Peer Review History

Original SubmissionFebruary 22, 2022
Decision Letter - Ricky Chee Jiun Chia, Editor

PONE-D-22-05444The role of tourism in service sector employment: Do market capital, financial development and trade also play a role?PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Avishek Khanal,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by 6th June 2022. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.
  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.
  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.
If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Ricky Chee Jiun Chia

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: 

"NO"

At this time, please address the following queries:

a) Please clarify the sources of funding (financial or material support) for your study. List the grants or organizations that supported your study, including funding received from your institution. 

b) State what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role in your study, please state: “The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.”

c) If any authors received a salary from any of your funders, please state which authors and which funders.

d) If you did not receive any funding for this study, please state: “The authors received no specific funding for this work.”

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf

3. Thank you for stating the following in your Competing Interests section:  

"No" 

Please complete your Competing Interests on the online submission form to state any Competing Interests. If you have no competing interests, please state "The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.", as detailed online in our guide for authors at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submit-now 

 This information should be included in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The study titled "The role of tourism in service sector employment: Do market capital, financial development and trade also play a role?" has been prepared in accordance with scientific rules. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to read and evaluate this work.

Reviewer #2: The study examined a very interesting subject using annual data from 1991 to 2019.

This topic is relevant from societal point of view.

The choice of statistical methods used in the study (ARDL, NARDL) is unique.

A full revision of the manuscipt is highly recommended for the following reasons:

1. The “2. Background and Literature Review” section is advised to be extended.

2. The topic considered (the role of tourism in service sector employment) has a large body of literature, and a thorough presentation of this literature would make the article more valuable. If the authors do not wish to extend the range of sources discussed, it is pertinent to define and justify those used more precisely.

3. Policy recommendations were suggested in section 6. (Conclusion and policy implications). I think these are not sufficiently substantiated and reasoned for.

4. Your proposals should be more specific.

5. A thorough proofreading is strongly recommended regarding grammatical errors and style.

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Revision 1

Response to Reviewers' Comments

1st June 2022

Editor-in-Chief

Re: Responses /Actions to the Reviewers’ Report on Ms. Ref. No.: PONE-D-22-05444

Title: The role of tourism in service sector employment: Do market capital, financial development and trade also play a role?

Dear Editor,

We are grateful to the respected editor for giving us an opportunity to revise and resubmit the paper. We think the comments are useful for further development of the paper. We have tried our level best to address all the comments of the reviewers in our revised manuscript. We believe our joint effort will enrich the paper in terms of quality. Thanks a lot, to the editor and the reviewers for your support, cooperation and valuable suggestions in the work. The Comments/Suggestions and our Responses/Actions are noted below for your consideration.

Reviewer #1: The study titled "The role of tourism in service sector employment: Do market capital, financial development and trade also play a role?" has been prepared in accordance with scientific rules. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to read and evaluate this work.

Response: Thank you very much for your nice comment and interest in reading our manuscript.

Reviewer #2: The study examined a very interesting subject using annual data from 1991 to 2019.

Response: Thank you very much for showing your interest in reading our manuscript.

A full revision of the manuscipt is highly recommended for the following reasons:

1. The “2. Background and Literature Review” section is advised to be extended.

Response: We have reviewed some recent literature to improve the section (See page# 4-8). Followings are the literatures we have added:

1. Camargo, B. A., Winchenbach, A., & Vázquez-Maguirre, M. (2022). Restoring the dignity of indigenous people: Perspectives on tourism employment. Tourism Management Perspectives, 41, 100946.

2. Ioannides, D., Gyimóthy, S., & James, L. (2021). From liminal labor to decent work: A human-centered perspective on sustainable tourism employment. Sustainability, 13(2), 851.

3. Tosun, C., Çalişkan, C., Şahin, S. Z., & Dedeoğlu, B. B. (2021). A critical perspective on tourism employment. Current Issues in Tourism, 1-21.

4. Walmsley, A., Koens, K., & Milano, C. (2021). Overtourism and employment outcomes for the tourism worker: impacts to labour markets. Tourism Review.

5. Sayan, S., & Alkan, A. (2021). A novel approach for measurement and decomposition of the economywide costs of shutting down tourism and related service sectors against COVID-19. Tourism Economics, 13548166211037100.

6. Scarlett, H. G. (2021). Tourism recovery and the economic impact: A panel assessment. Research in Globalization, 3, 100044.

7. Yousaf, U. B., Ullah, I., Wang, M., Junyan, L., & Rehman, A. U. (2021). Does board capital increase firm performance in the Chinese tourism industry?. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society. DOI 10.1108/CG-04-2021-0165

8. Dalwai, T., & Sewpersadh, N. S. (2021). Intellectual capital and institutional governance as capital structure determinants in the tourism sector. Journal of Intellectual Capital.

9. Isaeva, A., Salahodjaev, R., Khachaturov, A., & Tosheva, S. (2022). The impact of tourism and financial development on energy consumption and carbon dioxide emission: Evidence from post-communist countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(1), 773-786.

10. Ehigiamusoe, K. U. (2021). The nexus between tourism, financial development, and economic growth: Evidence from African countries. African Development Review, 33(2), 382-396.

11. Irani, F., Katircioglu, S., & Gokmenoglu, K. K. (2021). Effects of business and finance conditions on tourism firms’ financial performances: evidence from major tourist destinations. SAGE Open, 11(3), 21582440211040120.

2. The topic considered (the role of tourism in service sector employment) has a large body of literature, and a thorough presentation of this literature would make the article more valuable. If the authors do not wish to extend the range of sources discussed, it is pertinent to define and justify those used more precisely.

Response: While addressing the section: Background and Literature Review, this suggestion has automatically been incorporated (See page# 4-8); Thanks to the reviewer for the suggestion.

3. Policy recommendations were suggested in section 6. (Conclusion and policy implications). I think these are not sufficiently substantiated and reasoned for.

Response: We have tried to link the suggestions with the findings of the research (See page# 19 last paragraph).

4. Your proposals should be more specific.

Response: We have included specific suggestions based on the findings of our research (See page# 19 last paragraph).

5. A thorough proofreading is strongly recommended regarding grammatical errors and style.

Response: Thanks reviewer for this suggestion. Language has been checked by native speaker and proof-reader.

Attachments
Attachment
Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx
Decision Letter - Ricky Chee Jiun Chia, Editor

The role of tourism in service sector employment: Do market capital, financial development and trade also play a role?

PONE-D-22-05444R1

Dear Dr. Avishek Khanal,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Ricky Chee Jiun Chia

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Formally Accepted
Acceptance Letter - Ricky Chee Jiun Chia, Editor

PONE-D-22-05444R1

The role of tourism in service sector employment: Do market capital, financial development and trade also play a role?

Dear Dr. Khanal:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Ricky Chee Jiun Chia

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Open letter on the publication of peer review reports

PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose to reveal their names.

We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions, to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research system.

Learn more at ASAPbio .