Peer Review History

Original SubmissionJanuary 30, 2020
Decision Letter - Anil Kumar Singh, Editor

PONE-D-20-02641

Identification and functional analysis of the CorA/MGT/MRS2-type magnesium transporter in banana

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Huang,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Jun 19 2020 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.
  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.
  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Anil Kumar Singh, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2.  PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels.

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions.

3. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

4. Please ensure that you refer to Figure 1 in your text as, if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the figure.

5. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: 1. The author said that these genes were not only involved in Mg uptake and transport, but also participated in Mg allocation among banana’s root, pseudo stem, corm, and leaf components,which required more biological experiments to support it

2.need adding bilogical stastics for q-PCR data

3. DISCUSSION should be rewritten.

4. writting and and orgnization should be further improved.

Reviewer #2: The authors characterized the Magnesium transporter MaMRS2 protein family. 10 MaMRS2 genes in banana (Musa acuminata) were identified. The physicochemical properties, location on chromosomes, gene structure, cisacting elements, and replication relationships between these ten members were analyzed. The tissue-specific expression pattern was analyzed. Three genes MaMRS2-1, MaMRS2-4, and MaMRS2-7 were cloned and complemented with triple MGT mutant of Salmonella typhimurium. This study could help in understanding the function of each MaMRS2 gene in development or stress conditions.

The manuscript is poorly written and needs to be largely reworked.

1. Rewrite the line: These results should be helpful to further research work on Mg transporters in banana crops.

2. The introduction is very messy, especially the expression summary of MGTs in different plants. Rewrite the introduction.

3. Units are missing: The isoelectric point of the predicted proteins and their corresponding amino acid length ranged respectively from 4.51 to 9.16 (pI) and from 379 to 495 (aa).

4. Rewrite: Figure 2 shows the phylogenetic tree built for Mg transporter protein sequences from banana, Arabidopsis, rice, maize, and yeast, with yeast Mg transporters as the outgroup.

5. Chromosomal location and gene duplication: Authors mentioned gene duplication as gene replication. (5 times). There is a difference between the two terms.

Also, in the discussion part: we found evidence for replication relationships that occurred between MaMRS2 family members across chromosomes but no signs of a tandem replication relationship (Fig. 4). This pattern generally exists among other gene family members of banana [32]. It is reasonable to speculate that multiple rounds of whole genome replication events have occurred over evolutionary time in banana.

6. Figure legends are not uploaded properly or incomplete:

Fig. 1 Multiple sequence alignments of MaMSR2 proteins. This alignment was performed using DNAMAN software. The identical, conserved, and less conserved

Fig. 2 Phylogenetic analysis of Arabidopsis, rice, maize, yeast, and banana CorA/MRS2/MGT members. The neighbor-joining tree, which includes 10 MaMRS2

Fig. 3 Phylogenetic relationships (A), gene structure (B), and motif analysis (C) of MaMRS2 family members in banana. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the

Fig. 4 Chromosomal location and gene duplication of MaMRS2 genes in the banana genome. The MaMRS2 gene is located on multiple chromosomes. The chromosome

Fig. 5 Predicted cis-acting elements in the promoter region of the 10 MaMRS2 genes in banana. Different colors represent cis-acting elements associated with different

Fig. 6 Complementary analysis of the MaMRS2 genes. MM1927 is the wild type, used here as a positive control; the MM281 and

Fig. 7 Expression of 10 MaMRS2 genes in different tissues of banana cultivar ‘Baxijiao’ (Musa spp. AAA Cavendish) seedlings. Explain the Abbreviations.

Fig. 8 Relative expression levels of 10 MaMRS2 genes in different tissues of banana cultivar ‘Baxijiao’ (Musa spp. AAA Cavendish) Explain the Abbreviations.

7. The author mentioned sequences of 7 genes:

Supplementary Test1 The nucleotide sequences of the seven MaMRS2 genes from sequencing

There are only three sequences >MaMRS2-1, >MaMRS2-4, >MaMRS2-7 as authors clones only three genes.

8. The authors did complementation assay with MM281 mutant.

Figure 6A: Why the growth of complemented lines is low in higher concentration of magnesium as compare to Mutant (MaMRS2-4, MaMRS2-7), as Complemented lines are growing fine in lower concentrations.

Figure 6B: Authors mentioned: The data are shown as the mean ± SD of three biological replicates,

However, no SD is shown on the line charts.

The growth curve at 0.01 mM Mg2+ shows that complementing lines 2-1 and 2-7 are growing better than the wild type, which does not correlate with Figure 6A.

