Peer Review History
| Original SubmissionApril 23, 2020 |
|---|
|
PONE-D-20-11741 Facile, one-pot biosynthesis and characterization of iron, copper and silver nanoparticles using Syzygium cumini leaf extract: As an effective antimicrobial and aflatoxin B1 adsorption agents PLOS ONE Dear Dr Asghar, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Jul 02 2020 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file. If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out. We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Kind regards, Mohammad A. Al-Ghouti Academic Editor PLOS ONE Journal Requirements: When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements. 1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and [Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.] Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: N/A Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 5. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: Attached file Minor – 1. Line number 47 and 55 – they should add “and”. 2. Line number 61 – “Although about 20 AFs have been discovered”; it looks incomplete. 3. Line number 79 – reference format 4. The editor could ask for better resolution or contrast of images. If possible they could add statistical particle distribution of metal – nanoparticles. 5. In FTIR study – they should provide reference for Fe – O stretching. 6. UV – Visible study should be discussed in details and should provide appropriate reference for absorption peak as it is a signature peak for metal nanoparticles. 7. Please provide supporting reference for section 3.4.4 (Effect of contact time) and 3.4.5 (Effect of incubation temperature). 8. Reference for “he calculation of three isotherm models such as Langmuir, Freundlich and Dubinin–Radushkevich (D-R)”. 9. More analysis and supporting reference needed for section 3.7 kinetic study. 10. Kinetic study and thermodynamic parameters needs more explanation. 11. For supporting document the editor can ask for procedure to estimate parameters in Table – 4 , Table – 5 and Table – 6. 12. Figure captions need to be modified a. For example Figure I - SEM images of metal nanoparticles (a) iron (b) copper (c) and silver nanoparticles - (c) should be after ‘and’ (do in all captions) 13. Please provide better quality of TEM images (with proper brightness and contrast ration) - Reviewer #2: The authors presented Facile, one-pot biosynthesis and characterization of iron, copper and silver nanoparticles using Syzygium cumini leaf extract: As an effective antimicrobial and aflatoxin B1 adsorption agents. The work is okay with minor correction as stated below. The work can be accepted after the minor corrections 1. Section 2.1, line 1 About 10 g of chopped leaves were accurately weighed and boiled in the presence of 100 mL of Section 2.3.1, line 2 ….a concentration between of 1‒512 µg mL-1 was prepared in 10 mL of 0.8% (w v-1) nutrient broth 133 2. Section 2.5, line 1&2 The adsorption of aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) with NPs with studied as a were studied following the previously defined method with some modifications (15). 3. After equation one Where, where 4. Section 3.1Line 9&10 The volume of the leaf extracts directly influences on the size of the NPs 5. Section 3.1 Paragraph 7 line 3-5 It was occur caused by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and verifying that the available leaves protein plays a significant role as a template as well as preservative during synthesis route. (This sentence is ambiguous kindly re-cast) 6. Conclusion, line 2&3 Ag-NPs the promising potential to reveal the excellent antibacterial and antifungal effect and inhibit the AFs production. (This sentence is ambiguous kindly re-cast) 7. Conclusion, line 3 In addition, Fe-NPs showed the higher highest adsorption capacity with 8. Acknowledgement The authors thankfully are thankful to the Feed and Feed Safety Laboratory, FMRRC, PCSIR Laboratories 9. The introduction lack current citation. The suggested articles below should be added to the introduction 1. Materials Chemistry and Physics 237:121859 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.121859 2. Polym Res (2019) 26: 225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-019-1897-z 3. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology Volume 199, October 2019, 111601 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2019.111601 4. Appl Nanosci (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-019-01099-x 5. Surfaces and Interfaces Volume 17, December 2019, 100359 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2019.100359 6. European Polymer Journal 2020, 122:109371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.109371 7. Applied Physics A 2020, 126:72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-019-3249-6 8. Surfaces and Interfaces, 18, 100419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2019.100419 9. General English and grammar correction should be done, few has been suggested above ********** 6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: Yes: Amol Nande Reviewer #2: No [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.] While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.
|
| Revision 1 |
|
Facile, one-pot biosynthesis and characterization of iron, copper and silver nanoparticles using Syzygium cumini leaf extract: As an effective antimicrobial and aflatoxin B1 adsorption agents PONE-D-20-11741R1 Dear Dr. Asghar, We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements. Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication. An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org. Kind regards, Mohammad A. Al-Ghouti Academic Editor PLOS ONE Additional Editor Comments (optional): Please adjust the minor edits raised by the reviewer 2. Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation. Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed ********** 2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 6. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: It sound OK to me. All comments are addressed properly. They added the references and performed the required changes also. The TEM diagram changed to good pixel. Thank you for consideration Reviewer #2: The authors should see attached file for my comments. Little corrections are needed. try and effect them corretly ********** 7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: Yes: Amol Nande Reviewer #2: No |
| Formally Accepted |
|
PONE-D-20-11741R1 Facile, one-pot biosynthesis and characterization of iron, copper and silver nanoparticles using Syzygium cumini leaf extract: As an effective antimicrobial and aflatoxin B1 adsorption agents Dear Dr. Asghar: I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org. If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org. Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access. Kind regards, PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff on behalf of Dr. Mohammad A. Al-Ghouti Academic Editor PLOS ONE |
Open letter on the publication of peer review reports
PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose to reveal their names.
We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions, to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research system.
Learn more at ASAPbio .