricultural products to avoid homogenization and the situation of many but not strong.
The eastern region should fully utilize its geographic location to consolidate the
dominant position of agricultural products in markets such as the United States, the
European Union, Japan, and South Korea, while the central and western regions should
actively promote the diversification of agricultural export markets based on the CHINA
RAILWAY Express and the new western land-sea corridor.
Reviewer #4: The authors have largely addressed the suggestions made by the reviewers,
but there are still the following details that need attention.
1. Pay attention to formatting, such as aligning the ends of the text and keeping
the charts and graphs on the same page.
We thank the reviewers for this suggestion. The latest manuscript has been set up
to align the ends of the text and keep the charts and graphs on the same page.
2. Simplify the content, such as the findings need to be further refined and summarised
to make them more logical and organised.
We thank the reviewer for pointing to this important issue. We rephrased the sentences
in the analysis of regression results.
The content of paragraph ' In terms of pure structural effects ' and ' The 2-star
with a positive coefficient significantly fosters ' has been simplified based on internal
logic.
The 2-star with a positive coefficient significantly fosters export competitiveness
for agricultural products in the global market, indicating a “rich get richer” effect.
This means that competitive export relationships are continually expanding. In situations
where such relationships are already in place, Chinese provincial agricultural products
tend to form more. This paper can, therefore, confirm that the model’s results verify
H1. Simultaneously, the 3-star coefficient shows a significantly negative value. As
trade costs rise with the addition of too many competitive export relationships for
agricultural products, provinces will avoid forming numerous such relationships.
Social network analysis typically features Markov models with convergence, characterized
by positive 2-star coefficients and negative 3-star coefficients [25]. A positive
2-star coefficient suggests a propensity for forming new friendships, while a negative
3-star coefficient implies potential drawbacks from establishing and sustaining a
large number of friendships, indicating a “ceiling” on maintained friendships [66].China
has emphasized the importance of promoting high-quality agricultural development,
paying more attention to expanding favorable agricultural products in international
markets, and creating new competitive advantages in exporting specialty agricultural
products.
The paragraph of ' Secondly, concerning node attribute variables ' was rephased as
followed:
AFAHF and export significantly contribute to establishing the provincial agricultural
products’ export competitiveness network. A higher provincial AFAHF suggests a propensity
for a province to develop competitive advantages in its agricultural products. Provincial
export establishes a channel for agricultural products in each province.
The paragraph of ' The effect of national (or regional) attributes on the competitive
advantage ' was rephased as followed:
CouGDP's influence on the competitive advantage of provincial agricultural exports
is statistically insignificant. Financially developed countries or regions are more
probable recipients of agricultural exports from China's various provinces. This scenario
makes it difficult for each province's agricultural exports to form a competitive
edge in the financially developed export markets.
The part ' China’s varying economic development and openness across its eastern, central,
and western regions can lead to different factors influencing the competitive advantages
of agricultural exports in each province. ' was deleted.
The paragraph of ' The regression results in Table 7 indicate that ' was rephased
as followed:
The regression results in Table 7 indicate that the formation of competitive advantage
for provincial agricultural product exports is influenced uniformly by structural
effects and covariate networks. Due to the advanced economy in the eastern and central
provinces, where the sister-city relationship has a limited role in boosting their
agricultural exports’ competitiveness, the eastern and central provinces generally
have lower coefficients than the western provinces. These findings emphasize the importance
of considering the provincial’s economic development and openness when exploring the
actors influencing the competitive advantages of agricultural exports.
The paragraph ' The coefficient for the international sister-city network ' and '
Ultimately, the establishment of competitive agricultural export relationships ' has
been merged as one paragraph based on the content and internal logic.
The international sister-city network shows a significant positive relationship within
both categories. However, this relationship is less pronounced for countries along
the Belt and Road. This result reveals that the friendly relations between Chinese
provinces and countries (regions) along the Belt and Road are not entirely mirrored
in the provinces’ agricultural export competitiveness. Ultimately, the establishment
of competitive agricultural export relationships by Chinese provinces along the Belt
and Road route is also shaped by contractual relationships, reducing the influence
of sister-city relations. Most countries along the Belt and Road possess natural geographical
advantages, substantial economic development benefits, and a strong reliance on foreign
trade. Thus, the establishment of sister-city relationships holds the potential to
enhance cooperation and development further.
3. describe in detail the construction process of the agricultural export competitiveness
network, including the definition of network nodes and edges, data processing methods
and other content.
We apologize for not describing in detail the construction process of the agricultural
export competitiveness network in the paper. As suggested, we have made some additions.
The part ' The network comprises two types of nodes ' was changed as followed:
The network comprises two types of nodes: one is a composite node encompassing a province
and a specific type of agricultural product, meaning each node corresponds to a province
and the agricultural product it exports. For example, if Guangdong Province exports
Vegetable Oil, then Guangdong-Vegetable Oil constitutes a node. This paper identified
a total of 189 agricultural product export categories classified at the HS 4-digit
level. The theoretical maximum number of nodes in this type is 189 x 31, combining
31 provinces. The other type of node represents the export destination, signifying
a country or region. The edges of the two-mode network of provincial agricultural
product exports are the trade relationships established between the province's agricultural
products and countries.
The paragraph ' Feng et al. [52] primarily researched RCA networks ' was added a sentence:
Based on the trade volume of various agricultural products exported from Chinese provinces
to different countries, the TCA is constructed as follows:
4. carefully proofread and revise the language of the paper to ensure smooth and accurate
language expression and avoid grammatical errors and spelling mistakes.
As suggested, we checked the whole manuscript once again and corrected the misrepresentations.
PONE-D-24-04543R2Export competitiveness network of Chinese provincial agricultural products: Evolution,
performance, and influencing factorsPLOS ONE
Dear Dr. Chen,
Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration,
we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria
as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the
manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.
Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 10 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more
time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact
the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.
Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s).
You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.
A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version.
You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.
An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload
this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.
If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your
updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files
are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.
We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.
