Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Exclusion criteria of the study.

The chronological order of the exclusions is reflected in the sequence.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Frequency distribution of MTS urgency levels in the five MTS levels.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Top three presentational flow charts within the five different urgency levels.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Top three discriminator questions within the five different urgency levels.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Frequency distribution of the types of patient admission (outpatient, normal ward, intensive care unit).

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 2.

AUC values from ROC analysis for the decade 2014–2023 in terms of “admission in general” and “admission to intensive care unit”.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 6.

AUC values from ROC analysis for the decade 2014–2023 in terms of “admission in general” and “admission to intensive care unit”.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 3.

AUC values from ROC analysis in the decade 2014–2023 in terms of “short-term mortality (< 12 hours)” and “30-day mortality”.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Death in the decade 2014–2023 in terms of “short-term mortality (< 12 hours)” and “30-day mortality” in the urgency levels “red” and “orange”.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 7.

Kaplan-Meier curve in terms of “12-hour survival probability” comparing 2014 and 2023.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Kaplan-Meier curve in terms of “30-day survival probability” comparing 2014 and 2023.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

AUC values from ROC analysis in the decade 2014–2023 in terms of “short-term mortality (< 12 hours)” and “30-day mortality”.

More »

Fig 9 Expand