Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Multi-sensor performance evaluation metric system and corresponding scoring [10,11].

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Influence coefficients of varying UAV flying heights on sensor performance.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Flowchart for multi-sensor fusion scheme selection based on improved AHP-TOPSIS.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 3.

Specific requirements for sensor environmental adaptability and hazard response capability in four major areas.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Random consistency check table.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Scale and meaning of two judgment matrices.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Improved AHP evaluation metric weights table.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 2.

Comparison of evaluation metric weights in diverse areas.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 7.

Ideal solution distance and closeness results of each sensor in the rural level highway area (flying height 5-20 m).

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Closeness and ranking of sensors across four areas at different heights.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Screening results of sensor fusion solutions for four major areas at different flight heights.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Table 10.

Optimal sensor fusion scheme for different areas and heights.

More »

Table 10 Expand