Peer Review History

Original SubmissionJanuary 26, 2024
Decision Letter - Anand Thirupathi, Editor
Transfer Alert

This paper was transferred from another journal. As a result, its full editorial history (including decision letters, peer reviews and author responses) may not be present.

PONE-D-24-02915Linking Plasma Taurine Levels with Post-COVID Outcomes Reveals Therapeutic ImplicationsPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Oudit,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by May 18 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.
  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.
  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.
If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Anand Thirupathi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: 

"For this study, GYO is supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant no. PJT-451105), the Northern Alberta Clinical Trials and Research Centre (grant no. RES50821), and the long COVID web (grant no. RES0065210) at the University of Alberta."

  

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: ""The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."" 

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. 

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript: 

"This work is supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant no. PJT-451105), the Northern Alberta Clinical Trials and Research Centre (grant no. RES50821), and the long COVID web (grant no. RES0065210) at the University of Alberta."

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form. 

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows: 

"For this study, GYO is supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant no. PJT-451105), the Northern Alberta Clinical Trials and Research Centre (grant no. RES50821), and the long COVID web (grant no. RES0065210) at the University of Alberta."

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

5. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

Dear Authors,

However both reviewers have suggested minor revisions, the comments raised by both reviewers during the review process is very important. Therefore, the authors must carry out the revisions carefully according to the reviewers comments before the paper is accepting.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Authors should provide data which can support the taurine administration and its benefits like reduced depressive

behavior, improved memory, and mitigation of age-related issues. The authors are expected to study the correlation between the plasma taurine levels and therapeutic activities, including antioxidant, anti-aging, antiepileptic, cytoprotective, and cardioprotective effects in patients having diseases like diabetes, obesity. It will provide a scope for researches in this domain in future.

Authors can contribute some substantial findings to support the taurine supplementation to reduce the total cholesterol and triglycerides in patients with obesity.

Reviewer #2: This study aimed to investigate the role of taurine and possible recommendations of taurine supplementation for post-COVID conditions. However, the submitted article needs a thorough revision in order to bring better quality of scientific presentation towards the easy understanding of the article. The authors are advised to respond thoroughly to all the corrections mentioned below. I recommend this manuscript for publication in PLosOne, once the authors consider the revisions for the below comments.

This study aimed to investigate the role of taurine and possible recommendations of taurine supplementation for post-COVID conditions. Although the manuscript is well written, the results sections were quite confusing for readers. For example, the authors explained the data with repetition (“Fig 1. Taurine in acute and convalescence phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection.” Fig 2. Taurine correlations with biomarkers of inflammation and gut dysbiosis). This must be rewritten.

The authors explained about gut dysbiosis. However, it needs to be explained with the taurine supplementation with gut dysbiosis markers in the PCC. In addition, authors explaining about the role of taurine and tryptophan could strengthen these results.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Natarajan Sampathkumar

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Revision 1

Response to the editor:

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf.

Response: We would like to thank the editor for their effort towards our manuscript. We made sure that our manuscript meets the style requirements found in the links.

Please state what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed.

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

"This work is supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant no. PJT-451105), the Northern Alberta Clinical Trials and Research Centre (grant no. RES50821), and the long COVID web (grant no. RES0065210) at the University of Alberta."

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

"For this study, GYO is supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant no. PJT-451105), the Northern Alberta Clinical Trials and Research Centre (grant no. RES50821), and the long COVID web (grant no. RES0065210) at the University of Alberta."

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Response: We thank the editor for this comment. We removed the funding-related text from the acknowledgement section. This section reads as follows now: “We would like to thank the patients, their families, and the dedicated clinical staff and frontline workers at the University of Alberta's COVID-19 units, whose collaboration made this work possible. Special appreciation goes to Dr. Bruce Ritchie and the Canadian Biosample Repository team for their noteworthy efforts in contributing to the CoCollab COVID-19 Study. The metabolomics assays were carried out by The Metabolomics Innovation Center in Edmonton, AB, Canada.”

Please update our funding statement section to this text:

For this study, GYO is supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant no. PJT-451105), the Northern Alberta Clinical Trials and Research Centre (grant no. RES50821), and the Long COVID web (grant no. RES0065210) at the University of Alberta.

4. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

Response: We thank the editor for this comment. We have added the caption for supporting information file at the end of our manuscript.

Changes made:

Supporting information

S1 File. Supporting data values of all plots.

5. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Response: We ensured that all references used in this manuscript are complete and correct. Vancouver style used for this section as requested in the author’s guideline. We also made sure that there is no retracted article cited.

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Response: We have checked all the figures by Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) to ensure they all meet the PLOS requirements.

Response to reviewers:

Reviewer #1: Authors should provide data which can support the taurine administration and its benefits like reduced depressive behavior, improved memory, and mitigation of age-related issues.

