Table 1.
Demographic and clinical characteristics of participants.
Table 2.
Estimated marginal means (EMM) of perceived externalization probability for each group (patients vs. controls) across sound types.
Fig 1.
Degree of perceived externalization (sound source perceived as outside the head) for the three types of sound processing (diotic; HRTF: Head Related Transfer Function; BRIR: Binaural Room Impulse Response) in healthy controls (n = 24) and patients with schizophrenia (n = 23).
***p < .001; **p < 0.01.
Table 3.
Estimated marginal means (EMM) of perceived externalization probability for each group (patients vs. controls) across emotions.
Table 4.
Estimated marginal means (EMM, predicted probabilities) and odds ratios (OR) of perceived externalization for each emotion relative to neutral, separately for each sound type.
Fig 2.
Degree of perceived externalization (sound source perceived as outside the head) across the six emotional contents of sounds, averaged across participant groups (n = 47) and types of sound processing.
Results are presented as mean in percent ± one standard deviation. *p < .05.
Fig 3.
Reality monitoring performance presenting the number of correct source attributions for imagined, heard and new words and the number of source misattributions (heard words recognized as imagined and imagined words recognized as heard) in healthy controls (n = 24) compared with patients with schizophrenia (n = 23).
Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation. *p < .05.