Nurses' Continuance Intention to Use Electronic Health Record Systems The Antecedent Role of Personality and Organisation Support

PONE-D-23-31970

Dear Dr. Alsyouf,

My compliments!

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Sabina De Rosis, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: 

 "Nurses' Continuance Intention to Use Electronic Health Record Systems: The Antecedent Role of Personality and Organization Support

Dear Editor,

PLOS ONE Journal

Subject: Funding Declaration for the Paper Titled "Nurses' Continuance Intention to Use Electronic Health Record Systems: The Antecedent Role of Personality and Organization Support"

I am writing to declare the funding sources that supported our research, which is submitted for your esteemed journal's consideration.

1. I, Adi Alsyouf, have received funding grants from King Abdulaziz University under grant number G: 533-849-1443.

2. My co-author, Nizar Abdulhai Alsubahi, has obtained funding grants in association with Maastricht University.

We believe it is essential to maintain transparency in our research endeavors, and hence, we share this information with PLOS ONE to ensure integrity in the publishing process.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

Adi Alsyouf"

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." 

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. 

Please respond by return e-mail so that we can amend your financial disclosure and competing interests on your behalf.

3. Please include your full ethics statement in the ‘Methods’ section of your manuscript file. In your statement, please include the full name of the IRB or ethics committee who approved or waived your study, as well as whether or not you obtained informed written or verbal consent. If consent was waived for your study, please include this information in your statement as well. 

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: I Don't Know

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: I applaude your effort.

Linking UTAUT with nursing is extremely innovative. The importance of this strain of research can prepare new ground for future research in the managerial and organizational field, i.e. nursing management.

Reviewer #2: Thank you for the opportunity to review your manuscript. I found it both interesting and informative. It was interesting to see the overlay and different lens of the personality traits of nurses when either accepting (or not) the continued use of EMR post implementation. Personally, I had never taken into consideration, in such depth, of the personality traits of the multiusers. I did find the introduction and the literature review, while thorough di tend to be a little long. This could be a little more concise. Aims and objectives of the study were readily identified and addressed. Discussion was supported with appropriative literature and reads well. The manuscript was logically sequenced and well written, with minor anomalies, such as commencing a sentence with an acronym, only noted.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Chiara Barchielli, Ph.D.

Reviewer #2: No

**********