Peer Review History

Original SubmissionApril 7, 2021
Decision Letter - Carmine Pizzi, Editor

PONE-D-21-11502

Determining propensity for sub-optimal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol response to statins and future risk of cardiovascular disease

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Akyea,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 20 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.
  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.
  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Carmine Pizzi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

"JB is supported by the Hong Kong Research Grants Council as a recipient of the Hong Kong

PhD Fellowship Scheme."

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Competing Interests/Financial Disclosure * (delete as necessary) section:

"Funded by scientific donation by AMGEN Ltd. The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report."

We note that you received funding from a commercial source: AMGEN Ltd.

Please provide an amended Competing Interests Statement that explicitly states this commercial funder, along with any other relevant declarations relating to employment, consultancy, patents, products in development, marketed products, etc.

Within this Competing Interests Statement, please confirm that this does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests).  If there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared.

Please include your amended Competing Interests Statement within your cover letter. We will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Please know it is PLOS ONE policy for corresponding authors to declare, on behalf of all authors, all potential competing interests for the purposes of transparency. PLOS defines a competing interest as anything that interferes with, or could reasonably be perceived as interfering with, the full and objective presentation, peer review, editorial decision-making, or publication of research or non-research articles submitted to one of the journals. Competing interests can be financial or non-financial, professional, or personal. Competing interests can arise in relationship to an organization or another person. Please follow this link to our website for more details on competing interests: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests

4. Thank you for stating the following in the Competing Interests section:

"NQ is a member of the most recent NICE Familial Hypercholesterolaemia & Lipid Modification Guideline Development Groups (CG71 & CG181). SW, IW are members of the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Independent Scientific Advisory Committee (ISAC). RKA currently holds an NIHR-SPCR funded studentship (2018-2021). SW reports honorarium from AMGEN and is also an employee of Janssen. KM holds the CW Malpethorpe Fellowship Award and reports personal fees from IQVIA Ltd have been received outside the submitted work. EC and IW report grants from Amgen. The remaining authors have no competing interests."

Please confirm that this does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to  PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests).  If there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared.

Please include your updated Competing Interests statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Please know it is PLOS ONE policy for corresponding authors to declare, on behalf of all authors, all potential competing interests for the purposes of transparency. PLOS defines a competing interest as anything that interferes with, or could reasonably be perceived as interfering with, the full and objective presentation, peer review, editorial decision-making, or publication of research or non-research articles submitted to one of the journals. Competing interests can be financial or non-financial, professional, or personal. Competing interests can arise in relationship to an organization or another person. Please follow this link to our website for more details on competing interests: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests

5. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially identifying or sensitive patient information) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. Please see http://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c181.long for guidelines on how to de-identify and prepare clinical data for publication. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

Review Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1: I’ve read with attention the paper of Ralph Kwame Akyea et al. that is potentially of interest. The background and aim of the study have been clearly defined. The methodology applied is overall correct and the results are reliable. I’ve only some minor comments: - The difference in use of low intensity statin in the two cohort could be influenced by the fact that Asian are more sensible to statin-side effects and some drugs are to be used at lower dosages in Asians

- The authors stress that ezetimibe should be used in secundary prevention patients only... why? The guidelines suggest to add ezetimibe where LDL-C target is not achieved, in high-risk patients in primary prevention as well

- The authors suggest the use of icosapent ethyl as an adjunct to diet in adults with triglycerides of at least 500 mg/dL. This is not supported by the reference chosen by the authors nor it is supported by any guideline. Probably fenofibrate should be considered as well.

Revision 1

Response to Comments from Editorial Committee

Comment:

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

Response:

The manuscript has been formatted/revised to meet PLOS ONE’s style requirements, including those for file naming.

Comment:

2. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

"JB is supported by the Hong Kong Research Grants Council as a recipient of the Hong Kong

PhD Fellowship Scheme."

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Response:

The funding statement "JB is supported by the Hong Kong Research Grants Council as a recipient of the Hong Kong PhD Fellowship Scheme" has been removed from the acknowledgement section to the competing interests/financial disclosure section.

The funding statement remains the same: “Funded by scientific donation by AMGEN Ltd. The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report”.

Comment:

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Competing Interests/Financial Disclosure * (delete as necessary) section:

"Funded by scientific donation by AMGEN Ltd. The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report."

We note that you received funding from a commercial source: AMGEN Ltd.

Please provide an amended Competing Interests Statement that explicitly states this commercial funder, along with any other relevant declarations relating to employment, consultancy, patents, products in development, marketed products, etc.

Within this Competing Interests Statement, please confirm that this does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests). If there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared.

