Advances and future trends in research on carbon emissions reduction in China from the perspective of bibliometrics

Caiyun Chen; Wei Liu

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0288661

Peer Review History

Original SubmissionMay 24, 2023
8 Jun 2023 Decision Letter - Rita Yi Man Li, Editor PONE-D-23-15921Analyzing China's Efforts and Future Trends in Carbon Emission Reduction from the Perspective of BibliometricsPLOS ONE Dear Dr. Liu, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Please submit your revised manuscript by Jul 23 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file. Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript: A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'. A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'. An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'. If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter. If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols. We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Kind regards, Rita Yi Man Li Academic Editor PLOS ONE Journal Requirements: When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements. 1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf 2. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript: "This work was supported by Jiujiang traditional petrochemical industry green low carbon Upgrading Research Project entrusted by Jiujiang Environmental Protection Industry Association (HX202205130002)." We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form. Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows: "NO" Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf. 3. We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match. When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section. 4. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability. "Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized. Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access. We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter. Additional Editor Comments: Comments for Analyzing China's Efforts and Future Trends in Carbon Emission Reduction from the Perspective of Bibliometrics 1.How can we Analyzing China's Efforts from the Perspective of Bibliometrics? Remove the location from title 1.the authors may need to reduce the overall length of the abstract part, the relative background may be simplified, and the research methods could be briefly mentioned. 2.“Since the pre-industrial era, increasing global warming has led to melting polar glaciers, hurricane damage, accelerated species extinction, rising sea levels, and changing rainfall patterns”. Please add reference to support this opinion. 3.“the global average temperature may rise by 1.5 by 2030-2052.” Where does this result come from? The authors may add a reference here. 4.some of the reference in the introduction part may seem a bit outdated, the authors may consider revising them. 5.Why almost all the CO2 emission data and papers are before 2010? Please add research after 2010. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.949959/full?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter 6.“China's carbon emissions have increasingly become a hot issue in the international community. Relevant research has been continuously enriched and developed. Many research results were published in journal articles. The research contents and perspectives are rich,” why this sentence stays here? This sentence could be simplified. 7.The authors should shorten length of the introduction part. 8.There should be a brief introduction of the coming sections of this paper at the end of the introduction part. 9.There should be a section with title “Literature review” which discuss the research background and current gaps, and also this section may be helpful regarding controlling the length of the introduction part. 10.The title Merhodology may be changed to Methods instead. 11.The authors may take a discussion about reasons for the selection of WoSviewer, Gephi, Citespace in this research and where have these tools been used before: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0925753522001291 https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/562 12.Reference about the knowledge map is necessary in the research methods part. 13.A descriptive statistics table should be added, which may contains the published year, journal name., etc. 14.There should be a discussion section. 15.Figure 5 is unclear, please enlarge. 16.Burst words are keywords that suddenly increase in number within a certain…please add citation. 17.Lines 624-654 should avoid numbering, please use paragraph. [Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.] Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ******** 2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ****** 3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ****** 4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: No ****** 5. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: The research method is appropriate, the data analysis is more systematic, the conclusion is logical, the picture is clear, and the reference is standard.The article is generally good enough to be published. Reviewer #2: The logical structure of the article is clear, while the topic and content meet the requirements of originality. Language expressions and methods used in the data analysis section are detailed, rigorous, and standardized. Conclusions are presented in an appropriate manner and supported by data. I propose the following suggestions for authors to refer to. The article has some grammar issues that require further improvement and correction by the author. The references are relatively outdated, and the author can appropriately increase the proportion of references cited in the past five years. Especially, it is necessary to add professional journal papers related to bibliometrics, as follows. Wang, X. (2022). Research on the discourse power evaluation of academic journals from the perspective of multiple fusion: taking Medicine, General and Internal journals as an example. Journal of Information Science, 01655515221107334. Wang, X. (2022), "Characteristics analysis and evaluation of discourse leading for academic journals: perspectives from multiple integration of altmetrics indicators and evaluation methods", Library Hi Tech, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-04-2022-0195 Wang, X. and Feng, X. (2022), "Research on the relationships between discourse leading indicators and citations: perspectives from altmetrics indicators of international multidisciplinary academic journals", Library Hi Tech, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-09-2021-0296 Wang, X., Feng, X. and Guo, K. (2023), "Research hotspots and prospects of ethics education of science and technology in China based on bibliometrics", Library Hi Tech, Vol. 41 No. 2, pp. 454-473. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-06-2022-0298 ****** 6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: No Reviewer #2: No ******** [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.] While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288661.r001
Revision 1
29 Jun 2023 Author Response Dear editor and reviewers： Thank you very much for your email dated June 8, 2023, informing us the Referees’ comments on our manuscript entitled “Analyzing China's Efforts and Future Trends in Carbon Emission Reduction from the Perspective of Bibliometrics” (PONE-D-23-15921). We appreciate all of your time and work in processing our manuscript. Your insightful comments and suggestions are valuable and very helpful for further revising and improving our paper. After receiving the email, we read the comments and suggestions of the editor and reviewers with great interest. We revised our manuscript point by point based on their comments and suggestions and provided a detailed point-by-point response, as described below. Reviewers' comments are listed in black italics and specific questions have been numbered. Our responses are given in regular black font, and relevant text is highlighted in red and blue in the revised manuscript. We hope our revisions will meet your satisfaction. Once again, thank you for your help. We are looking forward to your final decision at your earliest convenience. Sincerely yours, Wei Liu Replies to reviewer’s comments： 1.How can we Analyzing China's Efforts from the Perspective of Bibliometrics? Remove the location from title. Response: Many thanks to the reviewers for their suggestions and reminders, which we think will add professionalism and rigor to the manuscript. As suggested by the reviewer, we have revised the title to make it more relevant. Please see the revised manuscript for details (lines 1-5). 2.The authors may need to reduce the overall length of the abstract part, the relative background may be simplified, and the research methods could be briefly mentioned. Response: Thank you very much for your suggestion. We have made revisions to the abstract as requested. We have simplified the background introduction and emphasized the explanation of the research methodology and the results. Please see the revised manuscript for details (lines 17-47). 3.“Since the pre-industrial era, increasing global warming has led to melting polar glaciers, hurricane damage, accelerated species extinction, rising sea levels, and changing rainfall patterns”. Please add reference to support this opinion. Response: Thank you very much for your suggestion. We have added relevant literature to make the description of the research background more reliable. Furthermore, we made detailed modifications to the structure and content of the introduction. Please see the revised manuscript for details (revised introduction, lines 50-141). References: [1] B. Marzeion, G. Kaser, F. Maussion, N. Champollion, Limited influence of climate change mitigation on short-term glacier mass loss, Nature Climate Change, 8 (2018) 305-308. [2] C. Taylor, T.R. Robinson, S. Dunning, J. Rachel Carr, M. Westoby, Glacial lake outburst floods threaten millions globally, Nature Communications, 14 (2023) 487. 4.“the global average temperature may rise by 1.5 by 2030-2052.” Where does this result come from? The authors may add a reference here. Response: Thank you very much for your suggestion. We have added relevant literature to increase the reliability and scientific rigor of this section. References: [1] IPCC, Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability:Summary for Policymakers, 2022. [2] R. Biesbroek, S.J. Wright, S.K. Eguren, A. Bonotto, I.N. Athanasiadis, Policy attention to climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: a global assessment of National Communications (1994–2019), Climate Policy, 22 (2022) 97-111. 