Peer Review History

Original SubmissionDecember 22, 2023
Decision Letter - Sara Hemati, Editor

PONE-D-23-43165Removal of organic contamination from wastewater using granular activated carbon modified - Polyethylene glycol: Characterization, Kinetics and Isotherm studyPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Rezakazemi,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

Reviewer 1:

1. The introduction is too long, it is better to reduce it to 800 words maximum.

2. Figure 1 needs reference

3. The resistance of the distilled (DI) water should be stated in the text.

4. In the results section,it is stated that "... employing GAC-PEG in the treatment of water may lead to enhanced ...", do not your test results conclusively indicate that GAC increases the removal efficiency over GAC-PEG?

5. Improve the title of Table 3. It is not appropriate to bring every specification of the table in the title

6. This manuscript has no literature review and a good literature review should be included.

7. Table 5 is not mentioned in the text, it should be described in the text.

reviewer 2:

1-You need to statement necessity of study in the introduction.

2-You need to statement aims of study in the introduction.

3- You need to statement disadvantages of adsorption in the introduction.

4- Please, transfer of sentence (The highest dye concentration

was adsorbed in pH=2 and 5 mg. L-1 tartrazine, corresponding to removal efficiencies of up to

99.81% for GAC at 0.1 g/50 mL and 90.45% for rice husk at 0.2 g/50 mL. The ideal contact time

was discovered after 120 minutes of rice husk and 60 minutes of GAC) from introduction to discussion section.

5-What criteria select of Diazinon (DZ), Amoxicillin (AMX), and Crystal Violet removal from waste water?

6-Please use same format such as : (L. (mg) -1) or (mg. L-1)

6-Which is right % or % Adsorption?

7- You need to references in the method section.

8-Add the caption above table 5

9- In Pseudo-second order unit of K2 is not (min-1) in Table 4.

10- Add QC/QA in method section.

11-You need to discussion section stronger.

12-Add recommendations and future directions for further study in the conclusion section.

13-You need to same format of references

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by May 31 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.
  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.
  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Sara Hemati

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please amend the manuscript submission data (via Edit Submission) to include author Leila Choopani, Mohammad Mehdi Salehi, Hossein Mashhadimoslem, Mobin Safarzadeh Khosrowshahi, Ali A. AlHammadi, Ali Elkamel, and Ali Maleki.

3. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information. 

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

Reviewer #2: No

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: 1. The introduction is too long, it is better to reduce it to 800 words maximum.

2. Figure 1 needs reference

3. The resistance of the distilled (DI) water should be stated in the text.

4. In the results section,it is stated that "... employing GAC-PEG in the treatment of water may lead to enhanced ...", do not your test results conclusively indicate that GAC increases the removal efficiency over GAC-PEG?

5. Improve the title of Table 3. It is not appropriate to bring every specification of the table in the title

6. This manuscript has no literature review and a good literature review should be included.

7. Table 5 is not mentioned in the text, it should be described in the text.

Reviewer #2: 1-You need to statement necessity of study in the introduction.

2-You need to statement aims of study in the introduction.

3- You need to statement disadvantages of adsorption in the introduction.

4- Please, transfer of sentence (The highest dye concentration

was adsorbed in pH=2 and 5 mg. L-1 tartrazine, corresponding to removal efficiencies of up to

99.81% for GAC at 0.1 g/50 mL and 90.45% for rice husk at 0.2 g/50 mL. The ideal contact time

was discovered after 120 minutes of rice husk and 60 minutes of GAC) from introduction to discussion section.

5-What criteria select of Diazinon (DZ), Amoxicillin (AMX), and Crystal Violet removal from waste water?

6-Please use same format such as : (L. (mg) -1) or (mg. L-1)

6-Which is right % or % Adsorption?

7- You need to references in the method section.

8-Add the caption above table 5

9- In Pseudo-second order unit of K2 is not (min-1) in Table 4.