9. qRT-PCR analysis of MaMRS2-9 has no error bars; what does it signify?

Also, many other samples have no or negligible error bar, which cannot be true for three biological replicates. The authors did not mention technical replicates. Tubulin primers used in the current study are new or from the previous study? If from the previous study needs a reference.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Ritesh Kumar

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Revision 1

Reviewer #1: 1. The author said that these genes were not only involved in Mg uptake and transport, but also participated in Mg allocation among banana’s root, pseudo stem, corm, and leaf components,which required more biological experiments to support it

Response: the original sentences“The contrasting expression pattern of different Mg transporter genes among differing tissues under Mg deficiency (Fig. 8) indicated these genes were not only involved in Mg uptake and transport, but also participated in Mg allocation among banana’s root, pseudo stem, corm, and leaf components”in page 7 line 21 - 24 changed to:

“The contrasting expression pattern of different Mg transporter genes among differing tissues under Mg deficiency (Fig. 8) indicated these genes is probably not only involved in Mg uptake and transport, but also participated in Mg allocation among different tissues.”in page 7 line 13 – 16 in the revised version.

2. need adding bilogical stastics for q-PCR data

Response:We analyzed the significance of q-PCR data, as shown in Figure 8.

3. DISCUSSION should be rewritten.

Response: We changed the 1-8 paragraphs in the original DISCUSSION to the 1-3 paragraphs in the revised version.

4. writting and orgnization should be further improved.

Response: We carefully read the manuscript and improved the writting in the revised version.

In the original version in page 1 line 10 – 11: “and the CorA/MGT/MRS2 family proteins are considered vital to this process.” was change to: “especially CorA/MGT/MRS2 family proteins, played a vital role in regulating Mg content in plant cells” in page 1 line 10 -11;

In the original version in page 1 line 12 – 13: “much less is known about it for tropical crops.” was change to: “the relevant information is scarce in tropical crops.” in page 1 line 11 - 12;

In the original version in page 1 line 15: “chromosomes” was change to: “chromosome” in page 1 line 15;

In the original version in page 1 line 18 – 19: “branches of the phylogenetic tree” was change to: “phylogenetic” in page 1 line 18;

In the original version in page 1 line 22 – 28: “Specifically, among the MaMRS2 genes, MaMRS2-2 was expressed only in the corm, and MaMRS2-6 was most expressed in the leaves. This result was confirmed by real-time PCR analysis which uncovered differential MaMRS2 gene expression under Mg2+ deficiency conditions, in that MaMRS2-5 and MaMRS2-7 were both up-regulated in stems, whereas MaMRS2-1 and MaMRS2-10 were down-regulated in roots, stems, and leaves. These results will contribute to the further study of Mg transporters in banana.”

was change to:

“The result was confirmed by real-time PCR analysis, in addition to tissue specific expression, expression differences among MaMRS2 members was also observed under Mg deficiency conditions. These results showed that Mg transporters may play a versatile role in banana growth and development, and our work will shed light on the functional analysis of Mg transporters in banana.” in page 1 line 21 - 26;

In the original version in page 2 line 1 - 4 “the concentration of Mg in metabolic pools, such as the cytoplasm and chloroplast, are strictly regulated, for which magnesium transporter (MGT) plays a vital role in maintaining the equilibrium and homeostasis of Mg2+ in plants [6, 7].” changed to “The concentration of Mg in metabolic pools, such as the cytoplasm and chloroplast, are strictly regulated. And magnesium transporter (MGT) plays a vital role in maintaining the equilibrium and homeostasis of Mg in plants [6, 7].” in page 1 line 37 – 38 and page 2 line 1 -2 in the revised version.

In the original version in page 5 line 24 - 29 “was” changed to “were” in page 5 line 17 – 19 in the revised version.

Reviewer #2: The authors characterized the Magnesium transporter MaMRS2 protein family. 10 MaMRS2 genes in banana (Musa acuminata) were identified. The physicochemical properties, location on chromosomes, gene structure, cis-acting elements, and replication relationships between these ten members were analyzed. The tissue-specific expression pattern was analyzed. Three genes MaMRS2-1, MaMRS2-4, and MaMRS2-7 were cloned and complemented with triple MGT mutant of Salmonella typhimurium. This study could help in understanding the function of each MaMRS2 gene in development or stress conditions.

The manuscript is poorly written and needs to be largely reworked.