Please include your amended Competing Interests Statement within your cover letter. We will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Please know it is PLOS ONE policy for corresponding authors to declare, on behalf of all authors, all potential competing interests for the purposes of transparency. PLOS defines a competing interest as anything that interferes with, or could reasonably be perceived as interfering with, the full and objective presentation, peer review, editorial decision-making, or publication of research or non-research articles submitted to one of the journals. Competing interests can be financial or non-financial, professional, or personal. Competing interests can arise in relationship to an organization or another person. Please follow this link to our website for more details on competing interests: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests

Response:

The competing interests/financial disclosure section has been revised accordingly and now includes the statement "This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.”, as required. The competing interest statement now reads (page 22):

“NQ is a member of the most recent NICE Familial Hypercholesterolaemia & Lipid Modification Guideline Development Groups (CG71 & CG181). SW, IW are members of the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Independent Scientific Advisory Committee (ISAC). RKA currently holds an NIHR-SPCR funded studentship (2018-2021). SW reports honorarium from AMGEN and is also an employee of Janssen. KM holds the CW Malpethorpe Fellowship Award and reports personal fees from IQVIA Ltd have been received outside the submitted work. JB is supported by the Hong Kong Research Grants Council as a recipient of the Hong Kong PhD Fellowship Scheme. EC and IW report grants from Amgen. The remaining authors have no competing interests. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.”

Comment:

4. Thank you for stating the following in the Competing Interests section:

"NQ is a member of the most recent NICE Familial Hypercholesterolaemia & Lipid Modification Guideline Development Groups (CG71 & CG181). SW, IW are members of the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Independent Scientific Advisory Committee (ISAC). RKA currently holds an NIHR-SPCR funded studentship (2018-2021). SW reports honorarium from AMGEN and is also an employee of Janssen. KM holds the CW Malpethorpe Fellowship Award and reports personal fees from IQVIA Ltd have been received outside the submitted work. EC and IW report grants from Amgen. The remaining authors have no competing interests."

Please confirm that this does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests). If there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared.

Please include your updated Competing Interests statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Please know it is PLOS ONE policy for corresponding authors to declare, on behalf of all authors, all potential competing interests for the purposes of transparency. PLOS defines a competing interest as anything that interferes with, or could reasonably be perceived as interfering with, the full and objective presentation, peer review, editorial decision-making, or publication of research or non-research articles submitted to one of the journals. Competing interests can be financial or non-financial, professional, or personal. Competing interests can arise in relationship to an organization or another person. Please follow this link to our website for more details on competing interests: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests

Response:

As indicated in the response to the earlier comment, the competing interest section has been revised as required and the sentence “The remaining authors have no competing interests. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” has been added (page 20).

Comment:

5. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially identifying or sensitive patient information) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. Please see http://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c181.long for guidelines on how to de-identify and prepare clinical data for publication. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

Response:

There are ethical and legal restrictions on sharing de-identified data set and this has been explained in the revised data availability section (page 22):

“The third-party data for this study were obtained from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and the University of Hong Kong/Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster. CPRD is a research service that provides primary care and linked data for public health research. CPRD and University of Hong Kong/Hospital Authority data governance and our own license to use data do not allow us to distribute or make available patient data directly to other parties. However, data is available upon application to CPRD (www.cprd.com) and the University of Hong Kong/Hospital Authority (www.ha.org.hk).”

Response to Comments from Reviewer 1

Specific comments

Comment:

“I’ve read with attention the paper of Ralph Kwame Akyea et al. that is potentially of interest. The background and aim of the study have been clearly defined. The methodology applied is overall correct and the results are reliable. I’ve only some minor comments: - The difference in use of low intensity statin in the two cohort could be influenced by the fact that Asian are more sensible to statin-side effects and some drugs are to be used at lower dosages in Asians”

Response:

We thank the reviewer for the positive assessment.

Comment:

“The authors stress that ezetimibe should be used in secondary prevention patients only... why? The guidelines suggest adding ezetimibe where LDL-C target is not achieved, in high-risk patients in primary prevention as well”

Response:

Thank you for highlighting this. We agree with the reviewer that the guidelines recommend Ezetimibe for primary prevention as well. The sentence has, therefore, been revised to reflect this. The sentence now reads (page 14): “Medications that aim to reduce LDL-C such as PCSK9 inhibitors and Ezetimibe, [26,27] are presently indicated for both primary and secondary prevention of CVD.”

Comment:

“The authors suggest the use of icosapent ethyl as an adjunct to diet in adults with triglycerides of at least 500 mg/dL. This is not supported by the reference chosen by the authors, nor it is supported by any guideline. Probably fenofibrate should be considered as well.”

Response:

The paragraph have been revised and the bit about the use of icosapent ethyl as an adjunct to diet in adults with triglycerides of at least 500mg/dL, has been removed. The paragraph now reads (page 14): “Medications that aim to reduce LDL-C such as PCSK9 inhibitors and Ezetimibe, [26,27] are presently indicated for both primary and secondary prevention of CVD. When taken in combination with statin and diet therapies, additional reduction in LDL-C levels have been shown in trials.”

Attachments
Attachment
Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx
Decision Letter - Carmine Pizzi, Editor

Determining propensity for sub-optimal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol response to statins and future risk of cardiovascular disease

PONE-D-21-11502R1

Dear Dr. Akyea,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Carmine Pizzi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Formally Accepted
Acceptance Letter - Carmine Pizzi, Editor

PONE-D-21-11502R1

Determining propensity for sub-optimal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol response to statins and future risk of cardiovascular disease

Dear Dr. Akyea:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Prof Carmine Pizzi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Open letter on the publication of peer review reports

PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose to reveal their names.

We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions, to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research system.

Learn more at ASAPbio .