10- Add QC/QA in method section.

11-You need to discussion section stronger.

12-Add recommendations and future directions for further study in the conclusion section.

13-You need to same format of references

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Farideh Bagherzadeh

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachments
Attachment
Submitted filename: Comments.docx
Revision 1

PONE-D-23-43165

Removal of organic contamination from wastewater using granular activated carbon modified - Polyethylene glycol: Characterization, Kinetics and Isotherm study

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Rezakazemi,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Dear Dr. Sara Hemati

We thank the reviewers and the editor for their interesting and helpful comments. Below, we give our responses to all the specific issues and indicate the associated changes we have made to the manuscript. We earnestly appreciate the views, comments, and suggestions provided by all the reviewers. We have revised and attempted to improve the manuscript accordingly. Revisions are highlighted in the revised manuscript.

==============================

Reviewer 1:

1. The introduction is too long, it is better to reduce it to 800 words maximum.

Response: Thank you so much for your respectful comments. This important topic, as kindly highlighted by the reviewer, was considered in the manuscript. We simplified the introduction section, pp.2-4, lines 8-12, 15-19, 20-22, 1-3, 9-14 & 12-16 as follows:

” Clean water is essential for human health and the ecosystem. In many parts of the world, access to clean and safe water is a significant challenge. In order to be clean and safe, water must be free of all pollutants and harmful factors. Pollutants include chemical, physical, and biological threats to health. Diazinon (DZ), known as dimpylate, is an organophosphorus pesticide (OPPs) frequently employed in urban and agricultural settings.”

“Antibiotics are considered essential medical medicines, but their release into the environment and aquatic resources has had adverse effects even at modest doses. Semi-synthetic penicillin known as amoxicillin (AMX), among the most popular in Europe and other parts of the world, has been used alone and in combination with the beta-lactamase inhibitor clavulanic acid since the 1970s.” “Crystal Violet (CV) is a toxin dye that, according to research, can cause skin irritation and ocular problems in addition to the ability to cause cancer in mammalian cells. The chemical structures of DZ, AMX, and CV are illustrated in Fig.1.”

Fig.1. Chemical structure of (a) DZ, (b) AMX, and (C) CV.

It is essential to remove such organic contaminants from contaminated water to preserve the environment and the general public's health.”

“However, among the disadvantages of the adsorption process, we can point out the difficult recovery, inefficient adsorption method, and weak interactions between the adsorbent surface and the adsorbed surface. In this method several adsorbents are used, one of which is carbon-based adsorbents. Carbon-based adsorbents appropriate for gas adsorption include CMS, granular activated carbon (GAC), graphene, carbon nanotubes, and fullerenes”.

“A maximum adsorption capacity was reported for DZ, AMX, and CV adsorption. A Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm were investigated. A pseudo-first-order and a pseudo-second-order model was developed to describe the adsorption kinetics. As a result of the experiments, DZ, AMX, and CV were able to achieve their maximum adsorption capability using GAC-PEG.”

2. Figure 1 needs reference

Response: Thank you for your comment. Changes have been done in revised manuscript. This important topic is now considered and revised the mentioned (Fig. 1, p.3) in the amended manuscript. Figure 1 was drawn by the authors as well.

3. The resistance of the distilled (DI) water should be stated in the text.

Response: Thanks for your attention. The change has been done in revised manuscript. We consider this comment and mentioned in p.5, line 7.

4. In the results section, it is stated that "... employing GAC-PEG in the treatment of water may lead to enhanced ...", do not your test results conclusively indicate that GAC increases the removal efficiency over GAC-PEG?

Response: Thank you for your comment. Based on the results of the testing of the GAC adsorption capacity for the three organic contaminants (Diazinon (DZ) = 516.21 mg. g-1, Amoxicillin (AMX) = 564.87 mg. g-1, and Crystal Violet (CV) = 438.32 mg. g-1), Table 5 of the revised manuscript illustrates the results. Table 5 in the revised manuscript shows that GAC-PEG has a higher adsorption capacity than GAC due to its synergistic effects.

