Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Summary of symbols, meanings, and tensor shapes used in the proposed method.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Schematic of the MedSpectralNet architecture with parallelizable convolutional operations.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Structure of the SpectralFlow Module.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

ContextGate block with three pathways: spatial (depthwise conv + SpectralFlow), gating (pointwise conv + GELU), and identity (pointwise conv).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Training and test loss (left) and accuracy (right) curves for MedSpectralNet on OrganCMNIST dataset over 200 epochs.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Confusion matrix for MedSpectralNet on OrganCMNIST dataset showing class-wise prediction distribution across 11 organ categories.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Multi-class ROC results of MedSpectralNet on the OrganCMNIST dataset.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Multi-class PRC results of MedSpectralNet on the OrganCMNIST dataset.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Training and test loss (left) and accuracy (right) curves for MedSpectralNet on OrganSMNIST dataset over 200 epochs.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Confusion matrix for MedSpectralNet on OrganSMNIST dataset showing class-wise prediction distribution across 11 organ categories.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Multi-class ROC results of MedSpectralNet on the OrganSMNIST dataset.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Multi-class PRC results of MedSpectralNet on the OrganSMNIST dataset.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Grad-CAM visualization for ContextGate Block on BreastMNIST.

Class 0 (normal) shows distributed attention suggesting holistic assessment, while Class 1 (abnormal) focuses on suspicious regions, reflecting adaptive gating behavior.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Grad-CAM for SpectralFlow Module on BreastMNIST.

Visualizations show precise, localized activations on diagnostically relevant regions in Class 1, while Class 0 displays more distributed patterns.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Table 2.

Ablation study of different optimizers and augmentation strategies on the BreastMNIST dataset. The best performance is highlighted in bold.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Accuracy comparison of MedSpectralNet with benchmark models across selected datasets.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Computational efficiency comparison on medical image classification. FLOPs measured in giga floating-point operations (G).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 14.

Parameter size required by MedSpectralNet in comparison to benchmark models.

More »

Fig 14 Expand