Peer Review History

Original SubmissionMarch 14, 2023
Decision Letter - Andre van Wijnen, Editor

PONE-D-23-07167Evaluating the potential of vitamin D and curcumin to alleviate inflammation and mitigate the progression of osteoarthritis through their effects on human chondrocytes: a proof-of-concept investigation.PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Banerjee,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by May 25 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.
  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.
  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Andre van Wijnen

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: 

   "This study is supported by research award from Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences (MBRU), jointly awarded to NN and YB with the following identifier; MBRU-CM-RG2022-04.SR is a recipient of scholarship in the Biomedical Sciences Master Program at MBRU."

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." 

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. 

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

3. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

"Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

4. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

5. We note that you have included the phrase “data not shown” in your manuscript. Unfortunately, this does not meet our data sharing requirements. PLOS does not permit references to inaccessible data. We require that authors provide all relevant data within the paper, Supporting Information files, or in an acceptable, public repository. Please add a citation to support this phrase or upload the data that corresponds with these findings to a stable repository (such as Figshare or Dryad) and provide and URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers that may be used to access these data. Or, if the data are not a core part of the research being presented in your study, we ask that you remove the phrase that refers to these data.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: 1. The author refers to a large number of references in the INTRODUCTION. However, for the research article, the background information related to the research should be clarified succinctly and clearly.

2. In the Results section, the authors only considered the anti-inflammatory effects of vitamin D and curcumin in the proinflammatory chondrocyte model, but did not consider the toxic effects of vitamin D and curcumin on chondrocytes, which is a serious defect.

3. The authors considered that PAR-2 expression is critical for the anti-inflammatory effects of vitamin D and curcumin on chondrocytes. Why not test this conclusion by regulating the expression of PAR-2?

4. The author's summary presented in Figure 10 is based on references, but most of the conclusions have not been verified in this paper

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Revision 1

Subject: Response to Review Comments for Manuscript ID PONE-D-23-07167: "Evaluating the potential of vitamin D and curcumin to alleviate inflammation and mitigate the progression of osteoarthritis through their effects on human chondrocytes: a proof-of-concept investigation"

Dear Professor Andre van Wijnen,

We greatly appreciate your careful review and constructive feedback regarding our manuscript titled "Evaluating the potential of vitamin D and curcumin to alleviate inflammation and mitigate the progression of osteoarthritis through their effects on human chondrocytes: a proof-of-concept investigation".

We have taken your valuable suggestions into account and have revised our manuscript accordingly. We have taken your valuable suggestions into account and made extensive revisions to our manuscript. All changes introduced in the revised manuscript are clearly indicated in the form of track changes. The details of our responses to your comments and the changes made to our manuscript are as follows:

Comment: 1

The author refers to a large number of references in the INTRODUCTION. However, for the research article, the background information related to the research should be clarified succinctly and clearly.

Response

We appreciate your suggestion to provide a more succinct and clear background. We understand the need for clarity, conciseness, and relevance in setting up the context for our research work.

In response to your comments, we have extensively revised the introduction (refer to the manuscript with track changes for details) to ensure a balance between detail and brevity. We have retained the original number of references as each of them serves a specific purpose in elucidating our context and shaping the premise of our study. Each reference provides a piece of the complex puzzle of understanding the roles and potential of drugs targeting proinflammatory cytokines, a field that is diverse and extensive. Moreover, the references provide the necessary backdrop to comprehend the therapeutic potential of vitamin D and curcumin in the context of osteoarthritis (OA), creating a comprehensive picture of the current landscape of knowledge in this area. We believe that the comprehensiveness of our citation will aid readers in exploring the topic further if they wish to, and thus, it adds value to the overall understanding of the research field.

Regarding the table reviewing the studies assessing the effect of vitamin D in OA, we believe it is of paramount importance to our research. This table synthesizes a wide array of studies and gives readers a thorough overview of the state of current research in a concise and easily digestible format. By summarizing the outcomes and methodologies of several studies, it enables readers to quickly grasp the collective findings on the impact of vitamin D on OA. This, in turn, underscores the novelty and significance of our study, which extends this knowledge by investigating the role of vitamin D in the context of PAR-2 mediated inflammation in OA.

