Fig 1.
Stimuli presented in Experiments 1 and 2 in the Lewkowicz et al. (2021) and in the current study.
The video stimuli presented in the Lewkowicz et al. (2021) study can be viewed at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104743 and the video stimuli presented in the current study can be viewed at https://osf.io/swzat/?view_only=e571661179694ec4a8cf1a8817af6b64. The V utterances all began at the same time but were temporally jittered with respect to one another, meaning that the starting point of 3 of the 4 V utterances was increasingly later into the utterance relative to the starting point of the first V utterance.
Fig 2.
Selective attention to the temporally desynchronized (distractor) and synchronized (target) talking faces in the synchrony and asynchrony conditions in Experiment 1.
Mean proportion of total looking time (PTLT) at the distractor and target faces across the two synchrony conditions. Error bars represent standard errors of the mean. The data underlying this figure can be found at https://osf.io/swzat/overview?view_only=e571661179694ec4a8cf1a8817af6b64.
Fig 3.
Selective attention to each distractor face as well as the target face across the two synchrony conditions in Experiment 1.
Mean looking time in seconds directed to each distractor face as well as the target face in the synchrony and the asynchrony condition in Experiment 1. Error bars represent standard errors of the mean. The data underlying this figure can be found at https://osf.io/swzat/overview?view_only=e571661179694ec4a8cf1a8817af6b64.
Fig 4.
Selective attention to the eyes and mouth in Experiment 1.
Mean proportion of total looking time to the eyes and mouth of the distractors and the target, respectively, in the two synchrony conditions in Experiment 1. Error bars represent standard errors of the mean. The data underlying this figure can be found at https://osf.io/swzat/overview?view_only=e571661179694ec4a8cf1a8817af6b64.
Fig 5.
Selective attention to the temporally desynchronized (distractor) and synchronized (target) talking faces in the synchrony and asynchrony conditions in Experiment 2.
Mean proportion of total looking time (PTLT) at the distractor and target faces across the two synchrony conditions. Error bars represent standard errors of the mean. The data underlying this figure can be found at https://osf.io/swzat/overview?view_only=e571661179694ec4a8cf1a8817af6b64.
Fig 6.
Selective attention to the eyes and mouth in Experiment 2.
Mean proportion of total looking time to the eyes and mouth of the distractors and the target, respectively, in the two synchrony conditions in Experiment 2. Error bars represent standard errors of the mean. The data underlying this figure can be found at https://osf.io/swzat/overview?view_only=e571661179694ec4a8cf1a8817af6b64.
Fig 7.
Average pupil diameter as a function of trials in the synchrony and asynchrony conditions in Experiment 2 in Experiment 1 for comparison. Error bars represent standard errors of the mean. The data underlying this figure can be found at https://osf.io/swzat/overview?view_only=e571661179694ec4a8cf1a8817af6b64.
Fig 8.
Comparison of selective attention to the eyes and mouth in Experiment 1 in the current study versus Experiment 1 in the Lewkowicz et al. [1] study.
Mean proportion of total looking time to the eyes and mouth of the distractors and the target, respectively, in the synchrony and asynchrony conditions across the two experiments. Error bars represent standard errors of the mean. The data underlying this figure can be found at https://osf.io/swzat/overview?view_only=e571661179694ec4a8cf1a8817af6b64.
Fig 9.
Comparison of selective attention to talking faces in Experiment 2 in the current study and Experiment 2 in Lewkowicz et al. [1].
The comparison is represented by PTLT difference scores computed by subtracting the distractor PTLT scores from the target PTLT scores. Error bars represent standard errors of the mean. The data underlying this figure can be found at https://osf.io/swzat/overview?view_only=e571661179694ec4a8cf1a8817af6b64.