Kind regards,
Tinggui Chen
Academic Editor
PLOS ONE
Additional Editor Comments :
Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE.
I have completed my evaluation of your manuscript. The reviewers recommend reconsideration
of your manuscript following major revision. I invite you to resubmit your manuscript
after addressing the comments below.
[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]
Reviewers' comments:
Reviewer's Responses to Questions
Comments to the Author
1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round
of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you
may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your
conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit
your "Accept" recommendation.
Reviewer #4: (No Response)
Reviewer #5: All comments have been addressed
**********
2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?
The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with
data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously,
with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be
drawn appropriately based on the data presented.
Reviewer #4: Partly
Reviewer #5: Yes
**********
3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?
Reviewer #4: Yes
Reviewer #5: Yes
**********
4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully
available?
The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript
fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data
Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as
part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository.
For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians
and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing
data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.
Reviewer #4: No
Reviewer #5: Yes
**********
5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard
English?
PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles
must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should
be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.
Reviewer #4: No
Reviewer #5: Yes
**********
6. Review Comments to the Author
Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You
may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual
publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as
an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)
Reviewer #4: The manuscript presents an interesting analysis of the export competitiveness
network of Chinese provincial agricultural products from 2015 to 2022. The use of
a two-mode network perspective and the Exponential Random Graph Model (ERGM) adds
novelty to the research. However, there are a few points that need clarification and
improvements to strengthen the manuscript.
1. Introduction Section:
The introduction could benefit from a more concise summary of the research gap, particularly
international outlook, and the significance of studying export competitiveness at
the provincial level. Clearly stating why this study is needed and how it differs
from existing literature will strengthen the motivation. The authors mention three
research innovations, but these could be framed more clearly in the context of the
overall study goals and objectives.
2. Methodology: Provide more details on the construction of the export competitiveness
network. Clarify the definition of network nodes and edges, including the data sources
and processing methods. This will help readers replicate the analysis. Explain the
choice of ERGM over other statistical models, highlighting its advantages in capturing
endogenous dependencies.
3. Empirical Analysis: Strengthen the comparative analysis with other methods and
literature. Discuss how ERGM compares to traditional linear regression models in terms
of explaining the development of the export competitiveness network. Provide more
interpretation of the regression results, particularly the significance of various
network effects and covariates. Link the findings back to the research questions and
hypotheses.
4. Results and Discussion: The findings could be organized more logically and concisely.
Avoid repetition and streamline the explanations to make them more accessible to readers.
Discuss potential limitations of the study and suggestions for future research. For
example, consider examining longer time series data or including additional covariates.
5. Policy Implications: The policy implications are well-aligned with the conclusions,
but could be framed more concretely with specific actions provinces could take. Consider
including real-world examples or case studies to illustrate the implementation of
these policies.
6. Formatting and Language: Ensure the text is consistently formatted, with aligned
ends and charts/graphs kept on the same page. Carefully proofread the manuscript to
correct any grammatical errors, spelling mistakes, or unclear phrasing.
Reviewer #5: The manuscript can be considered for publication after the following
questions and recommendations:
1-The researchers did not indicate what is new and distinctive in the abstract of
this manuscript (compared to other previous studies).
2-The authors did not specify the method used to determine the sample size.
3-The idea of the manuscript is based on the exported products to determine which
products have the most significant impact on the global market. Therefore, the Pareto
chart will help draw a clearer picture for the reader and summarize the manuscript
in one chart. The Pareto chart aims to highlight the most important products among
a (usually large) group of products.
4-The researchers did not mention why this regression method was used to analyze the
results.
**********
7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article
(what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.
If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still
be made public.
Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.
Reviewer #4: No
Reviewer #5: No
**********
[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached
to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account,
locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If
this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]
While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis
and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first
register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab,
where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter
any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.
We are thankful to reviewer 4 and reviewer 5 for their valuable comments that helped
to improve the manuscript.
Reviewer #4: The manuscript presents an interesting analysis of the export competitiveness
network of Chinese provincial agricultural products from 2015 to 2022. The use of
a two-mode network perspective and the Exponential Random Graph Model (ERGM) adds
novelty to the research. However, there are a few points that need clarification and
improvements to strengthen the manuscript.
1. Introduction Section:
The introduction could benefit from a more concise summary of the research gap, particularly
international outlook, and the significance of studying export competitiveness at
the provincial level. Clearly stating why this study is needed and how it differs
from existing literature will strengthen the motivation. The authors mention three
research innovations, but these could be framed more clearly in the context of the
overall study goals and objectives.
We thank the reviewer for raising this important point. As suggested, we have made
some additions and rephrased portions of the Introduction section.
The third paragraph in the Introduction section has been supplemented with additional
sentences:
Notably, the primary competitive agricultural products in the global market include
wheat from Russia, soybeans from the United States, and rice from Thailand. As a major
agricultural nation, China is relatively deficient in globally competitive agricultural
products.
The first sentence in the fourth paragraph was rephrased as follows:
The competitive advantage of exported products is crucial for the high-quality economic
development of a country or region.
We have added a sentence in the fourth paragraph:
Due to variations in geographic location and resource endowment, China's exported
agricultural products exhibit distinct geographical characteristics and imbalances.
A sentence in the fourth paragraph was rephrased as follows:
Therefore, it is essential to provide complete insights into the agricultural export
advantages of each province [8] and to identify the factors that propel the effective
international expansion of these advantageous agricultural products [9,10].
A sentence in the fifth paragraph was rephrased as follows:
Exploring the evolution of the export competitiveness network of Chinese provincial
agricultural products and identifying the influencing factors will help promote the
high-quality development of agricultural trade in China's provinces.
A sentence in the sixth paragraph was rephrased as follows:
This paper, however, connects Chinese provinces with their exported agricultural products
and examines the international competitiveness of Chinese provincial agricultural
products from a more micro perspective to further explain the regionalization and
differentiation characteristics of competitive agricultural products across Chinese
provinces.
A sentence has been added to the sixth paragraph:
This approach more effectively identifies agricultural products with competitive advantages
in each province and further enriches the research paradigm and methodology regarding
the trade relationship.
