Peer Review History
Original SubmissionMarch 31, 2023 |
---|
PONE-D-23-09689Dormancy release from seeds of Sinopodophyllum hexandrum (Royle) Ying accompanied by changes in endogenous components and inorganic elements PLOS ONE Dear Dr. Du, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 19 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file. Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter. If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols. We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Kind regards, Branislav T. Šiler, Ph.D. Academic Editor PLOS ONE Journal Requirements: When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements. 1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 2. We suggest you thoroughly copyedit your manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar. If you do not know anyone who can help you do this, you may wish to consider employing a professional scientific editing service. Whilst you may use any professional scientific editing service of your choice, PLOS has partnered with both American Journal Experts (AJE) and Editage to provide discounted services to PLOS authors. Both organizations have experience helping authors meet PLOS guidelines and can provide language editing, translation, manuscript formatting, and figure formatting to ensure your manuscript meets our submission guidelines. To take advantage of our partnership with AJE, visit the AJE website (http://learn.aje.com/plos/) for a 15% discount off AJE services. To take advantage of our partnership with Editage, visit the Editage website (www.editage.com) and enter referral code PLOSEDIT for a 15% discount off Editage services. If the PLOS editorial team finds any language issues in text that either AJE or Editage has edited, the service provider will re-edit the text for free. Upon resubmission, please provide the following: ● The name of the colleague or the details of the professional service that edited your manuscript ● A copy of your manuscript showing your changes by either highlighting them or using track changes (uploaded as a *supporting information* file) ● A clean copy of the edited manuscript (uploaded as the new *manuscript* file) 2.Thank you for stating the following in your Competing Interests section: "The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper." Please complete your Competing Interests on the online submission form to state any Competing Interests. If you have no competing interests, please state "The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.", as detailed online in our guide for authors at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submit-now This information should be included in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf. 3.Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: "Supported by the earmarked fund for CARS-21." Please state what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role, please state: ""The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."" If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf. 4. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability. ""Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized. Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access. We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter. 5. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ Additional Editor Comments: Plant nomenclature must be in line with the scientifically accepted authorities such as Kew Garden's Plants of the World Online (https://powo.science.kew.org/) and World Flora Online (https://www.worldfloraonline.org/). Therefore, the model species Sinopodophyllum hexandrum (Royle) Ying is in fact just a synonym of the internationally accepted name Podophyllum hexandrum Royle (https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77137821-1 and https://www.worldfloraonline.org/taxon/wfo-0000507972) and the latter should be used throughout the text, but the synonym can be mentioned in the Introduction section. Several additional explanations are needed according to the reviewers' reports. Figures should be prepared according to the PLOS ONE guidelines (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures) and submitted as separate files in the revised version. The Discussion section must be improved to contain active and thorough comparison of the results obtained in the study and those find in the literature. Language usage must be substantially improved since in some parts the text is incomprehensible; the manuscript needs to be proofread by a native English speaker or a professional editing agency. [Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.] Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: Partly Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: No Reviewer #2: No ********** 5. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: In the present manuscript, the authors investigated the changes in the contents of inorganic elements and biomolecules in endosperm and seed coat during dormancy release in Sinopodophyllum hexandrum. A lot of effort emphasized proteins and transcriptional changes during seed dormancy release in this plant. However, the dynamics of other biomolecules including lipids and inorganic elements is almost unexplored. As inorganic elements facilitate proteins and enzyme in their functioning and other biomolecules also regulate seed germination process, the concenption of the manuscript have merits. Authors analaysed the changes in endogenous components and inorganic elements in different seed parts during cold stratification mediated dormancy release, and tried to implicate those changes with dormancy release/seed germination. Though the comnception has merits, the manuscript needs thorough improvements. Please see comments below: Comments: • Writing needs a thorough editing and improvemt throughout. • “Endogenous components” doesn’t specifies any thing and looks vague. This shoud be replaced with more suitable words such as “phytochemicials” or “phytomolecules”. • Discussion is very poor. There’s no inference collected and simply previous literature is cited. • It looks that authors just presented the profilings data, and drawn no inferences. • There’s no explanation how various phytomolcules and inorganic elemnst present in seed coat, endosperm and embryo, could be functioning in dormancy release or seed germination. Reviewer #2: Sinopodophyllum hexandrum is a medicinal plant that produces podophyllotoxin, a compound with anti-cancer properties. However, the plant is endangered due to over-harvesting and habitat loss. Therefore, seed germination and propagation studies are important for its conservation and sustainable use. The MS findings lies within the scope of the journal PLOS ONE. The MS aimed at understanding the factors that affect the seed dormancy release and seed germination of S. hexandrum. Though it is well known that seed dormancy in S. hexandrum is mainly caused by the presence of a hard seed coat that prevents water uptake and gas exchange, seed dormancy can be broken by cold treatment. However, its physiological bases are poorly understood. Some studies showed that S. hexandum showed dormancy due to under developed embryo as well as physiological factors such as ABA/GA, antioxidants, H2O2 that help in maintaining GA/ABA ratio. Here I have some questions. 