Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Summary statistics of the sample.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

The effect of PM2.5 on catastrophic health expenditure.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Results of linear probability model and instrumental variable estimation.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Estimates at different thresholds for catastrophic health expenditure.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Estimates after winsorizing the out-of-pocket health expenditure.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Estimates after adding city covariates.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Estimates after including observations with missing data for categorical covariates.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

The effect of PM2.5 on the direct costs of diseases.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

The effect of PM2.5 on labor supply.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Fig 1.

Heterogeneity analysis of PM2.5 effects on catastrophic health expenditure.

This figure presents subgroup analyses by residence, age, education, and chronic disease. The diamonds represent the estimated marginal effects of PM2.5 exposure, and horizontal bars represent the 90% confidence interval. All regressions included individual covariates, weather covariates, year dummies, and individual random effects. Robust standard errors in parentheses are clustered at the household level. CI, Confidence Interval.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 10.

The moderating effects of social health insurance types.

More »

Table 10 Expand