2. Methodology: Provide more details on the construction of the export competitiveness
network. Clarify the definition of network nodes and edges, including the data sources
and processing methods. This will help readers replicate the analysis. Explain the
choice of ERGM over other statistical models, highlighting its advantages in capturing
endogenous dependencies.
We apologize for not describing in detail the construction process of the agricultural
export competitiveness network in the paper.
This paper develops the export competitiveness network of provincial agricultural
products based on the two-mode network for provincial agricultural exports. These
two types of networks have the same nodes but different edges. As suggested, we enhanced
the description of the nodes and edges within the export competitiveness network of
Chinese provincial agricultural products in the part of Network construction.
Therefore, the nodes of the export competitiveness network of Chinese provincial agricultural
products include two categories: the composite nodes of agricultural products exported
from Chinese provinces and the destination countries. The edges of the export competitiveness
network are the TCA index with a value greater than 1.5.
As suggested, we have made some additions about data sources and processing methods
in Network construction.
We added a sentence in the first paragraph of the Network construction:
The data was sourced from China Customs data, which has been available since 2015.
By 2023, obtaining complete data for the year ending in 2022 may be possible. Therefore,
the research sample in this paper is based on data from 2015 to 2022 to ensure consistency
and coherence.
We added a sentence in the second paragraph of the Network construction:
We excluded the sample of countries with missing data on economic freedom for more
than two consecutive years, resulting in 186 countries. From this group, we further
excluded countries that had missing GDP data for more than two consecutive years.
Ultimately, the final sample comprised 174 countries.
A sentence about why we determine the sample size based on HS 4 to classify provincial
agricultural products has been added to the second paragraph of the Network construction:
The advantage of classifying agricultural products at the HS 4-digit level is that
it effectively distinguishes between various agricultural products without leading
to an excessively granular and diverse range. In this paper, we have excluded the
Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan regions of China.
We summarize the reasons for selecting the ERGM based on three key points, the second
of which illustrates the advantages in capturing endogenous dependencies.
(1) The ERGM is a crucial empirical regression model utilized in complex network analysis.
It helps explain the characteristics of network structure and the factors that influence
its formation. The ERGM views the whole network structure as a combination of local
network effects, seeing the observed network as one possible outcome among a set of
random networks [56]. Compared to the linear regression methods employed in Long [5]
and Bojnec and Ferto [6], which only explore the factors influencing the competitiveness
of agricultural exports from an external perspective, the ERGM provides insights into
the formation of relationships and the underlying factors that shape them, grounded
in the nature and logic of network construction.
(2) In contrast to traditional linear regression models, such as those presented by
Zhou and Tong [4] and Huyen and Bang [10], ERGM does not exclude the issue of endogeneity.
An essential category of explanatory variables in ERGM is network self-organization,
which refers to the network structure of the explanatory variables. The underlying
rationale is that network connections are both endogenous and interdependent [35].
Pre-existing network relationships significantly influence the formation of new connections
within the network. Thereby, ERGM aims to comprehend the formation of the entire network
through its local structure [57].
(3) Additionally, the model incorporates three different types of explanatory variables:
self-organization, node attribute indicators, and external covariate network. Based
on this, we can comprehensively identify critical influences [39] and promote the
theoretical hypothesis regarding the formation of export competitiveness networks.
3. Empirical Analysis: Strengthen the comparative analysis with other methods and
literature. Discuss how ERGM compares to traditional linear regression models in terms
of explaining the development of the export competitiveness network. Provide more
interpretation of the regression results, particularly the significance of various
network effects and covariates. Link the findings back to the research questions and
hypotheses.
In explaining the choice of ERGM over other statistical models, we have made some
additions to compare ERGM with traditional linear regression models in the Construction
of ERGM and variable explanation:
Compared to the linear regression methods employed in Long [5] and Bojnec and Ferto
[6], which only explore the factors influencing the competitiveness of agricultural
exports from an external perspective, the ERGM provides insights into the formation
of relationships and the underlying factors that shape them, grounded in the nature
and logic of network construction.
In contrast to traditional linear regression models, such as those presented by Zhou
and Tong [4] and Huyen and Bang [10], ERGM does not exclude the issue of endogeneity.
An essential category of explanatory variables in ERGM is network self-organization,
which refers to the network structure of the explanatory variables. The underlying
rationale is that network connections are both endogenous and interdependent [35].
We thank the reviewer for pointing to the interpretation of the regression results.
In part of Basic regression analysis, we have made some addition about the interpretation
of network effects:
This means that competitive export relationships are continually expanding. As a result,
the 2-star of the export competitiveness network of provincial agricultural products
contributes to the formation of network relationships.
Provinces are likely to refrain from establishing numerous such relationships. Therefore,
a negative 3-star coefficient indicates a “ceiling” on maintained friendships.
At the same time, an appropriate number of competitive export relationships is optimal.
In part of Basic regression analysis, we have made some deletion about the interpretation
of network effects:
A positive 2-star coefficient suggests a propensity for forming new friendships, while
a negative 3-star coefficient implies potential drawbacks from establishing and sustaining
a large number of friendships.
In part of Basic regression analysis, we have made some addition about the interpretation
of covariates:
These networks act as a valuable resource of social capital, providing natural advantages
in enhancing bilateral trade, driving economic development and partnerships [67].
Specifically, by lowering language-related costs, sharing market information and consumer
preferences, conducting agricultural cooperation projects, and optimizing supply chain
management for agricultural products among sister cities, the sister-city networks
ultimately build competitive advantages for agricultural exports. Consequently, playing
the role of a sister-city platform has become a crucial strategy for many provinces
and cities to promote their agricultural products.
4. Results and Discussion: The findings could be organized more logically and concisely.
Avoid repetition and streamline the explanations to make them more accessible to readers.
Discuss potential limitations of the study and suggestions for future research. For
example, consider examining longer time series data or including additional covariates.
