Peer Review History

Original SubmissionAugust 16, 2020
Decision Letter - Yeonseok Chung, Editor

PONE-D-20-25707

Liposome/gold hybrid nanoparticle encoded with CoQ10 (LGNP-CoQ10) suppressed rheumatoid arthritis via STAT3/Th17 targeting

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Cho,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please address all critiques raised by the reviewers. Particularly, reviewer #1 raised a few critical comments regarding the role of the nanoparticle on Th17 cell responses. Other minor comments should also be addressed in the revised manuscript.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 23 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.
  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.
  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Yeonseok Chung

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Your ethics statement must appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please move it to the Methods section and delete it from any other section. Please also ensure that your ethics statement is included in your manuscript, as the ethics section of your online submission will not be published alongside your manuscript.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: In this manuscript, authors demonstrated the enhanced anti-inflammatory effect of LGNP-CoQ10 compared to CoQ10 in collagen induced arthritis model (CIA). Oral administration of LGNP-CoQ10 ameliorated the pathogenesis of CIA by decreasing inflammatory cytokines including IL-1β, IL-6, IL-17, and TNF-α. The therapeutic effect of LGNP-CoQ10 is impressive. However, several concerns should be addressed to convincingly describe the author’s novel findings.

Major points

- The data showed that LGNP-CoQ10 inhibits CIA through IL-17 related pathways. However, it is not clear that LGNP-CoQ10 reduces IL-17 production from CD4 T cells. As authors titled this article that ‘Liposome/gold hybrid nanoparticle encoded with CoQ10 (LGNP-CoQ10) suppressed rheumatoid arthritis via STAT3/‘Th17’ targeting’, please show the LGNP-CoQ10 mediated IL-17 inhibition in CD4 T cells and other IL-17–producing cells.

- How does LGNP-CoQ10 reduces IL-17 levels? For example, LGNP-CoQ10 inhibits induction of IL-17–producing cells or decreases the maintenance of established IL-17–producing cells?

Minor points

- Please describe the meaning of each data more in detail including Figure 3 in the result section.

- Figure 4B is not marked in the Figure 4.

Reviewer #2: This study evaluated the anti-inflammatory effect of CoQ in liposome/gold hybrid nanoparticle (LGNP-CoQ10) in the animal model of rheumatoid arthritis. Although the therapeutic potential of LGNP-CoQ10 against rheumatoid arthritis seems promising according to the results in the study, the current manuscript has too many typos and errors and did not extensively describe or interpret the data. Please find my comments as below.

Materials and Methods

1. In the Confocal microscopy of immunostaining section, please provide the clone name for the antibodies used in the study.

2. In the Cell culture section, C57NL/6? Is this a typo of C57BL/6?

Results

3. In the “Formation of LGNP-CoQ10”, no description about Figure 1A

4. In the “The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis was suppressed by LGNP-CoQ10 in CIA mice”, the authors should compare the results of all tested experimental groups in the figure. They did not describe the result of CoQ10 in Figure 2A. Also, in the last sentence of this paragraph, the authors did not interpret the data of Figure 3.

5. In the “Expression of IL-17 and phosphorylated STAT3…”, there is no B in Figure 4B.

Figures

6. Please add B in Figure 4

7. Please remove A in the figure 5.

Figure legends

8. In the legend of Figure 4, please add CoQ10 in the second sentence.

9. In the legend of Figure 5, please describe the experimental condition in more detail including the addition of CoQ10 and NGNP-CoQ10.

Discussion

10. In the fourth paragraph, the authors demonstrated that “We found that only liposomes containing CoQ10 or CoQ10/gold nanoparticles suppressed the pathogenesis of experimental RA in the animal model.”. Throughout the study except Figure 1, the authors compared LGNP-CoQ10 with CoQ10 alone (or vehicle) but they did not include CoQ10 in liposome as an experimental group. Please make it clear whether CoQ group in the Figure 2-5 means CoQ10 itself or CoQ10 in liposome.

