Table 1.
Characteristics of the participants (n = 39).
Table 2.
Round-by-round agreement and final consensus designation for each candidate item (n = 114), organized by domain/category (Domains 1–7).
Fig 1.
The flow of rounds throughout the e-Delphi study and summary of consensus outcomes.
In Round 1, consensus for inclusion (≥70% of panelists rating an item as 4 [recommended] or 5 [highly recommended]) was achieved for 104 of 114 items, and 10 items were carried forward to Round 2. In Round 2, one additional item met the inclusion criterion, resulting in 105 items included as minimum standards (64 classified as “highly recommended” and 41 as “recommended”) and nine items with no consensus. Items are organized by domain/category in Table 2 and S4 Table, and a domain-level summary of final designations is provided in S5 Table to enable rapid identification of areas with stronger consensus (items classified as “highly recommended”).