Peer Review History
| Original SubmissionJanuary 20, 2020 |
|---|
|
PONE-D-20-01785 Effect of diurnal intermittent fasting during Ramadan on ghrelin, leptin, melatonin, and cortisol levels among overweight and obese subjects: A prospective observational study PLOS ONE Dear Dr. MoezAlIslam E Faris Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Based on the comments of the expert reviews , kindly do the revision of the manuscript and resubmit to this journal . Please submit your revised manuscript by Jul 30 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file. Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter. If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Kind regards, Nayanatara Arun Kumar Academic Editor PLOS ONE Journal Requirements: When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements. 1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 2. lease ensure that your related article ( Madkour, Mohamed I., et al. "Effect of Ramadan diurnal fasting on visceral adiposity and serum adipokines in overweight and obese individuals." Diabetes research and clinical practice 153 (2019): 166-175.) is adequately mentioned in the present submission, and the rationale of these separate analyses is clearly discussed (for more information on PLOS ONE criteria on related manuscripts , please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-related-manuscripts ) . 3. Thank you for stating the following in your Competing Interests section: 'Declaration of Competing Interest: None' Please complete your Competing Interests on the online submission form to state any Competing Interests. If you have no competing interests, please state "The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.", as detailed online in our guide for authors at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submit-now This information should be included in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf. Please know it is PLOS ONE policy for corresponding authors to declare, on behalf of all authors, all potential competing interests for the purposes of transparency. PLOS defines a competing interest as anything that interferes with, or could reasonably be perceived as interfering with, the full and objective presentation, peer review, editorial decision-making, or publication of research or non-research articles submitted to one of the journals. Competing interests can be financial or non-financial, professional, or personal. Competing interests can arise in relationship to an organization or another person. Please follow this link to our website for more details on competing interests: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests 4. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts: a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially identifying or sensitive patient information) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent. b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. Please see http://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c181.long for guidelines on how to de-identify and prepare clinical data for publication. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide. 5. Please amend the manuscript submission data (via Edit Submission) to include author Fatima Alhasan. 6. Please amend your authorship list in your manuscript file to include author Fatima Alali. [Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.] Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: Partly Reviewer #2: Yes Reviewer #3: Yes Reviewer #4: Yes Reviewer #5: Yes Reviewer #6: Partly ********** 2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: No Reviewer #2: Yes Reviewer #3: No Reviewer #4: I Don't Know Reviewer #5: No Reviewer #6: I Don't Know ********** 3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes Reviewer #3: Yes Reviewer #4: Yes Reviewer #5: Yes Reviewer #6: Yes ********** 4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes Reviewer #3: Yes Reviewer #4: No Reviewer #5: Yes Reviewer #6: Yes ********** 5. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: This study measured the effect of diurnal intermittent fasting (DIF) during Ramadan on ghrelin, leptin, melatonin, and cortisol levels among overweight and obese subjects. The study examined hormone levels (salvia/serum), weight, body type in 57 individuals over a 28 day period. Data points for each individual were collected one week before and after the period of DIF. The authors found that DIF during Ramadan significantly altered serum levels of ghrelin, melatonin, and serum leptin, and then concluded that these altered hormone levels may impact the circadian rhythms of overweight and obese fasting people. Major point: *The authors have identified 57 individuals and assessed each subject for bodyweight/composition, blood hormonal levels, and more. Considering the variability of each individual and that the authors have before and after data for each subject, why were the measurements the subjects and time points averaged? Comparisons of subjects would provide quite a bit more insight to changes observed. A direct relationship