Peer Review History

Original SubmissionApril 18, 2021
Decision Letter - Lóránt Dénes Dávid, Editor

PONE-D-21-11653

The need to address knowledge gaps of Human actions on Caribbean touristic islands facing environmental threats: Tourists’ Perceptions of the environment on Holbox Island and archipelago of Bocas del Toro before the COVID-19 health crisis

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Nadia Tamata Rubio-Cisneros,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 04 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.
  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.
  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Lóránt Dénes Dávid, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

3. Please include additional information regarding the survey or questionnaire used in the study and ensure that you have provided sufficient details that others could replicate the analyses. For instance, if you developed a questionnaire as part of this study and it is not under a copyright more restrictive than CC-BY, please include a copy, in both the original language and English, as Supporting Information.

4. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

5. Please upload a new copy of Figures 2a, 2b, 3, 4, 5, and 6  as the detail is not clear. Please follow the link for more information: " ext-link-type="uri" xlink:type="simple">https://blogs.plos.org/plos/2019/06/looking-good-tips-for-creating-your-plos-figures-graphics/" " ext-link-type="uri" xlink:type="simple">https://blogs.plos.org/plos/2019/06/looking-good-tips-for-creating-your-plos-figures-graphics/"

6. We note that Figure 1 in your submission contain map images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

a. You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figure 1 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license.  

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

b. If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

********** 

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

********** 

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

********** 

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

********** 

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The paper is about a very current topic. The research aims and the reletad metholodogy are clear and proper. The reserach is based on a detailed and relevant literature review. THa results of the paper have high novelty. I recommend the paper for acceptance in current form.

Reviewer #2: The paper focuses on a contemporay and actual topic. The title is too long, should be shortened or compressed somehow. The abstract is well written and the keywords are well selected.

The literature review is too short, should be extended.

The results are clear, well supported by the methodological toolset. LImitations of the study is not described.

********** 

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Revision 1

Nadia T. Rubio-Cisneros, Ph.D.

Director and Founder

Mar Sustentable Ciencia y Conservación, A.C.

https://marsustentable.org

Academic Affiliations

Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León

Laboratorio de Biología de la Conservación.

Associated Researcher, Center for

Marine Biodiversity and Conservation,

SIO, UCSD

April 8, 2021

PLOS ONE

Editorial Committee

Dear Editorial Committee, it is a pleasure to meet you. I am submitting the reviewers comments for our paper entitled: ¨The need to address knowledge gaps of Human actions on Caribbean touristic islands facing environmental threats: Tourists' Perceptions of the environment on Holbox Island and archipelago of Bocas del Toro before the COVID-19 health crisis, which is in review for publication in PLOS ONE.

Response to Reviewers

Reviewer #1:

The paper is about a very current topic. The research aims and the related methodology are clear and proper. The research is based on a detailed and relevant literature review. The results of the paper have high novelty. I recommend the paper for acceptance in its current form.

Reviewer #2:

• The paper focuses on a contemporary and actual topic.

• The title is too long, should be shortened or compressed somehow.

The title was shortened to

Tourists perceptions of Caribbean islands facing environmental threats before the COVID-19 health crisis: Holbox Island and Archipelago of Bocas del Toro

• The abstract is well written, and the keywords are well selected.

The literature review is too short, should be extended.

• The authors added several current references that supported our work ideas. Below I mention them:

Abbas, J., Mubeen, R., Iorember, P. T., Raza, S., Mamirkulova, G. (November 01, 2021). Exploring the impact of COVID-19 on tourism: transformational potential and implications for a sustainable recovery of the travel and leisure industry. Current Research in Behavioral Sciences, 2.

Balzan, Mario Potschin-Young, Marion Haines-Young, Roy. (2018). Island Ecosystem Services: insights from a literature review on case-study island ecosystem services and future prospects. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services Management. 14. 71-90. 10.1080/21513732.2018.1439103.

Brinklow L, Ellsmoor J, Randall J, Rouby M, Sajeva G, Shetye A. Sindico F. COVID 19 Island Insights Series Final Report. University of Strathcyce. Centre for Environmental Law and Governance. 2021; 3-160.

Hakim, L. (2020). COVID-19, tourism, and small islands in Indonesia: Protecting fragile communities in the global Coronavirus pandemic. Journal of Marine and Island Cultures, v9n1, 130-141. https://doi.org/10.21463/jmic.2020.09.1.08

https://webunwto.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/2020-08/SG-Policy-Brief-on-COVID-and-Tourism.pdf

https://www.palcoquintanarroense.com.mx/noticias-de-quintana-roo/habitantes-de-holbox-abandonan-pesca-para-dedicarse-de-lleno-a-actividad-turistica/

Jouault, S., Rivera-Nuñez, T., García de Fuentes, A., Xool Koh, M., Montañez Giustinianovic, A. (2021). Respuestas, resistencias y oportunidades del turismo comunitario en la península de Yucatán frente al COVID-19 y las crisis recurrentes. Investigaciones Geográficas, (104). https://doi.org/10.14350/rig.60240

Lopez-Ercilla, Ines, Maria Jose Espinosa-Romero, Francisco J. Fernandez Rivera-Melo, Stuart Fulton, Rebeca Fernández, Jorge Torre, Araceli Acevedo-Rosas, Arturo J. Hernández-Velasco, and Imelda Amador. 2021. "The voice of Mexican small-scale fishers in times of COVID-19: Impacts, responses, and digital divide". Marine Policy. 131: 104606.

Mulder, N (coord.), “The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the tourism sector in Latin America and the Caribbean, and options for a sustainable and resilient recovery”, International Trade series, No. 157 (LC/TS.2020/147), Santiago, Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), 2020.

Palco Noticias. 2021. Habitantes de Holbox abandonan pesca para dedicarse de lleno a actividad turística. Palcoquintanarroense.com.mx. November 3, 2021.

Sheller, M. (2021) Reconstructing tourism in the Caribbean: connecting pandemic recovery, climate resilience and sustainable tourism through mobility justice, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 29:9, 1436-1449, DOI: 10.1080/09669582.2020.1791141

United Nations. 2020. COVID-19 and Transforming Tourism. United Nations.

• The results are clear, well supported by the methodological toolset.

Limitations of the study is not described.

• The authors modified the previous conclusion section to add some examples of limitations that our study can face.

Other modifications made to the manuscript are mentioned below.

• The figures were updated in the required format using the PASE program.

• All the figures developed for this study were from the original idea of first author Nadia Rubio and created with our data sources.

• The reference list was updated.

Sincerely

Nadia Rubio-Cisneros, Ph.D.

Attachments
Attachment
Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx
Decision Letter - Lóránt Dénes Dávid, Editor

Tourists perceptions of Caribbean islands facing environmental threats before the COVID-19 health crisis: Holbox Island and Archipelago of Bocas del Toro

PONE-D-21-11653R1

Dear Colleague,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Lóránt Dénes Dávid, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Accepted.

Reviewers' comments:

Formally Accepted
Acceptance Letter - Lóránt Dénes Dávid, Editor

PONE-D-21-11653R1

Tourists perceptions of Caribbean islands facing environmental threats before the COVID-19 health crisis: Holbox Island and Archipelago of Bocas del Toro 

Dear Dr. Rubio-Cisneros:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Lóránt Dénes Dávid

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Open letter on the publication of peer review reports

PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose to reveal their names.

We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions, to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research system.

Learn more at ASAPbio .