In conclusion, while we have worked expansively and extensively on the brevity and clarity of the introduction, we believe that the breadth of references and the inclusion of the review table add significant value to our research article, offering the readers a comprehensive view of the field and our unique contribution to it.

Comment: 2

In the Results section, the authors only considered the anti-inflammatory effects of vitamin D and curcumin in the proinflammatory chondrocyte model, but did not consider the toxic effects of vitamin D and curcumin on chondrocytes, which is a serious defect.

Response

Thank you for your insightful comments. We recognize the importance of considering the toxic effects of Vitamin D and curcumin on chondrocytes and we wholeheartedly agree with you on its importance.

In our initial submission, we noted that both Vitamin D and curcumin did not affect the expression of the control glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) gene in our Western blot experiments. This observation suggested that these compounds were most likely non-cytotoxic at the doses used. However, we understand the need for a more direct assessment of cytotoxicity.

To strengthen our study and address your valuable comment, we have now performed further cytotoxicity evaluations using the MTT (3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay, a widely recognized method for its robustness in cytotoxicity evaluation. This assay works by measuring the metabolic activity of the cells, thereby providing a reliable measure of cell health and proliferation.

We have tested various doses for each compound: LPS (0.1 µg/mL, 1 µg/mL, 10 µg/mL, 20 µg/mL, and 40 µg/mL), Vitamin D (0.01 µM, 0.02 µM, 0.12 µM, 0.25 µM), and Curcumin (10 µM, 25 µM, 50 µM, 75 µM, 100 µM). The selected dose ranges for LPS encompasses the dose that was used to create the proinflammatory chondrocyte model. For Vitamin D, and curcumin the used concentrations encompass the doses used in our ELISA, Western Blot, and Flow cytometry studies, where both compounds showed anti-inflammatory effects.

Our findings from the MTT assay indicate no observable cytotoxicity at any of the tested concentrations, as illustrated in the newly added Figure 3 in the revised version of the manuscript. This vital observation underscores that the doses of LPS, Vitamin D, and curcumin used in our experiments do not exert cytotoxic effects and should not interfere with the cells' normal function, further reinforcing their potential as safe therapeutic agents in the study and management of OA.

To reflect these important additions, we have revised the Methods, Results and Discussion sections of our manuscript (identifiable through track changes in the track-changed manuscript). In the Discussion, we specifically address the lack of observed cytotoxicity for Vitamin D and curcumin at the tested doses and provide context for these results in the broader landscape of OA therapeutics. These changes are also highlighted in the manuscript through track changes.

We hope that these additions and modifications adequately address your concerns and further validate our study's findings.

Comment: 3

The authors considered that PAR-2 expression is critical for the anti-inflammatory effects of vitamin D and curcumin on chondrocytes. Why not test this conclusion by regulating the expression of PAR-2?

Response

Thank you for your insightful comments and the opportunity to further clarify our experimental approach. We appreciate your suggestion of testing our hypothesis regarding the critical role of PAR-2 in the anti-inflammatory effects of vitamin D and curcumin. In fact, in response to your comment, we have performed additional experiments to directly assess this hypothesis.

To delineate the role of PAR-2 expression in regulating the anti-inflammatory effects of vitamin D and curcumin, we used siRNA to knockdown the expression of PAR-2 in our chondrocyte model. As you've suggested, we evaluated the consequential changes in TNF-α expression under various conditions of LPS treatment in the absence and presence of siRNA transfection. Our findings (please refer to the revised Results section and Figures 10 and 11 in the manuscript) corroborate the hypothesis that diminished PAR-2 expression results in a relative decrease in the secretion of TNF-α, affirming the role of PAR-2 in mediating inflammatory responses in chondrocytes.

