Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of the study participants (N = 140).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Descriptive summary of the four urinary biomarkers between exposed and control groups (N = 140).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Descriptive summary of serum biomarkers comparing means of exposed and control groups (N = 24).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Disease symptoms and changes noticed in both dry cleaners and hotel laundry workers (N = 140).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Independent t-Test result of the log-transformed urinary biomarkers and serum biomarkers between exposed and control groups.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Comparison of Renal Function (eGFR) by Occupational Group.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Point-Biserial correlation result between log10 transformed urinary biomarkers and risk factors.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Spearman correlation result between ordinal risk factors and urinary biomarkers.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Fig 1.

Clustered Bar graph comparing abnormal urinary biomarkers between dry cleaners and hotel laundry workers (N = 17 (TPU), N = 26 (Urinary creatinine), N = 97 (calcium), N = 8 (sodium)).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 9.

Multiple linear regression model showing significantly associated indicators for Urinary protein to creatinine ratio.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Table 10.

Multiple linear regression model showing significantly associated indicators for total protein.

More »

Table 10 Expand