11. Please discuss how LGNP can improve the solubility or absorption of CoQ10 in vivo.

12. Is the effect of CoQ10 on suppression of Stat3 phosphorylation direct or indirect? Please explain the mechanism by which CoQ10 modulate the Stat3 phosphorylation in Th17 cells.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Revision 1

Reviewer #1: In this manuscript, authors demonstrated the enhanced anti-inflammatory effect of LGNP-CoQ10 compared to CoQ10 in collagen induced arthritis model (CIA). Oral administration of LGNP-CoQ10 ameliorated the pathogenesis of CIA by decreasing inflammatory cytokines including IL-1β, IL-6, IL-17, and TNF-α. The therapeutic effect of LGNP-CoQ10 is impressive. However, several concerns should be addressed to convincingly describe the author’s novel findings.

Major points

- The data showed that LGNP-CoQ10 inhibits CIA through IL-17 related pathways. However, it is not clear that LGNP-CoQ10 reduces IL-17 production from CD4 T cells. As authors titled this article that ‘Liposome/gold hybrid nanoparticle encoded with CoQ10 (LGNP-CoQ10) suppressed rheumatoid arthritis via STAT3/‘Th17’ targeting’, please show the LGNP-CoQ10 mediated IL-17 inhibition in CD4 T cells and other IL-17–producing cells.

� Thank you for your comments. As the reviewer pointed, the authors investigated the population of Th17 using flow cytometry. Although the population of Th17 cells of CoQ10 and LGNP-CoQ10 injected group tended to decrease, however, there were no significant differences. So, we didn’t put the data in the manuscript. Instead of the FACS data, we added the immunofluorescence images of spleen tissues (Figure 4) and serum ELISA data (Figure 5) in this study.

- How does LGNP-CoQ10 reduces IL-17 levels? For example, LGNP-CoQ10 inhibits induction of IL-17–producing cells or decreases the maintenance of established IL-17–producing cells?

� As the reviewer pointed, the accurate mechanism of reduction of IL-17 by LGNP-CoQ10 was not conducted in this paper. However, our previous studies confirmed the Coenzyme Q10 has a therapeutic effect on rheumatoid arthritis through the regulation of IL-17 level (Lee SY et al. A Combination with Probiotic Complex, Zinc, and Coenzyme Q10 Attenuates Autoimmune Arthritis by Regulation of Th17/Treg Balance. J Med Food. 2018; Lee SH et al. Coenzyme Q10 Exerts Anti-Inflammatory Activity and Induces Treg in Graft Versus Host Disease. J Med Food. 2016; Jhun J et al. Combination therapy with metformin and coenzyme Q10 in murine experimental autoimmune arthritis. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2016). besides, coenzyme Q10 suppressed the differentiation of Th17 cells and osteoclast, it also inhibited the STAT3 signaling pathway in the autoimmune disease mouse model. (Jhun J et al. Coenzyme Q10 suppresses Th17 cells and osteoclast differentiation and ameliorates experimental autoimmune arthritis mice. Immunol Lett. 2015; Lee SY et al. Coenzyme Q10 Inhibits Th17 and STAT3 Signaling Pathways to Ameliorate Colitis in Mice. J Med Food. 2017.) LGNP-CoQ10 system was used as an improvement process to increase the absorption rate of CoQ10. For this reason, the mechanism for reducing IL-17 by LGNP-CoQ10 is expected to be similar to previous studies.

Minor points

- Please describe the meaning of each data more in detail including Figure 3 in the result section.

� As the reviewer commented, the author added more detail explanation in the manuscript. “We obtained mouse joint tissues at the end of the experiments. Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-6, IL-17 and TNF-α, and an osteoclast differentiation marker, RANKL, were observed in the joint tissues by immunohistochemistry (Figure 3). The tissue immunohistochemistry images of CoQ10-injected mice showed a significant reduction of the pro-inflammatory cytokines and RANKL. Besides, the joint tissues which were treated the LGNP-CoQ10 were more decreased the pro-inflammatory cytokines and RANKL than only the CoQ10-treated group. This result suggested that the LGNP-CoQ10 system is more effective using CoQ10 alone.”

- Figure 4B is not marked in the Figure 4.