5.Some of the reference in the introduction part may seem a bit outdated, the authors may consider revising them. Response: Many thanks to the reviewers for their suggestions and reminders, which we think will add professionalism and rigor to the manuscript and make it more convincing. We have updated the research background with the latest literature on relevant studies in recent years, which will enhance the reliability and scientific rigor of our work. References: [1] R. Biesbroek, S.J. Wright, S.K. Eguren, A. Bonotto, I.N. Athanasiadis, Policy attention to climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: a global assessment of National Communications (1994–2019), Climate Policy, 22 (2022) 97-111. [2] C. Taylor, T.R. Robinson, S. Dunning, J. Rachel Carr, M. Westoby, Glacial lake outburst floods threaten millions globally, Nature Communications, 14 (2023) 487. [3] R. Biesbroek, S.J. Wright, S.K. Eguren, A. Bonotto, I.N. Athanasiadis, Policy attention to climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: a global assessment of National Communications (1994–2019), Climate Policy, 22 (2022) 97-111. [4] R.Y.M. Li, Q. Wang, L. Zeng, H. Chen, A Study on Public Perceptions of Carbon Neutrality in China: has the Idea of ESG Been Encompassed?, Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10 (2023). [5] R. Sun, K. Wang, X. Wang, J. Zhang, China's Carbon Emission Trading Scheme and Firm Performance, (2022). [6] X. Wang, Research on the discourse power evaluation of academic journals from the perspective of multiple fusion: Taking Medicine, General and Internal journals as an example, Journal of Information Science, (2022) 01655515221107334. [7] X. Wang, Characteristics analysis and evaluation of discourse leading for academic journals: perspectives from multiple integration of altmetrics indicators and evaluation methods, Library Hi Tech, ahead-of-print (2022). [8] X. Wang, X. Feng, Research on the relationships between discourse leading indicators and citations: perspectives from altmetrics indicators of international multidisciplinary academic journals, Library Hi Tech, ahead-of-print (2022). [9] L. Wang, Y. Xu, T. Qin, M. Wu, Z. Chen, Y. Zhang, W. Liu, X. Xie, Global trends in the research and development of medical/pharmaceutical wastewater treatment over the half-century, Chemosphere, 331 (2023) 138775. [10] L. Zeng, R.Y.M. Li, Construction safety and health hazard awareness in Web of Science and Weibo between 1991 and 2021, Safety Science, 152 (2022) 105790. [11] L. Zeng, R.Y. Li, J. Nuttapong, J. Sun, Y. Mao, Economic Development and Mountain Tourism Research from 2010 to 2020: Bibliometric Analysis and Science Mapping Approach, in: Sustainability, 2022. [12] X. Wang, X. Feng, K. Guo, Research hotspots and prospects of ethics education of science and technology in China based on bibliometrics, Library Hi Tech, 41 (2023) 454-473. 6.Why almost all the CO2 emission data and papers are before 2010? Please add research after 2010. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.949959/full?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter Response: Thank you very much for the reminder, this is a very crucial addition. We have included the latest research data and streamlined some content in this section to control the length of the introduction. As the reviewer mentioned, this is a recent publication that discusses the latest hot topics in China's carbon emissions research. We have added this reference and read it carefully, and we are inspired by carefully reading the literature of Li et al. (2023). Please see the revised manuscript for details (revised introduction, lines 50-141). References: [1] R.Y.M. Li, Q. Wang, L. Zeng, H. Chen, A Study on Public Perceptions of Carbon Neutrality in China: has the Idea of ESG Been Encompassed?, Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10 (2023). 7.“China's carbon emissions have increasingly become a hot issue in the international community. Relevant research has been continuously enriched and developed. Many research results were published in journal articles. The research contents and perspectives are rich,” why this sentence stays here? This sentence could be simplified. Response: Thank you very much for your suggestion. As you mentioned, the information provided in this paragraph was limited and the expression was not concise enough. We simplified this content and reviewed the entire manuscript to ensure that the language is clear and easy to understand. please see the revised manuscript for details (lines 105-107). 8 .The authors should shorten length of the introduction part. Response: Thank you very much for your suggestion. As you mentioned, the introduction section was too lengthy, so as per the reviewer's request, we have made detailed revisions to the introduction with the objectives of (1) controlling the length of the introduction, and (2) improving the logical coherence of the text, thus enhancing the rigor and readability of the paper. Additionally, we have added the latest relevant research literature as requested by the reviewer, which greatly improved the quality of the introduction. Please see the revised manuscript for details (revised introduction, lines 50-141). 9. There should be a brief introduction of the coming sections of this paper at the end of the introduction part. Response: Many thanks to the reviewers for their suggestions and reminders, which we think will add professionalism and rigor to the manuscript and make it more convincing. As suggested by the reviewer, in the last paragraph, we described the purpose of conducting this study and the research contents of the upcoming chapters. Please see the revised manuscript for details (lines 119-141). 