We thank the reviewer for pointing to this important result and discussion aspect
of our study. In part of Robustness analysis, we have rephrased the sentences as follows:
The coefficients for pure structural effects and the lagged-by-one-period external
covariate network are consistent with the benchmark regression results, and both pass
the 1% significance test.
In part of Heterogeneity analysis, we have made some addition about the reasons for
conducting heterogeneity analysis:
The influencing factors and effects may vary significantly among provinces due to
differences in geographic location, resource endowment, economic development, and
other factors.
Specific descriptions of regional divisions have been deleted in consideration of
redundancy:
The eastern region includes provinces such as Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, Shanghai, Jiangsu,
Zhejiang, Fujian, Shandong, Guangdong, Hainan, Liaoning, Jilin, and Heilongjiang.
The central region comprises Shanxi, Anhui, Jiangxi, Henan, Hubei, and Hunan, while
the western region includes Inner Mongolia, Guangxi, Chongqing, Sichuan, Guizhou,
Yunnan, Xizang, Shaanxi, Gansu, Qinghai, Ningxia and Xinjiang.
A sentence on regional divisions has been rephrased as follows:
This paper divides the 31 provinces into three regions-eastern, central, and western-based
on their province location for the heterogeneity analysis.
In the Heterogeneity analysis section, the paragraph relating to Table 7 was changed
as followed:
The results presented in Table 7 also reveal the heterogeneity in the impact of node
attributes on the formation of competitive advantages in agricultural product exports
across different regions. The CouGDP positively influences the competitiveness of
agricultural product exports in the eastern provinces, but it has a negative effect
in the central and western provinces. Agricultural exports from the eastern provinces
benefit from lower transportation costs, making them more likely to be exported to
developed markets, thereby facilitating their competitive edge. In contrast, the central
and western provinces tend to export agricultural products to neighboring countries
due to transportation cost constraints.
In the Heterogeneity analysis section, we have made some addition about the interpretation
of node attribute indicators:
Since the western provinces must consider transportation costs, they prefer to export
their competitive agricultural products to countries with open trade policies to minimize
expenses.
In the Heterogeneity analysis section, the interpretation of international sister-city
network has been rephrased as follows:
The international sister-city network shows a significant positive relationship in
both categories. However, the coefficients for the international sister-city network
are lower for countries along the Belt and Road. This result reveals that the friendly
relations between Chinese provinces and countries along the Belt and Road are not
entirely mirrored in the agricultural export competitiveness. Ultimately, the establishment
of competitive agricultural export relationships by Chinese provinces along the Belt
and Road is also shaped by contractual relationships, which diminish the influence
of sister-city relations. Most countries along the Belt and Road possess natural geographical
advantages and rely on foreign trade. Thus, there is a need for further examination
into the role of international sister-city relationships in fostering competitive
advantages in provincial agricultural exports to countries along the Belt and Road.
Underpinned by a combination of national and local political relations, Chinese provinces
find it easier to establish competitively advantageous agricultural export relationships.
As suggested, we addressed the deficiencies based on data and covariates.
Furthermore, the data in the China Customs database has been available since 2015,
making the current timeframe under study relatively short. A longer span of data can
enhance statistical credibility and improve the generalizability of the findings.
Therefore, it is essential to consider examining longer time series data in future
studies.
Moreover, while this paper incorporates three types of network structure statistics
in the empirical regression analysis, some of these variables are not statistically
significant. Future research will explore additional variables at the levels of Chinese
provinces and countries to enhance its validity.
5. Policy Implications: The policy implications are well-aligned with the conclusions,
but could be framed more concretely with specific actions provinces could take. Consider
including real-world examples or case studies to illustrate the implementation of
these policies.
We apologize for not elaborating policy implications concretely. As suggested, we
have made some additions.
For the first implications, the following phrases were added:
For example, Shandong Province, recognized as a significant agricultural export hub
in China, can emphasize its strengths in exporting vegetables and fruits. Meanwhile,
Zhejiang Province can stren
PONE-D-24-04543R3Export competitiveness network of Chinese provincial agricultural products: Evolution,
performance, and influencing factorsPLOS ONE
Dear Dr. Chen,
Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration,
we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria
as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the
manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.
Please submit your revised manuscript by Nov 18 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more
time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact
the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.
Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s).
You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.
A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version.
You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.
An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload
this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.
If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your
updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files
are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.
We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.
Kind regards,
Tinggui Chen
Academic Editor
PLOS ONE
Journal Requirements:
Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you
have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing
so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant
current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal
letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article,
indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a
citation and full reference for the retraction notice.
[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]
Reviewers' comments:
Reviewer's Responses to Questions
Comments to the Author
1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round
of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you
may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your
conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit
your "Accept" recommendation.
Reviewer #4: All comments have been addressed
Reviewer #5: (No Response)
**********
2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?
The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with
data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously,
with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be
drawn appropriately based on the data presented.
Reviewer #4: Yes
Reviewer #5: (No Response)
**********
3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?
Reviewer #4: Yes
Reviewer #5: Yes
**********
4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully
available?
The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript
fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data
Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as
part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository.
For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians
and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing
data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.
Reviewer #4: Yes
Reviewer #5: Yes
**********
5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard
English?
PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles
must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should
be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.
Reviewer #4: Yes
Reviewer #5: Yes
**********
6. Review Comments to the Author
Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You
may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual
publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as
an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)
Reviewer #4: (1)Improve the simplicity of language throughout the text.
(2)Please use standard English descriptions.
Reviewer #5: (No Response)
**********
7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article
(what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.
If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still
be made public.
Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.
Reviewer #4: No
Reviewer #5: No
**********
[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached
to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account,
locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If
this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]
While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis
and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first
register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab,
where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter
any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.
【We found that when pasting the changes here, the formatting of the changes could
not be preserved. Therefore, the specific changes can be better presented in Response
to Reviewers.docx.】
We are thankful to reviewer 4 for him/her valuable comments that helped to improve
the manuscript.
Reviewer #4:
Improve the simplicity of language throughout the text.
We thank the reviewer for pointing to this important issue. We went through the whole
text again and removed some redundant expressions.
