Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Comparison of macrophages morphology in bone marrow.

(a) A representative image of non-activated macrophages and non-hemophagocytes. (b) A representative image of activated macrophages and non-hemophagocytes. (c) A representative image of activated macrophages and hemophagocytes. Arrowheads show phagocytized red blood cells, Scale bar = 10 μm.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics at the time of bone marrow aspiration.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Laboratory findings at the time of bone marrow aspiration.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Correlation between serum presepsin levels and other biomarkers including bone marrow aspiration findings.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

Correlation between serum presepsin levels and bone marrow aspiration findings.

(a) Correlation with number of macrophages. (b) Correlation with number of hemophagocytes. The scores are calculated using Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficients. p < 0.05, 100 LPF: 100 fields of view at low power fields.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Comparison of macrophage marker and presepsin precursor protein expression in the lymph node and bone marrow.

IHC is performed using CD68 (PG-M1) and CD14 (D7A2T) antibodies. The panels (a-c) show negative staining and (d-f) show positive staining for hemophagocytosis in the lymph node. Similarly, the panels (g-i) show negative staining and (j-l) show positive staining for hemophagocytosis in the bone marrow. Arrowheads show phagocytic cells. Scale bar = 50 μm.

More »

Fig 3 Expand