1. If seed dormancy in S. hexandrum is due to both factors (under developed embryo, and biochemicals hormones), the authors applied only cold treatment. Literature showed that cold treatment 4 oC for 60-90 days and 30-60 days treatment of 25 oC is required. Why the authors do not follow the standard protocol for treatment and analyze the biochemicals over 15 days interval. 2. Why authors do not consider the analysis of hormones such as ABA, GA and expression of genes responsible for biosynthesis/catabolism of these hormones My general observations are as follows: Introduction: It is suggested to add review literature about biochemical/physiological factors in seed dormancy and release and cite the reports about which metabolites may affect GA/ABA ratio etc. Results: English of this section is poor and it seems that senior author did not rectify this section. For example, very difficult to understand these sentences As shown in Figure 1A, the GP of S.hexandrum seeds grew from the initial 34.81% to 87.22% 217 with the lengthening of stratification time, and the dormancy was gradually released. As 218 illustrated in Figure 1B, the T50 of seeds at each stage presented an overall downward trend, 219 but the variation range was small. After being stratified for 90 d, the T50 of seeds was 220 significantly lower than that at other stages. Discussion It is suggested to add one paragrph about % release of seed dormancy with days after cold treatment, which will be followed by discussion on migration of nutrients and metabolites from seed part and release of seed dormancy. Overall, the MS is well written and can be accepted after minor changes in the MS. ********** 6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: No Reviewer #2: Yes: Prof Dr Habib-ur-Rehman Athar ********** [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.] While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step. |
Revision 1 |
PONE-D-23-09689R1Dormancy release of seeds of Podophyllum hexandrum Royle accompanied by changes in phytochemicals and inorganic elementsPLOS ONE Dear Dr. Du, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Although considerably improved according to the reviewers' reports, the manuscript still cannot be accepted due to several minor issues: L35, 36-37 and elsewhere in the text: Once fully introduced, the plant species' name should be shortened to P. hexandrum containing no authority name. Full species name can remain in its first mention in Abstract, Introduction and MM. The same applies to L111. L39-40: Please choose keywords not mentioned in the main title that are closely associated to the study theme. L42: "Podophyllum hexandrum is a perennial Sinopodophyllum Ying herb that is..." cannot stand, since a species cannot belong to two genera. Please rewrite as suggested in the first review round. L50: Podophyllum hexandrum is not listed in the IUCN Red List under any threatened category. Please remove this remark. L77,78, and elsewhere in the text: Please do not capitalize compound names or randomly chosen words (see the attached file where I highlighted SOME BUT NOT ALL places of intervention). L130-131: Please provide geographic coordinated in the internationally accepted format. L177, 179: some strange signs stand here. L285: What "The same as below" means? Fig 4, Fig 5, Fig 6, Fig 7, Fig 9, Fig 10, Fig 11: Provide here informative captions. They should contain short descriptions of what can be seen from the bars, dots, etc. and description of what bars/dots were compared and their statistical significance. Fig 8: Please provide better descriptions of what can be seen from the graphs and provide PC components' contribution. ============================== Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 11 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file. Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-emailutm_source=authorlettersutm_campaign=protocols. We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Kind regards, Branislav T. Šiler, Ph.D. Academic Editor PLOS ONE Journal Requirements: Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice. [Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.] [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.] While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step. |
Revision 2 |
Dormancy release of seeds of Podophyllum hexandrum Royle accompanied by changes in phytochemicals and inorganic elements PONE-D-23-09689R2 Dear Dr. Du, We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements. Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication. An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org. Kind regards, Branislav T. Šiler, Ph.D. Academic Editor PLOS ONE Additional Editor Comments (optional): Reviewers' comments: |
Formally Accepted |
PONE-D-23-09689R2 Dormancy release of seeds of Podophyllum hexandrum Royle accompanied by changes in phytochemicals and inorganic elements Dear Dr. Du: I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org. If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org. Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access. Kind regards, PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff on behalf of Dr. Branislav T. Šiler Academic Editor PLOS ONE |
Open letter on the publication of peer review reports
PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose to reveal their names.
We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions, to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research system.
Learn more at ASAPbio .