Peer Review History

Original SubmissionNovember 15, 2020
Decision Letter - Amit Sapra, Editor

PONE-D-20-35931

The epidemiology of autoimmune bullous diseases in Sudan between 2000 and 2016

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Siddig,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 28 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.
  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.
  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Amit Sapra

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1) Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2) Please include additional information regarding the data extraction tool used in the study and ensure that you have provided sufficient details that others could replicate the analyses. For instance, if you developed a data extraction tool as part of this study and it is not under a copyright more restrictive than CC-BY, please include a copy, in both the original language and English, as Supporting Information, or include a citation if it has been published previously.

3) Please use standard statistical reporting for your estimates. For example, rates can be presented as 57.7 per 100,000 population and so forth.

4) We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially identifying or sensitive patient information) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. Please see http://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c181.long for guidelines on how to de-identify and prepare clinical data for publication. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: 1) the study design should be- Retrospective Cross Sectional Study. 2) Lack of consent - can present as an ethical consideration 3) Grammatical errors which need correction 4) Better to mention the percentages of males and females being affected for each AIBD group should be mentioned rather than Male: Female ratio. 5) Bar graph representation of the age of patients being affected for each AIBD group can be included for a better visual representation. 6) Authors have included a Fig 3 ( bar graph) showing various comorbidities that the patients had. I think it would be better if the authors elaborate on the same. For an example if they found a higher prevalence of an AIBD's with a particular underlying comorbidity, that would be very informative.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Revision 1

Journal requirements:

1) We double checked that the manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements.

2) We included the data extraction tool as Supporting Information, named S1_File. We re-uploaded the previous S1_File.pdf as S2_File. We developed the tool in English and therefore we are uploading it as it is.

3) Standard reporting of the rates was used (lines 25, 74).

4) Regarding data availability, the ethics committees of the University of Khartoum and Khartoum State Ministry of Health restricted publicly sharing of research data that were extracted from routinely-collected healthcare data even if anonymized. Some of the diseases under study are very rare and therefore potentially identifying. Data are available from the University of Khartoum Faculty of Dentistry (dentistry@uofk.edu).

Reviewer’s comments:

1) The study design is now written as advised (lines 18 and 57).

2) We agree that a lack of consent is an ethical consideration in general. However, for a retrospective study using routinely-collected health care data, this is a grey area. The ethics committees exempted this study from the requirement of informed consent based on its minimal risk to ethics.

3) Grammatical errors were corrected in lines: 19, 24, 35, 50,64, 65, 78, 123, 132, 188, 212, and 240.

4) We added information on gender percentages for each disease to Table 1. We still believe that the male-to female ratio is important for comparison with other countries.

5) A bar chart for age representation is uploaded as Fig4 and appropriately cited within the manuscript.

6) We did not observe a high prevalence of a co-morbidity with a specific AIBDs.

Attachments
Attachment
Submitted filename: AIBDs - Rebuttal letter.docx
Decision Letter - Feroze Kaliyadan, Editor

PONE-D-20-35931R1

The epidemiology of autoimmune bullous diseases in Sudan between 2000 and 2016

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Siddig,

Thank you for submitting your revised manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by May 06 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.
  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.
  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Feroze Kaliyadan, M.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #2: I appreciate the authors attempt to evaluate ‘The epidemiology of autoimmune bullous diseases in Sudan between 2000 and 2016’. Some minor comments

1. “However, in some Arab Gulf countries, namely Kuwait [9] and Saudi Arabia [23], the disease was reported in males more than females suggesting an element of gender inequality in those countries [32]….” (Lines 151-153). Strongly recommend to delete the wording ‘gender inequality in those countries’. How will a difference in male:female ratio in a country denote an element of gender inequality? The reference 32 as cited by the authors was commenting on concluded that “his study highlighted important differences in access to and utilisation of PHCS between urban and rural populations in Riyadh province in the KSA. These findings have implications for policy and planning of PHCCs and reducing inequalities in health care between rural and urban populations…” Hence the authors claim is neither supported by the cited literature. There are AI conditions where there may be male:female incidence differences. In the same paragraph, authors were commenting “In contrast, more males were affected by PF than females in France [26], Turkey [16], Singapore [19], and Israel [22]…” Whether authors inference that there is ‘an element of gender inequality’ in these countries too! Moreover, in Line 184, authors were stating there is higher female preponderance for BP in Kuwait.

2. The authors rightly mentioned in the manuscript regarding retrospective study design and possibility of missing the information (as could be extracted from a leading question). Please highlight specifically the lack of information on neurological disease a/w AIBD in this study.

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Revision 2

Omayma Siddig

Faculty of Dentistry, University of Khartoum

Khartoum 11111

Sudan

29 June, 2021

Ref.: PONE-D-20-35931, The epidemiology of autoimmune bullous diseases in Sudan between 2000 and 2016, second revision

Dear Feroze Kaliyadan

We thank you for the flexibility you showed regarding the due date for submission this manuscript. We also thank the reviewer for their time reviewing and commenting on the manuscript.

We have edited the manuscript as requested and here are the details of the changes made:

Journal requirements:

1) Regarding reference list: we removed the reference related to the reviewer’s first comment, and we added a reference reporting on the outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with autoimmune bullous as we believe it enforces the idea of a national registry.

2) We uploaded the pictures that have been corrected by the PACE tool as advised.

Reviewer’s comments:

1) We deleted the phrase “suggesting an element of gender inequality in those countries”. The reviewer made a valid point and we agree with them.

2) Although the association between neurological diseases and autoimmune bullous diseases is an interesting area and yes our study lacked any information about neurological diseases, we cannot comment on this issue. We feel that it would be biased to comment on association between neurological diseases and autoimmune bullous diseases only and leave all other associations that have been reported in the literature as if we imply that there is definitely an association. On the other hand, we cannot comment on every single association that was reported as it would be overwhelming for the reader and would put the manuscript off track.

Attached along with this letter are the marked-up manuscript with track changes, the unmarked manuscript, the PACE-corrected figures and the supplementary files.

We look forward to receiving from you the acceptance of publication in PLOS ONE. We would be happy to respond to any questions or comments that may arise.

Kind regards,

Omayma Siddig; BDS, MFD, MFDS, MSc

Faculty of Dentistry, University of Khartoum

On behalf of all authors.

Attachments
Attachment
Submitted filename: AIBDs - Rebuttal letter.docx
Decision Letter - Feroze Kaliyadan, Editor

The epidemiology of autoimmune bullous diseases in Sudan between 2000 and 2016

PONE-D-20-35931R2

Dear Dr. Siddig,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Feroze Kaliyadan, M.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Formally Accepted
Acceptance Letter - Feroze Kaliyadan, Editor

PONE-D-20-35931R2

The epidemiology of autoimmune bullous diseases in Sudan between 2000 and 2016

Dear Dr. Siddig:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Feroze Kaliyadan

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Open letter on the publication of peer review reports

PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose to reveal their names.

We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions, to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research system.

Learn more at ASAPbio .