Response:the original part in page 1 line 13-29 “In this study, 10 MaMRS2 genes in banana (Musa acuminata) were isolated from its sequenced genome and classified into five distinct clades. The physicochemical properties, location on chromosomes, gene structure, cis-acting elements, and duplication relationships between these 10 members were analyzed. Complementary experiments revealed that three MaMRS2 gene members (MaMRS2-1, MaMRS2-4, MaMRS2-7), from three distinct branches of the phylogenetic tree, were capable of restoring the function of Mg2+ transport in Salmonella typhimurium mutants. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR showed that the 10 members of the MaMRS2 gene were differentially expressed in the root, pseudo stem, corm, and leaves of banana cultivar ‘Baxijiao’ (Musa spp. AAA Cavendish) seedlings. Specifically, among the MaMRS2 genes, MaMRS2-2 was expressed only in the corm, and MaMRS2-6 was most expressed in the leaves. This result was confirmed by real-time PCR analysis which uncovered differential MaMRS2 gene expression under Mg2+ deficiency conditions, in that MaMRS2-5 and MaMRS2-7 were both up-regulated in stems, whereas MaMRS2-1 and MaMRS2-10 were down-regulated in roots, stems, and leaves. These results should be helpful to further research work on Mg transporters in banana crops.” changed to:

“In this study, 10 MaMRS2 genes in banana (Musa acuminata) were isolated from its genome and classified into five distinct clades. The putative physicochemical properties, chromosome location, gene structure, cis-acting elements, and duplication relationships in between these members were analyzed. Complementary experiments revealed that three MaMRS2 gene members (MaMRS2-1, MaMRS2-4, MaMRS2-7), from three distinct phylogenetic branches, were capable of restoring the function of Mg transport in Salmonella typhimurium mutants. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR showed that MaMRS2 genes were differentially expressed in banana cultivar ‘Baxijiao’ (Musa spp. AAA Cavendish) seedlings. The result was confirmed by real-time PCR analysis, in addition to tissue specific expression, expression differences among MaMRS2 members was also observed under Mg deficiency conditions. These results showed that Mg transporters may play a versatile role in banana growth and development, and our work will shed light on the functional analysis of Mg transporters in banana.” In page 1 line 13 -29 in the revised version

1. Rewrite the line: These results should be helpful to further research work on Mg transporters in banana crops.

Response:the original “These results should be helpful to further research work on Mg transporters in banana crops” in page 1 line 27 - 29 changed to:

“These results showed that Mg transporters may play a versatile role in banana growth and development, and our work will shed light on the functional analysis of Mg transporters in banana.” in page 1, line 24-26 in the revised version.

2. The introduction is very messy, especially the expression summary of MGTs in different plants. Rewrite the introduction.

Response: we have rewritten the INTRODUCTION.

The original sentence in page 1 line 32 – 33 “ During plant growth and development, magnesium (Mg) is essential and it cannot be substituted[1]” changed to:

“Magnesium (Mg) is essential in plant growth and development, and cannot be substituted[1].” In page 1 line 30 – 31 in the revised version;

The original sentence in page 1 line 34-36 “The major function of Mg in green leaves is forming the central atom of chlorophyll, Mg is also involved in protein synthesis as a bridging element for the aggregation of ribosome subunits [2], and functions as a stabilizer of specific conformation in nucleic acid synthesis [3]” changed to: “Mg is also involved in protein and nucleic acid synthesis, and it acts as a bridging element for the aggregation of ribosome subunits [2] and a conformation stabilizer [3] respectively.” In page 1 line 32 - 34 in the revised version;

The original sentence in page 2 line 1 – 4 “The concentration of Mg in metabolic pools, such as the cytoplasm and chloroplast, are strictly regulated, for which magnesium transporter (MGT) plays a vital role in maintaining the equilibrium and homeostasis of Mg2+ in plants [6, 7].” changed to: “The concentration of Mg in metabolic pools, such as the cytoplasm and chloroplast, are strictly regulated. And magnesium transporter (MGT) plays a vital role in maintaining the equilibrium and homeostasis of Mg in plants [6, 7].” In page 1 line 37 – 38 and page 2 line 1 – 2 in the revised version;

The expression summary of MGTs in different plants in the original part in page 2 second and third paragraphs changed to page 2 second paragraph in the revised version;

The original sentence in page 3 line 6 – 10 “Imbalanced fertilization practices aggravates the likelihood of Mg deficiency occurring in cultivated banana, such that Mg deficiency is now a major reason for reduced banana fruit yield [30]. Therefore, improving the efficiency of Mg utilization in banana has immediate practical significance. Clearly, MGT plays a vital role in Mg nutrition maintence in plant species.” changed to: “Imbalanced fertilization practices aggravates the likelihood of Mg deficiency, as a result, Mg deficiency is now a major contributor to banana yield reduction [30]. Therefore, improving the efficiency of Mg utilization in banana has immediate practical significance. Clearly, MGT plays a vital role in Mg nutrition maintenance in plants.” in page 2 line 41 – 44 and page 3 line 1 in the revised version;

3. Units are missing: The isoelectric point of the predicted proteins and their corresponding amino acid length ranged respectively from 4.51 to 9.16 (pI) and from 379 to 495 (aa).

