Table 1.
Summary of interaction patterns between hospitals and block groups.
Fig 1.
Hospitals’ dynamic catchment area.
Fig 2.
Block groups’ dynamic catchment sizes.
Table 2.
Summary of distance decay model calibration.
Fig 3.
Two samples of the distribution of visits over distance comparing the fitted power-law and exponential models.
a) Example of Power-Law distance decay. b) Example of Exponential distance decay.
Fig 4.
Accessibility map based on E2SFCA and default parameters.
Fig 5.
Accessibility map based on revised E2SFCA.
Fig 6.
Comparative correlation of traditional and revised accessibility models with health outcomes.
a) The E2SFCA with default values. b) Revised E2SFCA.
Fig 7.
Accessibility and income: validating spatial models against socioeconomic indicators.
a) The E2SFCA with default values. b) Revised E2SFCA.
Table 3.
Quantitative comparison of spatial inequality and clustering.