Peer Review History
| Original SubmissionJuly 23, 2022 |
|---|
|
PONE-D-22-20787Street Mothers’ Well-Being and Motivation to Leave Street Life in Bahir Dar City, Ethiopia: A Phenomenological StudyPLOS ONE Dear Dr. Nigatu, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Please submit your revised manuscript by Nov 10 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file. Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols. We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Kind regards, Benedict Weobong, Ph.D Academic Editor PLOS ONE Journal Requirements: When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements. 1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 2. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability. "Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized. Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access. We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter. 3. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice. Additional Editor Comments: Kindly ensure all comments are addressed. 1.Main comments Line 27-28: What is perception of street mothers about street life? The results section of the abstract does not capture that. Shed a light on that. Line 65-66: “This made to have many people lead their livelihood on street overtime.” This sentence does not make sense. Articulate properly the linkage between many Ethiopians living in poverty and streetism. Line 79: Rephrase sentence in line 79. The evidence provided from line 80 to 83 to support the claim that street people are on the rise is not clear. Before concluding that street people are on the rise there should be a comparison of data between previous year and current year. You could perhaps either look at data either before or after 2018 and compare with 2018. Line 87-88: The phrasing is a bit unclear. Should read: For mothers with children, the lack of secure accommodation or creche facilities cannot allow them to move far from home to look for income opportunities. Line 118-123: provide rationale for choosing Bahir Dar city. What makes the site ideal for your study? Is the phenomenon of streetism prevalent in the city? Any figures to support that? Line 137-139: Perhaps you could break down the interview guide into themes. It could be in the form of a short table to give readers an insight of the kind of questions asked during the interview. It could also be an appendix. Line 131-133: Expatiate the process of the sampling selection. How did the authors select respondents. Did authors use snowball? Detail the steps used to select mothers from different age groups. Provide enough information to validate the study and make it easy for another researcher to reproduce the study with the same methods. Line 180-184: I suggest the thematic framework developed during analysis be added as an appendix if possible. Line 218-229: These quotes do not necessarily represent the theme of physical wellbeing of street mothers highlighted. For instance, how does the physical problems of their husbands/children impact street mothers. If does impact them, would it not impact their mental wellbeing rather than physical wellbeing? Line 245-247: Is streetism a causal factor of this sentiment by family members or because of another factor Line 252-256: I struggle to understand how the quotes provided is related to a bad relation with family and therefore affecting their social wellbeing. Line 311-345: I will suggest that emotional wellbeing and mental health are combined into one grand theme. The quotes/sub-themes under the two themes are almost the same and will be better to have them under one theme. Line 380: Provide a context of what the holy water is. It would be good to enlighten your readers what ‘attending holy water’ means. Line 553-Line 556: There seems to be a disconnect between line 553 to line 555 and the second part of line 555 to line 559. How are the broader social conditions linked to social well-being of your respondents? Need to make it clear Line 576-577: Did the study cited from lines 576-577 establish a link between human connection with God and well-being? Perhaps you could discuss the study cited from that angle and link it to your current study on spiritual well-being. 2.Minor comments Line 129-130: “The researchers were also made discussion each day after interview.” Check grammar Line 157-158: “Data were read and re-read by the research team until understanding the full content of the response.” Check grammar Line 192-195: Check grammar and tenses Line 200: “The age of street mothers participated in the study rage from 20 to 42 years.” “rage” should be ranges Line 222: “Street mothers also stated as their children had physical health problem.” Check tenses Line 380: “holly water” Check spellings Line 514-516: “Some street mothers have tried different mechanisms to end the street life such as educating their children, giving their children to their relatives and else persons, and let them devote their time on work and education.” Check spellings and tenses Line 521-522: “Another a 40 years old mother described how she have tried her best to educate her child and how she was challenged by her child.” Check spellings and tenses [Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.] Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: Yes ********** 2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: N/A ********** 3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: Yes ********** 4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: Yes ********** 5. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: The manuscript is technically sound and answers the research questions the authors sought to explore. However, authors need to address concerns raised regarding analysis and quotes provided in the results section. ********** 6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: No ********** [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.] While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.
|
| Revision 1 |
|
Street Mothers’ Well-Being and Motivation to Leave Street Life in Bahir Dar City, Ethiopia: A Phenomenological Study PONE-D-22-20787R1 Dear Dr. Nigatu, We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements. Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication. An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org. Kind regards, Benedict Weobong, Ph.D Academic Editor PLOS ONE Additional Editor Comments (optional): Reviewers' comments: |
| Formally Accepted |
|
PONE-D-22-20787R1 Street Mothers’ Well-Being and Motivation to Leave Street Life in Bahir Dar City, Ethiopia: A Phenomenological Study Dear Dr. Nigatu: I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org. If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org. Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access. Kind regards, PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff on behalf of Dr. Benedict Weobong Academic Editor PLOS ONE |
Open letter on the publication of peer review reports
PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose to reveal their names.
We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions, to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research system.
Learn more at ASAPbio .