A sentence in the third paragraph of the Introduction section was rephrased as follows:
These issues have impacted the competitiveness of Chinesea’s agricultural exports,
revealing which have revealed a comparative disadvantage [3,4] that hinders both the
export growth and the sustainable development of the sector [5].
A sentence in the fourth paragraph of the Introduction section was rephrased as follows:
Secondly, it enhances competitiveness in the global market and improves fosters the
improvement of the international economic circulation system [7].
A sentence in the fifth paragraph of the Introduction section was rephrased as follows:
In light of these circumstances, tThe main objective of this study is to investigate
the evolution, performance, status and influence influencing factors of the export
competitiveness network of Chinese provincial export competitiveness for agricultural
products through the perspective of complex networks. In this context, provinces refer
to 27 Chinese provinces and 4 municipalities directly governed by the Central Government.
A sentence in the second paragraph of the External covariate effect section was rephrased
as follows:
Furthermore, it reduces trade disputes and friction, thereby influencing the establishment
and robustness of trade network relationships between cities and countries. However,
bilateral geographical distance elevates the trade cost of trade, subsequently diminishing
the establishment of competitively advantageous trading trade relationships. Based
on these considerations, this study puts forth the following hypotheses:
We have combined the first paragraph of the Network construction section with the
first paragraph of the Research design section. The first paragraph of the Research
design section was rephrased as follows:
The article utilizes data from, using Chinese Customs data,to examines the dynamic
evolution and competitive edge of agricultural exports across different Chinese provinces
to various countries and regions. TheThis data was sourced from China Customs data,
which has been available since 2015. By 2023, it may be possible to obtainobtaining
complete data for the year ending in 2022 may be possible. Therefore, the research
sample in this paper is based on data from 2015 to 2022 to ensure consistency and
coherence.
Some sentences in the sixth paragraph of the Network construction section were rephrased
as follows:
〖G(V,TCA)〗_t is an M*N matrix, where M representsis the composite nodes set of provinces
and the agricultural products they export, and N denotesis the nodesset of destination
countries. Therefore, the nodes of the export competitiveness network of Chinese
provincial agricultural products include two categories: the composite nodes of agricultural
products exported from Chinese provinces and the destination countries.
Since the first paragraph in the Construction of structural indicators section does
not address the key elements, we have deleted this paragraph.
The export competitiveness network of provincial agricultural products is a typical
two-mode network. This article primarily establishes the following structural indicators.
Some sentences in the first paragraph of the Network structure characteristics and
evolution analysis section were rephrased as follows:
Table 1 presents the structural indicators of the export competitiveness network of
provincial agricultural products over time. The agricultural products exported from
various provinces have proven to be competitive within expanding international markets,
primarily evidenced by an increased in network edges and nodes. This suggests an overall
improvement in the competitiveness of agricultural products.
A sentence in the fourth paragraph of the Network structure characteristics and evolution
analysis section was rephrased as follows:
It is clear that The provinces selectively choose specific export markets for their
agricultural products to cultivate a competitive advantage. However, this competitive
advantage accounts for less than 4% across the 174 countries analyzed in this paper.
A sentence in the fifth paragraph of the Network structure characteristics and evolution
analysis section was rephrased as follows:
Table 2 demonstrates a consistent The node degree among the top 5five countries in
node degree perform consistently.
A sentence in the paragraph before the Fig 3 was rephrased as follows:
However, the yearly rankings of the top 5 provincial agricultural products in degrees
show variability and instability in competitive edge across provinces, except forwith
only Guangdong Province consistently showing a competitive edge.
A sentence in the second paragraph of the Robustness analysis section was rephrased
as follows:
Regression analyses of the export competitiveness network of Chinese provincial agricultural
products from 2016 to 2022, based on a lagged-by-one-period external covariate network
and node attribute indicators, demonstrate that the coefficients for pure structural
effects and the lagged-by-one-period external covariate network coefficients closely
align with the benchmark regression results,. The coefficients for pure structural
effects and the lagged-by-one-period external covariate network are consistent with
the benchmark regression results, and both pass the 1% significance test. Besides,
the coefficients for Export also match the benchmark regression results. Hence, the
regression utilizing the lagged-by-one-period external covariate network lagged term
provides robust outcomes.
A sentence in the first paragraph before the Table 8 was deleted since the usefulness
was not evident:
Most countries along the Belt and Road possess natural geographical advantages and
rely on foreign trade.
Some sentences in the second paragraph of the Policy implications section were rephrased
as follows:
(1) Enhancing and developing agricultural products with traditional advantages in
for China's Chinese provinces, while strengthening collaboration with research institutes
and relevant enterprises, which will cultivate distinctive and high-quality varieties,
thereby and increaseing their international competitiveness and influenceof agricultural
products.
Some sentences in the second paragraph of the Limitations section were rephrased as
follows:
First, ERGM is primarily used to empirically analyze the influence of relationship
establishment. However, future research should focus on empirically analyzing the
impact of relationship strength , specifically exploring the factors that influence
relationships strength withinon the export competitiveness network of Chinese provincial
agricultural products.
(2)Please use standard English descriptions.
As suggested, we checked the full text and rephrased some expressions of the manuscript.
A sentence in the sixth paragraph of the Introduction section was rephrased as follows:
This paper, however, connects Chinese provinces with their exported agricultural products
and examines the international competitiveness of Chinese provincial agricultural
products at the provincial level, providing insights intofrom a more micro perspective
to further explain the regionalization and differentiation characteristics of competitive
agricultural products across Chinese provinces.
Some sentences in the second paragraph of the Research on the two-mode network section
were rephrased as follows:
Although some studies have explored the export competitiveness of Chinese agricultural
products [5], none have assessed the influencing factors and evolutionevolutionary
patterns of this competitiveness from a network perspective. This gap hinders our
comprehensive understanding of the export networks of provincial agricultural products
export networks.
