Peer Review History

Original SubmissionJune 17, 2019
Decision Letter - Yulin Gao, Editor

PONE-D-19-17188

Photo-degradation dynamics of five neonicotinoids: bamboo vinegar as synergistic agent for improved duration

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Yue,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Sep 26 2019 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.
  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.
  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Yulin Gao

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

1. When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Overall, this is a systematical study on investigating the photo-degradation of several neonicotinoids under various influencing factors including the initial concentration, light source, water quality and pH value. Moreover, bamboo vinegar has been found that it can serve as an efficient synergistic agent to improve the photo-stability of neonicotinoids, which is the major novelty of this manuscript. The organization and presentation of the manuscript are good. In general, this manuscript is suitable for publication in PLOS ONE after some major revisions.

1. The typical chromatograms of the photo process including photo-degradation intermediates and starting material of the neonicotinoid should be provided.

2. The possible photo-degradation products should be identified and confirmed by comparison with the authentic standards. The possible photo-degradation pathway and product of acetamiprid should be carefully reconsidered.

3. Lines 269-270, by separating and identifying the photo-degradation products of the five neonicotinoids in methanol, it can be inferred that the pathways are mainly photo-oxidation processes. Have you separated and identified these photo-degradation products?

4. Lines 301-302, it can be observed that the main factors that quench the photo-degradation of neonicotinoids in bamboo vinegar are possibly acetic acid and pigments. To confirm your hypothesis, you’d better to use acetic acid and one pigment to test the quenching effect.

Reviewer #2: Nice work, certainly worth publication in PLOS One after some minor revisions. The topic of the manuscript is of high importance in the field and results are very significant, will be useful to scientists working in photodegradation of organic contaminants. The manuscript is well written (perhaps some thorough reading needed to polish and correct typos and mistakes in the final version) and all results are of high interest, providing relevant insights on photodegradation intermediates and improvement use of pesticides by the synergistic effect with bamboo vinegar. The authors are kindly requested to shorten the conclusions (currently too long) and maybe redo some of the Figures of the photodegradation intermediates to ensure high quality in the final manuscript. Otherwise, a nice work worth publication in PLOS One.

Reviewer #3:  Your manuscript submission is interesting and contains information that our readers would find useful.  Unfortunately, the quality of the language is not up to the standards of the journal.

Revision 1

Dear Dr Yulin Gao,

We have revised the manuscript in response to the editor and reviewers’ advice, and the following shows the point by point response to the reviewers’ comments. Additionally, we made some other revisions. All the changes in separate file and labeled ‘Revised Manuscript with Track Changes’ were highlighted in RED.

The language of this manuscript was carefully revised by ‘Elsevier Language Editing’.

We appreciate very much for your time spent on our manuscript and the referees for their valuable suggestions and comments. The revised manuscript has been resubmitted to your journal. We are looking forward to hearing from your final decision when it is made.

Best wishes

Sincerely,

Yongde Yue

22-Aug-2019

Response to reviewers:

Reviewer: 1 

1. The typical chromatograms of the photo process including photo-degradation intermediates and starting material of the neonicotinoid should be provided. 

Response: We have noticed this problem, and agree with you. The necessary information about typical chromatograms of the photo process has been submitted as ‘Supporting Information’ file.

2. The possible photo-degradation products should be identified and confirmed by comparison with the authentic standards. The possible photo-degradation pathway and product of acetamiprid should be carefully reconsidered. 

Response: We have noticed this problem. The photo-degradation product of acetamiprid was identified using LC-Q-TOF-MS with a diode array detector, and which was compared with the results of PhD dissertation ‘Study on Hydrolytic and Photolytic Behavior of Acetamiprid in Environment’ that was completed by Dr. Guohong Xie.

3. Lines 269-270, by separating and identifying the photo-degradation products of the five neonicotinoids in methanol, it can be inferred that the pathways are mainly photo-oxidation processes. Have you separated and identified these photo-degradation products? 

Response: We have modified this sentence. We didn’t separated the photo-degradation products, and standards of five neonicotinoids were prepared at 10 mg/L using methanol, then were photo-treated using the high-pressure mercury lamp, and a darkness control was set. Finally, the photo-degradation product samples were detected using LC-Q-TOF-MS.

4.Lines 301-302, it can be observed that the main factors that quench the photo-degradation of neonicotinoids in bamboo vinegar are possibly acetic acid and pigments. To confirm your hypothesis, you’d better to use acetic acid and one pigment to test the quenching effect.

Response: We have noticed this statement, and agree with you. We have modified this sentence. In our study about the photo-degradation of five neonicotinoids with different pH value, in an acidic buffer solution, the photo-degradation rate was low, whereas in neutral and alkaline buffer solutions, the rate was relatively high and generally increased with increasing pH. And then compared with literature which listed as 47, 48, and 69-79 in the manuscript, the hypothesis was obtained. Of course, we will confirm that in the following in-depth study.

Thanks to reviewer’s suggestion, it’s very carefully.

Reviewer: 2

Thank you for such high rating of this manuscript. We have polished and corrected typos and mistakes, and the language of this manuscript was carefully revised by ‘Elsevier Language Editing’. We have modified the conclusions part according the suggestion.

Reviewer: 3

Thank you for such high rating to the results of this manuscript, and we are regret to the quality of the language. Then, we have polished and corrected typos and mistakes, and the language of this manuscript was carefully revised by ‘Elsevier Language Editing’.

