Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Participants’ characteristics per experimental conditions.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Virtual Stress Scenario.

Left: high-stress; right: low-stress condition.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Experimental Procedure of the VST.

Key measurement time points inside and outside VR.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Cortisol Responder Rate (in %) per experimental condition.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Manipulation check.

On the left, maximal stress ratings per stress condition are displayed, on the right, externalization ratings per audio condition.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Social Presence.

On the left: measured with the subscale of the MPS; on the right: with rating scales within the VR scene.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Social Presence rating as a function of stress and audio manipulation at two different measurement time points.

Error bars indicate the standard error.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Log-transformed mean salivary cortisol (nmol/l) in response to the VST as a function of audio and stress.

Error bars indicate the standard error.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Mean heart rate in beats per minute in response to the VST as a function of stress and audio manipulation.

Error bars indicate the standard error.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Mean stress rating as a function of stress and audio manipulation at five different measurement time points.

Error bars indicate the standard error.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Social Anxiety and Audio.

Social presence rating (on the left) and subscale of the MPS (right) as a function of audio and social anxiety (SPIN median split).

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Table 3.

Means of outcome variables in individual and generic HRIRs audio conditions and the Bayes factor for an independent samples t-test of H0.

More »

Table 3 Expand