Peer Review History
| Original SubmissionAugust 16, 2020 |
|---|
|
PONE-D-20-25707 Liposome/gold hybrid nanoparticle encoded with CoQ10 (LGNP-CoQ10) suppressed rheumatoid arthritis via STAT3/Th17 targeting PLOS ONE Dear Dr. Cho, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Please address all critiques raised by the reviewers. Particularly, reviewer #1 raised a few critical comments regarding the role of the nanoparticle on Th17 cell responses. Other minor comments should also be addressed in the revised manuscript. Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 23 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file. Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter. If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Kind regards, Yeonseok Chung Academic Editor PLOS ONE Journal Requirements: When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements. 1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 2. Your ethics statement must appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please move it to the Methods section and delete it from any other section. Please also ensure that your ethics statement is included in your manuscript, as the ethics section of your online submission will not be published alongside your manuscript. [Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.] Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: Partly Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: No Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 5. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: In this manuscript, authors demonstrated the enhanced anti-inflammatory effect of LGNP-CoQ10 compared to CoQ10 in collagen induced arthritis model (CIA). Oral administration of LGNP-CoQ10 ameliorated the pathogenesis of CIA by decreasing inflammatory cytokines including IL-1β, IL-6, IL-17, and TNF-α. The therapeutic effect of LGNP-CoQ10 is impressive. However, several concerns should be addressed to convincingly describe the author’s novel findings. Major points - The data showed that LGNP-CoQ10 inhibits CIA through IL-17 related pathways. However, it is not clear that LGNP-CoQ10 reduces IL-17 production from CD4 T cells. As authors titled this article that ‘Liposome/gold hybrid nanoparticle encoded with CoQ10 (LGNP-CoQ10) suppressed rheumatoid arthritis via STAT3/‘Th17’ targeting’, please show the LGNP-CoQ10 mediated IL-17 inhibition in CD4 T cells and other IL-17–producing cells. - How does LGNP-CoQ10 reduces IL-17 levels? For example, LGNP-CoQ10 inhibits induction of IL-17–producing cells or decreases the maintenance of established IL-17–producing cells? Minor points - Please describe the meaning of each data more in detail including Figure 3 in the result section. - Figure 4B is not marked in the Figure 4. Reviewer #2: This study evaluated the anti-inflammatory effect of CoQ in liposome/gold hybrid nanoparticle (LGNP-CoQ10) in the animal model of rheumatoid arthritis. Although the therapeutic potential of LGNP-CoQ10 against rheumatoid arthritis seems promising according to the results in the study, the current manuscript has too many typos and errors and did not extensively describe or interpret the data. Please find my comments as below. Materials and Methods 1. In the Confocal microscopy of immunostaining section, please provide the clone name for the antibodies used in the study. 2. In the Cell culture section, C57NL/6? Is this a typo of C57BL/6? Results 3. In the “Formation of LGNP-CoQ10”, no description about Figure 1A 4. In the “The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis was suppressed by LGNP-CoQ10 in CIA mice”, the authors should compare the results of all tested experimental groups in the figure. They did not describe the result of CoQ10 in Figure 2A. Also, in the last sentence of this paragraph, the authors did not interpret the data of Figure 3. 5. In the “Expression of IL-17 and phosphorylated STAT3…”, there is no B in Figure 4B. Figures 6. Please add B in Figure 4 7. Please remove A in the figure 5. Figure legends 8. In the legend of Figure 4, please add CoQ10 in the second sentence. 9. In the legend of Figure 5, please describe the experimental condition in more detail including the addition of CoQ10 and NGNP-CoQ10. Discussion 10. In the fourth paragraph, the authors demonstrated that “We found that only liposomes containing CoQ10 or CoQ10/gold nanoparticles suppressed the pathogenesis of experimental RA in the animal model.”. Throughout the study except Figure 1, the authors compared LGNP-CoQ10 with CoQ10 alone (or vehicle) but they did not include CoQ10 in liposome as an experimental group. Please make it clear whether CoQ group in the Figure 2-5 means CoQ10 itself or CoQ10 in liposome. 11. Please discuss how LGNP can improve the solubility or absorption of CoQ10 in vivo. 12. Is the effect of CoQ10 on suppression of Stat3 phosphorylation direct or indirect? Please explain the mechanism by which CoQ10 modulate the Stat3 phosphorylation in Th17 cells. ********** 6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: No Reviewer #2: No [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.] While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step. |
| Revision 1 |
|
Liposome/gold hybrid nanoparticle encoded with CoQ10 (LGNP-CoQ10) suppressed rheumatoid arthritis via STAT3/Th17 targeting PONE-D-20-25707R1 Dear Dr. Cho, We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements. Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication. An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org. Kind regards, Yeonseok Chung Academic Editor PLOS ONE Additional Editor Comments (optional): Reviewers' comments: |
| Formally Accepted |
|
PONE-D-20-25707R1 Liposome/gold hybrid nanoparticle encoded with CoQ10 (LGNP-CoQ10) suppressed rheumatoid arthritis via STAT3/Th17 targeting Dear Dr. Cho: I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org. If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org. Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access. Kind regards, PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff on behalf of Dr Yeonseok Chung Academic Editor PLOS ONE |
Open letter on the publication of peer review reports
PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose to reveal their names.
We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions, to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research system.
Learn more at ASAPbio .