10.There should be a section with title “Literature review” which discuss the research background and current gaps, and also this section may be helpful regarding controlling the length of the introduction part. Response: Many thanks to the reviewers for their suggestions and reminders, which we think will add professionalism and rigor to the manuscript and make it more convincing. As suggested by the reviewer, we have made detailed revisions to the introduction with the objectives of (1) controlling the length of the introduction, and (2) improving the logical coherence of the text, thus enhancing the rigor and readability of the paper. As requested by the reviewer, we introduced the latest reports on relevant research in the second and third paragraph of the introduction. Although we did not add a separate “literature review” section, we briefly summarized the latest literature on the research background and methodology , which also helped to control the overall length of the manuscript. We appreciate the reviewer's professional feedback, which greatly improved the quality of the introduction, especially with the addition of many new relevant references. Please see the revised manuscript for details (revised introduction, lines 50-141). 11.The title Merhodology may be changed to Methods instead. Response: Many thanks to the reviewers for their suggestions and reminders. As suggested by the reviewer, we have revised the title to make it more relevant. Please see the revised manuscript for details (lines 159, 160, 175). 12.The authors may take a discussion about reasons for the selection of WoSviewer, Gephi, Citespace in this research and where have these tools been used before: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0925753522001291 https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/562 Response: Please accept my sincere thanks for your professional comments and suggestions. As the reviewer mentioned, Analysis tools are crucial and are not described in sufficient detail in our research methodology. This is a very important list of references, which we have read carefully and added relevant and cited in this article. References: [1] L. Zeng, R.Y.M. Li, Construction safety and health hazard awareness in Web of Science and Weibo between 1991 and 2021, Safety Science, 152 (2022) 105790. [2] L. Zeng, R.Y. Li, J. Nuttapong, J. Sun, Y. Mao, Economic Development and Mountain Tourism Research from 2010 to 2020: Bibliometric Analysis and Science Mapping Approach, in: Sustainability, 2022. 13.Reference about the knowledge map is necessary in the research methods part. Response: Thank you very much for your suggestion. As you mentioned, We have referred to and cited relevant research on knowledge maps in the research methods part of our study. References: [1] L. Wang, Y. Xu, T. Qin, M. Wu, Z. Chen, Y. Zhang, W. Liu, X. Xie, Global trends in the research and development of medical/pharmaceutical wastewater treatment over the half-century, Chemosphere, 331 (2023) 138775. [2] L. Zeng, R.Y.M. Li, Construction safety and health hazard awareness in Web of Science and Weibo between 1991 and 2021, Safety Science, 152 (2022) 105790. [3] L. Zeng, R.Y. Li, J. Nuttapong, J. Sun, Y. Mao, Economic Development and Mountain Tourism Research from 2010 to 2020: Bibliometric Analysis and Science Mapping Approach, in: Sustainability, 2022. 14. A descriptive statistics table should be added, which may contains the published year, journal name., etc. Response: Thank you very much for your suggestion. As you mentioned, We added descriptive statistics on relevant research information, including the number and proportion of journal publications, highly cited articles, and publication years. Please see the revised manuscript for details (Tables 1 and 2, lines 332, 368). 15.There should be a discussion section. Response: Many thanks to the reviewers for their suggestions and reminders. As you mentioned, the discussion section is necessary and crucial, so in chapter three, we conducted a thorough analysis of the results obtained through econometrics and statistical analysis in each subsection. Furthermore, we adjusted the structure of sections 3.3 and 4, adding a discussion section. We believe this adjustment is a professional recommendation that makes the article structure more rigorous and the discussion logic clearer. Once again, we appreciate the valuable suggestions from the reviewers, we will continue to maintain this approach in our future writing. Please see the revised manuscript for details (4. Discussion, line 460). 16.Figure 5 is unclear, please enlarge. Response: Thank you very much for your suggestion. As you mentioned, we enlarged Figure 5 to make it clearer. Please see the revised manuscript for details (Figure 5, line 394). 17.Burst words are keywords that suddenly increase in number within a certain…please add citation. Response: Thank you very much for your suggestion. As you mentioned, burst words can present research hotspots or trends during a certain period, therefore literature related to key nodes is worth referencing. We added some literature related to this study to explain the relevant information of the burst words. References: [1] J. Chen, W. Gui, Y. Huang, The impact of the establishment of carbon emission trade exchange on carbon emission efficiency, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30 (2023) 19845-19859. [2] S. Wang, Y. Yu, T. Jiang, J. Nie, Analysis on carbon emissions efficiency differences and optimization evolution of China’s industrial system: An input-output analysis, PLOS ONE, 17 (2022) e0258147. [3] Y. Yu, J. Su, Y. Du, Impact of global value chain and technological innovation on China’s industrial greenhouse gas emissions and trend prediction, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, (2023). [4] Z. Zuo, H. Guo, J. Cheng, An LSTM-STRIPAT model analysis of China’s 2030 CO2 emissions peak, Carbon Management, 11 (2020) 577-592. [5] X. Yu, C. Tan, China’s process-related greenhouse gas emission dataset 1990–2020, Scientific Data, 10 (2023) 55. [6] J. Han, W. Zhu, C. Chen, Identifying Emissions Reduction Opportunities in International Bilateral Emissions Trading Systems to Achieve China’s Energy Sector