Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Comparison of characteristics between the recovery and no-recovery group.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

OR for the hearing threshold of the contralateral in relation to treatment failure.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Distribution of the contralateral hearing threshold in Recovery and No-recovery groups. Green dots represent the contralateral hearing thresholds of the Recovery group (n = 234), and red dots represent the contralateral hearing thresholds of the No-recovery group (n = 211). Each dot corresponds to an individual subject. The difference between the two groups was compared using the Mann-Whitney U test, and the result was statistically significant (P < 0.001).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 3.

Analysis of the influence of contralateral hearing threshold with age, diabetes, hypertension, duration of illness and audiometric curves on outcome of treatment.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis of influencing factors of outcome of treatment.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 2.

Receiver Operating Characteristic curve of different multi factor models for predicting ISSNHL prognosis. Fig 2 demonstrates the application of multivariate logistic regression analysis. Model 1 includes five variables: age, diabetes, hypertension, disease duration, and hearing curve. Model 2 adds the variable of contralateral hearing. The results indicate that the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for Model 2 is significantly larger (AUC: 0.678, 95% CI: 0.628-0.727).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 5.

Treatment outcomes of contralateral normal hearing group and contralateral SNHL group.

More »

Table 5 Expand