Fig 1.
Regional Location Map (The map was simplified and redrawn by the authors based on fieldsurveys and coordinates; no copyrighted base maps were used).
Fig 2.
Research framework.
Fig 3.
Differences in the assessment of social values between resident and non-resident visitors.
Table 1.
Types and descriptions of social values and some representative high frequency words.
Fig 4.
Relationship between various types of social values and natural factor conditions.
Table 2.
Geospatial data description.
Fig 5.
Luo gang Park Environmental Elements Layer.
(The map was simplified and redrawn by the authors based on fieldsurveys and coordinates; no copyrighted base maps were used.).
Fig 6.
Density distribution of social value point kernel in Luogang Park, Hefei City (The map was simplified and redrawn by the authors based on fieldsurveys and coordinates; no copyrighted base maps were used).
Table 3.
Maximum value index and spatial clustering analysis of various values in Luogang Park.
Fig 7.
Spatial distribution of various types of social values in Luogang Park(The map was simplified and redrawn by the authors based on fieldsurveys and coordinates; no copyrighted base maps were used).
Fig 8.
Relationship between various types of social values and the density of service facility points.
Fig 9.
Percentage stacking of the contribution of geo-environmental elements to the distribution of social value types.
Table 4.
AUC values for each type of social value in Luogang Park.
Fig 10.
Comparative Validation of Perceptual Evaluation Based on Social Media Data.