Response: We have supplemented the corresponding units “Identification of MRS2 family genes in banana” ,the isoelectric point, the amino acid length and the molecular weight of the predicted proteins ranged from 4.51 to 9.16 (pI), from 379 to 495 (aa), and from 42.57 to 54.83 (kDa)” in Page 3 line 15 in the revised version.

4. Rewrite: Figure 2 shows the phylogenetic tree built for Mg transporter protein sequences from banana, Arabidopsis, rice, maize, and yeast, with yeast Mg transporters as the outgroup.

Response:the original sentence in page 5 line 4 - 6 “Figure 2 shows the phylogenetic tree built for Mg transporter protein sequences from banana, Arabidopsis, rice, maize, and yeast, with yeast Mg transporters as the outgroup” changed to:

“Phylogenetic trees were constructed using MGTs of banana, Arabidopsis, rice, maize and yeast. Among them, MGTs of yeast was selected as the outgroup (Fig. 2)”. In Page 5, line 3 – 4 in the revised version.

5. Chromosomal location and gene duplication: Authors mentioned gene duplication as gene replication. (5 times). There is a difference between the two terms.

Also, in the discussion part: we found evidence for replication relationships that occurred between MaMRS2 family members across chromosomes but no signs of a tandem replication relationship (Fig. 4). This pattern generally exists among other gene family members of banana [32]. It is reasonable to speculate that multiple rounds of whole genome replication events have occurred over evolutionary time in banana.

Response: we modified “replication” in page 5 line 39 = 42 and page 6 line 1 to “duplication” in page 5 line 37 – 42 (5 times) in the revised version.

Also, the original sentence “This pattern generally exists among other gene family members of banana [32]. It is reasonable to speculate that multiple rounds of whole genome replication events have occurred over evolutionary time in banana.” in page 8 line 14 -16 changed to:

“Genomic collinearity showed that duplication relationships occurred between MaMRS2 family members across chromosomes, but no signs of a tandem duplication relationship (Fig. 4), a pattern generally exists among other gene family members of banana” in the revised version.

6. Figure legends are not uploaded properly or incomplete:

Fig. 1 Multiple sequence alignments of MaMSR2 proteins. This alignment was performed using DNAMAN software. The identical, conserved, and less conserved

Fig. 2 Phylogenetic analysis of Arabidopsis, rice, maize, yeast, and banana CorA/MRS2/MGT members. The neighbor-joining tree, which includes 10 MaMRS2

Fig. 3 Phylogenetic relationships (A), gene structure (B), and motif analysis (C) of MaMRS2 family members in banana. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the

Fig. 4 Chromosomal location and gene duplication of MaMRS2 genes in the banana genome. The MaMRS2 gene is located on multiple chromosomes. The chromosome

Fig. 5 Predicted cis-acting elements in the promoter region of the 10 MaMRS2 genes in banana. Different colors represent cis-acting elements associated with different

Fig. 6 Complementary analysis of the MaMRS2 genes. MM1927 is the wild type, used here as a positive control; the MM281 and

Fig. 7 Expression of 10 MaMRS2 genes in different tissues of banana cultivar ‘Baxijiao’ (Musa spp. AAA Cavendish) seedlings. Explain the Abbreviations.

Fig. 8 Relative expression levels of 10 MaMRS2 genes in different tissues of banana cultivar ‘Baxijiao’ (Musa spp. AAA Cavendish) Explain the Abbreviations.

Response: We have uploaded the complete Figure legends.

Fig.1 Multiple sequence alignments of MaMSR2 proteins. Alignment was performed using DNAMAN software. The identical, conserved and less conserved amino acid residues are indicated by dark, cherry red and cyan background colors, respectively. The conservative GMN motif was indicated and the TM domains are underlined.

