Peer Review History
| Original SubmissionJune 14, 2022 |
|---|
|
PONE-D-22-17071Is teenage parenthood associated with early use of disability pension? Evidence from a longitudinal study PLOS ONE Dear Dr. Namatovu, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 19 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file. Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter. If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols. We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Kind regards, Tae Kyoung Lee, Ph.D. Academic Editor PLOS ONE Journal Requirements When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements. 1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 2. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For more information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts: a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent. b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide. 3. Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please move it to the Methods section and delete it from any other section. Please ensure that your ethics statement is included in your manuscript, as the ethics statement entered into the online submission form will not be published alongside your manuscript. Additional Editor Comments: Dear Dr. Namatovu, Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Is teenage parenthood associated with early use of disability pension? Evidence from a longitudinal study" for review and consideration for publication in PLOS ONE. I sincerely appreciate the opportunity to review the manuscript. I have now received the reviews of your manuscript and am able to make an editorial decision at this time. Let me first sincerely apologize for the amount of review time for this submission. I am a firm believer in having at least 2 peer-reviews for convergence of perspectives, but a larger than average number of reviewers declined to review this work. This is not a reflection of the quality of the work; rather, it is a reflection of how much additional work reviewers of this journal have been presented with during the ongoing and uneven pandemic response. The Reviewer and I have now commented on your paper. The reviews are appended to this email. As you will note, the reviewers found your manuscript to be quite interesting. However, at the same time, the reviewers also indicated that several quite significant conceptual and methodological/statistical problems exist in the manuscript, so I cannot accept the manuscript for publication in its present form. However, the reviewers and I conclude that it may be possible to address the points raised. I encourage you therefore to revise and resubmit the manuscript. I believe you will find the reviewers' comments clear. Thank you for considering PLOS ONE as an outlet for your work. Sincerely, Tae Kyoung Lee, Ph.D. Academic Editor PLOS ONE. [Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.] Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: Partly Reviewer #2: Partly ********** 2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: No ********** 3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: No ********** 4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 5. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: This is an interesting study that examines the longitudinal associations between teenage parenthood and early use of disability pension in Sweden. Below, I address issues/questions that emerged from my read of the paper. [Introduction] 1. I was able to learn the longitudinal associations between teenage parenthood and early use of disability pension (DP) among Swedish. That’s advantage. However, I was wondering what contribution DP can make to society or what benefits it can have in their lives. Clarify whether getting DP is good or bad? If getting DP is good, why is this good? [Result] 2. The study's findings that having the first child in 10s is associated with a higher There is not enough need for a relevance study to being a parent in your 10s and getting an early DP. (There is a lack of evidence as to why these studies should be done.) 3. Given that the author(s) used longitudinal data, I wonder if the findings was contaminated by confounders. Please consider socio-demographic variables (incomes, age, gender, parent education). It is obvious that your physical aging will come quickly if parenthood at an early age. However, readers may want to know what longitudinal changes of their physical health with the age of those who became parents in their 10s. If the data supports this, please provide evidence. 4. In the analyses, the author(s) checked comparison target the year of birth with the 3 year interval. Justify why you decided to use 3 years. Plus, there is a lack of information as to why only the father's education was adjusted and the mother's level of education was not taken into account. [discussion] 5. I was wondering how this finding can be applied to other countries. Please discuss generalizability of the findings. Reviewer #2: This is an interesting study conducted on early application and use of disability pensions (DP) for teenage parents. Below, I address some of the problems/questions that appeared when I read the paper. Introduction In the introduction, the study reported that the proportion of disability pensions (DP) in several European countries is increasing, and according to the WHO, one in seven people (14%) experience mental illness, accounting for 13% of the global burden caused by disease within this age group. It was said that this mental health had a negative effect, and the risk of higher health deterioration and socioeconomic consequences was high in teenage parents. This high mental health problem can be identified as a strong predictor for using disability pension (DP) and hypothesized that becoming a teenage parent increases the risk of receiving disability pension (DP) in adulthood, and for the purpose of the study, it was examined whether there was a difference in the use of early disability pension (DP) between parents. However, based on previous studies and introductions, it can be confirmed that there are already many mental health risks in adolescent parents, and as a result, it can be predicted that the probability of receiving a disability pension (DP) will be high. Therefore, it is not well felt whether this content is an important explanatory element for research. If the research problem and hypothesis can be sufficiently confirmed based on the existing research, it will be necessary to derive and prove a more detailed research hypothesis. I propose to mention the importance of research hypotheses in the discussion. In other words, why should readers know the finding of the hypothesis established by the researcher? Results The results reported in this study used analysis techniques through Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox provincial regression, but it was shown as an occurrence rate over simple time, and statistical significance verification of the results was not confirmed. There will be a need for solid information about the scientific validity of this report. Discussion This study reported that through discussion, the probability of teenage parents using disability pension (DP) and important results that teenage parents later adversely affect mental health were confirmed as implications. If other research results or cohort comparison data that can support these implications were explained more abundantly, the validity of the results according to the research purpose and research hypothesis could be improved. However, since this research data is simple technical information, it is questionable whether it is information that can generalize the research results. Conclusions In conclusion, teenage parents are likely to start using the disability pension (DP) at the age of 20-42. However, it does not explain why teenage parents apply for a disability pension (DP) between the ages of 20-42. In addition, it is based on Swedish cohort research data, and since Sweden's support policy is richer than other countries, the conclusion that other countries will have relatively larger problems is insufficient and it will need to be verified through comparison between countries in the future. ********** 6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: Yes: Minhee Lee Reviewer #2: No ********** [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.] While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.
|
| Revision 1 |
|
Is teenage parenthood associated with early use of disability pension? Evidence from a longitudinal study PONE-D-22-17071R1 Dear Dr. Namatovu, We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements. Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication. An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org. Kind regards, Janet E Rosenbaum, Ph.D. Academic Editor PLOS ONE Additional Editor Comments (optional): Reviewers' comments: |
| Formally Accepted |
|
PONE-D-22-17071R1 Is teenage parenthood associated with early use of disability pension? Evidence from a longitudinal study Dear Dr. Namatovu: I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org. If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org. Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access. Kind regards, PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff on behalf of Dr. Janet E Rosenbaum Academic Editor PLOS ONE |
Open letter on the publication of peer review reports
PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose to reveal their names.
We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions, to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research system.
Learn more at ASAPbio .