Peer Review History
| Original SubmissionJanuary 30, 2020 |
|---|
|
PONE-D-20-02641 Identification and functional analysis of the CorA/MGT/MRS2-type magnesium transporter in banana PLOS ONE Dear Dr. Huang, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Jun 19 2020 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file. If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out. We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Kind regards, Anil Kumar Singh, Ph.D. Academic Editor PLOS ONE Journal Requirements: When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements. 1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 2. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels. In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions. 3. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ 4. Please ensure that you refer to Figure 1 in your text as, if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the figure. 5. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information. [Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.] Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: No Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: No Reviewer #2: No ********** 3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: No Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: No Reviewer #2: No ********** 5. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: 1. The author said that these genes were not only involved in Mg uptake and transport, but also participated in Mg allocation among banana’s root, pseudo stem, corm, and leaf components,which required more biological experiments to support it 2.need adding bilogical stastics for q-PCR data 3. DISCUSSION should be rewritten. 4. writting and and orgnization should be further improved. Reviewer #2: The authors characterized the Magnesium transporter MaMRS2 protein family. 10 MaMRS2 genes in banana (Musa acuminata) were identified. The physicochemical properties, location on chromosomes, gene structure, cisacting elements, and replication relationships between these ten members were analyzed. The tissue-specific expression pattern was analyzed. Three genes MaMRS2-1, MaMRS2-4, and MaMRS2-7 were cloned and complemented with triple MGT mutant of Salmonella typhimurium. This study could help in understanding the function of each MaMRS2 gene in development or stress conditions. The manuscript is poorly written and needs to be largely reworked. 1. Rewrite the line: These results should be helpful to further research work on Mg transporters in banana crops. 2. The introduction is very messy, especially the expression summary of MGTs in different plants. Rewrite the introduction. 3. Units are missing: The isoelectric point of the predicted proteins and their corresponding amino acid length ranged respectively from 4.51 to 9.16 (pI) and from 379 to 495 (aa). 4. Rewrite: Figure 2 shows the phylogenetic tree built for Mg transporter protein sequences from banana, Arabidopsis, rice, maize, and yeast, with yeast Mg transporters as the outgroup. 5. Chromosomal location and gene duplication: Authors mentioned gene duplication as gene replication. (5 times). There is a difference between the two terms. Also, in the discussion part: we found evidence for replication relationships that occurred between MaMRS2 family members across chromosomes but no signs of a tandem replication relationship (Fig. 4). This pattern generally exists among other gene family members of banana [32]. It is reasonable to speculate that multiple rounds of whole genome replication events have occurred over evolutionary time in banana. 6. Figure legends are not uploaded properly or incomplete: Fig. 1 Multiple sequence alignments of MaMSR2 proteins. This alignment was performed using DNAMAN software. The identical, conserved, and less conserved Fig. 2 Phylogenetic analysis of Arabidopsis, rice, maize, yeast, and banana CorA/MRS2/MGT members. The neighbor-joining tree, which includes 10 MaMRS2 Fig. 3 Phylogenetic relationships (A), gene structure (B), and motif analysis (C) of MaMRS2 family members in banana. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the Fig. 4 Chromosomal location and gene duplication of MaMRS2 genes in the banana genome. The MaMRS2 gene is located on multiple chromosomes. The chromosome Fig. 5 Predicted cis-acting elements in the promoter region of the 10 MaMRS2 genes in banana. Different colors represent cis-acting elements associated with different Fig. 6 Complementary analysis of the MaMRS2 genes. MM1927 is the wild type, used here as a positive control; the MM281 and Fig. 7 Expression of 10 MaMRS2 genes in different tissues of banana cultivar ‘Baxijiao’ (Musa spp. AAA Cavendish) seedlings. Explain the Abbreviations. Fig. 8 Relative expression levels of 10 MaMRS2 genes in different tissues of banana cultivar ‘Baxijiao’ (Musa spp. AAA Cavendish) Explain the Abbreviations. 7. The author mentioned sequences of 7 genes: Supplementary Test1 The nucleotide sequences of the seven MaMRS2 genes from sequencing There are only three sequences >MaMRS2-1, >MaMRS2-4, >MaMRS2-7 as authors clones only three genes. 8. The authors did complementation assay with MM281 mutant. Figure 6A: Why the growth of complemented lines is low in higher concentration of magnesium as compare to Mutant (MaMRS2-4, MaMRS2-7), as Complemented lines are growing fine in lower concentrations. Figure 6B: Authors mentioned: The data are shown as the mean ± SD of three biological replicates, However, no SD is shown on the line charts. The growth curve at 0.01 mM Mg2+ shows that complementing lines 2-1 and 2-7 are growing better than the wild type, which does not correlate with Figure 6A. 9. qRT-PCR analysis of MaMRS2-9 has no error bars; what does it signify? Also, many other samples have no or negligible error bar, which cannot be true for three biological replicates. The authors did not mention technical replicates. Tubulin primers used in the current study are new or from the previous study? If from the previous study needs a reference. ********** 6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: No Reviewer #2: Yes: Ritesh Kumar [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.] While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step. |
| Revision 1 |
|
PONE-D-20-02641R1 Identification and functional analysis of the CorA/MGT/MRS2-type magnesium transporter in banana PLOS ONE Dear Dr. Huang, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Please incorporate suggestions of reviewer 2 in the revised manuscript. Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 14 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file. Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter. If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Kind regards, Anil Kumar Singh, Ph.D. Academic Editor PLOS ONE [Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.] Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation. Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed ********** 2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 6. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: (No Response) Reviewer #2: Authors have addressed all the comments and quality of manuscript is now acceptable. Authors may include this response in Discussion: Comment8. The authors did complementation assay with MM281 mutant. Figure 6A: Why the growth of complemented lines is low in higher concentration of magnesium as compare to Mutant (MaMRS2-4, MaMRS2-7), as Complemented lines are growing fine in lower concentrations. Response: We speculate that the growth of the transformants has an optimal concentration. the genes from banana may be less efficient under high Mg condition when compared with that from bacteria, while they are similar under low Mg conditions. English quality is much better than the first version. Also statistical analysis is now clear and acceptable. ********** 7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: No Reviewer #2: Yes: Ritesh Kumar [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.] While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step. |
| Revision 2 |
|
Identification and functional analysis of the CorA/MGT/MRS2-type magnesium transporter in banana PONE-D-20-02641R2 Dear Dr. Huang, We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements. Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication. An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org. Kind regards, Anil Kumar Singh, Ph.D. Academic Editor PLOS ONE Additional Editor Comments (optional): Reviewers' comments: |
| Formally Accepted |
|
PONE-D-20-02641R2 Identification and functional analysis of the CorA/MGT/MRS2-type magnesium transporter in banana Dear Dr. Huang: I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org. If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org. Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access. Kind regards, PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff on behalf of Dr. Anil Kumar Singh Academic Editor PLOS ONE |
Open letter on the publication of peer review reports
PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose to reveal their names.
We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions, to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research system.
Learn more at ASAPbio .