Peer Review History
| Original SubmissionSeptember 27, 2020 |
|---|
|
PONE-D-20-30481 Growth Performance, Physiological Parameters, and Transcript Levels of Lipid Metabolism-related Genes in Hybrid Yellow Catfish (Tachysurus fulvidraco ♀ × Pseudobagrus vachellii ♂) Fed with Diets Containing Acanthopanax senticosus PLOS ONE Dear Dr. Li, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 24 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file. Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter. If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Kind regards, Silvia Martínez-Llorens Academic Editor PLOS ONE Additional Editor Comments: Following the suggestion raised by the reviewer, it could be also interesting to analyze the relation between digestive enzymes and protein efficiency ratio. Journal Requirements: When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements. 1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 2. In your Methods section, please provide additional information on the animal research and ensure you have included details on : (1) methods of sacrifice (2) methods of anesthesia and/or analgesia, and (2) efforts to alleviate suffering. [Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.] Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: Yes ********** 2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: Yes ********** 3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: Yes ********** 4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: Yes ********** 5. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: Growth Performance, Physiological Parameters, and Transcript Levels of Lipid Metabolism-related Genes in Hybrid Yellow Catfish (Tachysurus fulvidraco ♀ × Pseudobagrus vachellii ♂) Fed with Diets Containing Acanthopanax senticosus The present study conducted to evaluate the effect Siberian ginseng in 5levelsongrowthandphysiological performance as well as metabolism related genes in hybrid yellow catfish. Dietary levels of 2-4 g/kg showed growth promotion and reduced cholesterol and triglycerides in serum and liver. Also dietary ginseng revealed down regulation of some related gene to reduce the fat deposition in the liver. Is this fish a kind of low fat fish which can be expressed by aquaculture activities to be high fat content? Market always prefers original taste. The author stated that amylase, trypsin, and lipase activities in the yellow catfish intestine significantly increased with increasing of A. senticosus, but no change in FCR was found. This should be discussed appropriately. The authors said that they measured glycogen (page 6, line 139), but no data is available in this parameter? The present of some antinutrients in Chinese ginseng could probably affect the results and this can be considered for more discussion. The manuscript can be accepted, but there are some minor corrections to improving the manuscript before publication. Some of my comments are listed below: Abstract: Give the duration of the experiment here. Also some numerical data should be given in summary. Keywords: 4 of 7 exactly repeated in the title and should be moderately changed. Introduction: Well writing. Just some explanation on the measured parameters in this study could mature the introduction. The culture importance and problems in the examined fish should be given. Materials and methods: Page 4, line 90: use the same unit for g/kg throughout the text. Page 4, line 95-97: the preparation of the diets is not complete in terms of the amount of added water and oil, time for drying and so on. Page 4, line 108-109: give the other water physio-chemical parameters. The tank dimension, source of water and flow rate is not given! Page 8, line 196: the company info for this version of SPSS in not correct. Results: Well writing. Give the final weight of fish for better comparison by readers. Discussion: Page 13, line 292: change rate to level. Page 13, line 296-298: but no changes were observed in FCR. Page 13, line 299: should be present as strongest effect on… Page 13, line 300-302: not related to the changes of enzymes. Some ingredients and the levels should be an effective reason. Page 13, line 306-308: but the authors did not measure the catabolic enzymes. Page 13, line 309-310: this sentence is repeated in introduction. Page 14, line 336: change to HSI. Page 15, line 369-370: I'm not agree with this as those are antinutrients and many studies showed the negative impacts of these on growth and metabolism of animals. Reference: There are many mistakes in references in terms of format, journal abbreviations, scientific names, etc. such as lines 394-395, 411,414-415,417, 421-422, and so on. Tables: Table 1: give the unit in parenthesis in front of the ginseng. Correct middling with small letter. Put all proximate analyses of the diets in terms of ash, dry matter and other items. Table 3: insert the initial and final fish weights. Table 4: why no data on T3, T3 and the ratio of T3:T4 are available in this table!? Those should be given here. The unit of TP is generally g/dL. Figures: The quality of all figures is low in the reviewers' file. Figure 1: no data are available to how the broken-line was analyzed. Figure 2: change value to ratio. ********** 6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: Yes: Bahram Falahatkar [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.] While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.
|
| Revision 1 |
|
Growth performance, physiological parameters, and transcript levels of lipid metabolism-related genes in hybrid yellow catfish (Tachysurus fulvidraco♀ × Pseudobagrus vachellii ♂) fed diets containing Siberian ginseng PONE-D-20-30481R1 Dear Dr. Li, We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements. Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication. An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org. Kind regards, Silvia Martínez-Llorens Academic Editor PLOS ONE Additional Editor Comments (optional): Reviewers' comments: |
| Formally Accepted |
|
PONE-D-20-30481R1 Growth performance, physiological parameters, and transcript levels of lipid metabolism-related genes in hybrid yellow catfish (Tachysurus fulvidraco ♀ × Pseudobagrus vachellii ♂) fed diets containing Siberian ginseng Dear Dr. Li: I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org. If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org. Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access. Kind regards, PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff on behalf of Dr Silvia Martínez-Llorens Academic Editor PLOS ONE |
Open letter on the publication of peer review reports
PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose to reveal their names.
We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions, to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research system.
Learn more at ASAPbio .