Thanks to reviewer’s comments and suggestions.

Attachments
Attachment
Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.doc
Decision Letter - Yulin Gao, Editor

[EXSCINDED]

PONE-D-19-17188R1

Photo-degradation dynamics of five neonicotinoids: bamboo vinegar as synergistic agent for improved duration

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Yue,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Oct 19 2019 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.
  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.
  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Yulin Gao

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

 Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #3: Your manuscript submission is interesting and contains information that our readers would find useful. AND also this revision looks more better than before, Unfortunately, the quality of the language is not up to the standards of the journal.  language error still can be see in the current version.I suggest you may wish to consider having your paper professionally edited for English language by a native English speaker and/or a professional language editing service here before resubmitting this manuscript: http://www.zn16289208.icoc.bz/ http://www.unlecture.com/http://www.goodenglish.com/http://www.journalexpert.com/which specialise in editing scientific and technical research papers written in English by authors who are not native English speakers.Please note that while this service will greatly improve the readability of your paper, it does not guarantee acceptance of your paper by the journal. 

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Rafael Luque

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Revision 2

Dear Dr Yulin Gao,

We have revised the manuscript in response to the editor and reviewers’ advice, and the following shows the point by point response to the reviewers’ comments. Additionally, we made some other revisions. All the changes in separate file and labeled ‘Revised Manuscript with Track Changes’ were highlighted.

The language of this manuscript was carefully revised by ‘AJE Language Editing’ again.

We appreciate very much for your time spent on our manuscript and the referees for their valuable suggestions and comments. The revised manuscript has been resubmitted to your journal. We are looking forward to hearing from your final decision when it is made.

Best wishes

Sincerely,

Yongde Yue

15-Sep-2019

Response to reviewers:

Reviewer #3: Your manuscript submission is interesting and contains information that our readers would find useful. AND also this revision looks more better than before, Unfortunately, the quality of the language is not up to the standards of the journal. language error still can be see in the current version.

I suggest you may wish to consider having your paper professionally edited for English language by a native English speaker and/or a professional language editing service here before resubmitting this manuscript:

http://www.zn16289208.icoc.bz/

http://www.unlecture.com/

http://www.goodenglish.com/

http://www.journalexpert.com/

which specialise in editing scientific and technical research papers written in English by authors who are not native English speakers.

Please note that while this service will greatly improve the readability of your paper, it does not guarantee acceptance of your paper by the journal.

Thanks to reviewer’s suggestion, it’s very carefully.

Response: Thank you for such high rating to the results of this manuscript, and we are regret to the quality of the language. Then, we have polished and corrected typos and mistakes, and the language of this manuscript was carefully revised by ‘AJE Language Editing’ according your suggestion.

Thanks to reviewer’s comments and suggestions.

Attachments
Attachment
Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx
Decision Letter - Yulin Gao, Editor

PONE-D-19-17188R2

Photo-degradation dynamics of five neonicotinoids: bamboo vinegar as a synergistic agent for improved functional duration

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Yue,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

ACADEMIC EDITOR: although the  revised ms looks much better,still lots of language mistakes can be easy found, again, this is the last time to reminders.

==============================

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Nov 08 2019 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.
  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.
  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Yulin Gao

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Revision 3

Dear Dr Yulin Gao,

We have revised the manuscript in response to the editor’ advice, and the following shows the point by point response to the editor’ comments. Additionally, we made some other revisions. All the changes in separate file and labeled ‘Revised Manuscript with Track Changes’ were highlighted.

The language of this manuscript was carefully revised and modified by Prof. Rafael Luque.

We appreciate very much for your time spent on our manuscript and the valuable suggestions and comments. The revised manuscript has been resubmitted to your journal. We are looking forward to hearing from your final decision when it is made.

Best wishes

Sincerely,

Yongde Yue

25-Sep-2019

Response to editor:

Editor: After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Response: Thank you for such high rating to the results of this manuscript, and we are regret to the quality of the language. Then, we have polished and corrected typos and mistakes, and the language of this manuscript was carefully revised and modified by Prof. Rafael Luque.

Thanks to editor’s comments and suggestions.

Attachments
Attachment
Submitted filename: Response to Editor.docx
Decision Letter - Yulin Gao, Editor

Photo-degradation dynamics of five neonicotinoids: bamboo vinegar as a synergistic agent for improved functional duration

PONE-D-19-17188R3

Dear Dr. Yue,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it complies with all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you will receive an e-mail containing information on the amendments required prior to publication. When all required modifications have been addressed, you will receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will proceed to our production department and be scheduled for publication.

Shortly after the formal acceptance letter is sent, an invoice for payment will follow. To ensure an efficient production and billing process, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, you must inform our press team as soon as possible and no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

With kind regards,

Yulin Gao

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Formally Accepted
Acceptance Letter - Yulin Gao, Editor

PONE-D-19-17188R3

Photo-degradation dynamics of five neonicotinoids: bamboo vinegar as a synergistic agent for improved functional duration

Dear Dr. Yue:

I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

For any other questions or concerns, please email plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE.

With kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Yulin Gao

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Open letter on the publication of peer review reports

PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose to reveal their names.

We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions, to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research system.

Learn more at ASAPbio .