Fig.2 Phylogenetic analysis of Arabidopsis, rice, maize, yeast and banana CorA/MRS2/MGT members. The Neighbor-Joining tree, which includes 10 MaMRS2 protein from banana, 11 MRS2/MGT proteins from Arabidopsis, 9 MRS2/MGT proteins from rice, 12 MRS2/MGT proteins from maize and 5 MRS2/MGT proteins from yeast, was constructed using MEGA X. A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H represent the different clades of the MRS2/MGT family in these five species.

Fig.3 Phylogenetic relationships (A), gene structure (B) and motif analysis (C) of MaMRS2 family members. The Phylogenetic tree was constructed using the Neighbor-Joining method with 1000 bootstrap replicates in the MEGA X software. Then the gene structure was performed using GSDS program. MEME program and TBTools were used to illustrate the motif analysis results. Yellow boxes and black lines represent exons and introns, respectively, blue boxes indicate 5’ or 3’ untranslated regions (UTRs) and different motif was painted with different color.

Fig.4 Chromosomal location and gene duplication of MaMRS2 genes in the banana genome. The MaMRS2 gene is located on different chromosomes. The number of chromosomes is shown on the outside, and the different colors represent different chromosomes. The grey region is the collinearity of the banana genome, highlighting the collinearity between the MaMRS2 genes was highlighted with red lines.

Fig.5 Analysis of cis-acting elements of members of the MaMRS2 gene family. Different colors represent cis-acting elements of different functions.

Fig.6 Complementary analysis of the MaMRS2 genes. MM1927 was the wild type and used as a positive control, MM281 and MM281 transformed with an empty pTrc99A were used as negative controls. (A) Functional verification on N minimal solid medium containing 20, 10, 5, 2, 1, 0.5, 0.1, 0.01 mM MgSO4. The bacterial was diluted sequentially 10-fold from left to right. (B) Growth curves were performed in N-minimal liquid medium containing 10, 1, 0.5 and 0.01mM MgSO4, and the cell density was monitored at OD600 every 2 hours. Data was an average of three independent experiments, and the different icons in the figure represent the average of three repetitions.

Fig.7 Expression of MaMRS2 gene in different tissues of Baxijiao seedlings. UL, LL, PS, C and R represent upper leaf, lower leaf, pseudo stem, corm and root respectively.

Fig.8 Relative expression level of MaMRS2 gene in different tissues of Baxijiao seedlings under magnesium deficiency. The CK indicated the value under normal growth conditions as a control, and the -Mg indicated the relative expression level under the complete absence of magnesium ion condition. UL, LL, PS, C and R represent upper leaf, lower leaf, pseudo stem, corm and root respectively.

7. The author mentioned sequences of 7 genes:

Supplementary Test1 The nucleotide sequences of the seven MaMRS2 genes from sequencing

There are only three sequences >MaMRS2-1, >MaMRS2-4, >MaMRS2-7 as authors clones only three genes.

Response: The original “Supplementary Test1 The nucleotide sequences of the seven MaMRS2 genes from sequencing” changed to “Supplementary Test1 The nucleotide sequences of the three MaMRS2 genes from sequencing” see Supplementary test1.

8. The authors did complementation assay with MM281 mutant.

Figure 6A: Why the growth of complemented lines is low in higher concentration of magnesium as compare to Mutant (MaMRS2-4, MaMRS2-7), as Complemented lines are growing fine in lower concentrations.

Response: We speculate that the growth of the transformants has an optimal concentration. the genes from banana may be less efficient under high Mg condition when compared with that from bacteria, while they are similar under low Mg conditions.

Figure 6B: Authors mentioned: The data are shown as the mean ± SD of three biological replicates,

However, no SD is shown on the line charts.

Response: “The data are shown as the mean ± SD of three biological replicates,” in page 12 line 19 changed to “The data are shown as the mean of three biological replicates,” in page 11 line 4 in the revised version.

The growth curve at 0.01 mM Mg2+ shows that complementing lines 2-1 and 2-7 are growing better than the wild type, which does not correlate with Figure 6A.

Response: We carefully checked the original data and found that there were errors in the data processing. Now we have corrected the original data. Figure 6B 0.01mm is corrected (please see the revised figure 6B):

9. qRT-PCR analysis of MaMRS2-9 has no error bars; what does it signify? Also, many other samples have no or negligible error bar, which cannot be true for three biological replicates. The authors did not mention technical replicates.

Response: The histogram in Figure 8 is the average of three technical repetitions with 3 biological replicates, we revised it in the new manuscript with error bars added.

Tubulin primers used in the current study are new or from the previous study? If from the previous study needs a reference.