NDCs, in: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2023. [7] J. Cao, M. Ho, Q. Liu, Analyzing multi-greenhouse gas mitigation of China using a general equilibrium model, Environmental Research Letters, 18 (2023) 025001. [8] Q. Zhang, B. Gu, H. Zhang, Q. Ji, Emission reduction mode of China's provincial transportation sector: Based on “Energy+” carbon efficiency evaluation, Energy Policy, 177 (2023) 113556. [9] C. Rao, Q. Huang, L. Chen, M. Goh, Z. Hu, Forecasting the carbon emissions in Hubei Province under the background of carbon neutrality: a novel STIRPAT extended model with ridge regression and scenario analysis, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30 (2023) 57460-57480. [10] G. Pang, Z. Ding, X. Shen, Spillover effect of energy intensity reduction targets on carbon emissions in China, Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11 (2023). [11] C. Xu, F. Liu, Y. Zhou, R. Dou, X. Feng, B. Shen, Manufacturers' emission reduction investment strategy under carbon cap-and-trade policy and uncertain low-carbon preferences, Industrial Management & Data Systems, ahead-of-print (2023). [12] Q.-H. Zeng, L.-Y. He, Study on the synergistic effect of air pollution prevention and carbon emission reduction in the context of "dual carbon": Evidence from China's transport sector, Energy Policy, 173 (2023) 113370. 18.Lines 624-654 should avoid numbering, please use paragraph. Response: Thank you very much for the reminder, we have made the change, Please see the revised manuscript for details (lines 685-715). Review Comments to the Author: 19.The article has some grammar issues that require further improvement and correction by the author. Response: Thank you very much for your suggestion. We apologize for any unclear language in our manuscript, and we take the reviewer's comments very seriously. We have taken steps to address this issue by seeking help from professional organizations and editors to review and revise the manuscript. Additionally, we have provided evidence of the language editing work done. 20.The references are relatively outdated, and the author can appropriately increase the proportion of references cited in the past five years. Especially, it is necessary to add professional journal papers related to bibliometrics, as follows. Response: Please accept my sincere thanks for your professional comments and suggestions. This is a very important list of references, which we have read carefully and added relevant and important elements to this article. As mentioned above, these review comments not only enhance the quality of this review article but also deepens the authors' understanding of bibliometrics. References: [1] Wang, X. (2022). Research on the discourse power evaluation of academic journals from the perspective of multiple fusion: taking Medicine, General and Internal journals as an example. Journal of Information Science, 01655515221107334. [2]Wang, X. (2022), "Characteristics analysis and evaluation of discourse leading for academic journals: perspectives from multiple integration of altmetrics indicators and evaluation methods", Library Hi Tech, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-04-2022-0195 [3] Wang, X. and Feng, X. (2022), "Research on the relationships between discourse leading indicators and citations: perspectives from altmetrics indicators of international multidisciplinary academic journals", Library Hi Tech, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-09-2021-0296 [4] Wang, X., Feng, X. and Guo, K. (2023), "Research hotspots and prospects of ethics education of science and technology in China based on bibliometrics", Library Hi Tech, Vol. 41 No. 2, pp. 454-473. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-06-2022-0298 Attachments Attachment Submitted filename: Responses to Reviewers.docx https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288661.r002
2 Jul 2023 Decision Letter - Rita Yi Man Li, Editor Advances and Future Trends in Research on Carbon Emissions Reduction in China from the Perspective of Bibliometrics PONE-D-23-15921R1 Dear Dr. Liu, We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements. Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication. An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org. Kind regards, Rita Yi Man Li Academic Editor PLOS ONE Additional Editor Comments (optional): 4.2, why China only? 4.2, shorten this section, combines some point forms to paragraphs. Figure 2 needs higher resolution. References, DESA. The sustainable development goals report 2018. 2018. UNEP. Emissions gap report 2021: The Heat Is On. 2022. Avoid using references that are not journal articles like these. Replace conference proceeding by journal articles. Reviewers' comments: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288661.r003
Formally Accepted
12 Jul 2023 Acceptance Letter - Rita Yi Man Li, Editor PONE-D-23-15921R1 Advances and Future Trends in Research on Carbon Emissions Reduction in China from the Perspective of Bibliometrics Dear Dr. Liu: I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org. If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org. Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access. Kind regards, PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff on behalf of Dr. Rita Yi Man Li Academic Editor PLOS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288661.r004

Open letter on the publication of peer review reports

PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose to reveal their names.

We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions, to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research system.

Learn more at ASAPbio .