Peer Review History
| Original SubmissionNovember 17, 2020 |
|---|
|
PONE-D-20-36227 Could PDX-1 explain the changes observed in endocrine pancreas due to chronic cola drink consumption in rats? A global point of view PLOS ONE Dear Dr. Cao, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Present study is unique in its nature as it is a new breakdown in diabetic studies that links to pancreatic morphological alterations especially in relation to gene. But the reviewers have criticized on the data. Moreover, I also found that experimental evidences are also required to support the histological results of PDX-1. Language of this paper needs to be critically revised to remove grammatical mistakes and syntax errors. Please submit your revised manuscript by Feb 27 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file. Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter. If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Kind regards, Muhammad Sajid Hamid Akash Academic Editor PLOS ONE Journal Requirements: When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements. 1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 2 Please ensure you have discussed any potential limitations of your study in the Discussion. 3.At this time, we request that you please report additional details in your Methods section regarding animal care, as per our editorial guidelines: (1) Please state the source of mice used in the study (2) Please describe the care received by the animals, including the frequency of monitoring and the criteria used to assess animal health and well-being. Thank you for your attention to these requests. 4. Please ensure you have provided the product number and any lot numbers of all the antibodies purchased from for your study. 5. Please include your statement regarding the method of euthanasia in the manuscript Methods. 6. Please amend either the abstract on the online submission form (via Edit Submission) or the abstract in the manuscript so that they are identical. [Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.] Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: Partly Reviewer #2: Partly ********** 2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 5. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: The current study is good, deep and unique in its nature. It is a new breakdown in diabetic studies that links to pancreatic morphological alterations especially in relation to gene. The idea of this pharmacogentic type research can be proved as a guide towards new establishments and findings for the treatments of such type of chronic ailments which are playing more crucial role in human mortalities. This manuscript describes genetic effects on insulin resistance in diabetic studies. This is a novel field of research. Different studies have been carried out on diabetes and diabetes related complications as well as disorders but no study is designed and conducted to correlate genetic makeup with insulin resistance with having regular drinks in daily life. Thank you for inviting me as reviewer to review this manuscript. This study is really good and the paper is well written and structured. However, in my opinion, the paper has some short comings in regards to some data analysis and text and these certain issues should be addressed before publishing this kind of research. Refer to comments Please for details. Specific Comments Manuscript has several flaws as follows: Title of Manuscript Tile of manuscript that has been sent through mail was "Could PDX-1 explain the changes observed in endocrine pancreas due to chronic cola drink consumption in Rats? A global point of view " but the manuscript titled with "Could PDX-1 explain the changes observed in endocrine pancreas due to chronic cola drinks consumption in Rats? A global point of view".or "Role of TDX-1 in the endocrine pancreas of Rats after chronic consumption of cola drinks ". If focusing is on PDX-1 ,then please maintain the same at every required place of paper. ABSTRACT 1. Please describe aim/objective of the study before discussing the methedology of research study. 2. No inferential statistics reported in results. please add the type of statistical methods i. e; one way ANOVA or any other method of analyzing the data before discussing the results. 3. Please add briefly the statistical values including especially p-values and then highlight the results of the present work. 4. Again the word TDX has been used. KEY WORDS 1. Here also TDX-1is used in place of PDX-1. METHODS 1. Large groups of animals have been used. It maybe considered as wastage of resources especially of animals as well as money 2. Due to large groups, a big data is collected and might be produce some errors in calculation of different values for different parameters . 3. In morphological analysis, to calculate Fab, self supposed formula has been used. Do you think, this is a proper way to produce and analyze the findings. ( from mathematical point of view) 4. Which anaesthesia is used for animals, their doses and for how long????????? RESULTS 1. Figures 1,2 and 3 should have expectations along with them. Not should be discussed on apart from their images. DISCUSSION 1. In this part, there is detailed discussion about different aspects but the focusing point PDX-1 (insulin promoter factor) is not deeply discussed. More considerations should be there to get better understanding about that explains different changes in pancreas. 2. For "Hedonic effect " no references are provided. 3. According to ref 46, there should be increased levels of ASAT, ALAT, Creatinine and TGs but this shows no significant changes in ASAT and ALAT levels. Might be the reason is large distributed data and applications of statistics in improper way for that or if any other explanations are there???? 4. Repetition of paragraphs (consumption of light cola................ Type 2 diabetes). Please do correct. 5. Any justifications for ( doses used in this paper are far higher than doses calculated to be provided cola drink consumption.)???? 6. In my opinion, caramel/ caramel colour is also a part of cola drinks and it can have destructive role for pancreatic morphology. No discussions or considerations about this in this article, are there. It also should be a focusing point. CONCLUSIONS/FURTHER RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Collected data of this research is Good, but more satisfactory and well explained information can be obtained from further investigations for this gene. 2. In introduction, it is mentioned that PDX-1 encodes a transcription factor that critically regulates early pancreas formations and multiple aspects of mature beta cells function" early pancreas development indicates early maturation and development of pancreatic cells. So, if this types of study is carried out in neonatal or especially gestational period, then the more clear information and data could be there to explain the changes related to PDX-1 gene. LIMITATIONS OF STUDY 1. Please add limitations of the study. 2. The limitations can be added as a separate heading that may be just replace the funding information into limitations of the study. Reviewer #2: Comments to the Author This manuscript nice presented and interesting finding to assess the impact of the three different beverages in glucose tolerance, lipid levels, creatinine levels, and immunohistochemical changes addressed for the expression of insulin, glucagon, PDX-1 and NGN3 in islet cells, to evaluate the possible participation of PDX-1 in the changes observed in α and β cells after 6 months of treatment. Overall, these findings are important and interesting. However, further, improvement is necessary to solidify the Manuscript. Here are a few comments and questions: 1. In the current manuscript, the author used the title Could “TDX-1 explain the changes observed in the endocrine pancreas due to chronic cola drink consumption in rats? A global point of view. Revised the title. The title does not completely match with the study. 2. To solidify the idea of the PDX-1 current study, the author should add more experiments like real-time PCR result or western blot results. 3. There is some typing error in table:2 4. In the current study what the effect of chronic or light cola on liver function test after 6 months. Like ALT, AST, ALP Bilirubin, etc. 5. Confusion in the group of chronic cola and light cola was only given cola for drinking.? Authors address these deficiencies, then the manuscript should be considered for publication. ********** 6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: Yes: Musaddique hussain Reviewer #2: Yes: DR. MUHAMMAD TARIQ [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.] While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.
|
| Revision 1 |
|
Structural changes in endocrine pancreas of male Wistar rats due to chronic cola drink consumption. Role of PDX-1. PONE-D-20-36227R1 Dear Dr. Cao, We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements. Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication. An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org. Kind regards, Muhammad Sajid Hamid Akash Academic Editor PLOS ONE Additional Editor Comments (optional): Reviewers' comments: |
| Formally Accepted |
|
PONE-D-20-36227R1 Structural changes in endocrine pancreas of male Wistar rats due to chronic cola drink consumption. Role of PDX-1. Dear Dr. Cao: I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org. If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org. Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access. Kind regards, PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff on behalf of Dr. Muhammad Sajid Hamid Akash Academic Editor PLOS ONE |
Open letter on the publication of peer review reports
PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose to reveal their names.
We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions, to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research system.
Learn more at ASAPbio .