However, it's worth noting that even with the knockdown of PAR-2 expression, we did not observe a complete abrogation of TNF-α secretion. This observation suggests that although PAR-2 plays a significant role in mediating the inflammatory response, other signalling pathways or receptors might also be involved in the regulation of TNF-α secretion. Therefore, the anti-inflammatory effects of vitamin D and curcumin may also target these alternative pathways, offering a multifaceted mode of action against inflammation.

Additionally, we tested the effect of vitamin D and curcumin on PAR-2 silenced chondrocytes. The diminished efficacy of these bioactives in the presence of PAR-2 knockdown offers further evidence towards their targeted activity against PAR-2-mediated inflammation.

These additions have been incorporated into our methodology, results, and discussion, which you will find marked clearly with track changes in the revised manuscript.

We believe that these new experiments strengthen our study by directly demonstrating the role of PAR-2 in mediating the anti-inflammatory effects of vitamin D and curcumin. We hope that this addresses your concerns and further reinforces the significance of our findings.

Comment: 4

The author's summary presented in Figure 10 is based on references, but most of the conclusions have not been verified in this paper

Response

We appreciate the reviewer's feedback and the opportunity to further clarify the importance of Figure 10 (Figure 13 in the revised manuscript). This figure serves as a comprehensive summary of our findings and how they contribute to the larger landscape of OA-associated inflammation, outlining the role of key proinflammatory cytokines and signalling molecules, and the modulatory effects of bioceuticals like vitamin D and curcumin.

Firstly, Figure 10 provides an integrated view of the intricate relationships between PAR-2 and other key cytokines such as TNF-alpha, IL-6, IL-8, and IFNgamma, as well as crucial signalling molecules like RANK and RANKL, all known to play significant roles in OA pathogenesis, and investigated in the present study.

Secondly, this figure illustrates the impact of vitamin D and curcumin on these pathways. Both bioceuticals exhibited significant anti-inflammatory properties by reducing the expression of these proinflammatory mediators and hence, can be considered as promising agents for OA management.

Finally, Figure 10 serves as a roadmap for future research. While it's true that not all depicted relationships and mechanisms have been verified within the scope of our current study, each of these points represents a significant and promising area for further investigation and have been indicated in the discussion of our manuscript in the form of track changes. Understanding the multiple layers of interactions between these cytokines and signalling molecules in the context of OA inflammation is a challenging but crucial task. This figure sets the stage for future research endeavours to delve deeper into the unexplored areas of this complex network.

We believe that our study, alongside Figure 10, significantly contributes to the broader understanding of OA inflammation. Furthermore, it highlights the potential therapeutic benefits of natural bioceuticals and underlines the need for continued research into the complex interplay of inflammatory mediators in OA.

We believe the modifications made in response to your comments have significantly strengthened our manuscript. We appreciate your time and consideration and look forward to hearing your thoughts on our revised submission.

Kindly do not hesitate to approach my office if you require further information or clarification.

Looking forward to a positive response from your side at the earliest,

Regards and Best Wishes,

Yajnavalka Banerjee, PhD, PGDME

Associate Professor of Biochemistry

Attachments
Attachment
Submitted filename: Rebuttal letter_YB et al.docx
Decision Letter - Andre van Wijnen, Editor

Evaluating the potential of vitamin D and curcumin to alleviate inflammation and mitigate the progression of osteoarthritis through their effects on human chondrocytes: a proof-of-concept investigation.

PONE-D-23-07167R1

Dear Dr. Banerjee,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you will receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Andre van Wijnen, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

The authors have adequately revised this paper in response to the previous critiques.

Reviewers' comments:

Prevous reviewers did not provide comments.

Formally Accepted
Acceptance Letter - Andre van Wijnen, Editor

PONE-D-23-07167R1

Evaluating the potential of vitamin D and curcumin to alleviate inflammation and mitigate the progression of osteoarthritis through their effects on human chondrocytes: a proof-of-concept investigation.

Dear Dr. Banerjee:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Andre van Wijnen

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Open letter on the publication of peer review reports

PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose to reveal their names.

We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions, to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research system.

Learn more at ASAPbio .