Peer Review History
| Original SubmissionFebruary 19, 2022 |
|---|
|
PONE-D-22-05096Psychosocial factors associated with mental health and quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic among low-income urban dwellers in Peninsular MalaysiaPLOS ONE Dear Dr. Said, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Please submit your revised manuscript by Jun 18 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file. Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter. If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols. We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Kind regards, Arsham Alamian, PhD, MSc, FACE, FRSPH Academic Editor PLOS ONE Journal Requirements: When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements. 1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 2. Please include your full ethics statement in the ‘Methods’ section of your manuscript file. In your statement, please include the full name of the IRB or ethics committee who approved or waived your study, as well as whether or not you obtained informed written or verbal consent. If consent was waived for your study, please include this information in your statement as well. [Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.] Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 5. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: Abstract - No comments or suggestions Introduction - Line 58: replace “suicides” with “suicide” - Line 60: replace “Malaysian” with “Malaysians” - Line 76: remove “on” - Line 91-93: Rephrase as it does not make sense - Line 99: add “pandemic” after “COVID-19” Methods - Manuscript states that the study was conducted from September to November of 2020 in the introduction section but from September to November of 2021 in the methods section. When did this study take place? Clarify and ensure that the information is identical across the manuscript. - Alpha value of 0.2 is relatively high resulting in an increased probability of making a type I error - Line 117: replace “enrolment” with “enrollment” - How were your questionnaires validated? - Line 129: replace “used” with “use” - Cronbach’s alpha of each mentioned scale were at or in most cases well above the 0.7 threshold illustrating strong consistency and therefore strong scale reliability - Except for the Self-Stigma of Seeking Help (SSOSH) scale which had a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.667 Statistical Analysis - Comprehensive statistical analyses were run - Results of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test can be highly dependent on groups chosen so it is important to acknowledge this in your manuscript Results - Majority of participants (64.5%) were male - Slight concern that this could lead to results that are not generalizable to the Malaysian population given that males only comprised 51.4% of its population in 2021 according to Malaysia’s Department of Statistics - Line 223: add “in” after “diabetes” - Line 224” add “in” before “20” Discussion - Adequately addressed the limitations created by their study sample being majority male - Line 413-414: rephrase as these lines do not make sense - Line 431” replace “rises” with “rose” - The discussion section is a bit disorganized. I suggest revising the order of ideas/references to create better clarity as is shown in the “Poverty Attribution”, “Stigma and Professional Help-Seeking”, and “Resilience” sections. Conclusion - Authors identify a future use for their study results specifically involving the development of psychosocial interventions for low-income community members. Tables & Figures - No comments or suggestions Reviewer #2: I have the following comments for the authors to address. I am happy to review this paper again. 1) Under the Introduction, the authors stated "This has led to concerns that the COVID-19 pandemic may 94 adversely affect the mental health of populations in LMIC that lack the resources to address 95 the increase in mental health needs of their population". Please refer to the following reference to support this statement: The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on physical and mental health of Asians: A study of seven middle-income countries in Asia. PLoS One. 2021 Feb 11;16(2):e0246824. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246824. PMID: 33571297. 2) Under the introduction, please discuss the following: Government response during the pandemic: Government response moderates the mental health impact of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of depression outcomes across countries. J Affect Disord. 2021 May 27;290:364-377. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.04.050. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34052584. Worst outcome of COVID infection due to depression Association Between Mood Disorders and Risk of COVID-19 Infection, Hospitalization, and Death: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 28. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.1818. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34319365. Impact on workers: Impacts on Occupations During the First Vietnamese National Lockdown. Ann Glob Health. 2020;86(1):112. Published 2020 Sep 3. doi:10.5334/aogh.2976 Impact of lockdown: Impacts of COVID-19 on the Life and Work of Healthcare Workers During the Nationwide Partial Lockdown in Vietnam. Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 19;12:563193. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.563193. PMID: 34489769; PMCID: PMC8417359. 3) Under the discussion, the author stated "Younger respondents (less than 30 years old) have a higher risk of developing depression symptoms than older respondents during the pandemic". They should mention the impact on education, examination and graduation as reported in the following study: Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors during the Initial Stage of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Epidemic among the General Population in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(5):1729. Published 2020 Mar 6. doi:10.3390/ijerph17051729 4) There has been no attempt to interpret the mean Euro-QOL score of this study and compared to other diseases/conditions. In one supplementary file, it seems the mean score is 1 and it should be mentioned in the text and compare to the following conditions so that reader know how it stands. It seems to be higher of the following conditions and it means the QOL is not that bad. Please compare with the following studies under the discussion. General population under COVID-19 (EuroQol-5D = 0.95) (Tran et al 2020), patients suffering from diabetes (EuroQol-5D= 0.8) Nguyen Huong Thi Thu et al 2018), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (EuroQol-5D = 0.8) (Tran et al 2018), skin diseases (EuroQol-5D= 0.73) (Nguyen et al 2019), respiratory diseases (EuroQol-5D= 0.66) (Ngo et al 2019), dengue fever (EuroQol-5D= 0.66) (Tran et al 2018), frail elderly (EuroQol-5D = 0.58) (Nguyen Anh Trung et al 2019) elderly after fall injury (EuroQol-5D = 0.46) (Vu et al 2019) fracture injuries (EuroQol-5D = 0.23) (Vu et al 2019). References: Tran BX, Nguyen HT, Le HT et al. Impact of COVID-19 on Economic Well-Being and Quality of Life of the Vietnamese During the National Social Distancing. Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 11;11:565153. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.565153. PMID: 33041928; PMCID: PMC7518066. Nguyen, Huong Thi Thu et al. “Health-related quality of life in elderly diabetic outpatients in Vietnam.” Patient preference and adherence vol. 12 1347-1354. 27 Jul. 2018, doi:10.2147/PPA.S162892 Tran, Bach Xuan et al. “Depression and Quality of Life among Patients Living with HIV/AIDS in the Era of Universal Treatment Access in Vietnam.” International journal of environmental research and public health vol. 15,12 2888. 17 Dec. 2018, doi:10.3390/ijerph15122888 Nguyen, Sau Huu et al. “Health-Related Quality of Life Impairment among Patients with Different Skin Diseases in Vietnam: A Cross-Sectional Study.” International journal of environmental research and public health vol. 16,3 305. 23 Jan. 2019, doi:10.3390/ijerph16030305 Ngo, Chau Quy et al. “Effects of Different Comorbidities on Health-Related Quality of Life among Respiratory Patients in Vietnam.” Journal of clinical medicine vol. 8,2 214. 7 Feb. 2019, doi:10.3390/jcm8020214 Tran, Bach Xuan et al. “Cost-of-Illness and the Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients in the Dengue Fever Outbreak in Hanoi in 2017.” International journal of environmental research and public health vol. 15,6 1174. 5 Jun. 2018, doi:10.3390/ijerph15061174 Nguyen, Anh Trung et al. “Frailty Prevalence and Association with Health-Related Quality of Life Impairment among Rural Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Vietnam.” International journal of environmental research and public health vol. 16,20 3869. 12 Oct. 2019, doi:10.3390/ijerph16203869 Vu, Hai Minh et al. “Effects of Chronic Comorbidities on the Health-Related Quality of Life among Older Patients after Falls in Vietnamese Hospitals.” International journal of environmental research and public health vol. 16,19 3623. 27 Sep. 2019, doi:10.3390/ijerph16193623 Vu HM, Dang AK, Tran TT, et al Health-Related Quality of Life Profiles among Patients with Different Road Traffic Injuries in an Urban Setting of Vietnam. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 24;16(8):1462. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16081462. PMID: 31022979; PMCID: PMC6517995. 5) The authors mentioned "These 449 were unexpected findings as females were the most replicable risk factors in the past studies 450 among the general population (85, 86), " Reference 85 and 86 focus on Malaysia. Please refer to the following global study: Prevalence of Depression in the Community from 30 Countries between 1994 and 2014. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):2861. Published 2018 Feb 12. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-21243-x 6) The authors stated "Non-communicable diseases, including hypertension and diabetes, were reported by 458 one in three persons within the low-income population". Please refer to the following low income country to support this statement: Depressive symptoms among elderly diabetic patients in Vietnam. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2018 Oct 23;11:659-665. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S179071. PMID: 30425543; PMCID: PMC6204855. 7) The authors stated "Respondents with a known history of hypertension, other diseases and perceived 465 chronic illness as stressful life events likely to report higher depressive symptoms" Please discuss the pathology between depression and heart diseases based on the following: Factors Associated with the Risk of Developing Coronary Artery Disease in Medicated Patients with Major Depressive Disorder. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 21;15(10):2073. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102073. PMID: 30248896; PMCID: PMC6210477. 8) The authors stated "Asthma was associated with a higher risk for anxiety symptoms". This statement needs a reference: Psychiatric comorbidities in Asian adolescent asthma patients and the contributions of neuroticism and perceived stress. J Adolesc Health. 2014 Aug;55(2):267-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.01.007. Epub 2014 Mar 12. PMID: 24630495. 9) Under "Poverty Attribution", please discuss strategies to allow workers to work during the COVID-19 pandemic so that they can have income based on the following study: Is returning to work during the COVID-19 pandemic stressful? A study on immediate mental health status and psychoneuroimmunity prevention measures of Chinese workforce. Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Jul;87:84-92. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.04.055. Epub 2020 Apr 23. PMID: 32335200; PMCID: PMC7179503. 10) Under "Stigma and Professional Help-Seeking", please discuss the findings of the following paper that focused on Asia: Overview of Stigma against Psychiatric Illnesses and Advancements of Anti-Stigma Activities in Six Asian Societies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 31;17(1):280. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010280. PMID: 31906068; PMCID: PMC6981757. 11) Please add a limitation that most factors such as respiratory diseases, marital status, workplace 44 issues, financial constraints, absence of investments, substance use and lack of rental income are not related to COVID-19. The authors should list down factor that should be studied in the future based on the following studies, under future direction. Exposure to health info/discrimination: The Impact of 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic on Physical and Mental Health: A Comparison between China and Spain. JMIR Form Res. 2021 Apr 22. doi: 10.2196/27818. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33900933. Physical symptoms: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on physical and mental health in the two largest economies in the world: a comparison between the United States and China. J Behav Med. 2021 Jun 14:1–19. doi: 10.1007/s10865-021-00237-7. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34128179; PMCID: PMC8202541. Face mask use: The Association Between Physical and Mental Health and Face Mask Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparison of Two Countries With Different Views and Practices. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:569981. Published 2020 Sep 9. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.569981 Religion and loss of confidence with doctors: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5318/2/1/6 Discrimination related to COVID: Psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines. J Affect Disord. 2020 Aug 24;277:379-391. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.043. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 32861839. Higher number of children in family: Evaluating the Psychological Impacts Related to COVID-19 of Vietnamese People Under the First Nationwide Partial lockdown in Vietnam. Front Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 2;11:824. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00824. PMID: 32982807; PMCID: PMC7492529. 12) Under "Stigma and Professional Help-Seeking", please mention internet CBT as it avoid stigma and main mode of psychological treatment during the pandemic: The most evidence-based treatment is cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT), especially Internet CBT that can prevent the spread of infection during the pandemic. Use of Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) to treat psychiatric symptoms during COVID-19: Mental Health Strategies to Combat the Psychological Impact of COVID-19 Beyond Paranoia and Panic. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2020;49(3):155‐160. Cost-effectiveness of iCBT: Moodle: The cost effective solution for internet cognitive behavioral therapy (I-CBT) interventions. Technol Health Care. 2017;25(1):163-165. doi: 10.3233/THC-161261. PMID: 27689560. Internet CBT can treat psychiatric symptoms such as insomnia: Efficacy of digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Sleep Med. 2020 Aug 26;75:315-325. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2020.08.020. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 32950013. ********** 6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: No Reviewer #2: No [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.] While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step. |
| Revision 1 |
|
PONE-D-22-05096R1Psychosocial factors associated with mental health and quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic among low-income urban dwellers in Peninsular Malaysia Psychosocial factors for mental health among the low-income communityPLOS ONE Dear, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 21 2022 11:59PM If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file. Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols. We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Kind regards, Muhammad Shahzad Aslam, Ph.D.,M.Phil., Pharm-D Academic Editor PLOS ONE Journal Requirements: Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice. [Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.] Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation. Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed Reviewer #3: (No Response) Reviewer #4: All comments have been addressed ********** 2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #2: Yes Reviewer #3: Yes Reviewer #4: Yes ********** 3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #2: Yes Reviewer #3: Yes Reviewer #4: Yes ********** 4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #2: Yes Reviewer #3: Yes Reviewer #4: Yes ********** 5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #2: Yes Reviewer #3: Yes Reviewer #4: Yes ********** 6. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #2: I recommend the study "Psychosocial factors associated with mental health and quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic among low-income urban dwellers in Peninsular Malaysia Psychosocial factors for mental health among the low-income community" for publication. Reviewer #3: Data availability statement: Data cannot be shared publicly because of the vulnerability of the population. Was data anonymised? How was the data stored and managed? De-identified data would not compromise the subjects. Minor comments attached. Reviewer #4: I was wondering during the MCO (September-November 2020) when the research was done face to face, were the researches welcomed to the subjects' homes or was there any resistance faced? As we know, at that point, movements were still restricted so was it ethical to conduct this study face-to face? Would it not have increased the risk of infection? How was this addressed? ********** 7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #2: No Reviewer #3: No Reviewer #4: Yes: Aida Syarinaz Ahmad Adlan ********** [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.] While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.
|
| Revision 2 |
|
Psychosocial factors associated with mental health and quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic among low-income urban dwellers in Peninsular Malaysia PONE-D-22-05096R2 Dear, We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements. Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication. An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org. Kind regards, Muhammad Shahzad Aslam, Ph.D.,M.Phil., Pharm-D Academic Editor PLOS ONE Additional Editor Comments (optional): Reviewers' comments: |
| Formally Accepted |
|
PONE-D-22-05096R2 Psychosocial factors associated with mental health and quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic among low-income urban dwellers in Peninsular Malaysia Dear Dr. Said: I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org. If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org. Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access. Kind regards, PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff on behalf of Dr. Muhammad Shahzad Aslam Academic Editor PLOS ONE |
Open letter on the publication of peer review reports
PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose to reveal their names.
We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions, to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research system.
Learn more at ASAPbio .