Based onUsing provincial export data, this articleit aims to establish a competitive
network for agricultural product exports to various countries and regions. The objective
is to analyze the evolution, performance, and influencing factors of the export competitiveness
network of Chinese provincial agricultural productscompetitive advantages, challenges,
and issues faced by agricultural product exports from different provinces within the
international marketplace.
A sentence in the second paragraph of the Node attribute effect section was rephrased
as follows:
Economic attributes significantly influence trade behavior and the overall structure
of trade networks [39]
Some sentences in the second paragraph of the Network construction section were rephrased
as follows:
This paper data helps builds a two-mode network of Chinese provincial agricultural
product exports. The nodes in the two-modeexport network of Chinese provincial agricultural
products comprises two types. The first type is a are composite nodes encompassing
a provinces and a specific type of agricultural products, meaning that each node corresponds
to a province and the agricultural product it exports.
A sentence in the third paragraph of the Number of network nodes, edges, density,
and average degree section was rephrased as follows:
The closer the index is to 1, the more connected the network becomesAs the index approaches
1, the nodes within the network become denser, implying closer connections.
Some sentences in the third paragraph of the Network structure characteristics and
evolution analysis section were rephrased as follows:
There is a notable potential for improving the competitive advantage of agricultural
exports from Chinese provinces. While international trade networks usually exhibit
high density [54], the density of this study constructed an the export competitiveness
network o this study constructed f provincial agricultural products around a defined
threshold. Consequently, the network’s density is remarkably low, consistently below
0.039, across the years studied. Therefore, boosting the competitiveness of these
exports is imperative. Moreover, a consistent uptrend was noted in LPN, LPN(M) and
LPN(N) the average degree across all classifications, indicateings an increase in
the number of competitivedominant agricultural export partnerships initiated by Chinese
provinces. On average, each province’s provincial agricultural exports product shows
a competitive edge in merely five or six countries.
The first paragraph before Table 4 and the first paragraph after Table 4 were rephrased
as follows:
This paper employed the stepwise method to perform an analysis aimed at The initial
step involves identifying the most suitable regression model using the 2015 data and
the specific regression results presented in . See Table 4.
The star effects of the country were removed as the strong correlation when incorporating
the star effects of both node types in the ERGM. AThe instability of the model results
may be attributed to the strong correlation between the star effects of provincial
agricultural products and the country in the ERGM. Consequently, it is not feasible
to incorporate the pure structural effects of both node types into a single model.
Simultaneously, as this paper primarily investigates the competitive advantage from
the perspective of provincial agricultural products, the model only incorporates the
star effect of provincial agricultural products.
A sentence in the second paragraph after the Table 7 was rephrased as follows:
The results presented in Table 7 also reveal the heterogeneity in the The impact of
node attributes on formingthe formation of competitive advantages in agricultural
product exports across different regions reveals the heterogeneity.
A sentence in the sixth paragraph of the Policy implications section was rephrased
as follows:
(4) Different regions should carry out reasonable regional layouts and planning for
agricultural products to avoid homogenization and the proliferation of products that
lack competitive strength.
PONE-D-24-04543R4Export competitiveness network of Chinese provincial agricultural products: Evolution,
performance, and influencing factorsPLOS ONE
Dear Dr. Chen,
Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration,
we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria
as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the
manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.
Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 06 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more
time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact
the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.
Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s).
You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.
A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version.
You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.
An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload
this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.
If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your
updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files
are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.
We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.
Kind regards,
Tinggui Chen
Academic Editor
PLOS ONE
Journal Requirements:
Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you
have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing
so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant
current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal
letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article,
indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a
citation and full reference for the retraction notice.
[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]
Reviewers' comments:
Reviewer's Responses to Questions
Comments to the Author
1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round
of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you
may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your
conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit
your "Accept" recommendation.
Reviewer #4: All comments have been addressed
Reviewer #5: (No Response)
**********
2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?
The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with
data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously,
with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be
drawn appropriately based on the data presented.
Reviewer #4: Yes
Reviewer #5: Yes
**********
3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?
Reviewer #4: Yes
Reviewer #5: Yes
**********
4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully
available?
The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript
fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data
Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as
part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository.
For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians
and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing
data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.
Reviewer #4: Yes
Reviewer #5: Yes
**********
5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard
English?
PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles
must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should
be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.
Reviewer #4: Yes
Reviewer #5: (No Response)
**********
6. Review Comments to the Author
Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You
may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual
publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as
an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)
Reviewer #4: This paper presents a novel and valuable contribution to understanding
the export competitiveness of Chinese agricultural products through a network lens.
With revisions focused on clarity, methodological justification, and expansion of
theoretical discussion, this study will be even more impactful.
1.Throughout the manuscript, there are several long and complex sentences, particularly
in the introduction and methodology sections. Simplifying the language will enhance
readability.
2.Clarity of H3 and H4: The hypotheses related to international sister-city networks
and geographic distance (H3 and H4) are interesting, but these sections would benefit
from additional theoretical background. Why are sister-city networks expected to play
such a crucial role in agricultural product competitiveness? Adding a few supporting
references would clarify the logic behind this.
3.While the Exponential Random Graph Model (ERGM) is appropriate for the study, the
rationale behind choosing this model over other network models should be further elaborated.
Highlighting its advantages in capturing interdependencies would reinforce its appropriateness.
4. The "star effects" and "node attribute effects" should be linked more explicitly
to relevant studies in the literature review. This will ensure that the theoretical
foundation for the hypotheses is clear.
5.While the policy implications section provides useful recommendations, it would
benefit from being more specific. For example, how can regional governments leverage
these findings to enhance their agricultural competitiveness? Additionally, consider
linking the discussion to international trade policies or agreements.
Reviewer #5: (No Response)
**********
7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article
(what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.
If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still
be made public.
Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.
Reviewer #4: No
Reviewer #5: No
**********
[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached
to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account,
locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If
this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]
While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis
and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first
register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab,
where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter
any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.
We are thankful to reviewer 4 for him/her valuable comments that helped to improve
the manuscript.