of the caloric intake for each individual would be helpful in identifying changes measured. (see data presentation below) *It seems that averaging all measurements from the subjects could hide specific results for each subject. If combining, then the data must be normalized to be compared. *Timescale/points – Did the authors consider more intermittent testing rather than one test at the beginning of the study and one test at the end? Could regular testing within the study show trends/rates or changes earlier than 28 days? What if there are more extreme changes in hormone within one week of DIF initiation that they are missing and by waiting 28 days, those levels have leveled off or become more normal? *According to the data, subjects appeared to consume the same amount of calories before and during DIF. Did the authors link calorie consumption to each individual? Was there direct monitoring of calories or only self-reporting? Are the caloric intake levels reported characteristic of subjects who are obese? Is It possible to supply individuals the same type of food/water and adjust according caloric needs? *Controls. Is it possible to perform the same experiments on subjects who are eating the same food but not participating in DIF? Do they also experience the same changes or not? *Did the authors test for levels of estrogen and testosterone for each individual? They state that levels of these two hormones affect levels of leptin. Therefore, if that’s correct, those levels should be measured at the beginning of the study for each. *Data presentation: Tables combining means and SD from subjects provide exact data, but visualization of the changes and significance of the studies would be better displayed as histograms or even better, scatter plots where each data point can be viewed in relation to the mean. I believe that this work is extremely interesting, not only to dieticians but also to the public at large. Reviewer #2: I appreciate this invitation to review manuscript by MoezAlIslam E Faris et al. entitled: “Effect of diurnal intermittent fasting during Ramadan on ghrelin, leptin, melatonin, and cortisol levels among overweight and obese subjects: A prospective observational study" submitted to PLOS ONE. MoezAlIslam E Faris et al. investigated the effects of diurnal intermittent fasting during Ramadan on ghrelin, leptin, melatonin, and cortisol levels in 57 overweight and obese subjects, as well as to determine how anthropometric, dietary and lifestyle changes during Ramadan correlate with the hormonal changes. The article is quite well written, a study design is simple but quite well planned, and results show interesting findings. However, I have also some minor comments: 1. Introduction- the circadian rhythm should be explained briefly, as well as its importance and role in the metabolic/energy balance regulation. 2. Page 3, “In their critical review (…)” the reference is missed. 3. Page 4, citations are missed. 4. Leptin is described at page 12, next is about ghrelin, and then, at page16 again about leptin, please put it in the thematic order. Reviewer #3: Dear Editor, the submitted manuscript is very interesting and one of the few studies in the area of diurnal intermittent fasting. It is very well written and all the required information is well reported. the author has started the abstract and introduction by focusing on relationship between the selected hormones and cicardian rhythm, however the aim of the study is to study the changes in these hormones before after Ramadan. the hormone melatonin and cortisol may be strongly correlated to sleeping pattern but ghrelin and leptin are also strongly related to huger and satiety(which is not reported in the study) . Since the study is intending to see the relationship between these hormones and ramadan and attribute this affect to change in sleeping pattern, the statistical test used of spearmans correlation is very weak as it does not take into consideration the confounders. Regression analysis could be a stronger statistical test. the study design as prospective study, however it is a before after or quasi-experimental study design. since all the 4 hormones are considered as primary objective, did the author take into consideration the bonferroni correction? the sleeping pattern is represented by total sleeping hours, maybe day and night hours sleeping could also be reported as Ramadan sleeping pattern reduces night sleeping hours and increases day sleeping hours. Reviewer #4: Although the article is written with clear English, it is not easy to read. The introduction is too long. This is mainly because there are multiple parameters to introduce (circadian rhythm, the hormones, dietary habits etc.). Especially on the second page, the introduction evolves to a discussion. Study aims to show the effect of Ramadan on serum levels of ghrelin, leptin, melatonin and salivary cortisol in a group of overweight and obese subjects and seek for correlations with lifestyle changes. Subjects were recruited using social media outlets. Were they paid? How would they correspond to the general