� As the reviewer pointed, the author edited the manuscript and the figure 4. “After the mice were sacrificed, we obtained spleen tissues and performed immunofluorescence staining (Figure 4). In spleen tissues, Th17 cells were decreased following CoQ10 treatment, and more significantly following LGNP-CoQ10 treatment. Besides, the spleen tissue immunofluorescence images showed a reduction in phosphorylated STAT3 among CoQ10-treated mice. This data suggested that the CoQ10 and LGNP-CoQ10 suppressed the IL-17 producing cells in the spleen tissue.”

Reviewer #2: This study evaluated the anti-inflammatory effect of CoQ in liposome/gold hybrid nanoparticle (LGNP-CoQ10) in the animal model of rheumatoid arthritis. Although the therapeutic potential of LGNP-CoQ10 against rheumatoid arthritis seems promising according to the results in the study, the current manuscript has too many typos and errors and did not extensively describe or interpret the data. Please find my comments as below.

Materials and Methods

1. In the Confocal microscopy of immunostaining section, please provide the clone name for the antibodies used in the study.

� Thank you for your comments. As the reviewer pointed, the authors added the clone name of antibodies in the manuscript. “Tissue sections were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated rat monoclonal anti-CD4, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated rat monoclonal anti-IL-17, FITC-conjugated mouse monoclonal anti-pSTAT3 705, and FITC-conjugated mouse monoclonal anti-pSTAT3 727 (all from eBiosciences, San Diego, CA, USA).”

2. In the Cell culture section, C57NL/6? Is this a typo of C57BL/6?

� As the reviewer pointed, the authors edited the typo in the manuscript. “Splenocytes were prepared from the spleens of normal C57BL/6 mice.”

Results

3. In the “Formation of LGNP-CoQ10”, no description about Figure 1A

� As the reviewer pointed, the authors edited the manuscript. “To form gold nanoparticles within the liposomes, gold precursor solution was added into the as-prepared liposomes (Figure 1A).”

4. In the “The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis was suppressed by LGNP-CoQ10 in CIA mice”, the authors should compare the results of all tested experimental groups in the figure. They did not describe the result of CoQ10 in Figure 2A. Also, in the last sentence of this paragraph, the authors did not interpret the data of Figure 3.

� As the reviewer pointed, the authors edited the manuscript and added more detail explanation. “Pathology scores and incidence of arthritis were significantly reduced in CoQ10- and LGNP-CoQ10-injected mice (Figure 2A). Although it was effective in both, the treatment of LGNP-CoQ10 had a higher therapeutic effect on RA.” and “The tissue immunohistochemistry images of CoQ10-injected mice showed a significant reduction of the pro-inflammatory cytokines and RANKL. Besides, the joint tissues which were treated the LGNP-CoQ10 were more decreased the pro-inflammatory cytokines and RANKL than only the CoQ10-treated group. This result suggested that the LGNP-CoQ10 system is more effective using CoQ10 alone.”

5. In the “Expression of IL-17 and phosphorylated STAT3…”, there is no B in Figure 4B.

� As the reviewer pointed, the authors edited the manuscript and figure. “After the mice were sacrificed, we obtained spleen tissues and performed immunofluorescence staining (Figure 4). In spleen tissues, Th17 cells were decreased following CoQ10 treatment, and more significantly following LGNP-CoQ10 treatment. Besides, the spleen tissue immunofluorescence images showed a reduction in phosphorylated STAT3 among CoQ10-treated mice. This data suggested that the CoQ10 and LGNP-CoQ10 suppressed the IL-17 producing cells in the spleen tissue.”

Figures

6. Please add B in Figure 4

� As the reviewer pointed, the authors edited the Figure 4.

7. Please remove A in the figure 5.

� As the reviewer pointed, the authors edited the Figure 5.

Figure legends

8. In the legend of Figure 4, please add CoQ10 in the second sentence.

� As the reviewer commented, the authors added “CoQ10” in the legend of Figure 4.

9. In the legend of Figure 5, please describe the experimental condition in more detail including the addition of CoQ10 and NGNP-CoQ10.

� As the reviewer pointed, the authors added more detail explanation. “IL-17 levels were detected by ELISA in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) in anti-CD3 conditions. The isolated PBMC was seeded and treated the 0.5µM of CoQ10 and LGNP-CoQ10 for 3 days respectively.”