Reviewer #4:
1.Throughout the manuscript, there are several long and complex sentences, particularly
in the introduction and methodology sections. Simplifying the language will enhance
readability.
We thank the reviewer for pointing to this important issue. We went through the whole
text again and simplified some redundant sentences.
The second paragraph of the Introduction section was rephrased as follows:
In 2022, China’s Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs rolled out the “14th Five-Year
Plan for International Cooperation in Agriculture and Rural Affairs”, . This plan
emphasizing emphasized the importance of strengthening international collaboration
in agriculture and fostering competitive advantages in agricultural trade. Focusing
on competitive advantage has now become a significant factor in China’s agricultural
cooperation endeavors [1].
The third paragraph of the Introduction section was rephrased as follows:
Despite this progress, Chinese agriculture contends with challenges such as limited
resources, land fragmentation, and high production costs [2]. These issues have led
toimpacted the competitiveness a comparative disadvantage of in Chinese agricultural
exports, revealing a comparative disadvantage [3,4] that and hinders hindered export
growth and the sustainable development [5].
A sentence in the fifth paragraph of the Introduction section was rephrased as follows:
The main objective of this study is to investigate the evolution, performance, and
influencing factors of the export competitiveness network of Chinese provincial agricultural
products through the perspective of complex networks.
Some sentences in the sixth paragraph of the Introduction section have been rephrased
as follows:
This paper, however, examines the international competitiveness of Chinese agricultural
products at the provincial level, highlightingproviding insights into the regionalization
and differentiation characteristics of competitive agricultural products across Chinese
provinces.
This approach more effectively identifies competitive agricultural products with competitive
advantages acrossin each provinces and further enriches the research paradigm and
methodology concerningregarding the trade relationships.
Using the Exponential Random Graph Model (ERGM), this paper investigates the factors
influencing the development of the export competitiveness network of provincial agricultural
products from a comprehensive perspective. Compared to the conventionaltraditional
linear regression models, ERGM is better suited to track the endogenous dependencies
in forming the export competitiveness network, a task that conventional regression
model models cannot effectively accomplish.
A sentence in the fourth paragraph of the Literature review section was rephrased
as follows:
Furthermore, rising production costs in China and a diminishing demographic dividend,
which the China country once benefited from, are undermining undermine its competitive
edge in exporting agricultural products.
A sentence in the second paragraph of the External covariate effect section was rephrased
as follows:
By enhancing knowledge of foreign markets [51], international sister-city relationships
assist not only in grasping trade and investment opportunities but also in reinforcing
identity and trust.
Some sentences in the second paragraph of the Research design section have been rephrased
as follows:
This approach adopts topological indicators like loop numbers, node strength, clustering
coefficient, and betweenness centrality expands upon social network analysis by to
highlighting node heterogeneity, structural complexity, and dynamic variability in
network patterns through topological indicators like loop numbers, node strength,
average clustering coefficient, and betweenness centrality.
Therefore, employing complex network analysis can effectively illuminate the structural
evolution of the export competitiveness network of Chinese provincial agricultural
products and identify the competitive agricultural products.
In contrast to traditional research methods, complex network analysis can investigate
the key factors influencing agricultural export competitiveness at various levels.
Based on this, we can provide, ultimately providing actionable recommendations to
enhance the export competitiveness of these products in Chinese provinces.
A sentence in the fifth paragraph of the Network construction section was rephrased
as follows:
Instead, it focuses on the share of specific agricultural exports in the province
and the share of national imports of specific agricultural products in total imports.competitiveness of a particular agricultural product exported by the province in comparison to all
agricultural product exported by that province and those of all other provinces.
The paragraph about Node attribute indicators in Empirical analysis was rephrased
as follows:
Node attribute indicators. At the provincial level, this paper accounts for GDP, the
total output value of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery (AFAHF),
and exports [71]. Each province's The GDP and export data for each province are sourced
from the China Statistical Yearbook, while the AFAHF data come from the China Rural
Statistical Yearbook. Nationally, it is important to account for GDP, population [72],
and economic freedom [73] attributes. Each country'sThe GDP and population data for
each country are derived from the World Bank’s World Development Indicators database,
while data about economic freedom is provided by the Global Heritage Foundation provides
data about economic freedom.
A sentence in the third paragraph of the Analysis of regression results section was
rephrased as follows:
China has emphasized the importance of promoting high-quality agricultural development,
paying more attention to expanding favorable agricultural products in international
markets, and creating new competitivenesscompetitive advantages in for exporting specialty
agricultural products in international markets.
Some sentences in the second paragraph of the Policy implications section have been
rephrased as follows:
Enhancing and developing agricultural products with traditional advantages for in
Chinese provinces while strengthening collaboration with research institutes and relevant
enterprises, . which will cultivate distinctive and high-quality varieties and increase
the international competitiveness of agricultural products.
For example, Shandong Province, recognized as a significant agricultural export hub
in China, can emphasize its strengths in exporting vegetables and fruits. Meanwhile,
Zhejiang Province can strengthen the international competitiveness of its tea industry,
and Yunnan Province can focus on building its strengths in flower exports, among other
initiatives.
Some sentences in the last two paragraphs of the Policy implications section have
been rephrased as follows:
It is essential to leverage international sister-city relationships to create new
opportunities for bilateral economic and trade cooperation and to enhance the competitivenesscompetitive
advantage of provincial agricultural exports in friendly countries. International
agricultural cooperation agreements Interactions and collaborations between provinces
and global partners should be encouraged to increase awareness and recognition of
provincial agricultural products through bilateral cultural and economic exchanges.
Different regions should carry out reasonable regional planning for agricultural products
to avoid competition of homogenized agricultural products in the same markethomogenization
and the proliferation of products that lack competitive strength. The eastern region
should fully utilize its geographic advantages by targetingto consolidate its dominant
position in agricultural markets such as the United States, the European Union, Japan,
and South Korea, and other countries as the main export destinations for its advantageous
agricultural products. Meanwhile, the central and western regions should actively
promote the diversification of agricultural export markets based on the China Railway
Express and the new western land-sea corridor. By differentiating the layout of agricultural
products in different markets, it is easier to form a competitive advantage of agricultural
products.
