Fig 1.
Common complex thin plate components.
Fig 2.
Research flowchart.
Fig 3.
Finite element model of ship components.
Table 1.
Comparison of two algorithms.
Fig 4.
Diagram of particle velocity update in the classical multi-objective particle swarm algorithm.
Fig 5.
Particle update rate in multi-objective particle swarm algorithm after adding a perturbation term.
Table 2.
Comparison of key parameters between present simulation and literature data [421].
Table 3.
Physical property parameters of Q345.
Fig 6.
(a) Material heat transfer properties (b) Mechanical properties of materials.
Fig 7.
Thermophysical properties of Q345 material.
Fig 8.
Network pattern division of ship deck structural members.
Fig 9.
Two-dimensional plan view of ship deck structural members.
Table 4.
Main parameters of the algorithm.
Fig 10.
Convergence curves of different algorithms.
Table 5.
Information on the optimal assembly sequence.
Table 6.
Quantitative comparison of optimization results for different algorithms.
Fig 11.
Average z-axis displacement.
Fig 12.
Z-axis displacement distribution of Line 1.
Fig 13.
Z-axis displacement distribution of Line 2.
Fig 14.
Z-axis displacement distribution of line 3.
Table 7.
Results of the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test (IMaOPSO vs. Benchmarks).