Peer Review History

Original SubmissionApril 12, 2021
Decision Letter - Itamar Ashkenazi, Editor
Transfer Alert

This paper was transferred from another journal. As a result, its full editorial history (including decision letters, peer reviews and author responses) may not be present.

PONE-D-21-10721

Emergency Capacity Analysis in Ethiopia: Results of the First Baseline Emergency Facility Assessment

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Mishra,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jul 04 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.
  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.
  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Itamar Ashkenazi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

3. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

4. Please ensure that you include a title page within your main document. We do appreciate that you have a title page document uploaded as a separate file, however, as per our author guidelines (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-title-page) we do require this to be part of the manuscript file itself and not uploaded separately.

Could you therefore please include the title page into the beginning of your manuscript file itself, listing all authors and affiliations.

5. Please include additional information regarding the survey or questionnaire used in the study and ensure that you have provided sufficient details that others could replicate the analyses. For instance, if you developed a questionnaire as part of this study and it is not under a copyright more restrictive than CC-BY, please include a copy, in both the original language and English, as Supporting Information.

6. In your Methods section, please provide additional information about data collection. Please ensure you have provided sufficient details to replicate the analyses such as:

- the date range (month and year) of data collection

- a description of any inclusion/exclusion criteria that were applied to participant/site recruitment.

7. In the Methods, please clarify that participants provided oral consent. Please also state in the Methods:

- Why written consent could not be obtained

- How oral consent was documented

For more information, please see our guidelines for human subjects research: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-human-subjects-research

8. To comply with PLOS ONE submission guidelines, in your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding your statistical analyses. For more information on PLOS ONE's expectations for statistical reporting, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines.#loc-statistical-reporting.

9. Please list the name and version of any software package used for statistical analysis, alongside any relevant references. For more information on PLOS ONE's expectations for statistical reporting, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines.#loc-statistical-reporting.

10. Please include a caption for each figure in your manuscript.

11. Please ensure that you refer to Figure 1, 2, 3 and 4 in your text as, if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the figure.

12. Please include titles for your Supporting Information tables.

13. Please include a copy of Table I which you refer to in your text on page 3.

14. We note you have included a table to which you do not refer in the text of your manuscript. Please ensure that you refer to Table IIIa and IIIb in your text; if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the Table.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: On the title need modifications.. says first baseline ... need clarification because its vague

Introduction and objective is clear

On the discussion its better to write it as paragraph rather than dividing it in theme

-make it focused and precise

- after identifying the gaps in each hospital what does authors recomend from experience or interventions from other settings

Conclusion should include all aspects of the paper introduction results and recommendations.

Overall its good and new research finding

Reviewer #2: It a very important study to improve emergency care. It is important that the study was part of an ongoing study conducted by the Ministry of Health. They have used the approriate statistical methods for the study. They have presented thier data but there are missing ones within the submission, such as table 1 mentioned in line 63 and most of all the letter from Ministry of Health mentioned in line 79/ 80. Once these are completed, my recommendation is to go ahead and publish the paper.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Selamawit Alemayehu

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Revision 1

Dear Reviewers,

Please see the following issues addressed:

1. Please amend your Response to Reviewers letter to include a point by point response to each of the points made by the Editor and / or Reviewers. Please follow this link for more information: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__blogs.PLOS.org_everyone_2011_05_10_how-2Dto-2Dsubmit-2Dyour-2Drevised-2Dmanuscript_&d=DwIGaQ&c=lb62iw4YL4RFalcE2hQUQealT9-RXrryqt9KZX2qu2s&r=umxSEMkcGadXDYDQmHtEVMzzj6hKkX9DmS7wSyJSuqo&m=FMEgiVO2HMjZmZldL5La-WmvZ9v7w5ewBqZDZbnKAlc&s=EF5q610FancagswuIC4I4pKko1drjC14ITtNc99UcrM&e=

The following format has now been used.

2. Please amend the title either on the online submission form or in your manuscript so that they are identical.

The title has been revised.

3. We note you have included a table to which you do not refer in the text of your manuscript. Please ensure that you refer to Table IIIa and IIIb in your text; if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the Table.

There is a figure III that has been referred to in line 277 – but no other tables/charts can be found that have not been referred to? Please let us know if anything else is being referred to.

4. If possible, please upload a file showing your changes either highlighted or using track changes. This should be uploaded as a Revised Manuscript w/tracked changes, file type. Please follow this link for more information: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__blogs.PLOS.org_everyone_2011_05_10_how-2Dto-2Dsubmit-2Dyour-2Drevised-2Dmanuscript_&d=DwIGaQ&c=lb62iw4YL4RFalcE2hQUQealT9-RXrryqt9KZX2qu2s&r=umxSEMkcGadXDYDQmHtEVMzzj6hKkX9DmS7wSyJSuqo&m=FMEgiVO2HMjZmZldL5La-WmvZ9v7w5ewBqZDZbnKAlc&s=EF5q610FancagswuIC4I4pKko1drjC14ITtNc99UcrM&e=

This file has been uploaded.

We appreciate all of the reviewer’s comments and look forward to discussing our paper further as needed. Please let us know if any further changes need to be made.

The Authors

Attachments
Attachment
Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers - 3.docx
Decision Letter - Itamar Ashkenazi, Editor

Emergency Capacity Analysis in Ethiopia: Results of A Baseline Emergency Facility Assessment

PONE-D-21-10721R1

Dear Dr. Mishra,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Itamar Ashkenazi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Formally Accepted
Acceptance Letter - Itamar Ashkenazi, Editor

PONE-D-21-10721R1

Emergency capacity analysis in Ethiopia: Results of a baseline emergency facility assessment

Dear Dr. Mishra:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Itamar Ashkenazi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Open letter on the publication of peer review reports

PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose to reveal their names.

We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions, to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research system.

Learn more at ASAPbio .