Response: We would like to thank the reviewer for their time and effort towards our manuscript. As we have elaborated in the discussion section, taurine administration enhances various biological processes, resulting in beneficial neurological functions, such as reduced depression, improved memory, and alleviation of age-related issues. We have now cited several references that show taurine supplementation could enhance the cognitive function in different disorders. This is consistent with our findings where plasma taurine was positively correlated with different biomarkers involved in those biological processes and negatively associated with neurological symptoms in patients with post-COVID condition. Please note that in this study, we just examined the plasma taurine levels in patients with PCC during the acute and convalescence phase, and we did not supplement the patients with taurine. At the end of the discussion, we also mentioned that a large clinical trial is required to test these beneficial functions of taurine in PCC patients directly.

Changes made:

Page 16, line 323 (Discussion): “Similar beneficial effects have also been observed in clinical studies, where taurine supplementation significantly improved the cognitive function of patients with dementia, first-episode psychotic disorder, and Mitochondrial encephalomyopathy with lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes (MELAS).(23-25) Consistently, our study showed higher plasma taurine level was correlated with various biomarkers reflecting improved physiological states, along with negative associations with different self-reported PCC symptoms, such as weakness, cognitive impairment, and mood disturbance.”

The authors are expected to study the correlation between the plasma taurine levels and therapeutic activities, including antioxidant, anti-aging, antiepileptic, cytoprotective, and cardioprotective effects in patients having diseases like diabetes, obesity. It will provide a scope for researches in this domain in future.

Response: We thank the reviewer for this comment. We agree that taurine can have more potent beneficial effects on PCC patients who are comorbid with other diseases, such as diabetes, obesity, or hypertension. To evaluate this, we assessed plasma taurine levels in patients with other comorbidities during the convalescence phase of COVID-19 disease. Out of all the comorbidities reported in Table 2, we could find that plasma taurine levels were reduced in PCC patients with diabetes compared to PCC patients without diabetes. We also demonstrated that taurine significantly correlates with other molecules with antioxidation, anti-inflammation, and cryoprotective properties in PCC patients with diabetes. These findings are now presented in the result and discussion sections.

Changes made:

Page 14, line 283 (Results, section 6): “Plasma taurine levels in patients with diabetes

Plasma taurine levels were examined in PCC patients with diabetes during the convalescence phase. Notably, PCC patients with diabetes exhibited reduced plasma taurine concentrations compared to PCC patients without diabetes (p<0.05) (Fig 6A). Further exploration of plasma samples from PCC patients with diabetes revealed associations between taurine and several key biomarkers involved in different biological functions. Plasma taurine levels were positively correlated with anti-inflammatory cytokines, namely interleukin-4 (R=0.51, p<0.001) and interleukin-13 (R=0.4, p=0.0046) (Fig 6B-C). Similarly, plasma taurine levels positively correlated with antithrombin-3 (R=0.38, p=0.0064) and peroxiredoxin-1 (R=0.62, p<0.001), which are involved in the inhibition of coagulation and oxidative stress, respectively (Fig 6D-E). Moreover, plasma taurine levels showed a positive correlation with apolipoprotein A1 (APO A-I) (R=0.29, p=0.043) in PCC patients with diabetes, which illustrates a potential role for taurine in lipid metabolism and cholesterol balance (Fig 6F). Moreover, we found that plasma taurine levels were positively associated with creatine (R=0.32, p=0.026), a source of energy in the body (Fig 6G). Lastly, taurine levels were negatively correlated with quinolinic acid (R=-0.3, p=0.038), a neurotoxic breakdown metabolite of tryptophan (Fig 6H).

Fig 6. Plasma taurine alteration and correlations with biomarkers in PCC patients with diabetes.

(A) Box and whisker plot illustrating the level of taurine in PCC patients with and without diabetes during the convalescence phase compared with healthy controls. Mann-Whitney U test with Benjamini-Hochberg correction was performed for pairwise comparison. (B-H) Scatter plots showing the correlations between plasma taurine levels with IL-4 (B), IL-13 (C), antithrombin III (D), peroxiredoxin I (E), APOA-I (F), creatine (G), and quinolinic acid (H) in PCC patients with diabetes. IL-4, Interleukin-4; IL-13, Interleukin-13; APOA-I, apolipoprotein A1. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.”

Page 16, line 332 (Discussion): “Many clinical trials have demonstrated the beneficial effects of taurine supplementation for patients with diabetes by improving glycemic indices and lipid profile. (29-33) Our study illustrated that PCC patients with comorbid diabetes had lower taurine levels compared to PCC patients without diabetes. However, taurine levels in these patients were positively correlated with molecules with anti-oxidation, anti-inflammatory, and cytoprotective properties. As such, taurine supplementation may be an effective adjuvant therapy for PCC patients with concurrent diabetes.”

Authors can contribute some substantial findings to support the taurine supplementation to reduce the total cholesterol and triglycerides in patients with obesity.

Response: As discussed in the previous comment, we cannot directly show that taurine supplementation will reduce total cholesterol and triglycerides in patients with obesity since we did not supplement our patients with taurine. We were able to examine the relationship between changes in cholesterol and triglyceride levels with taurine during follow-up. However, as evident by the figures below, we did not observe a significant difference in plasma taurine levels with and without obesity, which can result from the limited study cohort size. This point was explained in the discussion section to highlight the beneficial effects of taurine in other diseases through various biological functions, which can also help patients with post-COVID condition.