To produce the final adsorbent, GAC and PEG combine to create a synergistic effect. Consequently, the adsorbent's sorption capacity is further enhanced by cooperative interactions. In this adsorbent, several components contribute unique properties to the adsorption process that complement each other and result in synergistic effects. Having a high surface area and a mesoporous structure, GAC-PEG provides a perfect environment for adsorption. As a result of its complementary properties, this material outperforms its components when it comes to adsorption efficiency. Another reason is the increase in functional groups. Modified GAC contains some of these peaks, indicating that PEG tends to make it hydrophilic. During the process of functionalization, it seems that chain breaks gradually increase surface functional groups [1-3].

[1] Salehi, Mohammad Mehdi, Fereshte Hassanzadeh-Afruzi, Golnaz Heidari, Ali Maleki, and Ehsan Nazarzadeh Zare. “In situ preparation of MOF-199 into the carrageenan-grafted-polyacrylamide@ Fe3O4 matrix for enhanced adsorption of levofloxacin and cefixime antibiotics from water.” Environmental Research 233 (2023): 116466.

[2] Saeed, Ahmed M. "Temperature effect on swelling properties of commercial polyacrylic acid hydrogel beads." Int. J. Adv. Biol. Biomed. Res 1, no. 12 (2013): 1614-1627.

[3] Loyez, Médéric, Maxwell Adolphson, Jie Liao, Sanskar Thakur, and Lan Yang. "pH-sensitive optical micro-resonator based on PAA/PVA gel swelling." In Optics and Biophotonics in Low-Resource Settings IX, vol. 12369, pp. 36-39. SPIE, 2023.

5. Improve the title of Table 3. It is not appropriate to bring every specification of the table in the title.

Response: Thank you so much for your comment. This important topic, as kindly highlighted by the reviewer, is now considered in the amended manuscript, in p.10 line 8. The new title is Specific textural attributes of GAC-Pure and GAC-PEG samples.

6. This manuscript has no literature review and a good literature review should be included.

Response: Thank you so much for your comment. This important topic, as kindly highlighted by the reviewer, is now considered in the amended manuscript. We added the literature review in the introduction section, pp.2-4, lines 8-12, 15-19, 20-22, 1-3, & 9-14 as follows:

” Clean water is essential for human health and the ecosystem. In many parts of the world, access to clean and safe water is a significant challenge. To be clean and safe, water must be free of all pollutants and harmful factors [1]. Pollutants include chemical, physical, and biological threats to health. Diazinon (DZ), known as dimpylate, is an organophosphorus pesticide (OPPs) frequently employed in urban and agricultural settings.”

“Antibiotics are considered essential medical medicines, but their release into the environment and aquatic resources has had adverse effects even at modest doses [4]. Semi-synthetic penicillin, known as amoxicillin (AMX), among the most popular in Europe and other parts of the world, has been used alone and in combination with the beta-lactamase inhibitor clavulanic acid since the 1970s[5].”

“Crystal Violet (CV) is a toxin dye that, according to research, can cause skin irritation and ocular problems in addition to the ability to cause cancer in mammalian cells [7]. The chemical structures of DZ, AMX, and CV are illustrated in Fig. 1. [8-10].”

“Removing such organic contaminants from contaminated water is essential to preserve the environment and the general public's health”.

“However, among the disadvantages of the adsorption process, we can point out the difficult recovery, inefficient adsorption method, and weak interactions between the adsorbent surface and the adsorbed surface [13]. In this method, several adsorbents are used, including carbon-based adsorbents. Carbon-based adsorbents appropriate for gas adsorption include CMS, granular activated carbon (GAC) , graphene , carbon nanotubes , and Graphitic Carbon Nitride [14-16].”

