Fig 1.
Technology roadmap.
Table 1.
Chemical composition of cement, glass sand and rice husk ash (Unit: %).
Table 2.
Mix ratio (Unit: kg/m3).
Fig 2.
EDS experimental instrument.
Fig 3.
Chloride ion erosion tester.
Fig 4.
Carbonization box.
Fig 5.
Sulfate dry and wet cycle test machine.
Table 3.
Slump test results.
Fig 6.
Slump fitting results.
Fig 7.
Calculation results of water absorption.
Table 4.
Pearson correlation coefficient.
Fig 8.
Compressive strength.
Fig 9.
Splitting tensile strength.
Fig 10.
Flexural strength.
Table 5.
Calculation results of grey correlation degree.
Table 6.
Silica-calcium ratio of C-S-H gel in WGRC.
Fig 11.
Normal stress and shear stress of samples with different silicon-calcium ratios: (a) 0.34, (b) 0.4, (c) 0.46, (d) 0.52, (e) 0.58, (f) 0.64, (g) 0.7, (h) 0.76.
Table 7.
Cohesion and internal friction angle.
Fig 12.
Shear stress-shear strain curves of samples with different silicon-calcium ratios: (a) 0.34, (b) 0.4, (c) 0.46, (d) 0.52, (e) 0.58, (f) 0.64, (g) 0.7, (h) 0.76.
Table 8.
Parameter fitting results.
Fig 13.
Comparison of experimental curves and theoretical curves of samples with different silicon-calcium ratios: (a) 0.34, (b) 0.4, (c) 0.46, (d) 0.52, (e) 0.58, (f) 0.64, (g) 0.7, (h) 0.76.
Fig 14.
SEM morphologies of samples with different silicon-calcium ratios: (a) 0.34, (b) 0.4, (c) 0.46, (d) 0.52, (e) 0.58, (f) 0.64, (g) 0.7, (h) 0.76.
Table 9.
Electric flux.
Table 10.
Carbonization depth of WGRC at different carbonization times (Unit: mm).
Table 11.
Carbonization coefficients of WGRC at different carbonization times (Unit: mm/√d).
Table 12.
Experimental results of pH value.
Table 13.
Calculation results of mass loss rate.
Table 14.
Ultrasonic wave velocity test results (Unit: km/s).