2.Clarity of H3 and H4: The hypotheses related to international sister-city networks
and geographic distance (H3 and H4) are interesting, but these sections would benefit
from additional theoretical background. Why are sister-city networks expected to play
such a crucial role in agricultural product competitiveness? Adding a few supporting
references would clarify the logic behind this.
We thank the reviewer for pointing to this important theoretical aspect of our study.
In External covariate effect section, we have added some references to support H3
and H4. In the first paragraph:
Individuals can leverage social capital relationships to enhance their advantages
and seize opportunities [49].
In the second paragraph:
Sister-city relationships are an advantageous resource [50].
The quality of information and resources transmitted by such strong relationships
generated by identification and trust tends to be higher, providing both parties with
a competitive advantage in trade and economic activities [43].
Furthermore, it reduces trade disputes and friction, thereby influencing the establishment
and robustness of trade relationships between cities and countries [52]. As a result,
products from friendly cities or provinces have a significant advantage in entering
the markets of friendly countries.
In the third paragraph:
Geographic location influences the development of relationships [22]. Usually, distances
are used to proxy costs at an abstract level [53]. As a result, coastal cities possess
a greater geographical advantage when exporting their products [54]. Longer However,
bilateral geographical distances increaseelevates the trade costs, thereby becoming
an impediment to product exports [55] and further hindering diminishing the establishment
of competitively advantageous trade relationships.
3.While the Exponential Random Graph Model (ERGM) is appropriate for the study, the
rationale behind choosing this model over other network models should be further elaborated.
Highlighting its advantages in capturing interdependencies would reinforce its appropriateness.
The reasons for using ERGM instead of other models have been elaborated upon in the
Introduction and Construction of ERGM and variable explanation sections. As proposed
by the reviewer, we provide additional explanations.
In the third and fourth paragraphs of Construction of ERGM and variable explanation
section, we have made some additions.
It is indeed true that established product export relationships will further accumulate
experience for the product's overseas expansion and facilitate its export to additional
countries. Newly established export relationships are somewhat dependent on existing
ones.
Relative to other network models, such as the Quadratic Assignment Procedure (QAP),
which focuses on the correlation and regression between matrices [65], this model
does not take into account for the effects of node attributes and covariate networks
on relationship development. Similarly, the Simulation Investigation for Empirical
Network Analysis (SIENA) primarily incorporates explanatory variables related to structural
effects and individual actor attribute effects [66]. However, it also fails to consider
external covariate networks.
4. The "star effects" and "node attribute effects" should be linked more explicitly
to relevant studies in the literature review. This will ensure that the theoretical
foundation for the hypotheses is clear.
As suggested, in the Research on the network of agricultural product export section,
we have incorporated new literature related to star effects and node attribute effects.
Countries with high betweenness centrality serve as hubs in agricultural trade networks
and tend to establish a greater number of trade relationships [20]. This phenomenon
results in more network star effects [21]. Furthermore, the star effect promotes the
establishment of additional network relationships [22]. In addition, attribute variables
such as factor endowment, economic size, and geographic location are critical factors
influencing the expansion of agricultural trade networks [23].
5.While the policy implications section provides useful recommendations, it would
benefit from being more specific. For example, how can regional governments leverage
these findings to enhance their agricultural competitiveness? Additionally, consider
linking the discussion to international trade policies or agreements.
We thank the reviewer for raising this important point. In the second paragraph of
Policy implications section, a sentence has been rephrased as follows:
Specifically, provincial governments can improve the quality of agricultural products
through standardized, large-scale, and modernized production models, thereby further
strengthening the advantages of traditional agricultural products.
We have made some additions in the second paragraph:
Specifically, the government can increase funding and concentrate on fostering scientific
and technological innovation within agribusinesses. It is essential to establish a
high-quality team of experts in the field of agriculture, consisting of faculty and
students from universities, as well as agricultural scientists. Furthermore, emphasis
should be placed on fostering collaboration among local governments, agricultural
universities, and agriculture-related institutions and enterprises.
Some sentences have been rephrased as follows in the fourth paragraph of Policy implications
section:
On the other hand, local governments should leverage major agribusinesses as the foundation
for agricultural industrialization to achieve economies of scale.provincial governments
can enhance the export of advantageous agricultural products by building stable and
mature export routes.
Export competitiveness network of Chinese provincial agricultural products: Evolution,
performance, and influencing factors
PONE-D-24-04543R5
Dear Dr. Chen,
We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable
for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding
technical requirements.
Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When
these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript
will be scheduled for publication.
An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note,
if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets
the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please
make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at
Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have
any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department
directly at authorbilling@plos.org.
If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about
your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials,
please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving
the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until
2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact
onepress@plos.org.
Kind regards,
Tinggui Chen
Academic Editor
PLOS ONE
Additional Editor Comments (optional):
Reviewers' comments:
Reviewer's Responses to Questions
Comments to the Author
1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round
of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you
may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your
conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit
your "Accept" recommendation.
Reviewer #5: All comments have been addressed
**********
2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?
The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with
data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously,
with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be
drawn appropriately based on the data presented.
Reviewer #5: Yes
**********
3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?
Reviewer #5: Yes
**********
4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully
available?
The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript
fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data
Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as
part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository.
For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians
and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing
data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.
Reviewer #5: Yes
**********
5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard
English?
PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles
must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should
be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.
Reviewer #5: (No Response)
**********
6. Review Comments to the Author
Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You
may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual
publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as
an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)
Reviewer #5: (No Response)
**********
7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article
(what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.
If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still
be made public.
Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.
I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication
in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production
team.
At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication.
This includes ensuring the following:
* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited
* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,
* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset
If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve
them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date
has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during
production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a
large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper
and let you know the next and final steps.
Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know
about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing
press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript
will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication.
For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.
Open letter on the publication of peer review reports
PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore,
we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses
alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose
to reveal their names.
We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action
inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions,
to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research
system.