7. Table 5 is not mentioned in the text, it should be described in the text.

Response: Thank you so much for your comment. This important topic, as kindly highlighted by the reviewer, is now considered in the amended manuscript. We added the literature review in the section 3.3., pp.15-16, lines 24-26 & 1-4, as follows:

“Table 5 compares the maximal DZ, AMX, and CV adsorptive capability of the GAC-PEG to those of other adsorbents mentioned in earlier studies. Compared to several other adsorbents that have been previously reported, the created GAC-PEG adsorbent showed high Qmax. The different physicochemical properties of the made adsorbent systems, including a huge surface area and plenty of reactive adsorption sites, such as hydroxyl groups covering the surface, effectively adsorb OPPs, antibiotics, and toxic dyes from wastewater pollutants.”

Reviewer 2:

1-You need to statement necessity of study in the introduction.

Response: Thank you so much for your respectful comments. This important topic, as kindly highlighted by the reviewer, was considered in the manuscript. Changes have been made to the Introduction section of the revised manuscript. We mentioned in sec. 1., pp.2-4, lines 8-22 as follows:

” Clean water is essential for human health and the ecosystem. In many parts of the world, access to clean and safe water is a significant challenge. To be clean and safe, water must be free of all pollutants and harmful factors [1]. Pollutants include chemical, physical, and biological threats to health. Diazinon (DZ), known as dimpylate, is an organophosphorus pesticide (OPPs) frequently employed in urban and agricultural settings.”

“Antibiotics are considered essential medical medicines, but their release into the environment and aquatic resources has had adverse effects even at modest doses [4]. Semi-synthetic penicillin, known as amoxicillin (AMX), among the most popular in Europe and other parts of the world, has been used alone and in combination with the beta-lactamase inhibitor clavulanic acid since the 1970s [5].”

“Crystal Violet (CV) is a toxin dye that, according to research, can cause skin irritation and ocular problems in addition to the ability to cause cancer in mammalian cells [7]. The chemical structures of DZ, AMX, and CV are illustrated in Fig. 1. [8-10]”

“Removing such organic contaminants from contaminated water is essential to preserve the environment and the general public's health”.

2-You need to statement aims of study in the introduction.

Response: Thank you so much for your respectful comments. This important topic, as kindly highlighted by the reviewer, was considered in the manuscript. We consider the aims of study in the introduction section, p. 3, lines 9-14 as follows:

“However, among the disadvantages of the adsorption process, we can point out the difficult recovery, inefficient adsorption method, and weak interactions between the adsorbent surface and the adsorbed surface [13]. In this method, several adsorbents are used, including carbon-based adsorbents. Carbon-based adsorbents appropriate for gas adsorption include CMS, granular activated carbon (GAC), graphene, carbon nanotubes, and Graphitic Carbon Nitride [14-16].”

3- You need to statement disadvantages of adsorption in the introduction.

Response: Thank you so much for your respectful comments. This important topic, as kindly highlighted by the reviewer, was considered in the manuscript. We consider the aims of study in the introduction section, p. 3, lines 13-18 as follows:

“However, among the disadvantages of the adsorption process, we can point out the difficult recovery, inefficient adsorption method, and weak interactions between the adsorbent surface and the adsorbed surface [13]. In this method, several adsorbents are used, including carbon-based adsorbents. Carbon-based adsorbents appropriate for gas adsorption include CMS, granular activated carbon (GAC), graphene, carbon nanotubes (CNTs), and Graphitic Carbon Nitride [14-16].”

4- Please, transfer of sentence (The highest dye concentration was adsorbed in pH=2 and 5 mg. L-1 tartrazine, corresponding to removal efficiencies of up to 99.81% for GAC at 0.1 g/50 mL and 90.45% for rice husk at 0.2 g/50 mL. The ideal contact time was discovered after 120 minutes of rice husk and 60 minutes of GAC) from introduction to discussion section.

