Peer Review History

Original SubmissionJuly 5, 2021
Decision Letter - Clive Shiff, Editor
Transfer Alert

This paper was transferred from another journal. As a result, its full editorial history (including decision letters, peer reviews and author responses) may not be present.

PONE-D-21-21932Parous rate and longevity of anophelines mosquitoes in Bure district, northwestern EthiopiaPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Adugna,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Nov 22 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.
  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.
  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.
If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Clive Shiff

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for including the following ethics statement on the submission details page:

'A collection of mosquitoes was carried out after obtaining ethical approval

from the ethics review committee of Addis Ababa University (reference no.

CNSDO/382/07/15), Amhara Health Regional Bureau (permission reference no.

H/M/TS/1/350/07) and the Head of the Bure District Health Office (permission

reference no. BH/3/519L/2). Moreover, informed consent was obtained from

the selected households.'

Please also include this information in the ethics statement in the Methods section of your manuscript.

3. We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match.

When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section.

4. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For more information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

5. Please include your full ethics statement in the ‘Methods’ section of your manuscript file. In your statement, please include the full name of the IRB or ethics committee who approved or waived your study, as well as whether or not you obtained informed written or verbal consent. If consent was waived for your study, please include this information in your statement as well.

6. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

I like this paper, you have written it well and it should be published. My concern, and I would like you to rewrite this part. This deals with the introduction and the discussion of parous rates, Parity or non-parous are two conditions. A parous mosquito could have laid one or more batches of eggs. Th only way to expand parity is via Detinova's technique. But it is very difficult to undertake and be accurate. I know I have done it. You quote from ref 27about the length of a gonotrophic cycle, i.e. the time passed between laying egg batches. Really this can only be done in caged mosquitoes, but as they are poikilothermic, the ambient temperature is important. I have read ref 27, it is somewhat hypothetical, and I am not sure it is feasible to compare with nature.

We all have tried to age the life span of female mosquitoes, but the answer is frustratingly difficult.

Please also review the sentence "Usually, older females also have higher exposure rates... it is unclear. please do not suggest that we can judge the life span of a mosquito by parous rates, because we cannot estimate how many ovipositions had taken place. please also note that Davidson's work on longevity has been disputed, (see ref 27)

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Revision 1

Response letter

Comment 1: Prepare based on PLOS ONE journal guideline

Response 1: We have tried to prepare the manuscript based on the PLOS ONE journal guideline

criteria.

Comment 2: Regarding “ethical statement”

Response 2: As indicated by the reviewer / editor, ethical statements are included under materials

and methods section. In particular, next to data analysis. It is highlighted in the

manuscript.

Comment 3: About “Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure”

Response 3: We didn’t get any fund source from any organization. Being this, we clearly indicated

in the that “The author(s) received no specific funding for this work” in the funding

information section.

Comment 4. About data access / provision.

Response 4: I corrected myself. It is possible to access any necessary data /no restriction/ if you

require. Being this, revision of the cover letter is not necessary because there are

no data restrictions. All necessary data for this manuscript is already uploaded. If

the reviewer is required raw data; I can do now.

Comment 5: About ethical statement/ repeated/

Response 5: Enough information about ethical statements is treated under material method

section. All available and required information are incorporated.

Comment 6: Regarding references lists, i.e., review your reference list to ensure that it is

complete and correct.

Response 6: All used references are cited in the manuscript and follow the correct ways of

referencing style. There is no new citation and reference add in the manuscript.

� Additional Editor Comments

Comment: Please also review the sentence "Usually, older females also have higher

exposure rates..................It is indicated in the introduction.

Response: If you see the truth, naturally female known by feeding blood meals from

various animals including human to mature the fertilized eggs. Until she gets

die, she will have many batches of eggs. For each batches, she will take 2-3

blood meals. Therefore, to have many batches of eggs, the female should take

many times of blood meals. This increase the rate of exposure to be infected by

the parasites. Because of having this kinds of truth, we prefer to use the phrase

“usually, older females also have higher exposure rates….”.

In conclusion, the phrase hasn’t any problem /it is science/

� Comment: About calculating the life expectancy of mosquitoes

Response: Partly, I agree with your saying, but we have no any other option to do it. In

similar fashion (objective), the following researchers have used the formal

driven by Davidson (1954) to calculate mosquito life expectancy (longevity).

[34] Ndoen, E., Wild, C., Dale, P., Sipe, N., Dale, M. (2012). Mosquito Longevity, Vector

Capacity, and Malaria Incidence in West Timor and Central Java, Indonesia.

International Scholarly Research Network. doi:10.5402/2012/143863.

[62] Taye B, Lelisa K, Emana D, Asale A, Yewhalaw D. Seasonal dynamics, longevity and

biting activity of anopheline mosquitoes in southwest Ethiopia. J Insect Sci.

2016;16:1-7. doi: 10.1093/jisesa/iev150

Therefore, we can say that we are correct and haven’t any choice.

Comments: To prepare figures using PACE

Response: I did it after I registered. The uploaded figures are developed using the given

comments. It meets the requirement of PLOS ONE criteria, based on PACE.

Attachments
Attachment
Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx
Decision Letter - Clive Shiff, Editor

Parous rate and longevity of anophelines mosquitoes in Bure district, northwestern Ethiopia

PONE-D-21-21932R1

Dear Dr. Adugna,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Clive Shiff

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Formally Accepted
Acceptance Letter - Clive Shiff, Editor

PONE-D-21-21932R1

Parous rate and longevity of anophelines mosquitoes in bure district, northwestern Ethiopia

Dear Dr. Adugna:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Clive Shiff

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Open letter on the publication of peer review reports

PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose to reveal their names.

We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions, to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research system.

Learn more at ASAPbio .