Peer Review History

Original SubmissionMay 9, 2021
Decision Letter - Paulo Corti, Editor

PONE-D-21-15323

Temporal partitioning and spatiotemporal avoidance among large carnivores in a human-impacted African landscape

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Searle,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Pay attention to reviewers comments, especially to reviewer #2, who highlighted some issues in the manuscript. Check the emphasis you put on the literature of competitive interactions on large carnivores and less emphasis on how human disturbance impact these competitive relationships. The introduction need references to support some statements. There are some confusing parts that need to be clarified.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jul 30 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.
  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.
  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Paulo Corti, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that Figures 1 and S5 in your submission contain map images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

a) You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figures 1 and S5 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license.  

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

b) If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: This study uses camera trap data to examine the effects of human impact on temporal and spatiotemporal associations between some of Tanzania’s large carnivores. The authors found evidence of avoidance and attraction between the various carnivores, and that both leopard and lion altered these behaviours in the areas with high human impact. This suggests that, at least for road-travelling behaviours, human activity may interfere with spatiotemporal partitioning mechanisms that carnivore guilds use to facilitate coexistence with one another.

This is a very well written manuscript that clearly describes its methodology and findings. The authors are also transparent about the limitations of their data and the implications of their results. I enjoyed reading this paper, and I only have one very minor suggestion which the authors can take or leave as desired. I recommend this paper be accepted for publication.

Multi-panelled figures 2 & 3: the axes titles and labels for these figures is a bit small and hard to read. I suggest increasing the font size here. To help avoid the figures becoming overly crowded, I suggest that instead of having each figure panel’s axes titled individually, instead have a larger axes title placed in a central position between the panels (since in each figure, the x and y axis for the panels is the same).

Reviewer #2: Increase in anthropogenic impacts have been resulted in disruption of ecological process across the world and competitive interactions among large carnivores are one. Present study able to depicts how human disturbance can disrupt inter-predator relationship. Following are the comments from me:

Introduction of the manuscript is robust but have put to much emphasis on the literature of competitive interactions on large carnivores and less emphasis on how human disturbance impact these competitive relationships except one paragraph. Also, introduction lack References at certain statement. For example, Line 48, 49, 50 involves description of competition lack any reference to support the statement. Another statement in line 72 and 73 i.e., it has been theorised that the species may be forced to share space in more anthropogenically impacted areas. Does this statement can be applied in protected area which lack much human disturbance and leopards rely much on cover rather than human impacted area?

Under data collection heading paragraph includes line number from 136-142 is confusing. For example, in line number 136 i.e., We used data from camera trap surveys at four sites in the Ruaha-Rungwa landscape (38), what does 38 means is not clear. In Analysis section from line number 227 to 234 not a single reference has been provided to support that this analysis has been used in some earlier study. In survey effort a total independent capture of the species under study has been provided since study studies at different sites hence independent captures at different sites should also mentioned in survey effort. Also, how much captures of male and female leopards were got has not mentioned in survey effort which also need to be stated.

Authors have able to justified their findings thoroughly in discussion. But discussion lack light on spatio-temporal attraction in relation to different habitat which authors have sampled in RNP. Do these habitats differ in their structure and visibility which could further affect the outcome of the competitive interactions?

In nutshell present study is well written and have robust statical analysis and need minor revision.

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Revision 1

Please see uploaded file "Large carnivore interactions_Response to reviewers" for our response to the editor and reviewers' comments.

Attachments
Attachment
Submitted filename: Large carnivore interactions_Response to reviewers.pdf
Decision Letter - Paulo Corti, Editor

Temporal partitioning and spatiotemporal avoidance among large carnivores in a human-impacted African landscape

PONE-D-21-15323R1

Dear Dr. Searle,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Paulo Corti, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Comments to the Author

Reviewer #2: Present manuscript have rigorously answered the questions pertaining to large carnivore interactions in human dominated landscape. Authors have incorporated all the comments raised by me and manuscript can be accepted for publication in present form.

Formally Accepted
Acceptance Letter - Paulo Corti, Editor

PONE-D-21-15323R1

Temporal partitioning and spatiotemporal avoidance among large carnivores in a human-impacted African landscape

Dear Dr. Searle:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Paulo Corti

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Open letter on the publication of peer review reports

PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose to reveal their names.

We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions, to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research system.

Learn more at ASAPbio .