Peer Review History
| Original SubmissionApril 20, 2020 |
|---|
|
PONE-D-20-09705 Super-Resolution Reconstruction of Real Infrared Images Acquired with Unmanned Aerial Vehicle PLOS ONE Dear Mr Sun, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Jul 02 2020 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file. If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out. We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Kind regards, Zhihan Lv, Ph.D. Academic Editor PLOS ONE Journal Requirements: When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements. 1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf 2. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ 3. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information. [Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.] Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: Partly Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 5. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: The problem of low infrared imaging resolution limits the application of UAVs in target recognition and other fields to some extent. To this end, the combination of high-resolution image acquisition and low-resolution image processing, and the design of UAV flight optimization path schemes, the preservation of image edge features and the improvement of spatial resolution, as well as the application of the SR method in the field of UAV target recognition play an active role. At the same time, it has promoted the application of UAVs in target detection. But before the paper is published, there are still some shortcomings that need further improvement. The author is suggested to read the full text carefully and make appropriate adjustments to the structure of the paper. 1.The introduction of the paper is relatively tedious for the relevant expressions of the basic theories. It is recommended that the author reduce the content of this part appropriately, or start a paragraph to explain the research basis of the paper. In the introduction of the paper, the content related to the research progress worldwide should be highlighted. 2.In the last paragraph of the introduction of the paper, the author is suggested to add the research purpose and content, as well as express the research structure in detail. 3.In the introduction of the paper, the expression "In our work, a lp norm-based regularization function is proposed against weak edge preservation of IR images, which fits the sparse characters of IR images and achieve fast-convergence performance" appears. It is recommended that the author add the citation of references related to regularization functions here to support the research work of the paper. 4.For all the letter symbols appearing in the paper, the meanings of them should be explained, such as "Vk" and "Wk" in equation (1). Please check the full text and modify it. 5.In the establishment of the three-stage SR method of the paper, the expression "Considering that singular value decomposition (SVD) is advanced in data simplification as well as noise elimination" appears. The author is suggested to add the citation of references in the corresponding field here to provide support for the subsequent research of the paper. Reviewer #2: This paper proposes a method combining high-level image acquisition and low-level SR processing. During the integration process, UAV path optimization, sub-pixel image registration and sparse constraints are combined into the computational imaging framework of the region of interest (ROI). At the same time, the optimal flight control scheme is designed to optimize ROI complementary feathers and obtain sufficient image sequences from multiple angles. In particular, the phase correlation method is used to achieve reliable sub-pixel image feature matching. On this basis, an effective sparse regularization model is established to enhance the fine structure of infrared images. Experimental results of actual infrared sequences show that the algorithm has good performance in edge preservation and detail enhancement, and provides a very promising computational imaging method for obtaining high-resolution images. The paper should make the following amendments before publication: 1: The abstract is a relatively independent part. Readers only need to read the abstract section to understand all the research contents. Therefore, the abstract is a general description of the full text. The writing of the abstract of the paper lacks logic. The author needs to express the research purpose, methods, results and conclusions logically. Most content of the abstract in the paper is about the background of the research. But the description of the results of the study only mentions "Experimental results with real-life IR sequences indicate encouraging improvements by using our method." It is very simple. In addition, the abstract lacks relevant descriptions of the research conclusions. It is recommended that the author rewrite the abstract to reflect the substantive content of the paper. 2: In the introduction, the author should explain the research significance and innovation more clearly. 3: The conclusion should include a summary of the research content, deficiencies and limitations, as well as put forward a future outlook or research direction. However, the conclusion in this paper only summarizes the research results, and does not reflect the deficiencies, limitations, the future prospects or the research direction. Please confirm and modify accordingly. 4: Reference information should be complete (author, title, periodical name, year of publication, volume, period, page number). It is noted that the three basic information of publication year, volume and page number are required. The information of some references in the paper are incomplete and the format is relatively confusing, especially the author information. Some surnames are first, some names are first, some are abbreviated, and some are not abbreviated. Please check and modify it.In addition, there are many references that are relatively old. The author should cite more references for the last 3 to 5 years. ********** 6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: No Reviewer #2: No [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.] While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step. |
| Revision 1 |
|
Super-Resolution Reconstruction of Real Infrared Images Acquired with Unmanned Aerial Vehicle PONE-D-20-09705R1 Dear Dr. Sun, We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements. Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication. An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org. Kind regards, Zhihan Lv, Ph.D. Academic Editor PLOS ONE Additional Editor Comments (optional): Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation. Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed ********** 2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 6. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: The problem of low infrared imaging resolution limits the application of UAVs in target recognition and other fields to some extent. To this end, the combination of high-resolution image acquisition and low-resolution image processing, and the design of UAV flight optimization path schemes, the preservation of image edge features and the improvement of spatial resolution, as well as the application of the SR method in the field of UAV target recognition play an active role. At the same time, it has promoted the application of UAVs in target detection. In this revision, authors explain and discuss my concerns in details. Related work is surveyed and compared to the proposed method. The paper can be accepted. Reviewer #2: This paper proposes a method combining high-level image acquisition and low-level SR processing. During the integration process, UAV path optimization, sub-pixel image registration and sparse constraints are combined into the computational imaging framework of the region of interest (ROI). At the same time, the optimal flight control scheme is designed to optimize ROI complementary feathers and obtain sufficient image sequences from multiple angles. In particular, the phase correlation method is used to achieve reliable sub-pixel image feature matching. On this basis, an effective sparse regularization model is established to enhance the fine structure of infrared images. Experimental results of actual infrared sequences show that the algorithm has good performance in edge preservation and detail enhancement, and provides a very promising computational imaging method for obtaining high-resolution images. In this revision, authors have already addressed all the comments. Therefore, I am satisfied with their work and suggest to accept this paper. ********** 7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: No Reviewer #2: No |
| Formally Accepted |
|
PONE-D-20-09705R1 Super-Resolution Reconstruction of Real Infrared Images Acquired with Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Dear Dr. Sun: I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org. If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org. Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access. Kind regards, PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff on behalf of Dr. Zhihan Lv Academic Editor PLOS ONE |
Open letter on the publication of peer review reports
PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose to reveal their names.
We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions, to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research system.
Learn more at ASAPbio .