population? Especially female subjects were clearly less and middle aged. A control group would have shown if the differences attributed to Ramadan in overweight subjects are also present in normal population, or are they different? For statistical analysis were all data parametric? Second paragraph of the discussion belongs to introduction. In fact the discussion doesn't discuss the results of this study, but it explains other studies until the paragraph about ghrelin. Authors explain increased ghrelin levels with increased fat and carbohydrate consuming habits in Ramadan however subjects lost weight and their metabolic parameters ameliorated. What was the point of including cortisol in this study? Cortisol levels are measured accurately at midnight with salivary measurement. Random cortisol measurement may not reflect cortisol levels optimally. Also cortisol is mostly affected from circadian rhythm, authors may want to explain why it did not differ in Ramadan. Reviewer #5: The study by Al-Rawi and colleagues investigates the effect of Ramadan fasting on ghrelin, leptin, melatonin and cortisol in overweight and obese subjects. As the authors have pointed out, several changes accompany the Ramadan fast, and these include sleeping patterns and circadian rhythms. As such, a weakness of the presented study is the fact that blood (or saliva in the case of cortisol) samples were only taken at one single time point (8-10 hours after previous meal). The study therefore comes up with no information on what changes to these hormones may be at other times of the day. In more detail: Introduction-This is fine. Methods- "None of the subjects reported having had sleeping problems". Given the fact that obstructive sleep apnoea and sleeping disorders are highly prevalent among the obese, a more objective attempt at screening for sleep apnoea and other sleeping disorders (such as STOP-BANG questionnaire) would have been useful. If this was not done, a discussion of this and its potential implications should be included in the discussion section. Study Design- "subjects were instructed not to alter their habitual physical exercise levels before or during Ramadan". In practice this would be very difficult. Was any attempt made at measuring physical activity. If not, please mention and discuss the implications of this in the discussion section. Anthropometric assessment Please include statement on accuracy and reference on validation of the bio-impedance method used. Neck circumference is reported in table 1. No mention of how this was measured is included in Methods section. Blood sampling and lipid and hormone assays "immunosorbence". Please correct to "immunosorbent". Cortisol measurement was from saliva. Please include a statement about sample collection and precautions taken to ensure reliability. Dietary intake assessment- "24-hour recall". Please include a statement about reliability of these and also the software used. Reference? Statistical analysis- "Two-tailed paired sample t-tests..." Were data normally distributed? Please include a statement on this. Results: "BMI 29.89". Unit? Also inappropriate decimals. Suggest change to 29.9 kg/m2. "89.48%". Suggest change to "89.9%". Page 11. Line 8. "The male sex...". Suggest change to "Male sex...". Plasma levels of lipids and hormones: Were the reported changes in hormones independent of weight (and also of sleep duration)? Discussion: This section needs to discuss the study findings in more depth. Comparison with previous studies should be more comprehensive. In the case of cortisol for example, some important papers on changes in cortisol circadian rhythm have not been mentioned. In the case of leptin, as mentioned above, statistical analysis should look into whether changes in leptin with Ramadan fasting are weight and body fat independent. The authors have specifically investigated the obese and the overweight, there is no discussion of how similar, or different the findings of this study are from those in normal weight subjects. Tables: Two decimals have been reported for all parameters in the tables. Please consider whether this is appropriate. Oxygen saturation is almost identical for T1 & T2; yet the difference is highly significant statistically (p<0.001). Please check this again. Moreover, what was the reason for checking Oxygen saturation? What are the theoretical grounds for expecting a difference? Highly significant changes in LDL and HDL cholesterol have been reported in table 3, but not discussed at all in the discussion section. References: Please see note above on discussion. In summary: Good effort by the authors. For a study of hormones affected by circadian rhythms, single time points comparisons in pre- and post-Ramadan periods (as opposed to multiple, or at least two-point comparisons) is the most important weakness. This has been acknowledged by the authors. Further in-depth analysis of the findings of the study are suggested. Reviewer #6: PONE-D-20-01785 Title: Effect of diurnal intermittent fasting during Ramadan on ghrelin, leptin, melatonin, and cortisol levels among overweight and obese subjects: A prospective observational study 1- Abstract • organize by adding background, methods, results, conclusion • In methods, change this sentence « at fixed times of the day » by another one giving the hour of sampling • Give details in the results paragraph: Give the time about « serum levels of ghrelin, melatonin, and leptin significantly» • Give results on sleep (result of Stanford Health Care Sleep Questionnaire) • The conclusion at the end of the abstract : “which may impact the circadian rhythmicity of overweight and obese fasting people” is not accurate because authors did not study circadian rhythm since they have made the assessment at one time point (From 11 am To 1 pm) 2- Introduction • Replace reference 3 by another one more general about the relation between food and circadian clock. • Replace reference 5 which is not about Ramadan fasting, give a review or original article on Ramadan and chronobiology • Replace reference 7 with another on dietary habits and Ramadan, done in different Islamic countries • Reference 8 is not complete, add ref of an original article on sleep and Ramadan Paragraph 2: make sentences shorter Paragraph 5 need to be change to make it more clear, and more organized 3- Methods • First paragraph line 10 : replace the verb eliminated • Second paragraph : give details about criteria : regular sleep/wake schedule • In the paragraph entitled anthropometric assessment, authors written that subjects were assessed in the late morning (11:00 am-1:00 pm) after fasting for eight to ten hours. This means that food intake at the previous night could be at 1 or 3 am, which means that sleep in control days was very delayed and not “regular” as mentioned in including criteria 4- Results • Table 4 : All these correlations just make the reading difficult, they are not all necessary; make it shorter in term of data • Discussion The discussion is too long and focused on the result of others study. Authors need to discuss more their own results, particularly some limitations which will allow the reader to make the right conclusions • The Most important limitation was choosing one point at 11 am or 1 pm to determine the effect of Ramadan on melatonin and cortisol. The previous studies showed that the effect of Ramadan on these two hormones was an increase by night and a decrease in the morning. So the experimental design of this study will not allow to know the real effect of Ramadan on melatonin or cortisol. Thus the authors must always gave the time of saliva intake and they need to discuss this limitation • Authors did not study the circadian rhythm, so in the first paragraph line 6, authors could not write: “circadian rhythms such as ghrelin, leptin, and melatonin were significantly reduced at the end of the fasting. To do such a study authors need several sampling time a cross the 24H. • About change in melatonin, authors compared Ramadan fasting and experimental one and cited the ref 37. This reference is not about experimental fasting and could not be used to argue this comparison. • This study did not gave a reliable result about melatonin; since this hormone is secreted by night and it is normally very low by day. So we don’t expect reliable result if we study it with one time point in the morning • I recommend to the authors to reduce the part reserved in the discussion to cortisol and melatonin. Specially that this study did not use the appropriate time to measure these 2 hormones • Paragraph 4 line 4 : ref 31 not appropriate because not related to intermittent fasting • The conclusion must be changed. It did not reflect the result. For example the result showed significant correlations between some variables ********** 6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: No Reviewer #2: No Reviewer #3: No Reviewer #4: No Reviewer #5: No Reviewer #6: No [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.] While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step. |
| Revision 1 |
|
Effect of diurnal intermittent fasting during Ramadan on ghrelin, leptin, melatonin, and cortisol levels among overweight and obese subjects: A prospective observational study PONE-D-20-01785R1 Dear authors We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements. Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication. An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org. Kind regards, Nayanatara Arun Kumar Academic Editor PLOS ONE Additional Editor Comments (optional): Dear authors My sincere aplogize for the delay in the decision .The reviewers commentes has been done and rectified in the manuscript . So this manuscript can be accepted in this prestigious journal.Congragulations to you all with regards and Best wishes Dr. Nayanatara Arun Kumar Associate Profeesor in Physiology Kasturba Medical COllege, Mangalore Reviewers' comments: |
Open letter on the publication of peer review reports
PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose to reveal their names.
We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions, to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research system.
Learn more at ASAPbio .