Peer Review History

Original SubmissionAugust 1, 2023
Decision Letter - Dhanamjayulu C, Editor

PONE-D-23-24308A Versatilely High Fidelity Electric Machines Emulator for Rapid Testing of Motor ControllerPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Huang,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

ACADEMIC EDITOR: The reviewers recommend reconsideration the manuscript with revision and modification. I invite the authors to resubmit the manuscript after addressing the comments raised by the reviewers.

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 22 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.
  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.
  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Dhanamjayulu C, Ph.D & Post.Doc

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please note that PLOS ONE has specific guidelines on code sharing for submissions in which author-generated code underpins the findings in the manuscript. In these cases, all author-generated code must be made available without restrictions upon publication of the work. Please review our guidelines at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/materials-and-software-sharing#loc-sharing-code and ensure that your code is shared in a way that follows best practice and facilitates reproducibility and reuse.

3. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

“Limin Huang received Funded:Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program (2023YFQ0092), which provided support in terms of experimental setup. Chengdu Science and Technology Program (2022-YF05-01393-SN), which provided support in data collection and theoretical analysis. Sichuan College Students Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program (S202211079055), which Provided support in cultivating students' innovative abilities.”

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed.

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

“We would like to give great appreciation to the support of Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program (2023YFQ0092), Chengdu Science and Technology Program (2022-YF05-01393-SN), and Sichuan College Students Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program (S202211079055).”

We note that you have provided funding information that is currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

“Limin Huang received Funded:Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program (2023YFQ0092), which provided support in terms of experimental setup. Chengdu Science and Technology Program (2022-YF05-01393-SN), which provided support in data collection and theoretical analysis. Sichuan College Students Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program (S202211079055), which Provided support in cultivating students' innovative abilities.”

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

5. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

6. We note that Figure 13 and 14 in your submission contain copyrighted images. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

1. You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figures 13 and 14 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license.

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

2. If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

Additional Editor Comments:

The reviewers recommend reconsideration the manuscript with revision and modification. I invite the authors to resubmit the manuscript after addressing the comments raised by the reviewers.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Authors have simulated the electrical machine in real-time using Typhoon HIL in which following observations were noted:

1. It is hard to recognize any novelty in presented work. This is because; operation of an electrical machine with their non-linear characteristics has been already reported in many available literatures.

2. Furthermore, Real-time simulation using hardware emulator is also reported [1, 8, 11, 17, 18, 20].

3. HIL results in the manuscripts seem to be obtained from PC simulation using Typhoon software. It should be captured using suitable indicating instrument/DSO.

4. Authors are required to mention the suitable reason for the consideration of Interior Permanent Magnet (IPM) machine in their work.

5. Authors are also required to add more recent and relevant literature in reference section.

Reviewer #2: This paper is focused on a general-purpose motor simulator for motor controller and motor control plan testing. The real-time simulation tool typhoon HIL is used in the study to develop a hardware-in-the-loop simulation platform for an IPM electric machines emulator.

I have the following comments for the authors:

1. In the Steady State Simulation Analysis section I suggest summarizing the results in a table.

2. In the Electric Machines Emulator Transient Simulation Analysis section I suggest summarizing the results in a table.

3. Improving the quality of the figures in the article.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Revision 1

As kindly suggested by you and the reviews, the paper has been further carefully revised in accordance to the constructive and helpful comments from you and all the reviewers for improving the quality of paper further. The detailed information and responses to reviewers are provided in the “Detailed Response to Reviewers”.

We would like to give great appreciation to the support for this paper of the Sichuan Provincial Regional Innovation Cooperation Project (2023YFQ0092), the Chengdu City Technology Innovation R&D Project (2022-YF05-01393-SN), and the Sichuan College Students' Innovation and Entrepreneurship Program (S202211079055).

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. They have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

We have modified Figure 13, which may have copyright disputes, and Figure 14 has been deleted.

Response to Reviewer #1:

Comment 1 and Comment 2:

1. It is hard to recognize any novelty in presented work. This is because; operation of an electrical machine with their non-linear characteristics has been already reported in many available literatures.

2. Furthermore, Real-time simulation using hardware emulator is also reported [1, 8, 11, 17, 18, 20].

Response 1 and 2:

The objective of this study is to develop a simulator that can simulate the behavior of a motor in real time by combining the proposed motor model with typhoon. The simulator serves as a control object for the motor controller and helps the developer to develop the related control program in advance. Although many methods for describing motor nonlinearities have been reported in existing studies, the magnetic chain-based motor modeling method proposed in this paper characterizes the real operating characteristics of IPM motors, improves the simulation accuracy and efficiency of the model motor model, and the method has low computational complexity and high real-time performance. The magnetic chain-based motor model can be deployed on in the semi-physical simulation equipment with the advantages of stability and high reliability.

Comment 3:

3. HIL results in the manuscripts seem to be obtained from PC simulation using Typhoon software. It should be captured using suitable indicating instrument/DSO.

Response 3:

The result graph is drawn from the data exported by the oscilloscope through matlab, and no screenshots of the oscilloscope are retained during the experimental phase. The resulting graph proves that the simulator accurately represents the real behavior of the motor, and we will incorporate your suggestions in subsequent studies.

Comment 4:

Authors are required to mention the suitable reason for the consideration of Interior Permanent Magnet (IPM) machine in their work.、

Response 4:

The detailed parameters of the IPM motor in this study come from Toyota's open source motor data, and IPM is widely used in electric vehicles, so this is the motivation for choosing the IPM motor in this article. We will redescribe this part in Chapter 3 of the paper.

Comment 5:

Authors are also required to add more recent and relevant literature in reference section.

Response 5:

We have added some recent references to the paper.

Response to Reviewer #2:

Comment 1:

1. In the Steady State Simulation Analysis section I suggest summarizing the results in a table.

Response 1

We summarize the results of the steady-state simulation in Table 2.

Comment 2:

2. In the Electric Machines Emulator Transient Simulation Analysis section I suggest summarizing the results in a table.

Response 2

We summarize the results of the transient -state simulation in Table 3.

Comment 3:

3. Improving the quality of the figures in the article.

Response 3

We have redrawn the experimental results to improve picture clarity.

As kindly suggested by you and the reviews, the paper has been further carefully revised in accordance to the constructive and helpful comments from you and all the reviewers for improving the quality of paper further. The detailed information and responses to reviewers are provided in the “Detailed Response to Reviewers”.

We would like to give great appreciation to the support for this paper of the Sichuan Provincial Regional Innovation Cooperation Project (2023YFQ0092), the Chengdu City Technology Innovation R&D Project (2022-YF05-01393-SN), and the Sichuan College Students' Innovation and Entrepreneurship Program (S202211079055).

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. They have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

We have modified Figure 13, which may have copyright disputes, and Figure 14 has been deleted.

Attachments
Attachment
Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx
Decision Letter - Dhanamjayulu C, Editor

A Versatilely High Fidelity Electric Machines Emulator for Rapid Testing of Motor Controller

PONE-D-23-24308R1

Dear Dr,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Dhanamjayulu C, Ph.D & Post.Doc

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

The authors have revised the article properly

The article can be accepted the present form

Reviewers' comments:

Formally Accepted
Acceptance Letter - Dhanamjayulu C, Editor

PONE-D-23-24308R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Huang,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Dhanamjayulu C

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Open letter on the publication of peer review reports

PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose to reveal their names.

We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions, to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research system.

Learn more at ASAPbio .