Figure 1. Plasma Taurine levels in PCC patients during convalescence.

(A). Plasma taurine levels in healthy controls, PCC patients with obesity (BMI>30), and PCC patients without obesity (BMI<30).

(B). Plasma taurine levels in healthy controls, diabetic obese PCC patients, and PCC patients without obesity and diabetes.

Reviewer #2:

This study aimed to investigate the role of taurine and possible recommendations of taurine supplementation for post-COVID conditions. Although the manuscript is well written, the results sections were quite confusing for readers. For example, the authors explained the data with repetition (“Fig 1. Taurine in acute and convalescence phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection.” Fig 2. Taurine correlations with biomarkers of inflammation and gut dysbiosis). This must be rewritten.

Response: We thank the reviewer for their valuable input and comments. In the revised manuscript, we have now separated these two figures into two different sections in the result to offer more clarity for readers. We also rewrote some sentences in this part of the manuscript so that it will read better.

Changes made:

Page 10, line 184 (Results, section 2): “Temporal changes in taurine levels following SARS-CoV-2 infection

Metabolomic analysis of plasma samples in the convalescence phase identified 50 differentially expressed metabolites compared to age and sex-matched healthy controls, with the amino acid taurine as one of the top upregulated metabolites (fold-change=5.7, p<0.0001) (Fig 1B). Additionally, plasma taurine levels were significantly elevated in acute infection compared to healthy controls (p=1.1e-15) and were further elevated in the convalescence phase compared to the acute phase (p=1.8e-11) (Fig 1C). Taurine could protect against PCC through inhibition of various pathophysiological processes and stimulation of beneficial functions (Fig 1D). Therefore, we hypothesize that failure to upregulate the taurine pathway may predispose individuals to having adverse outcomes and greater symptom burden during convalescence from SARS-CoV-2 infection.”

Page 11, line 202 (Results, section 3): “Correlation between taurine levels with inflammatory and microbiome biomarkers in post-COVID condition

We examined the associations between plasma taurine levels and biomarkers of pathophysiological processes identified in PCC during the convalescence phase. We found that plasma levels of taurine negatively correlated with markers of inflammation, such as C-reactive protein (R=-0.22, p=0.019), interleukin-10 (R=-0.23, p=0.014), and interleukin-6 (R=-0.28, p=0.002) (Fig 2A-C). In contrast, there was a positive correlation between taurine levels with tryptophan (R=0.29, p=0.001) and serotonin (R=0.4, p=8.8e-6), while demonstrating a strong negative correlation with quinolinic acid (r=-0.4, p<0.001), a byproduct of tryptophan metabolism with neurotoxic effects (Fig 2D-F). Lastly, taurine was negatively correlated with biomarkers related to gut dysbiosis, such as trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) (R=-0.27, p=0.003), phenylacetic acid (R=-0.22, p=0.016), and lipopolysaccharide binding protein (R=-0.27, p=0.0031), suggesting a possible role of taurine in modulating microbial ecology in PCC (Fig 2G-I).”

Correlation between taurine levels with inflammatory and microbiome biomarkers in post-COVID condition

We examined the associations between plasma taurine levels and biomarkers of pathophysiological processes identified in PCC during the convalescence phase. We found that plasma levels of taurine negatively correlated with markers of inflammation, such as C-reactive protein (R=-0.22, p=0.019), interleukin-10 (R=-0.23, p=0.014), and interleukin-6 (R=-0.28, p=0.002) (Fig 2A-C). In contrast, there was a positive correlation between taurine levels with tryptophan (R=0.29, p=0.001) and serotonin (R=0.4, p=8.8e-6), while demonstrating a strong negative correlation with quinolinic acid (r=-0.4, p<0.001), a byproduct of tryptophan metabolism with neurotoxic effects (Fig 2D-F). Lastly, taurine was negatively correlated with biomarkers related to gut dysbiosis, such as trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) (R=-0.27, p=0.003), phenylacetic acid (R=-0.22, p=0.016), and lipopolysaccharide binding protein (R=-0.27, p=0.0031), suggesting a possible role of taurine in modulating microbial ecology in PCC (Fig 2G-I).

Page 10, line 190 (Results, section 2):

Attachments
Attachment
Submitted filename: Response to the Editor and Reviewers.docx
Decision Letter - Anand Thirupathi, Editor

Plasma taurine level is linked to symptom burden and clinical outcomes in post-COVID condition

PONE-D-24-02915R1

Dear Dr. Oudit

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Anand Thirupathi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Formally Accepted
Acceptance Letter - Anand Thirupathi, Editor

PONE-D-24-02915R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Oudit,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Anand Thirupathi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Open letter on the publication of peer review reports

PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose to reveal their names.

We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions, to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research system.

Learn more at ASAPbio .