Response: Thanks for the good comment. Thank you for your admirable attention. This text is related to another researcher's work, which is included in the introduction section to make it more complete and express the concept. We mentioned before this sentence “Khader et al. [22] used rice husk as a biomass-derived adsorbent and commercial GAC to separate the tartrazine color from an aqueous solution and compared the two.”

[22] Khader, Eman H., Thamer J. Mohammed, and Talib M. Albayati. "Comparative performance between rice husk and granular activated carbon for the removal of azo tartrazine dye from aqueous solution." Desalin Water Treat 229 (2021): 372-383.

5-What criteria select of Diazinon (DZ), Amoxicillin (AMX), and Crystal Violet removal from waste water?

Response: Thank you for your comment. Today, pharmaceutical pollution, dyes, insecticides, and pesticides have a significant potential for the environment due to their high consumption, and in particular pharmaceutical compounds that affect human and animal health. Medicines through the pharmaceutical industry, wastewater hospitals, human and animal excrement, the output of urban treatment plants, and the discharge of waste in poultry breeding, and industry enter the water and soil. Diazinon (DZ) is an organophosphorus insecticide frequently employed in urban and agricultural settings. High residual DZ concentrations were also discovered in urban waterways and wastewater treatment plant effluents. The problem that antibiotics such as amoxicillin (AMX) cause even in low concentrations in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems is bacterial resistance and increased allergic reactions. Crystal Violet (CV) is a toxin dye that, according to research, can cause skin irritation and ocular problems in addition to the ability to cause cancer in mammalian cells Also, organic dyes demonstrate toxicity and low biodegradability, with carcinogenic effects on aquatics because of their stability and structural aromaticity. According to the mentioned risks for the environment and human health, water treatment from pesticides, organic dye, and pharmaceutical pollution contaminants is vital [1-3].

[1] Salehi, Mohammad Mehdi, Fereshte Hassanzadeh-Afruzi, Farhad Esmailzadeh, Leila Choopani, Kimiya Rajabi, Hosein Naeimy Kuzekanan, Mojtaba Azizi, Oleg M. Demchuk, and Ali Maleki. "Chlorpyrifos and diazinon elimination through pAAm-g-XG/HKUST-1@ Fe3O4 biopolymer nanoadsorbent hydrogel from wastewater: Preparation, characterization, kinetics and isotherm." Separation and Purification Technology 334 (2024): 126097.

[2] Beigi, Paria, Fatemeh Ganjali, Fereshte Hassanzadeh-Afruzi, Mohammad Mehdi Salehi, and Ali Maleki. "Enhancement of adsorption efficiency of crystal violet and chlorpyrifos onto pectin hydrogel@ Fe3O4-bentonite as a versatile nanoadsorbent." Scientific Reports 13, no. 1 (2023): 10764.

[3] Mosavi, Seyedeh Soghra, Ehsan Nazarzadeh Zare, Hossein Behniafar, and Mahmood Tajbakhsh. "Removal of amoxicillin antibiotic from polluted water by a magnetic bionanocomposite based on carboxymethyl tragacanth gum-grafted-polyaniline." Water 15, no. 1 (2023): 202.

6-Please use same format such as: (L. (mg) -1) or (mg. L-1)

Response: Thanks for the good comment. All these have been implemented in the amended manuscript. The mentioned comments are unified as yellow color in all sections of the manuscript.

6-Which i

Decision Letter - Sara Hemati, Editor

Removal of organic contamination from wastewater using granular activated carbon modified - Polyethylene glycol: Characterization, Kinetics and Isotherm study

PONE-D-23-43165R1

Dear Dr. Choopani,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Sara Hemati

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Accept

Reviewers' comments:

No comment

Formally Accepted
Acceptance Letter - Sara Hemati, Editor

PONE-D-23-43165R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Rezakazemi,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Sara Hemati

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Open letter on the publication of peer review reports

PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose to reveal their names.

We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions, to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research system.

Learn more at ASAPbio .