Table 1.
Descriptive statistics of socio-demographic characteristics.
Fig 1.
Coherence design diagram.
Table 2.
Combination of information entropy values with landscape complexity and corresponding plant types and quantities (scene-level totals fixed at 48 plants for all three complexity levels).
Fig 2.
Complexity and coherence virtual scene (Created by the authors using Enscape software).
Fig 3.
Timeline of experimental procedure and sampling (one visit).
Table 3.
Presents the results of an ANOVA that examines the recovery values of physiological and psychological indicators across different groups.
Table 4.
The P-value matrix for the post-hoc analysis of ANOVA conducted for the pairwise comparisons in the SCL analysis.
Table 5.
Descriptive statistics of recovery capabilities are presented for three levels of coherence and complexity: low, moderate, and high.
Table 6.
Displays the outcomes of ANOVA for the physiological and psychological recovery values of participants across the three levels of coherence scenes.
Table 7.
Displays the outcomes of ANOVA for the physiological and psychological recovery values of participants across the three levels of complexity scenes.
Table 8.
Post-hoc comparisons of landscape coherence and complexity between different types of setting.
Table 9.
The results of intergroup main effects analysis on four physiological and psychological indicators were examined through a general linear model.
Fig 4.
The mean recovery values of physiological and psychological indicators for the ten.
Fig 5.
Box plots depicting the recovery values of physiological and psychological indicators among subjects in landscapes characterized by coherence and complexity.