Fig 1.
Technical Route for Indicator Selection and Validation.
Table 1.
Consistency of Expert Opinions (Secondary Indicators).
Table 2.
Consistency of Expert Opinions (Tertiary Indicators).
Fig 2.
The Comprehensive Evaluation Index System for Social Practice in Chinese Universities.
Table 3.
1–5 Rating Scale and Explanation.
Table 4.
Average Random Consistency Index (RI) Values.
Table 5.
Judgment matrix of secondary indicators under the social practice background A by experts.
Table 6.
Consistency Check of Secondary Indicators under Social Practice Background by Experts.
Table 7.
Weight Assignment of the Comprehensive Evaluation Index System for Social Practice in Chinese Universities.
Fig 3.
Weight of Primary Indicators in the Comprehensive Evaluation of Social Practice in Chinese Universities.
Fig 4.
Weight of Secondary Indicators in the Comprehensive Evaluation of Social Practice in Chinese Universities.
Fig 5.
Weights of Tertiary Indicators under the Background of Social Practice.
Fig 6.
Weights of Tertiary Indicators under the Input of Social Practice.
Fig 7.
Weights of Tertiary Indicators under the Implementation of Social Practice.
Fig 8.
Weights of Tertiary Indicators under the Outcomes of Social Practice.