Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Imaging parameters of the 4D flow MRI sequence.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Placement of the double oblique axes to obtain the PA measurement plane.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Placement of the plane at the level of the pulmonary valve (top).

After contouring, visualization of the streamlines during diastole showing a narrowing due to the valve leakage (bottom).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Baseline characteristics of the two groups of patients.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Pulmonary pressures and resistances in RHC according to PH groups.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 3.

Examples of vortices observed through the PA streamlines (arrows), compared to a normal appearance (left panel).

RHC mPAP was 22 mmHg, 30 mmHg and 60 mmHg from left to right panel, respectively. Bias (solid lines) and LOA (dashed lines) are displayed.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 4.

Hemodynamic and morphological measurements from RHC and MRI.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Correlations between PAPm or PAPs and MRI measurements.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Multiple linear regression models.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 4.

Scatter plots with regression lines and Bland-Altman plots for the comparison between MRI pressure estimations (mPAP and sPAP) and pulmonary arterial pressures measured via RHC.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 8.

Bland-Altman bootstrap analysis.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 7.

Hemodynamic and morphological measurements from RHC and MRI.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig 5.

Bland-Altman plots comparing MRI pressure estimations (mPAP and sPAP) from the calculated model with pulmonary arterial pressures measured via RHC in the validation cohort.

More »

Fig 5 Expand