Table 1.
Monthly climatic data and UV index scores during outdoor weathering.
Table 2.
Shapiro-Wilk test of normality.
Table 3.
Analysis of variance and mean squares in between and within groups in terms of surface roughness.
Table 4.
The surface roughness (μm) results of the study.
Fig 1.
The surface roughness of non-weathered MFSE with no NF.
Fig 2.
The surface roughness of non-weathered MFSE with 3% SiO2.
Fig 3.
The surface roughness of non-weathered MFSE with 10% SiO2.
Fig 4.
The surface roughness of non-weathered MFSE with 3% TiO2.
Fig 5.
The surface roughness of non-weathered MFSE with 10% TiO2.
Fig 6.
The surface roughness of the weathered MFSE with No NF.
Fig 7.
The surface roughness of the weathered MFSE with 3% SiO2.
Fig 8.
The surface roughness of the weathered MFSE with 10% SiO2.
Fig 9.
The surface roughness of the weathered MFSE with 3% TiO2.
Fig 10.
The surface roughness of the weathered MFSE with 10% TiO2.
Table 5.
Test of normality (Shapiro-Wilk test) for the surface hardness.
Table 6.
Analysis of variance and mean squares in between and within groups in terms of surface hardness.
Table 7.
The hardness (Shore A) results of the study.
Fig 11.
FTIR analysis of MFSE with No NF before (1) and after weather (2), showing the zone of wavenumbers.
The main Peaks are concentrated in the fingerprint zone.
Fig 12.
FTIR analysis of MFSE with 10% SiO2 NF before (1) and after weather (2), showing the zone of wavenumbers.
The main Peaks are concentrated in the fingerprint zone.
Fig 13.
FTIR analysis of MFSE with 10% TiO2 NF before (1) and after weather (2), showing the zone of wavenumbers.
The main Peaks are concentrated in the fingerprint zone.