Discussion

10. In the fourth paragraph, the authors demonstrated that “We found that only liposomes containing CoQ10 or CoQ10/gold nanoparticles suppressed the pathogenesis of experimental RA in the animal model.”. Throughout the study except Figure 1, the authors compared LGNP-CoQ10 with CoQ10 alone (or vehicle) but they did not include CoQ10 in liposome as an experimental group. Please make it clear whether CoQ group in the Figure 2-5 means CoQ10 itself or CoQ10 in liposome.

� We mean it is the CoQ10 exclusive use group. So, the authors edited the manuscript as the reviewer pointed. “We found that CoQ10 or CoQ10/gold nanoparticles suppressed the pathogenesis of experimental RA in the animal model.”

11. Please discuss how LGNP can improve the solubility or absorption of CoQ10 in vivo.

� Our previous studies demonstrated that the liposomal system with gold nanoparticles has higher absorption efficiency (Jin-Ho Lee et al. General and programmable synthesis of hybrid liposome/metal nanoparticles. Sci Adv. 2016; Youngjae Lee et al. Phase transfer-driven rapid and complete ligand exchange for molecular assembly of phospholipid bilayers on aqueous gold nanocrystals. Chem Commun. 2019.). This system facilitates endocytosis by wrapping the particles in a phospholipid bilayer like the cell’s surface, helping the cells to absorb the particles. The authors added the information in the discussion part of the manuscript. “Our previous studies demonstrated that the LGNP system has higher absorption efficiency [30, 31]. LGNP system facilitates endocytosis by wrapping the particles in a phospholipid bilayer which is the same with cell’s surface, helping the cells absorb the particles.”

12. Is the effect of CoQ10 on suppression of Stat3 phosphorylation direct or indirect? Please explain the mechanism by which CoQ10 modulate the Stat3 phosphorylation in Th17 cells.

� As the reviewer pointed, the detailed mechanism of the regulation effect of CoQ10 in Th17 cells is not described in this manuscript. Although our previous studies showed the therapeutic effect of CoQ10 in autoimmune diseases, the accurate mechanism of CoQ10 or LGNP system was not investigated (Jhun J et al. Coenzyme Q10 suppresses Th17 cells and osteoclast differentiation and ameliorates experimental autoimmune arthritis mice. Immunol Lett. 2015; Lee SY et al. Coenzyme Q10 Inhibits Th17 and STAT3 Signaling Pathways to Ameliorate Colitis in Mice. J Med Food. 2017.). For this reason, we are trying to discover the mechanism. We intend to present it in a further study. However, we can infer the process with the following study (Eric V. Dang. Control of TH17/Treg Balance by Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1. Cell. 2011.). In this study, the increase of ROS promotes Th17 differentiation and IL-17 production through the activation of RORγt and STAT3. Coenzyme Q10 is a ROS scavenger. So, CoQ10 has a regulatory effect on Th17 differentiation and IL-17 production. The authors added the explanation in the manuscript ‘discussion’ part. “A previous study showed that the increase of ROS promotes Th17 differentiation and IL-17 production through the activation of RORγt and STAT3 pathway. CoQ10 is a reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenger. Therefore, CoQ10 can directly or indirectly regulate Th17 and IL-17 as ROS scavengers through the STAT3 pathway.”

Attachments
Attachment
Submitted filename: LGNP-CoQ10 rebuttal letter - 200915.docx
Decision Letter - Yeonseok Chung, Editor

Liposome/gold hybrid nanoparticle encoded with CoQ10 (LGNP-CoQ10) suppressed rheumatoid arthritis via STAT3/Th17 targeting

PONE-D-20-25707R1

Dear Dr. Cho,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Yeonseok Chung

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Formally Accepted
Acceptance Letter - Yeonseok Chung, Editor

PONE-D-20-25707R1

Liposome/gold hybrid nanoparticle encoded with CoQ10 (LGNP-CoQ10) suppressed rheumatoid arthritis via STAT3/Th17 targeting

Dear Dr. Cho:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr Yeonseok Chung

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Open letter on the publication of peer review reports

PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose to reveal their names.

We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions, to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research system.

Learn more at ASAPbio .