Response: Tubulin primers used in the current study are from the previous study, The reference was in Page 12, line 29 - 31 “The expression level of each MaMRS2 gene was calculated using the 2-ΔCt method, for which the TUB gene served as the internal reference [56]”. See Reference: 56. Podevin N, Krauss A, Henry I, Swennen R, Remy S. Selection and validation of reference genes for quantitative RT-PCR expression studies of the non-model crop Musa. Mol Breeding. 30(3): 1237-1252.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-012-9711-1 PMID: 23024595.

Also, we carefully read our original article and found some mistakes, as follows:

the original sentences in page 6 line 2“The Ka/Ks of five homologous Mg transporters was < 0.3 (Supplementary Table S1);” have changed to “The Ka/Ks of five homologous Mg transporters was less than 0.3 (Supplementary Table S1);”in page 5 line 43-44 in the revised version.

Attachments
Attachment
Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx
Decision Letter - Anil Kumar Singh, Editor

PONE-D-20-02641R1

Identification and functional analysis of the CorA/MGT/MRS2-type magnesium transporter in banana

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Huang,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please incorporate suggestions of reviewer 2 in the revised manuscript.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 14 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.
  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.
  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Anil Kumar Singh, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Authors have addressed all the comments and quality of manuscript is now acceptable. Authors may include this response in Discussion:

Comment8. The authors did complementation assay with MM281 mutant.

Figure 6A: Why the growth of complemented lines is low in higher concentration of

magnesium as compare to Mutant (MaMRS2-4, MaMRS2-7), as Complemented lines

are growing fine in lower concentrations.

Response: We speculate that the growth of the transformants has an optimal

concentration. the genes from banana may be less efficient under high Mg condition

when compared with that from bacteria, while they are similar under low Mg

conditions.

English quality is much better than the first version.

Also statistical analysis is now clear and acceptable.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Ritesh Kumar

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Revision 2

Reviewer #2:

1.Authors may include this response in Discussion:

Comment8. The authors did complementation assay with MM281 mutant.

Figure 6A: Why the growth of complemented lines is low in higher concentration of

magnesium as compare to Mutant (MaMRS2-4, MaMRS2-7), as Complemented lines

are growing fine in lower concentrations.

Response:

In the reviewed manuscript at the end of the second paragraph of the discussion, we added the following:

The complementary lines incorporated with MaMRS2-4 and MaMRS2-7 could grow well under low Mg concentration conditions, but they had lower growth rate when compared with the mutant control under solid growth medium with higher Mg concentration (10 mM and 20 mM) (Fig. 6A). These results indicated that both MaMRS2-4 and MaMRS2-7could transport Mg, at the same time, the exogenous Mg transporters from banana might play its role in excessive Mg accumulation and lead to the toxic effect in bacteria under high Mg conditions.

2.Also, we carefully read our original article and found some mistakes, as follows:

The “physicochemical” was changed to “physiochemical” in page 1 line 15;

“was” was changed were” in page 1 line 23;

“isocitrate-lyase” was changed “isocitrate lyase” page 1 line 35;

“RuBP carboxylase” was changed “ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase” in page 2 line 36;

“diversed” was changed “diverse” in page 2 line 35;

“Protiens” was changed “proteins” in page 9 line 6;

“Figure. 6 A” was changed “Fig. 6” in page 9 line 7;

“Ca(NO3)·4H2O” was changed “Ca(NO3)2·4H2O” in page 11 line 20

“Chen C, Xia R, Chen H, He Y. TBtools, a Toolkit for Biologists integrating various HTS-data handling tools with a user-friendly interface. bioRxiv. 2018: 289660. https://doi.org/10.1101/289660.” was changed to “Chen C, Chen H, Zhang Y, et al. TBtools-an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data[J]. bioRxiv, 2020: 289660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.009” in page 16 line 15-17.

Attachments
Attachment
Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx
Decision Letter - Anil Kumar Singh, Editor

Identification and functional analysis of the CorA/MGT/MRS2-type magnesium transporter in banana

PONE-D-20-02641R2

Dear Dr. Huang,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Anil Kumar Singh, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Formally Accepted
Acceptance Letter - Anil Kumar Singh, Editor

PONE-D-20-02641R2

Identification and functional analysis of the CorA/MGT/MRS2-type magnesium transporter in banana

Dear Dr. Huang:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Anil Kumar Singh

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Open letter on the publication of peer review reports

PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose to reveal their names.

We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions, to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research system.

Learn more at ASAPbio .