Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Comparison of existing frameworks integrating SVR with other machine learning models for missing value imputation in non-class attributes.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Key contributions of the proposed SGA-DT framework in addressing identified research gaps.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Proposed SGA-DT framework.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 3.

SVR hyperparameters and genetic algorithm configuration.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Characteristics of datasets.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Performance results of various integrated frameworks across all the datasets.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 2.

Performance comparison of SGA-DT with other integrated frameworks in terms of accuracy.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Performance comparison of SGA-DT with other integrated frameworks in terms of precision.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Performance comparison of SGA-DT with other integrated frameworks in terms of recall.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Performance comparison of SGA-DT with other integrated frameworks in terms of F-measure.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Boxplot analysis of performance metrics for SGA-DT and other integrated frameworks.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Effect of percentage of missing value on various performance parameters.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Pruned decision tree generated for Breast Cancer dataset (ccp_alpha = 0.003).

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Pruned decision tree generated for Mammographic dataset (ccp_alpha = 0.003).

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Pruned decision tree generated for Hepatitis dataset (ccp_alpha = 0.007).

More »

Fig 10 Expand